Talk:2012 - Revision history

Slimz: /* He's back */ new section

2012-05-03T19:06:31Z

He's back: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 3 May 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:When I said that, I meant specifically the "20XX" articles. These sorts of videos just haven't ever gotten recognition in those articles. The closest thing is some stuff Megan did in the 2008 article (e.g. "March 14 - Megan asks Chris to leave her alone."), but I think this is a different situation. Chris hasn't acknowledged the video at all. It's entirely irrelevant to Chris' year. If Chris does mention it, I can see it maybe being worth putting in, but as-is, I don't think it's relevant enough to the subject material of this article to warrant a mention. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 09:33, 17 February 2012 (PST)		:When I said that, I meant specifically the "20XX" articles. These sorts of videos just haven't ever gotten recognition in those articles. The closest thing is some stuff Megan did in the 2008 article (e.g. "March 14 - Megan asks Chris to leave her alone."), but I think this is a different situation. Chris hasn't acknowledged the video at all. It's entirely irrelevant to Chris' year. If Chris does mention it, I can see it maybe being worth putting in, but as-is, I don't think it's relevant enough to the subject material of this article to warrant a mention. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 09:33, 17 February 2012 (PST)
	:: ok its your wiki.. i respectfully disagree but its not worth any more of my time. [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:38, 17 February 2012 (PST)		:: ok its your wiki.. i respectfully disagree but its not worth any more of my time. [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:38, 17 February 2012 (PST)

			== He's back ==

			Ok im leaving for the day but this page needs updating.. so do it faggots ! i will handle it tomorrow if its not done tonight [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 12:06, 3 May 2012 (PDT)

RachmaninovDESU: /* Quarterly month articles */

2012-04-22T20:41:35Z

Quarterly month articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:41, 22 April 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	As I was mentioning to Eamoo, perhaps it'll make sense to make quarterly articles instead of articles for each month - like January - March 2012 instead of [[January 2012]], [[February 2012]], etc. I'll leave the articles as they are now, as Chris could in theory come back and there could be a shitton of new content, but I'm not holding my breath and I'm just throwing it out there in case I forget.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:17, 16 January 2012 (PST)		As I was mentioning to Eamoo, perhaps it'll make sense to make quarterly articles instead of articles for each month - like January - March 2012 instead of [[January 2012]], [[February 2012]], etc. I'll leave the articles as they are now, as Chris could in theory come back and there could be a shitton of new content, but I'm not holding my breath and I'm just throwing it out there in case I forget.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:17, 16 January 2012 (PST)
			* I agree. It might even be worth just returning to a timeline overview for the entire year. We could also do this for the year 2011. It´s a bit annoying to have to keep opening new pages. [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 13:41, 22 April 2012 (PDT)

	== Dumbass ==		== Dumbass ==

Slimz: /* Dumbass */

2012-02-17T17:38:48Z

Dumbass

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 17 February 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:22, 17 February 2012 (PST)		[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:22, 17 February 2012 (PST)
	:When I said that, I meant specifically the "20XX" articles. These sorts of videos just haven't ever gotten recognition in those articles. The closest thing is some stuff Megan did in the 2008 article (e.g. "March 14 - Megan asks Chris to leave her alone."), but I think this is a different situation. Chris hasn't acknowledged the video at all. It's entirely irrelevant to Chris' year. If Chris does mention it, I can see it maybe being worth putting in, but as-is, I don't think it's relevant enough to the subject material of this article to warrant a mention. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 09:33, 17 February 2012 (PST)		:When I said that, I meant specifically the "20XX" articles. These sorts of videos just haven't ever gotten recognition in those articles. The closest thing is some stuff Megan did in the 2008 article (e.g. "March 14 - Megan asks Chris to leave her alone."), but I think this is a different situation. Chris hasn't acknowledged the video at all. It's entirely irrelevant to Chris' year. If Chris does mention it, I can see it maybe being worth putting in, but as-is, I don't think it's relevant enough to the subject material of this article to warrant a mention. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 09:33, 17 February 2012 (PST)
			:: ok its your wiki.. i respectfully disagree but its not worth any more of my time. [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:38, 17 February 2012 (PST)

Freecell at 17:33, 17 February 2012

2012-02-17T17:33:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 17 February 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	besides that its funny as hell and [[Fatman]] deserves recognition.		besides that its funny as hell and [[Fatman]] deserves recognition.
	[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:22, 17 February 2012 (PST)		[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:22, 17 February 2012 (PST)
			:When I said that, I meant specifically the "20XX" articles. These sorts of videos just haven't ever gotten recognition in those articles. The closest thing is some stuff Megan did in the 2008 article (e.g. "March 14 - Megan asks Chris to leave her alone."), but I think this is a different situation. Chris hasn't acknowledged the video at all. It's entirely irrelevant to Chris' year. If Chris does mention it, I can see it maybe being worth putting in, but as-is, I don't think it's relevant enough to the subject material of this article to warrant a mention. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 09:33, 17 February 2012 (PST)

Slimz: /* Dumbass */

2012-02-17T17:22:21Z

Dumbass

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 17 February 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	ok the "Dumbass" video should be mentioned here, and here is my argument.		ok the "Dumbass" video should be mentioned here, and here is my argument.
	*The video was important enough to make it to the front page		*The video was important enough to make it to the front page
	*~~free cell~~ said that he does not recall including this sort of thing but its here [[January 2012]]		*freecell said that he does not recall including this sort of thing but its here [[January 2012]]
	*This is the punctuation of the best example of Chris failing at being a troll hunter		*This is the punctuation of the best example of Chris failing at being a troll hunter
	*the Dumbass video was directed to Chris		*the Dumbass video was directed to Chris

