User:Midnight

2012-02-13T19:09:06Z

Midnight: Created page with "{{userbox |box-border-col= #CF142B |box-bg-col= #00247D |id-bg-col= #193a8a |id-border-col= #00247D |info-col= #fff |info-bg-col= #345198 |info-border-col = #00247D |id= [[Image:..."

{{userbox
|box-border-col= #CF142B
|box-bg-col= #00247D
|id-bg-col= #193a8a
|id-border-col= #00247D
|info-col= #fff
|info-bg-col= #345198
|info-border-col = #00247D
|id= [[Image:Uk-flag.png|55px|Union Jack]]
|info= '''Britfag''': [[Surfshack Tito|Tito]] [[Tito Got No Luck Against We Brits, Irish and Scots!|got no luck]] against this user, who is British.}}
<noinclude>[[Category:Userboxes|{{PAGENAME}}]][[Category:Nationality userboxes]]</noinclude>
<includeonly>[[Category:CWCkipedians who are Britfags|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>

Talk:DeviantART

2012-02-12T21:34:48Z

Midnight:

==A pedofork drawing?==
I didn't get to see CWC's dA soon enough, and am wondering about the pic that Chris was banned for. The poster of [http://comments.deviantart.com/4/11267140/1181810407 this comment] leads me to believe that it was some sort of Rosey pantyshot, but the main article calls it the Rosechu washing-machine (maybe facerape?) pic. (If it ''was'' the facerape, Rosechu ''was'' 18, so it wouldn't have been child porn, although . If it wasn't facerape, then I'd like a better description of the pic.)

Not that I want to see the pic or anything if it ''is'' child porn (which disgusts me). However, I would like to know more about this "washing-machine pic," whether or not Cheguevaraplz was right about it/lying/whatever, and (most importantly) whether or not this means that perhaps Chris ''is'' a pedofork after all. --[[User:Spandam-sama|Spandam-sama]] 00:35, 29 August 2009 (CEST)

* The [http://cogsdev.110mb.com/cwcipedia/index.php/Image:SchuComic9P35.jpg Pantyshot]...I don't think the pantyshot is enough to get him banned, but with my understanding of DA's sometimes arcane policies (and observations as a long time Deviantartfag myself), the facerape would DEFINITELY get him banhammered. Plus, probably twenty people reported him. -- [[User:Needlepants|Needlepants]] 00:40, 29 August 2009 (CEST)

*The panty shot wasn't it. If you could be banned for something like that, a lot more people would be gone. The face rape is more likely; but even then one piece being removed, even for something like pornography, isn't enough for a ban. What would have done it was probably a report for a questionable and/or truly against policy piece which informed the admins that this was a ban-evading account. Ban evaders are immediately re-banned when they're discovered. --[[User:LizardPie|LizardPie]] 05:13, 29 August 2009 (CEST)

* For the record: When I saw Cheguevaraplz's comment, I checked Chris's gallery, and lo and behold, the aforementioned washing-machine pantyshot was definitely deleted from the gallery. Of course, one can't say it's the sole reason they banned him. It could have been a factor. I definitely think that the combined fact that Chris admitted to evading a ban in his journal and people flagging his most questionable pictures left and right could have resulted a ban. --''[[User:Wwwwolf|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf|wake me when you need me]])</span> 21:27, 29 August 2009 (CEST)

I myself reported two of his pics, the pantyshot and the escene of blake and bubbles (yes he uploaded that one) and I suggested in the second report to wichever admin read it to make a full check of his gallery in case he uploaded something worse, and the enxt day I received a note form them telling me about hsi banning, here are the notes:
http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg186/keihzaru/note1.jpg
http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg186/keihzaru/note2.jpg
([[User talk:keihzaru]])

:* HE UPLOADED THE SEX SCENE WITH BLAKE AND BUBBLES? WHAT IS WRONG WITH HIM? [/cruise control] Every time I think I've seen it all, he just gets wackier. - [[User:Needlepants|Needlepants]] 04:27, 30 August 2009 (CEST)
::* That particular page was "censored" (had a speech big bubble and a black bar covering up the "naughty bits"), but ''still''... --[[User:Lime|Lime]] ([[User_talk:Lime|Scold?]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lime|Undo?]]) 05:11, 30 August 2009 (CEST)

==Getting Him B&==

I don't think immediately trying to get him banned is the best option. He will probably do something to get himself b& (racism, sexism, and homophobia are bannable offenses), and when he does we can take credit. Until then, many lulz will pour from the account. -[[User:Skwrr|Skwrr]] 18:11, 1 November 2009 (CET)

==Really?==

Do we really need to mock Deviantart? I mean, we're not Encyclopedia Dramatica (thank god for that), as far as this site should be concerned, DeviantART is just an art site on which Chris posts is retarded artwork, not "LULZLULZLULZDRAMA!!!111". --[[User:DoctorAwesome|DoctorAwesome]]
:*We're not Wikipedia either and there's content here that would equally offend others even if it's not the point. So in the end, everybody loses. --[[User:AntonImausMk2|AntonImausMk2]] 20:42, 17 December 2009 (CET)

==New DA page==
http://sonichuchrischan.deviantart.com/
[[User:Midnight|Midnight]] 13:34, 12 February 2012 (PST)

CWCki - User contributions [en]

User:Midnight

Talk:DeviantART