Talk:28 October 2011 - Revision history

Cereally: /* Who hit Snyder first */

2023-10-03T06:42:15Z

Who hit Snyder first

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:42, 3 October 2023
Line 202:		Line 202:
	'Snyder did get hit with the Chandler vehicle. Not once, but twice. Once by Chris, and then again by Barb when they switched places.'		'Snyder did get hit with the Chandler vehicle. Not once, but twice. Once by Chris, and then again by Barb when they switched places.'

	This is a quote from Cyan from [[This is how the Trial went]], and says that Chris hit Snyder first. I think this is important enough info to be added to the article.		This is a quote from Cyan from [[This is how the Trial went]], and says that Chris hit Snyder first. I think this is important enough info to be added to the article. [[User:Cereally\|Cereally]] ([[User talk:Cereally\|talk]]) 02:42, 3 October 2023 (EDT)

Cereally: /* Who hit Snyder first */ new section

2023-10-03T06:41:59Z

Who hit Snyder first: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:41, 3 October 2023
Line 197:		Line 197:

	Vinelink no longer turns up a result for Barb nor Chris when searched by name or offender ID. The reflinks in the page ([https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/detailsAction.do?siteId=47000&agency=228&id=323013&searchType=offender 1], [https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/detailsAction.do?siteId=47000&agency=228&id=125674&searchType=offender 2]) now just redirect to the main site. My guess is that's because their sentences are up and their names have been expunged. Did anyone get screencaps of these before they went down? I don't think the sentences are documented anywhere else. —[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 02:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)		Vinelink no longer turns up a result for Barb nor Chris when searched by name or offender ID. The reflinks in the page ([https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/detailsAction.do?siteId=47000&agency=228&id=323013&searchType=offender 1], [https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/detailsAction.do?siteId=47000&agency=228&id=125674&searchType=offender 2]) now just redirect to the main site. My guess is that's because their sentences are up and their names have been expunged. Did anyone get screencaps of these before they went down? I don't think the sentences are documented anywhere else. —[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 02:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

			== Who hit Snyder first ==

			'Snyder did get hit with the Chandler vehicle. Not once, but twice. Once by Chris, and then again by Barb when they switched places.'

			This is a quote from Cyan from [[This is how the Trial went]], and says that Chris hit Snyder first. I think this is important enough info to be added to the article.

CWCTime: /* Vinelink sources broken */ new section

2014-07-25T02:36:34Z

Vinelink sources broken: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 24 July 2014
Line 193:		Line 193:

	However, I've just asked Cyan if we can use her report here and if she consents, we'll make an article for it in the same vein as [[The Tale of the Crazy Pacer]] and other verified reports of Chris sightings. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 00:13, 12 July 2012 (PDT)		However, I've just asked Cyan if we can use her report here and if she consents, we'll make an article for it in the same vein as [[The Tale of the Crazy Pacer]] and other verified reports of Chris sightings. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 00:13, 12 July 2012 (PDT)

			== Vinelink sources broken ==

			Vinelink no longer turns up a result for Barb nor Chris when searched by name or offender ID. The reflinks in the page ([https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/detailsAction.do?siteId=47000&agency=228&id=323013&searchType=offender 1], [https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/detailsAction.do?siteId=47000&agency=228&id=125674&searchType=offender 2]) now just redirect to the main site. My guess is that's because their sentences are up and their names have been expunged. Did anyone get screencaps of these before they went down? I don't think the sentences are documented anywhere else. —[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 02:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

4Macie: /* A Quick Question */

2012-07-12T20:29:39Z

A Quick Question

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 12 July 2012
Line 186:		Line 186:

