CWCki talk:Priority Listing - Revision history

Champthom: /* Revised system */ new section

2011-03-04T21:15:15Z

Revised system: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 4 March 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:

	In the vein of "fix broken links", I'd like to point out that since the old CWCipedia imploded, we have been left with a bevy of links that lead to a 404 page. This can be changed by redirecting any example you see to the CWCipedia archive. I'm sure I'm not the first one to say this. Go and fix links to the extreme!--[[User:SeventhBase\|SeventhBase]] 09:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)		In the vein of "fix broken links", I'd like to point out that since the old CWCipedia imploded, we have been left with a bevy of links that lead to a 404 page. This can be changed by redirecting any example you see to the CWCipedia archive. I'm sure I'm not the first one to say this. Go and fix links to the extreme!--[[User:SeventhBase\|SeventhBase]] 09:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

			== Revised system ==

			Okay, yes, it's funny that everything was some variant of "high" priority but that's not very useful. Instead, I revised it so it's more natural, that people will look at and see what needs to be done. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:15, 4 March 2011 (PST)

BrianBash: /* Video infoboxes */

2011-02-08T02:00:29Z

Video infoboxes

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 7 February 2011
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Is there any kind of list of what videos don't have infoboxes, or a Template to tag videos that need it? If not should one be made?[[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 22:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)		Is there any kind of list of what videos don't have infoboxes, or a Template to tag videos that need it? If not should one be made?[[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 22:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
			:I'm curious about this too. It looks from the list that all have been given infoboxes, if the existence of categorisation icons is anything to go by. Is that not necessarily the case? [[User:BrianBash\|BrianBash]] 18:00, 7 February 2011 (PST)

	== Old CWCipedia links should be fixed ==		== Old CWCipedia links should be fixed ==

	In the vein of "fix broken links", I'd like to point out that since the old CWCipedia imploded, we have been left with a bevy of links that lead to a 404 page. This can be changed by redirecting any example you see to the CWCipedia archive. I'm sure I'm not the first one to say this. Go and fix links to the extreme!--[[User:SeventhBase\|SeventhBase]] 09:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)		In the vein of "fix broken links", I'd like to point out that since the old CWCipedia imploded, we have been left with a bevy of links that lead to a 404 page. This can be changed by redirecting any example you see to the CWCipedia archive. I'm sure I'm not the first one to say this. Go and fix links to the extreme!--[[User:SeventhBase\|SeventhBase]] 09:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

SeventhBase: /* Old CWCipedia links should be fixed */ new section

2010-07-20T09:56:42Z

Old CWCipedia links should be fixed: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 20 July 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Is there any kind of list of what videos don't have infoboxes, or a Template to tag videos that need it? If not should one be made?[[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 22:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)		Is there any kind of list of what videos don't have infoboxes, or a Template to tag videos that need it? If not should one be made?[[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 22:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

			== Old CWCipedia links should be fixed ==

			In the vein of "fix broken links", I'd like to point out that since the old CWCipedia imploded, we have been left with a bevy of links that lead to a 404 page. This can be changed by redirecting any example you see to the CWCipedia archive. I'm sure I'm not the first one to say this. Go and fix links to the extreme!--[[User:SeventhBase\|SeventhBase]] 09:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Mellowyellowsalvation at 22:05, 11 June 2010

2010-06-11T22:05:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 11 June 2010
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	::::* Wouldn't standardizing the presentation of basic facts about each video within the header text of each video's article make for a simpler and much less redundant way of accomplishing what these infoboxes are trying to accomplish? Don't get me wrong: all of the info that wwwwolf and others want to see in an infobox is fine to want on a page; it's just that I see no reason not to simply incorporate all of that info into uniform summary sections. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 17:04, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::::* Wouldn't standardizing the presentation of basic facts about each video within the header text of each video's article make for a simpler and much less redundant way of accomplishing what these infoboxes are trying to accomplish? Don't get me wrong: all of the info that wwwwolf and others want to see in an infobox is fine to want on a page; it's just that I see no reason not to simply incorporate all of that info into uniform summary sections. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 17:04, 8 December 2009 (CET)

			Is there any kind of list of what videos don't have infoboxes, or a Template to tag videos that need it? If not should one be made?[[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 22:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Clydec: 19 revisions

2010-01-03T08:47:31Z

19 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:47, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

VanKrause: /* Video infoboxes */

2009-12-08T16:04:03Z

Video infoboxes

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 8 December 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	::::* I haven't looked at [[Template:Infobox]] that well, but I think they can be styled with appropriate style parameters, so you can have, say, video infoboxes and biography infoboxes that look different. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::::* I haven't looked at [[Template:Infobox]] that well, but I think they can be styled with appropriate style parameters, so you can have, say, video infoboxes and biography infoboxes that look different. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)
			::::* Wouldn't standardizing the presentation of basic facts about each video within the header text of each video's article make for a simpler and much less redundant way of accomplishing what these infoboxes are trying to accomplish? Don't get me wrong: all of the info that wwwwolf and others want to see in an infobox is fine to want on a page; it's just that I see no reason not to simply incorporate all of that info into uniform summary sections. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 17:04, 8 December 2009 (CET)

VanKrause: /* Video infoboxes */

2009-12-08T15:28:09Z

Video infoboxes

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 8 December 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? Anyways, if we're gonna do infoboxes, we really should follow the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:The Revenge Society\|example]]. We could color code the title bar to correspond to what kind of video it is, and have the succession at the bottom. I have stuff to get done right now, but I'll try to screw around with this in my sandbox later today.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]]		:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? Anyways, if we're gonna do infoboxes, we really should follow the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:The Revenge Society\|example]]. We could color code the title bar to correspond to what kind of video it is, and have the succession at the bottom. I have stuff to get done right now, but I'll try to screw around with this in my sandbox later today.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]]
			::::* I haven't looked at [[Template:Infobox]] that well, but I think they can be styled with appropriate style parameters, so you can have, say, video infoboxes and biography infoboxes that look different. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)
			:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)

