<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://sonichu.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MaybeNever</id>
	<title>CWCki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sonichu.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MaybeNever"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sonichu.com/cwcki/Special:Contributions/MaybeNever"/>
	<updated>2026-05-21T23:46:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.37.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chris_and_English&amp;diff=87682</id>
		<title>Talk:Chris and English</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chris_and_English&amp;diff=87682"/>
		<updated>2010-05-03T03:26:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MaybeNever: /* Autism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;there's a difference between a spelling error (geinus or however he's been doing it for the past like what 6 years?) and typo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but i think this could be expanded to a Chris and English page imo [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 21:33, 21 October 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
* Good point. --[[User:USAJAP1|USAJAP1]] 21:36, 21 October 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chris and English sounds like a good idea to me.  The way he talks and writes is unique, to say the least.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 21:50, 21 October 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
::*Yeah, especially considering [[Sonic the Hedgehog Watch &amp;amp; Win Sweepstakes|this]]. --[[User:USAJAP1|USAJAP1]] 21:57, 21 October 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Spelling errors ==&lt;br /&gt;
Geinus seems to be the main one he's been making for years. Any others? Observe his grammar patterns and other shit and stuff. Yeah. stuff. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 03:53, 22 October 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Seinor&amp;quot; is one he does consistently. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:00, 23 October 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Autism==&lt;br /&gt;
I haven't read the article in full yet but I don't think there's anything noting that awkward speech is usually associated with autism. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:00, 23 October 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
*It didn't even occur to me.  My bad. --[[User:Beat|Beat]] 17:27, 23 October 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Many autistics (at least aspies; you know, the ones whom Chris thinks are not actually autistic) are actually very precise and pendantic about grammar and spelling in a way that is quite unlike Chris. It wasn't for nothing that Hans Asperger called the kids he studied &amp;quot;little professors.&amp;quot; --[[User:Doomknight|Doomknight]] 03:52, 2 December 2009 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
*Likewise, some of the semantics thing is an autism thing. Like Chris answering &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Do you listen to music while drawing?&amp;quot; is an autistic thing. It's sorta like on [[Facebook]] when people would message him after he'd request to be their friend with &amp;quot;Do I know you?&amp;quot; and Chris would say something like &amp;quot;I don't know, I can't read your mind.&amp;quot; Autistics tend to have very literal thinking and will fail to see the subtlety of a question, in this case &amp;quot;Do I know you?&amp;quot; is the socially accepted way of saying &amp;quot;Typically, people requesting to be my friend are people I know, and I don't know you. Are we connected in any way?&amp;quot; The &amp;quot;pen is mightier than the sword but more permanent than the pencil&amp;quot; is more of a random access humor thing. In fact, the random access humor is partially based in childish verb puns. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 04:33, 2 December 2009 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
**The literal answers to questions deal is technically known as a lack of linguistic pragmatism. His fairly flat, unnaturally patterned speaking voice is probably a case of aprosodic speech. I'm mentioning it here because I don't think it matters much to the article, so I'm hesitant to add it (especially as my first edit), but there are attempts at technical terminology here and there. [[User:MaybeNever|MaybeNever]] 03:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Chris and abstract thinking==&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think this could be a &amp;quot;Chris and...&amp;quot; article? There is plenty of evidence that he is NOT an abstract thinker (This would highlight his &amp;quot;Child-like&amp;quot; thinking; children tend be concrete, i.e. literal, in their thinking, Chris is no exception). There's enough evidence of his concrete thinking to make into a separate article. .  --[[User:Scarletdragon|Scarletdragon]] 23:21, 2 December, 2009 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
*This is something that could be discussed in the [[autism]] article (and it's already discussed there) since this is really an autism thing. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:44, 2 December 2009 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Attempts to sound suave and educated ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't really pin it down (I'm not great at literary analysis), but I've noticed that Chris often attempts to sound like, I dunno, a 19th century upper-middle class English writer. For example, in the email describing his detective work regarding the photo taken at the Game Place, he refers to playing a card game with &amp;quot;a young gentleman.&amp;quot; I'm too lazy to search for more examples but perhaps you guys know what I mean. I you agree this is a trait, it should be mentioned either here or in the [[Writing]] article. [[User:Glorious Tentacularity|Glorious Tentacularity]] 06:51, 6 December 2009 (CET)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MaybeNever</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>