	I understand as part of Christian's and Barb's plea deal, they have to pay Mike's medical expenses. Was there any wording in the plea that indicated that Mike was settling his civil case against them in exchange for this settlement, or is his civil suit still ongoing? I know it's not entirely strange for civil suits to be settled in criminal courts in exchange for plea deals, but I can't find any information about whether Mike's civil suit is still ongoing or not. --[[User:SargentPickles\|SargentPickles]] 21:32, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		I understand as part of Christian's and Barb's plea deal, they have to pay Mike's medical expenses. Was there any wording in the plea that indicated that Mike was settling his civil case against them in exchange for this settlement, or is his civil suit still ongoing? I know it's not entirely strange for civil suits to be settled in criminal courts in exchange for plea deals, but I can't find any information about whether Mike's civil suit is still ongoing or not. --[[User:SargentPickles\|SargentPickles]] 21:32, 11 July 2012 (PDT)
	:*Snyder received the restraining order again the Chandler's during the Civil Suit. This actually didn't go to trail, so I'm assuming it was a plea deal, kinda like "I won't press charges as long as you stay the hell away from me" type thing. The plea bargain for the criminal charges was probably an add-in to make the deal look better and to show that the Chandler's have some remorse over their actions (though, as we can see, Chris has no remorse for what he's done to Snyder and is only upset because he got in trouble). --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 13:29, 12 July 2012 (PDT)		:*Snyder received the restraining order again the Chandler's during the Civil Suit. This actually didn't go to trail, so I'm assuming it was a plea deal, kinda like "I won't press charges as long as you stay the hell away from me" type thing. The plea bargain for the criminal charges dealing with Snyder's medical payments was probably an add-in to make the deal look better and to show that the Chandler's have some remorse over their actions (though, as we can see, Chris has no remorse for what he's done to Snyder and is only upset because he got in trouble). --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 13:29, 12 July 2012 (PDT)

	== Cyan & Indigo's report ==		== Cyan & Indigo's report ==

4Macie: /* A Quick Question */

2012-07-12T20:29:05Z

A Quick Question

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 12 July 2012
Line 186:		Line 186:

	I understand as part of Christian's and Barb's plea deal, they have to pay Mike's medical expenses. Was there any wording in the plea that indicated that Mike was settling his civil case against them in exchange for this settlement, or is his civil suit still ongoing? I know it's not entirely strange for civil suits to be settled in criminal courts in exchange for plea deals, but I can't find any information about whether Mike's civil suit is still ongoing or not. --[[User:SargentPickles\|SargentPickles]] 21:32, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		I understand as part of Christian's and Barb's plea deal, they have to pay Mike's medical expenses. Was there any wording in the plea that indicated that Mike was settling his civil case against them in exchange for this settlement, or is his civil suit still ongoing? I know it's not entirely strange for civil suits to be settled in criminal courts in exchange for plea deals, but I can't find any information about whether Mike's civil suit is still ongoing or not. --[[User:SargentPickles\|SargentPickles]] 21:32, 11 July 2012 (PDT)
			:*Snyder received the restraining order again the Chandler's during the Civil Suit. This actually didn't go to trail, so I'm assuming it was a plea deal, kinda like "I won't press charges as long as you stay the hell away from me" type thing. The plea bargain for the criminal charges was probably an add-in to make the deal look better and to show that the Chandler's have some remorse over their actions (though, as we can see, Chris has no remorse for what he's done to Snyder and is only upset because he got in trouble). --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 13:29, 12 July 2012 (PDT)

