CWCki talk:Banned Users - Revision history

Trombonista: /* Users banned before the move */ new section

2010-08-12T21:52:08Z

Users banned before the move: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 12 August 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	After all, he did get a 6-month ban (28 January 2011). [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 11:12, 2 August 2010 (PDT)		After all, he did get a 6-month ban (28 January 2011). [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 11:12, 2 August 2010 (PDT)

			== Users banned before the move ==

			Can someone who was here during the 110mb era add users who were banned during that time to the list?--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 14:52, 12 August 2010 (PDT)

Freecell at 18:12, 2 August 2010

2010-08-02T18:12:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 2 August 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	*Probably. But we deal with a lot of vandals anyway, right? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 17:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*Probably. But we deal with a lot of vandals anyway, right? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 17:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

			==Should this include Delabonte?==

			After all, he did get a 6-month ban (28 January 2011). [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 11:12, 2 August 2010 (PDT)

Edward at 17:25, 16 July 2010

2010-07-16T17:25:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 16 July 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	:*Sorry about the original formatting boss. I figured too much information was better than too little, but I actually like the change too.--[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		:*Sorry about the original formatting boss. I figured too much information was better than too little, but I actually like the change too.--[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			::*Glad to hear that you guys approve. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 17:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

	== You know... ==		== You know... ==

	As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			*Probably. But we deal with a lot of vandals anyway, right? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 17:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Ronichu: /* Um... */

2010-07-16T17:01:22Z

Um...

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 16 July 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			:*Sorry about the original formatting boss. I figured too much information was better than too little, but I actually like the change too.--[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

	== You know... ==		== You know... ==

	As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Espanolic: /* You know... */ new section

2010-07-16T16:44:07Z

You know...: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 16 July 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

			== You know... ==

			As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Trombonista at 16:42, 16 July 2010

2010-07-16T16:42:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 16 July 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 16:12, 16 July 2010

2010-07-16T16:12:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 16 July 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 16:06, 16 July 2010

2010-07-16T16:06:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 16 July 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* Um... */

2010-07-16T15:53:04Z

Um...

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 16 July 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Um... ==		== Um... ==
	I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 15:50, 16 July 2010

2010-07-16T15:50:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 16 July 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	So yeah, Champ asked and I made it. Additions/corrections/etc are more than welcome- I don't recognise many of the names on the list, so feel free to add in more details. I'd recommend we keep it slightly-brief in order to prevent glory seekers/namefags.		So yeah, Champ asked and I made it. Additions/corrections/etc are more than welcome- I don't recognise many of the names on the list, so feel free to add in more details. I'd recommend we keep it slightly-brief in order to prevent glory seekers/namefags.

			== Um... ==
			I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 16 July 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	:*Sorry about the original formatting boss. I figured too much information was better than too little, but I actually like the change too.--[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		:*Sorry about the original formatting boss. I figured too much information was better than too little, but I actually like the change too.--[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			::*Glad to hear that you guys approve. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 17:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

	== You know... ==		== You know... ==

	As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			*Probably. But we deal with a lot of vandals anyway, right? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 17:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 16 July 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			:*Sorry about the original formatting boss. I figured too much information was better than too little, but I actually like the change too.--[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

	== You know... ==		== You know... ==

	As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --[[User:Espanolic\|Espanolic]] 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 16 July 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			**At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 16 July 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			*All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 16 July 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
	*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		*Agreed.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
			*I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)