Talk:Mailbag 52

Goddamn, this one hits hard. I predict a repeat of the All-Asperchu mailbag. Isarko 03:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Close enough. Half of the letters have a "neutral reply", including the Mike Jackson email(Make a section for these, count it as Gone Forever). He's clearly doing this because he's been called out on rejecting/deleting and doesn't realize that it makes him look like more of a jackass.--MoarLurk 01:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

WELP
I guess given the Simonchu issue this won't be answered soon. ExplodingSims 06:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The CWCipedia has recently been unfrozen, so Chris may just answer these letters later. --BreadGod 14:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If those phone calls are anything to go by, then Chris was planning to do this mailbag only a little while before the CWCipedia was frozen out. I predict that he'll cover this very soon. I just wonder though how he will ansew these. A lot of them are addressing issues long since past. Specifically, I wonder how he will react to Evan's emails demanding Simonla be removed or Mike Jackson's widow? --Edward 16:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Considering the fact that Chris has no empathy or remorse, he'll probably tell Mike Jackson's widow to get over it. --BreadGod 16:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably not that bluntly though. I think it'll be something along the lines of 'I'm sos sorry I feel for you. I know its difficult but you have to move past this tragic event and get on with your life.' All bets are off as to whether or not he will tell her to find a new husband and father for her children though. --Edward 02:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Boy was I ever wrong. Chris is a bigger prick than I thought.--Edward 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts.
Oh great, now Chris is going to half-ass his responses? At this point, I would rather let him reject my letter outright. --BreadGod 04:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You make it sound likehe didn't half ass them before.--Sonichuistehcool 05:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * He... he used that as his response to Mike Jackson's Death. Fucking shit.--Beat 05:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56. --Edward 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That sounds like an awesome idea. --BreadGod 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--MoarLurk 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --Edward 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --Torvalr 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Then we'll have to keep pestering Chris until he finally starts to give genuine responses again. --BreadGod 15:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The beauty of Chris's SysOp being a combination of two trolls is that they can tell him what they want and set action in motion ('legal' action, perhaps) through other trolls to threaten the CWCipedia and force compliance if he disobeys. We'll get him writing proper responses soon, I'm sure of it. Even if he relapses, the powers that be can push him back. - Liquid! 18:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)