CWCki talk:The Wallflower - Revision history

FokkerTISM: /* Suitress */ new section

2021-10-02T16:09:54Z

Suitress: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 2 October 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Just under a decade passed since this was implemented, and the Wallflower seems to have faded from Chris's memory in a way that Megan, BlueSpike the other characters from the Classic era have not; she is, in comparison, rather obscure in Christory. Any information on her from her brief period of relevance to us is probably obsolete: even her surname might be, if she has since married. The CWCki is protected by closed registration against petty vandals of the kind that saw fit to reveal as much irrelevant information as possible about her; such is beyond the CWCki's scope at any rate, which seeks only to document characters in Chris's life as they relate to Chris himself. Now, several years later, passions have cooled and I find that the policy of deliberately avoiding the Wallflower's name is uncharacteristic of the CWCki: if anything, it backfires, whetting others' appetite to find out more. As the CWCki has also changed hands from Cogsdev to Marvin since this was implemented, I do not think that the old agreement would still be binding. Though I understand why the policy was implemented and will naturally respect it as long as it is in force, I would like to appeal that we reconsider it now. [[User:ChanOfTartary\|ChanOfTartary]] ([[User talk:ChanOfTartary\|talk]]) 02:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)		Just under a decade passed since this was implemented, and the Wallflower seems to have faded from Chris's memory in a way that Megan, BlueSpike the other characters from the Classic era have not; she is, in comparison, rather obscure in Christory. Any information on her from her brief period of relevance to us is probably obsolete: even her surname might be, if she has since married. The CWCki is protected by closed registration against petty vandals of the kind that saw fit to reveal as much irrelevant information as possible about her; such is beyond the CWCki's scope at any rate, which seeks only to document characters in Chris's life as they relate to Chris himself. Now, several years later, passions have cooled and I find that the policy of deliberately avoiding the Wallflower's name is uncharacteristic of the CWCki: if anything, it backfires, whetting others' appetite to find out more. As the CWCki has also changed hands from Cogsdev to Marvin since this was implemented, I do not think that the old agreement would still be binding. Though I understand why the policy was implemented and will naturally respect it as long as it is in force, I would like to appeal that we reconsider it now. [[User:ChanOfTartary\|ChanOfTartary]] ([[User talk:ChanOfTartary\|talk]]) 02:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
	::I feel like the only way to ever reverse the policy is if we contact the Wallflower if she consents in having some of her identity released (name and birth-date at its most simple). That and if Canine (Marvin) agrees with us. -[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 03:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)		::I feel like the only way to ever reverse the policy is if we contact the Wallflower if she consents in having some of her identity released (name and birth-date at its most simple). That and if Canine (Marvin) agrees with us. -[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 03:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

			== Suitress ==

			Should we have a section about the Suitress on here? It's basically the same policy being applied. [[User:FokkerTISM\|FokkerTISM]] ([[User talk:FokkerTISM\|talk]]) 16:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Larry the Larryhog: /* Soberly reconsidering the policy */

2019-10-29T03:08:57Z

Soberly reconsidering the policy

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 28 October 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Just under a decade passed since this was implemented, and the Wallflower seems to have faded from Chris's memory in a way that Megan, BlueSpike the other characters from the Classic era have not; she is, in comparison, rather obscure in Christory. Any information on her from her brief period of relevance to us is probably obsolete: even her surname might be, if she has since married. The CWCki is protected by closed registration against petty vandals of the kind that saw fit to reveal as much irrelevant information as possible about her; such is beyond the CWCki's scope at any rate, which seeks only to document characters in Chris's life as they relate to Chris himself. Now, several years later, passions have cooled and I find that the policy of deliberately avoiding the Wallflower's name is uncharacteristic of the CWCki: if anything, it backfires, whetting others' appetite to find out more. As the CWCki has also changed hands from Cogsdev to Marvin since this was implemented, I do not think that the old agreement would still be binding. Though I understand why the policy was implemented and will naturally respect it as long as it is in force, I would like to appeal that we reconsider it now. [[User:ChanOfTartary\|ChanOfTartary]] ([[User talk:ChanOfTartary\|talk]]) 02:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)		Just under a decade passed since this was implemented, and the Wallflower seems to have faded from Chris's memory in a way that Megan, BlueSpike the other characters from the Classic era have not; she is, in comparison, rather obscure in Christory. Any information on her from her brief period of relevance to us is probably obsolete: even her surname might be, if she has since married. The CWCki is protected by closed registration against petty vandals of the kind that saw fit to reveal as much irrelevant information as possible about her; such is beyond the CWCki's scope at any rate, which seeks only to document characters in Chris's life as they relate to Chris himself. Now, several years later, passions have cooled and I find that the policy of deliberately avoiding the Wallflower's name is uncharacteristic of the CWCki: if anything, it backfires, whetting others' appetite to find out more. As the CWCki has also changed hands from Cogsdev to Marvin since this was implemented, I do not think that the old agreement would still be binding. Though I understand why the policy was implemented and will naturally respect it as long as it is in force, I would like to appeal that we reconsider it now. [[User:ChanOfTartary\|ChanOfTartary]] ([[User talk:ChanOfTartary\|talk]]) 02:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
			::I feel like the only way to ever reverse the policy is if we contact the Wallflower if she consents in having some of her identity released (name and birth-date at its most simple). That and if Canine (Marvin) agrees with us. -[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 03:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

