Talk:List of Chris's edits to Encyclopedia Dramatica

To do
This article is gonna need a ton of work to make it more presentable. My focus has been on just compiling all the information, but we'll want to organize it so it reads a little nicer. Some of the larger chunks of copypasta ought to be moved to other articles, now that we have some useful way to source them. --MachPunch 04:06, 16 March 2009 (CET)


 * If you've got the actual quote where Chris says he mass debates to Excel Saga, I'd like to put it in that article. I'm gonna have to go back in that one and take out about four or five "probably's" now.  Geez.  I knew he fapped to the show, but having first-person confirmation just makes it even more gross.  Dethchemist77 04:38, 16 March 2009 (CET)


 * Right here . He doesn't say it in so many words, he just alludes to masturbating and redlinks to "Excel Saga Anime".  --MachPunch 14:46, 16 March 2009 (CET)

We should link directly to the images Chris uploaded, that is the Rule 34, like if Chris uploaded Foo.jpg, then we'd say  Foo.jpg  (I'm saying this since not everyone knows how to link directly to images. --Champthom 10:18, 26 November 2009 (CET)

Wait wut?
"He also calls being gay VICE, and cites Dr. Kinsey. The only famous Dr. Kinsey I know agreed with everything he just said (Rent the Kinsey movie "R" rated or Unrated from your local movie store). But yet again, a 25 year old virgin knows all about love, especially after fucking a plastic woman full of his hot air now and then." He... HE changed it to that? HE changed it to that. WHAT? William Maize 04:09, 16 March 2009 (CET)


 * I've watched "Kinsey", and I think the line Chris has always been misconstruing is the part where Liam Neeson grumbles about how society imposes narrow limits on sexual behavior "and everything else is vice". I don't know if the real Dr. Kinsey ever said that, but when the movie version says the line, he's merely framing his viewpoint of his opposition, and Chris took his words as Kinsey's own opinion.
 * I've always found this strange, because it suggests that Chris watched "Kinsey" and didn't understand it at all. That's believable enough, but you'd think the part where Kinsey fucks Chris O'Donnel after visiting a gay bar would have made things clear. Dethchemist77 04:38, 16 March 2009 (CET)


 * Get this in a Kinsey section on the homos article, plzkthx. --MachPunch 14:43, 16 March 2009 (CET)

Awesome
This is (well, maybe not now) a great article. Don't get me wrong, it could use cleaning up but the concept is great. I mean, I've never bothered looking at Chris's ED edits and I am actually surprised how Chris will actually edit stuff to make himself look bad like directing "his comics" to "fail." --Champthom 05:20, 16 March 2009 (CET)
 * it was also a little suprising to me to see what a vulgar little fucker he used to be. He was really throwing the f bombs around back when he first found out he was the punchline of the internet. William Maize 05:49, 16 March 2009 (CET)
 * I think part of Chris's problem was that he thought he could ingratiate himself with ED'ers and become part of the club. Thus, he swears a lot and uses lots of self-deprecating humor, because he sees all the ED users doing it.  This might have had a slim hope of working, except he wanted to spin the "Chris-Chan" article at the same time, so everyone could immediately see through his bullshit.  That's what drove Megan nuts when she and Chris went back and forth about the "She Came for CWC" picture.  She couldn't understand why he would put that on the site, not realizing that Chris was just as desperate for ED's approval as he was for Megan's.  Dethchemist77 22:44, 16 March 2009 (CET)

May edits
Huh, you'd think he'd make some sort of comment about how ED might go down, wouldn't ya? He was gloating about how ED was going down that one other time the site was low on cash. --Lime (Scold? | Undo?) 07:39, 16 May 2009 (CEST)

Faker
I recall on PVCC some time ago, someone said that they were surprise that we mentioned their fake edit. Unfortunately, they wouldn't fess up which edit was theirs. We need to find out which one it was to remove it from the article. --Champthom 13:39, 12 June 2009 (CEST)
 * Easier on us to assume that their claim of having a fake edit is itself fake. Another thing to do is to link diffs to every edit. Axe 15:26, 12 June 2009 (CEST)