VanKrause: /* Video infoboxes */

2009-12-08T14:59:54Z

Video infoboxes

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:59, 8 December 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? --[[User:Beat\|Beat]]		:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? Anyways, if we're gonna do infoboxes, we really should follow the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:The Revenge Society\|example]]. We could color code the title bar to correspond to what kind of video it is, and have the succession at the bottom. I have stuff to get done right now, but I'll try to screw around with this in my sandbox later today.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]]

VanKrause: /* Video infoboxes */

2009-12-08T14:52:10Z

Video infoboxes

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 8 December 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)
			:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? --[[User:Beat\|Beat]]

VanKrause: /* Video infoboxes */

2009-12-08T14:47:29Z

Video infoboxes

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 8 December 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*The idea is that most of the information that is already in the article now can instead be put into the Infobox. Like instead of saying "Such and such video (officially this and that), uploaded day Month 200x..." we can now say "Such and such video is where Chris..." For Tristran, here's an [[Chris Chan Update 21 October 2008\|example]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:00, 8 December 2009 (CET)		*The idea is that most of the information that is already in the article now can instead be put into the Infobox. Like instead of saying "Such and such video (officially this and that), uploaded day Month 200x..." we can now say "Such and such video is where Chris..." For Tristran, here's an [[Chris Chan Update 21 October 2008\|example]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:00, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)
			::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 11 June 2010
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	::::* Wouldn't standardizing the presentation of basic facts about each video within the header text of each video's article make for a simpler and much less redundant way of accomplishing what these infoboxes are trying to accomplish? Don't get me wrong: all of the info that wwwwolf and others want to see in an infobox is fine to want on a page; it's just that I see no reason not to simply incorporate all of that info into uniform summary sections. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 17:04, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::::* Wouldn't standardizing the presentation of basic facts about each video within the header text of each video's article make for a simpler and much less redundant way of accomplishing what these infoboxes are trying to accomplish? Don't get me wrong: all of the info that wwwwolf and others want to see in an infobox is fine to want on a page; it's just that I see no reason not to simply incorporate all of that info into uniform summary sections. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 17:04, 8 December 2009 (CET)

			Is there any kind of list of what videos don't have infoboxes, or a Template to tag videos that need it? If not should one be made?[[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 22:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 8 December 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	::::* I haven't looked at [[Template:Infobox]] that well, but I think they can be styled with appropriate style parameters, so you can have, say, video infoboxes and biography infoboxes that look different. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::::* I haven't looked at [[Template:Infobox]] that well, but I think they can be styled with appropriate style parameters, so you can have, say, video infoboxes and biography infoboxes that look different. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)
			::::* Wouldn't standardizing the presentation of basic facts about each video within the header text of each video's article make for a simpler and much less redundant way of accomplishing what these infoboxes are trying to accomplish? Don't get me wrong: all of the info that wwwwolf and others want to see in an infobox is fine to want on a page; it's just that I see no reason not to simply incorporate all of that info into uniform summary sections. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 17:04, 8 December 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 8 December 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? Anyways, if we're gonna do infoboxes, we really should follow the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:The Revenge Society\|example]]. We could color code the title bar to correspond to what kind of video it is, and have the succession at the bottom. I have stuff to get done right now, but I'll try to screw around with this in my sandbox later today.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]]		:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? Anyways, if we're gonna do infoboxes, we really should follow the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:The Revenge Society\|example]]. We could color code the title bar to correspond to what kind of video it is, and have the succession at the bottom. I have stuff to get done right now, but I'll try to screw around with this in my sandbox later today.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]]
			::::* I haven't looked at [[Template:Infobox]] that well, but I think they can be styled with appropriate style parameters, so you can have, say, video infoboxes and biography infoboxes that look different. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)
			:::* The point of infoboxes is to provide concise summaries at one glance. It will be, by design, a little bit redundant with some facts in the articles - but the big point of infoboxes is that if you just need a critical factoid, you can look for them in the infobox instead of reading through half of the article. Perhaps the video boxes should be expanded to include ''useful'' summary information, like really short summaries of the videos and stuff the videos are notable for (i.e. "First appearance of Aivey", "Introduced us to the concept of YOUNG LADIES"). Or shirt information. Everyone loves shirt information. Everything that's in the list of videos right now. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 16:28, 8 December 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:59, 8 December 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? --[[User:Beat\|Beat]]		:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? Anyways, if we're gonna do infoboxes, we really should follow the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:The Revenge Society\|example]]. We could color code the title bar to correspond to what kind of video it is, and have the succession at the bottom. I have stuff to get done right now, but I'll try to screw around with this in my sandbox later today.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 8 December 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)		:*Well we can do it like that. I looked up a Wikipedia article with an Infobox to see how it's used and it's still redunant, but it's a concise sort of redundancy, like it's a sort of "basic info" sort of deal that can be used. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:03, 8 December 2009 (CET)
	::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)		::* It does, indeed, seem pretty redundant when the information is already part of the page text. I think they'd be convenient if that information were removed from the page text and simply put into the box on the side, though. --[[User:Tristran\|Tristran]] 15:47, 8 December 2009 (CET)
			:::* Do the infoboxes have to be so... I dunno... Ugly? --[[User:Beat\|Beat]]