CWCki talk:CWCki is - Revision history

Old meme at 15:20, 27 September 2011

2011-09-27T15:20:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 27 September 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	A lot of people complain about the conjecture on pages and I was thinking if it's perhaps because of the editors we have from TV Tropes. Now Cogs doesn't feel this way but I like TV Tropes, but I think one problem might be is that TV Tropes editors will come over to the CWCKi with the TV Tropes mentality. If anyone feels that I characterized TV Tropes, by all means correct me. But I think that concerns over conjecture on the CWCKi should be addressed and I think this is a start. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:31, 27 September 2011 (PDT)		A lot of people complain about the conjecture on pages and I was thinking if it's perhaps because of the editors we have from TV Tropes. Now Cogs doesn't feel this way but I like TV Tropes, but I think one problem might be is that TV Tropes editors will come over to the CWCKi with the TV Tropes mentality. If anyone feels that I characterized TV Tropes, by all means correct me. But I think that concerns over conjecture on the CWCKi should be addressed and I think this is a start. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:31, 27 September 2011 (PDT)
			*You left out the part about Fast Eddie being an enormous faggot, but aside from that I think the policy as you wrote it works fine. It covers the basic differences well enough for now, though I feel this is one of those things that we will revisit and update in later years when more major differences between the two sites occur to us. I also feel that the TV Tropes section should explicitly mention that CWCki is ran and used by people with backgrounds in trolling. The last thing we want is some naive troper coming over here, assuming that CWCki will be just as accepting as TV Tropes and then listing all their fetishes and favourite anime on their user pages or something. As far as I know it hasn't happened yet, but stuff like that tends to kick up a shitstorm on /cwc/. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 08:20, 27 September 2011 (PDT)

Champthom: /* TV Tropes */ new section

2011-09-27T14:31:06Z

TV Tropes: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:31, 27 September 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
	::Well, either way, the CWCki is a tool, and an important one. It's not going to be used to troll Chris directly, but it's a repository for all our knowledge. Frankly, it makes a lot of what we do possible, if not a little bit easier. I'm suggesting an addition like this because this article is a bit self deprecating and understates the importance of the wiki. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 13:20, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		::Well, either way, the CWCki is a tool, and an important one. It's not going to be used to troll Chris directly, but it's a repository for all our knowledge. Frankly, it makes a lot of what we do possible, if not a little bit easier. I'm suggesting an addition like this because this article is a bit self deprecating and understates the importance of the wiki. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 13:20, 8 September 2010 (PDT)

			== TV Tropes ==

			A lot of people complain about the conjecture on pages and I was thinking if it's perhaps because of the editors we have from TV Tropes. Now Cogs doesn't feel this way but I like TV Tropes, but I think one problem might be is that TV Tropes editors will come over to the CWCKi with the TV Tropes mentality. If anyone feels that I characterized TV Tropes, by all means correct me. But I think that concerns over conjecture on the CWCKi should be addressed and I think this is a start. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:31, 27 September 2011 (PDT)

Megaman: /* CWCki is a handbook? */

2010-09-08T20:20:46Z

CWCki is a handbook?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 8 September 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
	:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
	::Well, either way, the CWCki is a tool, and an important one. It's not going to be used to troll Chris directly, but it's a repository for all our knowledge. Frankly, it makes a lot of what we do possible, if not a little bit easier. I'm suggesting this ~~addition~~ because this article is a bit self deprecating and understates the importance of the wiki. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 13:20, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		::Well, either way, the CWCki is a tool, and an important one. It's not going to be used to troll Chris directly, but it's a repository for all our knowledge. Frankly, it makes a lot of what we do possible, if not a little bit easier. I'm suggesting an addition like this because this article is a bit self deprecating and understates the importance of the wiki. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 13:20, 8 September 2010 (PDT)

Megaman: /* CWCki is a handbook? */

2010-09-08T20:20:06Z

CWCki is a handbook?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 8 September 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
	:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
			::Well, either way, the CWCki is a tool, and an important one. It's not going to be used to troll Chris directly, but it's a repository for all our knowledge. Frankly, it makes a lot of what we do possible, if not a little bit easier. I'm suggesting this addition because this article is a bit self deprecating and understates the importance of the wiki. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 13:20, 8 September 2010 (PDT)

Ronichu: /* CWCki is a handbook? */

2010-09-08T09:05:18Z

CWCki is a handbook?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:05, 8 September 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
			:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)

Megaman: /* CWCki is a handbook? */ new section

2010-09-08T07:00:01Z

CWCki is a handbook?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 8 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Not ED==		==Not ED==
	Someone, try and round off what I started on the Not ED. Rachmanov, I'm looking at you. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 14:15, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		Someone, try and round off what I started on the Not ED. Rachmanov, I'm looking at you. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 14:15, 18 October 2009 (CEST)

			== CWCki is a handbook? ==

			This is just a suggestion.

			While it's true that the cwcki is not ALWAYS right, most of the time, it is. The CWCki is used as a reliable source of information by everyone, from PVCC to /cwc/. The CWCki is almost always the final authority on the facts of Chris. While the information on talk pages are almost completely erroneous, the articles of the CWCki are held to a high standard.


			or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)

Clydec: 1 revision

2010-01-03T08:47:17Z

1 revision

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:47, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

Champthom: New page: ==Not ED== Someone, try and round off what I started on the Not ED. Rachmanov, I'm looking at you. --~~~~

2009-10-18T12:15:49Z

New page: ==Not ED== Someone, try and round off what I started on the Not ED. Rachmanov, I'm looking at you. --~~~~

New page

==Not ED==
Someone, try and round off what I started on the Not ED. Rachmanov, I'm looking at you. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 14:15, 18 October 2009 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 8 September 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
	:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
	::Well, either way, the CWCki is a tool, and an important one. It's not going to be used to troll Chris directly, but it's a repository for all our knowledge. Frankly, it makes a lot of what we do possible, if not a little bit easier. I'm suggesting this ~~addition~~ because this article is a bit self deprecating and understates the importance of the wiki. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 13:20, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		::Well, either way, the CWCki is a tool, and an important one. It's not going to be used to troll Chris directly, but it's a repository for all our knowledge. Frankly, it makes a lot of what we do possible, if not a little bit easier. I'm suggesting an addition like this because this article is a bit self deprecating and understates the importance of the wiki. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 13:20, 8 September 2010 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 8 September 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		or something along those lines, something to be a counterpoint for CWCki is not always right, and something about the important role the cwcki serves in trolling Chris. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 00:00, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
	:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)		:Minor quibble (and entirely IMHO)- the CWCki is not about trolling Chris, merely documenting him. The fact that this documentation is frequently used for trolling is inconsequential. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:05, 8 September 2010 (PDT)
			::Well, either way, the CWCki is a tool, and an important one. It's not going to be used to troll Chris directly, but it's a repository for all our knowledge. Frankly, it makes a lot of what we do possible, if not a little bit easier. I'm suggesting this addition because this article is a bit self deprecating and understates the importance of the wiki. --[[User:Megaman\|Megaman]] 13:20, 8 September 2010 (PDT)