Talk:Harry Potter

Things Chris hates
This article has given me an idea for a new list section of the CWCiki: Things Chris Hates. This would include a variety of things which Chris has mentioned his disdain for, including the Hexbox, homo males, and everything that involves manual labor. Harry Potter seems abit irrelevant in of itself to warrant its own article, given that Chris has only mentioned it a couple of times and has no real basis for hating it other than because it was/is in competition with Pokemon, but it's still something that could be encapsulated in a list as a summary. --CrassCrab 18:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I support this. --Edward 19:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

This is a shining example of something that's not worth its own article.
Chris doesn't like Harry Potter, sure, but he's only mentioned it a few times and hasn't read any of the books. I like the idea of an article that covers all the weird little things that Chris hates for no reason, but we don't need a whole article for every one of them. Moon plz.--Beat 20:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I fully agree. While I do believe that there should be a page with all the things Chris hates, it seems kind of dumb for Harry Potter to get his own page. I mean, the guy killed Volemort and all, but that hardly relates to Chris's world... --Racer X 10:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I see you are learning fast, mate. Beat is always right. In the event Beat is "wrong", this is merely a test. Moon or merge plz. --Ronichu 11:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm for merging it into a larger Things Chris Hates article. That he's mentioned them makes them significant (in understanding what he dislikes as well as likes, artistically speaking), but as H.P. and other dislikes aren't ingrained into Sonichu, they don't need their own pages. EnsignDisposable 04:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

As above, moon plz Freecell 10:37, 15 November 2010 (PST)


 * I think this article should be kept as Harry Potter is a topic that comes up and people wonder what's the deal with it. Yes, this isn't going to be an epic article but it doesn't need to me. But let's keep the discussion going if this article is seriously an issue.--Champthom 16:46, 13 December 2010 (PST)