Talk:2013 - Revision history

Boomhauer: /* Splitting up article */ new section

2014-10-11T17:11:04Z

Splitting up article: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 11 October 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	--[[User:Skoodles\|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Skoodles\|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
	He wrote a long FB comment about it, with a response from one of the hosts ( I think) and a bunch of other comments from his fans asking for more sonichu--[[User:CaseHa\|CaseHa]] 17:51, 15 March 2013 (PDT)		He wrote a long FB comment about it, with a response from one of the hosts ( I think) and a bunch of other comments from his fans asking for more sonichu--[[User:CaseHa\|CaseHa]] 17:51, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

			== Splitting up article ==

			Thinking about categorizing 2013 in terms of months; seems a bit out of place, when both 2012 and 2014 have already done so. [[User:Boomhauer\|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer\|talk]]) 17:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

CaseHa: /* Failosophy */

2013-03-16T00:51:04Z

Failosophy

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 15 March 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:
	We should probably add info on him being on Failosophy, and maybe create a page for it if Chris [[Encyclopedia Dramatica\|goes bonkers about it]].		We should probably add info on him being on Failosophy, and maybe create a page for it if Chris [[Encyclopedia Dramatica\|goes bonkers about it]].
	--[[User:Skoodles\|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Skoodles\|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
			He wrote a long FB comment about it, with a response from one of the hosts ( I think) and a bunch of other comments from his fans asking for more sonichu--[[User:CaseHa\|CaseHa]] 17:51, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

Skoodles: /* Failosophy */ new section

2013-03-15T20:45:42Z

Failosophy: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 15 March 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:

	* Well we will just have to wait and see what happens. He has been extremly unactive recently. [[User:14recinez\|14recinez]] 17:53, 23 Febuary 2013 (EST)		* Well we will just have to wait and see what happens. He has been extremly unactive recently. [[User:14recinez\|14recinez]] 17:53, 23 Febuary 2013 (EST)

			== Failosophy ==

			We should probably add info on him being on Failosophy, and maybe create a page for it if Chris [[Encyclopedia Dramatica\|goes bonkers about it]].
			--[[User:Skoodles\|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

14recinez: /* Probation */

2013-02-23T22:50:51Z

Probation

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 23 February 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Probation==		==Probation==
	Due to Chris's probation ending on the July 10th, I think I should be worth noting that July 2013 might start up more of the Chris trolling as his community service ends, and assuming he wouldn't have learnt anything other than not to run people over. --The <b>TRUE</b> and <b>HONEST</b> [[User:Smugleaf\|Smugleaf Tsutarja]] 18:33, 25 January 2013 (PST)		Due to Chris's probation ending on the July 10th, I think I should be worth noting that July 2013 might start up more of the Chris trolling as his community service ends, and assuming he wouldn't have learnt anything other than not to run people over. --The <b>TRUE</b> and <b>HONEST</b> [[User:Smugleaf\|Smugleaf Tsutarja]] 18:33, 25 January 2013 (PST)

			* Well we will just have to wait and see what happens. He has been extremly unactive recently. [[User:14recinez\|14recinez]] 17:53, 23 Febuary 2013 (EST)

14recinez at 22:47, 23 February 2013

2013-02-23T22:47:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 23 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==why am important??==		==why am important??==
	* Chris uploaded another photo on Febuary 1 [[http://m.facebook.com/pages/Christian-Weston-Chandler/167832525915?id=167832525915&_rdr]]		* Chris uploaded another photo on Febuary 1 [[http://m.facebook.com/pages/Christian-Weston-Chandler/167832525915?id=167832525915&_rdr]] [[User:14recinez\|14recinez]] 17:50, 23 Febuary 2013 (EST)
	Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)		Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
	*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)		*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)

14recinez at 22:42, 23 February 2013

2013-02-23T22:42:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 23 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==why am important??==		==why am important??==
			* Chris uploaded another photo on Febuary 1 [[http://m.facebook.com/pages/Christian-Weston-Chandler/167832525915?id=167832525915&_rdr]]
	Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)		Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
	*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)		*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)

Smugleaf at 02:33, 26 January 2013

2013-01-26T02:33:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 25 January 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)		** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)
	::*Good thinking, I don't know why I didn't see that. But since it's almost 2013, I think we should stop making articles for individual months, unless Chris comes back to the Internet which I highly doubt. So instead of linking to [[January 2013]], we'd just make a subsection on this page, i.e. 2013#January. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 01:24, 30 December 2012 (PST)		::*Good thinking, I don't know why I didn't see that. But since it's almost 2013, I think we should stop making articles for individual months, unless Chris comes back to the Internet which I highly doubt. So instead of linking to [[January 2013]], we'd just make a subsection on this page, i.e. 2013#January. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 01:24, 30 December 2012 (PST)
			==Probation==
			Due to Chris's probation ending on the July 10th, I think I should be worth noting that July 2013 might start up more of the Chris trolling as his community service ends, and assuming he wouldn't have learnt anything other than not to run people over. --The <b>TRUE</b> and <b>HONEST</b> [[User:Smugleaf\|Smugleaf Tsutarja]] 18:33, 25 January 2013 (PST)

Champthom at 09:24, 30 December 2012

2012-12-30T09:24:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:24, 30 December 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)		*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
	** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)		** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)
			::*Good thinking, I don't know why I didn't see that. But since it's almost 2013, I think we should stop making articles for individual months, unless Chris comes back to the Internet which I highly doubt. So instead of linking to [[January 2013]], we'd just make a subsection on this page, i.e. 2013#January. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 01:24, 30 December 2012 (PST)

Giantgroundsloth at 00:35, 23 January 2012

2012-01-23T00:35:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 22 January 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)		Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
	*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)		*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
			** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)

Champthom: /* why am important?? */

2012-01-21T13:48:25Z

why am important??

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:48, 21 January 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==why am important??==		==why am important??==
	Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)		Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
			*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 15 March 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:
	We should probably add info on him being on Failosophy, and maybe create a page for it if Chris [[Encyclopedia Dramatica\|goes bonkers about it]].		We should probably add info on him being on Failosophy, and maybe create a page for it if Chris [[Encyclopedia Dramatica\|goes bonkers about it]].
	--[[User:Skoodles\|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Skoodles\|Skoodles]] 13:45, 15 March 2013 (PDT)
			He wrote a long FB comment about it, with a response from one of the hosts ( I think) and a bunch of other comments from his fans asking for more sonichu--[[User:CaseHa\|CaseHa]] 17:51, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:24, 30 December 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)		*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
	** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)		** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)
			::*Good thinking, I don't know why I didn't see that. But since it's almost 2013, I think we should stop making articles for individual months, unless Chris comes back to the Internet which I highly doubt. So instead of linking to [[January 2013]], we'd just make a subsection on this page, i.e. 2013#January. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 01:24, 30 December 2012 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 22 January 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)		Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
	*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)		*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
			** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)