Slimz: /* Dumbass */ new section

2012-02-17T17:22:03Z

Dumbass: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 17 February 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	As I was mentioning to Eamoo, perhaps it'll make sense to make quarterly articles instead of articles for each month - like January - March 2012 instead of [[January 2012]], [[February 2012]], etc. I'll leave the articles as they are now, as Chris could in theory come back and there could be a shitton of new content, but I'm not holding my breath and I'm just throwing it out there in case I forget.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:17, 16 January 2012 (PST)		As I was mentioning to Eamoo, perhaps it'll make sense to make quarterly articles instead of articles for each month - like January - March 2012 instead of [[January 2012]], [[February 2012]], etc. I'll leave the articles as they are now, as Chris could in theory come back and there could be a shitton of new content, but I'm not holding my breath and I'm just throwing it out there in case I forget.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:17, 16 January 2012 (PST)

			== Dumbass ==

			ok the "Dumbass" video should be mentioned here, and here is my argument.
			*The video was important enough to make it to the front page
			*free cell said that he does not recall including this sort of thing but its here [[January 2012]]
			*This is the punctuation of the best example of Chris failing at being a troll hunter
			*the Dumbass video was directed to Chris
			*If Chris directed a video at you (especially without provocation) and you reacted to it in this way, i would totally want that recorded.
			*Dumbass is a great word especially when used in this way

			besides that its funny as hell and [[Fatman]] deserves recognition.
			[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:22, 17 February 2012 (PST)

Champthom: /* Quarterly month articles */ new section

2012-01-16T14:17:54Z

Quarterly month articles: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:17, 16 January 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	If there was a physical CWCki Editing Guide there would be a screenshot of this "article" with DON'T DO THIS YOU FAGGOT written across it on the first page. Anybody that played a noteworthy role in the current state of the "article" should be permabanned. [[User:Sully\|Sully]] 14:37, 4 January 2011 (PST)		If there was a physical CWCki Editing Guide there would be a screenshot of this "article" with DON'T DO THIS YOU FAGGOT written across it on the first page. Anybody that played a noteworthy role in the current state of the "article" should be permabanned. [[User:Sully\|Sully]] 14:37, 4 January 2011 (PST)

			== Quarterly month articles ==

			As I was mentioning to Eamoo, perhaps it'll make sense to make quarterly articles instead of articles for each month - like January - March 2012 instead of [[January 2012]], [[February 2012]], etc. I'll leave the articles as they are now, as Chris could in theory come back and there could be a shitton of new content, but I'm not holding my breath and I'm just throwing it out there in case I forget.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:17, 16 January 2012 (PST)

Sully at 22:37, 4 January 2011

2011-01-04T22:37:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, 4 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Ok guys, even Offshore CWCki knows this page is fucking retarded. AS IN NOT EVEN THEY LAUGHED AT YOUR SHIT. Stop adding your lame jokes now guys. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 00:58, 3 January 2011 (PST)		Ok guys, even Offshore CWCki knows this page is fucking retarded. AS IN NOT EVEN THEY LAUGHED AT YOUR SHIT. Stop adding your lame jokes now guys. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 00:58, 3 January 2011 (PST)

			If there was a physical CWCki Editing Guide there would be a screenshot of this "article" with DON'T DO THIS YOU FAGGOT written across it on the first page. Anybody that played a noteworthy role in the current state of the "article" should be permabanned. [[User:Sully\|Sully]] 14:37, 4 January 2011 (PST)

Freecell: Created page with "Ok guys, even Offshore CWCki knows this page is fucking retarded. AS IN NOT EVEN THEY LAUGHED AT YOUR SHIT. Stop adding your lame jokes now guys. ~~~~"

2011-01-03T08:58:38Z

Created page with "Ok guys, even Offshore CWCki knows this page is fucking retarded. AS IN NOT EVEN THEY LAUGHED AT YOUR SHIT. Stop adding your lame jokes now guys. ~~~~"

New page

Ok guys, even Offshore CWCki knows this page is fucking retarded. AS IN NOT EVEN THEY LAUGHED AT YOUR SHIT. Stop adding your lame jokes now guys. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] 00:58, 3 January 2011 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 17 February 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:22, 17 February 2012 (PST)		[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:22, 17 February 2012 (PST)
	:When I said that, I meant specifically the "20XX" articles. These sorts of videos just haven't ever gotten recognition in those articles. The closest thing is some stuff Megan did in the 2008 article (e.g. "March 14 - Megan asks Chris to leave her alone."), but I think this is a different situation. Chris hasn't acknowledged the video at all. It's entirely irrelevant to Chris' year. If Chris does mention it, I can see it maybe being worth putting in, but as-is, I don't think it's relevant enough to the subject material of this article to warrant a mention. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 09:33, 17 February 2012 (PST)		:When I said that, I meant specifically the "20XX" articles. These sorts of videos just haven't ever gotten recognition in those articles. The closest thing is some stuff Megan did in the 2008 article (e.g. "March 14 - Megan asks Chris to leave her alone."), but I think this is a different situation. Chris hasn't acknowledged the video at all. It's entirely irrelevant to Chris' year. If Chris does mention it, I can see it maybe being worth putting in, but as-is, I don't think it's relevant enough to the subject material of this article to warrant a mention. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 09:33, 17 February 2012 (PST)
			:: ok its your wiki.. i respectfully disagree but its not worth any more of my time. [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 09:38, 17 February 2012 (PST)