Category talk:Sagas

Sub categories
Wouldn't it make more sense to make sub categories calling them "[x]" instead of "[x] saga}"? I mean, do we need the "saga" quantifier? For instance, if something is categorized about Clyde Cash, it probably would involve his saga, no? I suppose this could also be broadened to images as well but how big is the need for a specific saga category? Thoughts? --Champthom 17:04, 3 January 2011 (PST)


 * I disagree. There's already a Category:Clyde Cash category, and it's a subcategory of Category:Fan art.  If we make it a subcategory of Category:Sagas at the same time then we're left with one big, disorganized category of stuff that is neither entirely fan art nor entirely saga material.  I think most of the categories need to be granular, which requires fairly specific names.  "Category:Clyde Cash" could be anything to do with Clyde (images, his talk page, his YouTube accounts), but "Category:Clyde Cash Saga" is clearly about Chris's personal never-ending battle with his archnemesis. --MachPunch 18:35, 10 January 2011 (PST)