CWCki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Respectable Frames

2012-02-02T04:27:02Z

Philips:

== I hope those Pedo-Glasses actually make him a pedo ==
I would have sex with him, even though I'm under 18.
*GTFO and sign your posts, Princess Chris Chan. [[User:Jump|Jump]] 20:07, 21 June 2009 (CEST)

== Of Fail ==

Someone needs to move this page to Pedo-Glasses of Fail. –[[User:Lynxr|<font color="#C666FF">Ich bin schwul, '''Lynxr'''. Ich bin schwul.</font>]]– 01:02, 17 December 2009 (CET)

:Are there any Pedo-Glasses of Win? --[[User:Sonijew|Sonijew]] 03:12, 17 December 2009 (CET)
:Even if the Pedo-Glasses are a relic by themselves, they are not failing in their task. We are not adding the term "Fail" to the PSEye neither.[[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 03:15, 17 December 2009 (CET)
::They fail to make him not look like a pedo. --[[User:CWCAttack|CWCAttack]] 03:25, 17 December 2009 (CET)
*Not every relic has to have the prefix "Of Fail." As I say on the Relic of Fail page, I'm starting to regret coming up with the suffix. Really, I think that "of Fail" should be appended for relics forged by Chris's hands. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 03:30, 17 December 2009 (CET)
::Fair enough :) –[[User:Lynxr|<font color="#C666FF">Ich bin schwul, '''Lynxr'''. Ich bin schwul.</font>]]– 03:34, 17 December 2009 (CET)

== Actual pedos wearing actual pedo-glasses ==

Here's a couple of links to professional nonces proudly sporting their sexy specs; [http://www.herbanmedia.com/ambglb/myspace/myspace-pics-t/715patty_ann_kenley.jpg Patty Ann Kenley] and [http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/ffximage/2008/07/02/250ferguson,0.jpg Dennis Ferguson]. Could and should these be incorporated into the article, or has the point about Chris' unfortunate taste in eye-wear well enough made? [[User:Blusko|Blusko]] 06:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

:First of all: those are not pedophiles but rather child molesters. Is like comparing a women rapist to an heterosexual.
:Second: I really hope you understand that that is an stereotype. There is absolutely no "stereotypical" pedophile just like there is no "stereotypical" gay. I digress, but most people with this sexual orientation find out when they are very young, usually 13, 14, 15 yo, and they are most of them, are completely normal and healthy persons, who have the same morals, looks and intelligence as everyone else.
:Of course, '''stereotypes serve to make sense of things people dont understand and/or are scared of.''' No one chooses to be a pedophile and someone who discovers that has this orientation can be as good, as intelligent and as good-looking as anyone else. His only difference is his/her sexual orientation that nature/god (whatever you believe in) gave him/her. But being a pedophile (unlike autism) doesnt interfere and is certainly not incompatible with having the same moral, ethical, social and emotional skills as anyone else. I hope you understand. [[User:Philips|Philips]] 20:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)

:* There's also the child rapist/murderer from The Lovely Bones (named after Chris' [[Lovely Weather|future wife]], of course). Image below. The resemblance between this man and Chris is just uncanny IMHO. -[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 08:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

[[Image:TheLovelyChrisChan.jpg]]
::No it isn't. That guy was divorced, so not a virgin with rage. It took a lot of time and effort to build the underground dungeon - Crhis would be too lazy. Also, that guy was able to convince the jerkops that he was a normal person - Chris would just have shouted about trolls and tried to run away. [[User:Eamoo|Eamoo]] 18:01, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

==Moving "Dramatic Glasses Removal"==

Due to the section's small stature, i was going to copy the information in the DGR section to their own page in the "Mannerisms" category and then expand on it. It could probably do with some additions.

Does anyone have any objections?

--[[User:Jakkarra|Jakkarra]] 16:36, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

*Before you do anything, you really should draft the page. It's a small section because there isn't much to say. I'd say get someone to approve your draft before you start making edits to existing articles. That might not be the rule here. I don't remember. It is on other wikis I edit on though. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] 17:15, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

Probably. I wasnt entirely sure of the expected etiquette, which is why i was asking before i did anything important.
--[[User:Jakkarra|Jakkarra]] 03:16, 22 October 2010 (PDT)

==Glasses Gallery==

I was wondering if it might benefit the article to add a gallery of Chris's glasses? Maybe an early appearance like one of the birthday photos, a later picture, one of the taped glasses and of the blue model magic bridge? [[User:Whispsonichu|Whispsonichu]] 19:38, 3 November 2010 (PDT)

GO WORK ON IT. --[[User:Sonijew is back|Sonijew is back]] 00:29, 5 November 2010 (PDT)

On it, boss ;) [[User:Whispsonichu|Whispsonichu]] 04:28, 5 November 2010 (PDT)

== Pedo-Glasses II ==

Are there any plans to write about the new set of glasses that were first seen in the Tomgirl pictures? --[[User:IwegalBadnik|IwegalBadnik]] 14:01, 12 August 2011 (PDT)
*Are they new? I haven't really noticed. If they are indeed new then I'd include them in this article, be sure to have a pic. You sure they're new though, not just the old ones, fixed? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:22, 13 August 2011 (PDT)

User talk:CrassCrab

2012-02-02T04:14:26Z

Philips: /* "Chris would never harm a child intentionally"... so pedophiles would? */ new section

{{welcome|Champthom}}

== PRO TIP ==

When you use the [[:Template:Welcome|Welcome template]]:
# be sure to replace your name after the |, so it'd be <nowiki>{{Welcome|CrassCrab}}</nowiki>. Looks like you copy and pasted it from a time I did it, so it keeps linking to my user page. Nothing wrong with that, new people are welcome to ask me stuff, but since you extended it maybe you'd like to do it too.
# be sure to sign after you do it, so people know who you are (it's four ~ in a row).