ChanOfTartary: /* Soberly reconsidering the policy */ new section

2019-10-29T02:50:57Z

Soberly reconsidering the policy: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 28 October 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Not entirely true. He first posted the name Damian Antaria, the name used to find her, on the description of a LittleBigPlanet level he made to promote their owl book. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 20:05, 7 March 2011 (PST)		Not entirely true. He first posted the name Damian Antaria, the name used to find her, on the description of a LittleBigPlanet level he made to promote their owl book. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 20:05, 7 March 2011 (PST)
	*Then fix it, dude.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:02, 9 April 2011 (PDT)		*Then fix it, dude.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:02, 9 April 2011 (PDT)

			== Soberly reconsidering the policy ==

			Just under a decade passed since this was implemented, and the Wallflower seems to have faded from Chris's memory in a way that Megan, BlueSpike the other characters from the Classic era have not; she is, in comparison, rather obscure in Christory. Any information on her from her brief period of relevance to us is probably obsolete: even her surname might be, if she has since married. The CWCki is protected by closed registration against petty vandals of the kind that saw fit to reveal as much irrelevant information as possible about her; such is beyond the CWCki's scope at any rate, which seeks only to document characters in Chris's life as they relate to Chris himself. Now, several years later, passions have cooled and I find that the policy of deliberately avoiding the Wallflower's name is uncharacteristic of the CWCki: if anything, it backfires, whetting others' appetite to find out more. As the CWCki has also changed hands from Cogsdev to Marvin since this was implemented, I do not think that the old agreement would still be binding. Though I understand why the policy was implemented and will naturally respect it as long as it is in force, I would like to appeal that we reconsider it now. [[User:ChanOfTartary\|ChanOfTartary]] ([[User talk:ChanOfTartary\|talk]]) 02:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Champthom: /* Possible Correction */

2011-04-09T23:02:41Z

Possible Correction

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 9 April 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Not entirely true. He first posted the name Damian Antaria, the name used to find her, on the description of a LittleBigPlanet level he made to promote their owl book. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 20:05, 7 March 2011 (PST)		Not entirely true. He first posted the name Damian Antaria, the name used to find her, on the description of a LittleBigPlanet level he made to promote their owl book. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 20:05, 7 March 2011 (PST)
			*Then fix it, dude.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:02, 9 April 2011 (PDT)

T K 19: /* Possible Correction */ new section

2011-03-08T04:05:43Z

Possible Correction: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 8 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Kudos to [[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] for writing the bulk of this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:08, 7 March 2011 (PST)		Kudos to [[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] for writing the bulk of this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:08, 7 March 2011 (PST)

			== Possible Correction ==

			"In a video he released, he dropped her name which allowed more malicious minded trolls to find dox on her and used the CWCki page to post her doxs, her unique fanfiction, etc with intents of trolling her."

			Not entirely true. He first posted the name Damian Antaria, the name used to find her, on the description of a LittleBigPlanet level he made to promote their owl book. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 20:05, 7 March 2011 (PST)

T K 19 at 04:03, 8 March 2011

2011-03-08T04:03:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 8 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Kudos to [[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] for writing the bulk of this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:08, 7 March 2011 (PST)		Kudos to [[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] for writing the bulk of this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:08, 7 March 2011 (PST)

	~~== ossible correction ==~~

	" In a video he released, he dropped her name which allowed more malicious minded trolls to find dox on her and used the CWCki page to post her doxs, her unique fanfiction, etc with intents of trolling her."

T K 19: /* ossible correction */ new section

2011-03-08T04:03:19Z

ossible correction: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 8 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Kudos to [[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] for writing the bulk of this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:08, 7 March 2011 (PST)		Kudos to [[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] for writing the bulk of this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:08, 7 March 2011 (PST)

			== ossible correction ==

			" In a video he released, he dropped her name which allowed more malicious minded trolls to find dox on her and used the CWCki page to post her doxs, her unique fanfiction, etc with intents of trolling her."

Champthom: Created page with "Kudos to Ronichu for writing the bulk of this. --~~~~"

2011-03-08T03:08:53Z

Created page with "Kudos to Ronichu for writing the bulk of this. --~~~~"

New page

Kudos to [[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] for writing the bulk of this. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 19:08, 7 March 2011 (PST)