	== Cyan & Indigo's report ==		== Cyan & Indigo's report ==

Derk: /* Article Title and Redirects */

2012-07-12T17:04:06Z

Article Title and Redirects

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 12 July 2012
Line 80:		Line 80:
	:The subsection regarding the incident on the GAMe PLACe page called it "Strike Three, You're Out!" Something along those lines, perhaps?--[[User:Henry Bemis\|Henry Bemis]] 22:16, 6 November 2011 (PST)		:The subsection regarding the incident on the GAMe PLACe page called it "Strike Three, You're Out!" Something along those lines, perhaps?--[[User:Henry Bemis\|Henry Bemis]] 22:16, 6 November 2011 (PST)
	:We are a Wiki at the end of the day - and it's less about getting a "fitting" or amusing title, and more about getting a sensible one. I chose this one based on other articles about specific events (mostly significant videos that were not given a particularly unique name by Chris). "Keep It Simple" is the golden rule here, so any renames should be both simple and yet, unique enough for people to be easily able to find it. I'm totally open to better suggestions for the article title though, as I said near the top of this discussion page. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 03:17, 7 November 2011 (PST)		:We are a Wiki at the end of the day - and it's less about getting a "fitting" or amusing title, and more about getting a sensible one. I chose this one based on other articles about specific events (mostly significant videos that were not given a particularly unique name by Chris). "Keep It Simple" is the golden rule here, so any renames should be both simple and yet, unique enough for people to be easily able to find it. I'm totally open to better suggestions for the article title though, as I said near the top of this discussion page. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 03:17, 7 November 2011 (PST)
			Title suggestion: 2011 GAMe PLACe Altercation and Trial. Given that Chris ''is'' going before the grand jury however, we need to keep in mind this article is probably going to need to be split eventually as this whole thing is probably far from over. --[[User:Derk\|Derk]] 10:04, 12 July 2012 (PDT)

	==Where==		==Where==

Champthom: /* Cyan & Indigo's report */ new section

2012-07-12T07:13:31Z

Cyan & Indigo's report: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 12 July 2012
Line 185:		Line 185:

	I understand as part of Christian's and Barb's plea deal, they have to pay Mike's medical expenses. Was there any wording in the plea that indicated that Mike was settling his civil case against them in exchange for this settlement, or is his civil suit still ongoing? I know it's not entirely strange for civil suits to be settled in criminal courts in exchange for plea deals, but I can't find any information about whether Mike's civil suit is still ongoing or not. --[[User:SargentPickles\|SargentPickles]] 21:32, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		I understand as part of Christian's and Barb's plea deal, they have to pay Mike's medical expenses. Was there any wording in the plea that indicated that Mike was settling his civil case against them in exchange for this settlement, or is his civil suit still ongoing? I know it's not entirely strange for civil suits to be settled in criminal courts in exchange for plea deals, but I can't find any information about whether Mike's civil suit is still ongoing or not. --[[User:SargentPickles\|SargentPickles]] 21:32, 11 July 2012 (PDT)

			== Cyan & Indigo's report ==

			Just as a reminder, only [[Help:A_Quick_Guide_to_CWCki#Cite_only_publicly_available_media\|publicly available media]] is acceptable to cite on the CWCki. This is to promote transparency and as it stands, the CWCki Forums require registration and people shouldn't have to register an account to check out the report.

			However, I've just asked Cyan if we can use her report here and if she consents, we'll make an article for it in the same vein as [[The Tale of the Crazy Pacer]] and other verified reports of Chris sightings. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 00:13, 12 July 2012 (PDT)

SargentPickles at 04:32, 12 July 2012

2012-07-12T04:32:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 12 July 2012
Line 181:		Line 181:
	:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax		:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax
	:** At the time of this posting, that site has nothing updated for the Chandler's, in fact, it still says they have an active case and their arraignment date set. What I don't understand is this, I was under the impression that an arraignment was only for the prosecuted to plead guilty, not guilty, no contest, ext. I thought there was a different date all together for sentencing. But of course, this article says there was a plea bargain in place, which would probably happen during the arraignment. The only way I think we know this is through the troll that was there that day. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 16:23, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		:** At the time of this posting, that site has nothing updated for the Chandler's, in fact, it still says they have an active case and their arraignment date set. What I don't understand is this, I was under the impression that an arraignment was only for the prosecuted to plead guilty, not guilty, no contest, ext. I thought there was a different date all together for sentencing. But of course, this article says there was a plea bargain in place, which would probably happen during the arraignment. The only way I think we know this is through the troll that was there that day. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 16:23, 11 July 2012 (PDT)

			==A Quick Question==

			I understand as part of Christian's and Barb's plea deal, they have to pay Mike's medical expenses. Was there any wording in the plea that indicated that Mike was settling his civil case against them in exchange for this settlement, or is his civil suit still ongoing? I know it's not entirely strange for civil suits to be settled in criminal courts in exchange for plea deals, but I can't find any information about whether Mike's civil suit is still ongoing or not. --[[User:SargentPickles\|SargentPickles]] 21:32, 11 July 2012 (PDT)