The more you know.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 19:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

== MAKE CRASS AN ADMIN ==

DO IT CHAMP, IF I CAN'T GET POWERS, NO ONE CAN EXCEPT CRASS [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 16:07, 9 September 2010 (PDT)

== UNDO QUESTION ==

Hey, hope you don't mind me asking this here. That recent guy who has been going around vandalizing pages has been adding a lot of text into the pages. Whenever I try to hit undo I just get a server error due to the size but you seem to manage reverting those easily. Is there some trick to doing it or is it just because my computer is shit? Next time I see it happen I would like to be able to help incase nobody else is around. -- [[User:Lunachu|Lunachu]] 08:59, 12 September 2010 (PDT)
*I also get the error, but since I'm a jerkop I don't have to go into the actual edit, I can just hit rollback on the recent changes page. It's really not that big of a deal just letting the vandalism remain until a jerkop or admin gets around to reverting it. For now my biggest concern is people antagonizing the vandals, like Eniggy has been doing, thus why I blocked him for a day. [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 09:05, 12 September 2010 (PDT)
** Oh I see! Thanks for telling me, I'll just relax and trust that the jerkops are watching. -- [[User:Lunachu|Lunachu]] 09:09, 12 September 2010 (PDT)
*Somebody is usually around. [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 09:12, 12 September 2010 (PDT)

== Speculation ==

Did you move it before deleting it, that is the question. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 13:44, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
:*a bit late for that, we had to get rid of it permanently to reduce memory usage. i'm sure better speculation can be fostered on the new forum. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 13:58, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
::You forget that you can undelete on wikis. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 14:00, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
:::*you forget i have database permissions and can permanently remove things. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 14:01, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
::::Correction, you can undelete on NORMAL wikis. Ones that work properly without needing to butcher the database. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 14:05, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
:::::*this decision is beyond you. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 14:06, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
Mommy! Daddy! Stop fighting! [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 14:08, 5 October 2010 (PDT)

== "Chris would never harm a child intentionally"... so pedophiles would? ==

[[Talk:Pedofork|"Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally."]] Neither a pedophile would. Pedophilia is not a choice and its kinda lacking in empathy to say that pedophiles would hurt a child intentionally. Its the same as saying that heterosexuals would hurt women intentionally. It is simply not true. Most pedophiles would never hurt a child. [[User:Philips|Philips]] 20:14, 1 February 2012 (PST)

Talk:Pedofork

2012-02-02T04:12:06Z

Philips:

"...portmanteau for 'pedophile' and 'dork'" Just curious, has that been proven? It could just be that he was thinking of a less-offensive word that started with "f", and "fork" was the first thing that came to mind. [[User:Ayvuir|Ayvuir]] 19:03, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
*I think it's just assumed the word he wanted was 'dork' as he's called trolls dorks in several of his videos. I'm not sure why it's spelt 'pedofork' instead of 'pedophork' though. [[User:SirCucumber|SirCucumber]] 19:11, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
** Spelling is not one of Chris's strong suits. Not that he has any. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 02:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I was going to suggest something along the lines of a "Evidence Chris is a pedofork" similar to the homo page, though there seems to be more evidence to the contrary. Even Lucas made a post in that Q&A thread along the lines of "Chris really never showed any signs like that, but if you wanna argue it, you can try" (which, BTW, was one of the few nice things he said about Chris). --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 15:37, 26 November 2009 (CET)

Lolisa: I dunno about that. I mean, she's ironically the MILF of all Rosechus. I wonder, what influence Chris used to name this character? Or maybe he completely misundrstood what "lolita" means? --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 10:50, 29 November 2009 (CET)
* I honestly think it might just be a co-incindence. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 02:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

{{JumpToConclusions}}
Get rid of the stupid shit on this page already. -- [[User:Clydec|Clyde]] 02:01, 27 October 2010 (PDT)
:*Yes, I concur. This thread is complete shit and should be shot to the moon. Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally. The only thing we should concern ourselves with is his use of the term "pedofork". [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 10:55, 24 November 2010 (PST)
EDIT: Removed all speculative bullshit. Perhaps we should add pedofork to a CWCism article. [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 11:01, 24 November 2010 (PST)
::"Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally." Neither a pedophile would. Pedophilia is not a choice and its kinda lacking in empathy to say that pedophiles would hurt a child intentionally. Its the same as saying that heterosexuals would hurt women intentionally. It is simply not true. Most pedophiles would never hurt a child. [[User:Philips|Philips]] 20:12, 1 February 2012 (PST)

Should this page have a "Usage by Chris" and "Other references" with instances of pedofork being used? [[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 00:05, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
*Definitely, this article should serve more as a way of keeping track instances where Chris has used the term pedofork as opposed to speculating Chris being one.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:54, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
*i think the only time he used the word, outside of that one classic video, is in [[ChrisChanSonichu and WikiSysop correspondence]] --[[User:Acousticvirgin|Acousticvirgin]] 17:55, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
*Holy crap, the article has changed A LOT. Perhaps this could be incorporated into the [[Minor CWC-isms]] page? I mean, sure, it's popular but if Chris has only said it twice, does it warrant its own page? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:02, 28 April 2011 (PDT)
**Well, Clyde came around [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Pedofork&action=historysubmit&diff=122332&oldid=121423 and fucked it up], then CrassCrab came and [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Pedofork&action=historysubmit&diff=127850&oldid=127834 fucked it up even more]. --[[User:Sonijew is back|Sonijew is back]] 07:38, 29 April 2011 (PDT)