4Macie: /* Sentencing */

2012-07-11T23:23:19Z

Sentencing

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 11 July 2012
Line 180:		Line 180:
	Where did the details regarding Chris and Barb's sentencing come from? I saw it on Da Update and moved the info over from there.--[[User:The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here\|The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here]] 00:35, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		Where did the details regarding Chris and Barb's sentencing come from? I saw it on Da Update and moved the info over from there.--[[User:The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here\|The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here]] 00:35, 11 July 2012 (PDT)
	:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax		:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax
			:** At the time of this posting, that site has nothing updated for the Chandler's, in fact, it still says they have an active case and their arraignment date set. What I don't understand is this, I was under the impression that an arraignment was only for the prosecuted to plead guilty, not guilty, no contest, ext. I thought there was a different date all together for sentencing. But of course, this article says there was a plea bargain in place, which would probably happen during the arraignment. The only way I think we know this is through the troll that was there that day. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 16:23, 11 July 2012 (PDT)

Dangdirtylols: /* Time to split */

2012-07-11T22:48:58Z

Time to split

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 11 July 2012
Line 175:		Line 175:

	: What name? What saga is this? [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 00:45, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		: What name? What saga is this? [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 00:45, 11 July 2012 (PDT)
			::Felony Saga? Hit & Run Saga? Courthouse Saga? Trial Saga? Justice Saga?--[[User:Dangdirtylols\|Dangdirtylols]] 15:48, 11 July 2012 (PDT)

	==Sentencing==		==Sentencing==
	Where did the details regarding Chris and Barb's sentencing come from? I saw it on Da Update and moved the info over from there.--[[User:The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here\|The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here]] 00:35, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		Where did the details regarding Chris and Barb's sentencing come from? I saw it on Da Update and moved the info over from there.--[[User:The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here\|The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here]] 00:35, 11 July 2012 (PDT)
	:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax		:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 11 July 2012
Line 180:		Line 180:
	Where did the details regarding Chris and Barb's sentencing come from? I saw it on Da Update and moved the info over from there.--[[User:The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here\|The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here]] 00:35, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		Where did the details regarding Chris and Barb's sentencing come from? I saw it on Da Update and moved the info over from there.--[[User:The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here\|The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here]] 00:35, 11 July 2012 (PDT)
	:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax		:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax
			:** At the time of this posting, that site has nothing updated for the Chandler's, in fact, it still says they have an active case and their arraignment date set. What I don't understand is this, I was under the impression that an arraignment was only for the prosecuted to plead guilty, not guilty, no contest, ext. I thought there was a different date all together for sentencing. But of course, this article says there was a plea bargain in place, which would probably happen during the arraignment. The only way I think we know this is through the troll that was there that day. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 16:23, 11 July 2012 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 11 July 2012
Line 175:		Line 175:

	: What name? What saga is this? [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 00:45, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		: What name? What saga is this? [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 00:45, 11 July 2012 (PDT)
			::Felony Saga? Hit & Run Saga? Courthouse Saga? Trial Saga? Justice Saga?--[[User:Dangdirtylols\|Dangdirtylols]] 15:48, 11 July 2012 (PDT)

	==Sentencing==		==Sentencing==
	Where did the details regarding Chris and Barb's sentencing come from? I saw it on Da Update and moved the info over from there.--[[User:The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here\|The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here]] 00:35, 11 July 2012 (PDT)		Where did the details regarding Chris and Barb's sentencing come from? I saw it on Da Update and moved the info over from there.--[[User:The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here\|The Mad Butcher Of Insert Country Here]] 00:35, 11 July 2012 (PDT)
	:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax		:*Most likely The Official Website for Virginia's Judicial System. [[User:Alopax\|Alopax]] 00:59, 11 July 2012 (PDT)Alopax