Talk:A Workout - Revision history

Anonymax: →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

2011-09-28T07:56:47Z

→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:56, 28 September 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	seriously guys. there's a whole fucking board for this now. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 17:26, 24 October 2010 (PDT)		seriously guys. there's a whole fucking board for this now. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 17:26, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
	*That's why I used the words "would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles". --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 01:43, 26 October 2010 (PDT)		*That's why I used the words "would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles". --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 01:43, 26 October 2010 (PDT)

			== Dead link ==

			During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

			* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ5-iZYHBEc
			** In [[A Workout]] on 2011-09-20 22:29:41, 404 Not Found
			** In [[A Workout]] on 2011-09-28 07:53:00, 404 Not Found

			--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 00:56, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Spoonman: /* An example? */

2010-10-26T08:43:14Z

An example?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 26 October 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	seriously guys. there's a whole fucking board for this now. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 17:26, 24 October 2010 (PDT)		seriously guys. there's a whole fucking board for this now. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 17:26, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
			*That's why I used the words "would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles". --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 01:43, 26 October 2010 (PDT)

Pr45: /* An example? */

2010-10-25T01:34:44Z

An example?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 24 October 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)		What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
	* I can't see why not~~; his actions certainly aren't considered straight. But it is possible that this Jackie character may or may not be involved in getting Chris to produce these strange videos~~. --[[User:Pr45\|Pr45]] 23:42, 24 October 2010 (GMT)		* I can't see why not. --[[User:Pr45\|Pr45]] 23:42, 24 October 2010 (GMT)
	{{Not A Forum}}		{{Not A Forum}}

	seriously guys. there's a whole fucking board for this now. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 17:26, 24 October 2010 (PDT)		seriously guys. there's a whole fucking board for this now. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 17:26, 24 October 2010 (PDT)

Clydec: /* An example? */

2010-10-25T00:26:49Z

An example?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 24 October 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)		What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
	* I can't see why not; his actions certainly aren't considered straight. But it is possible that this Jackie character may or may not be involved in getting Chris to produce these strange videos. --[[User:Pr45\|Pr45]] 23:42, 24 October 2010 (GMT)		* I can't see why not; his actions certainly aren't considered straight. But it is possible that this Jackie character may or may not be involved in getting Chris to produce these strange videos. --[[User:Pr45\|Pr45]] 23:42, 24 October 2010 (GMT)
			{{Not A Forum}}

			seriously guys. there's a whole fucking board for this now. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 17:26, 24 October 2010 (PDT)

Pr45: /* An example? */

2010-10-24T22:43:33Z

An example?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 24 October 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)		What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
			* I can't see why not; his actions certainly aren't considered straight. But it is possible that this Jackie character may or may not be involved in getting Chris to produce these strange videos. --[[User:Pr45\|Pr45]] 23:42, 24 October 2010 (GMT)

Spoonman at 19:31, 24 October 2010

2010-10-24T19:31:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 24 October 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~---~~An example?~~---~~		==An example?==

	What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)		What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)

Spoonman at 19:31, 24 October 2010

2010-10-24T19:31:23Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:31, 24 October 2010
Line 1:	Line 1:
		---An example?---

		What strikes me the most about these recent videos is Chris' blatant ignorance of the fact that the things he's doing comes across as really, ''really'' transgenderish and generally not-straight. Would this be worth pointing out in the appropriate articles, like Chris and homosexuality? --[[User:Spoonman\|Spoonman]] 12:31, 24 October 2010 (PDT)

Shotaru: /* stuffed bra */

2010-10-20T22:18:20Z

stuffed bra

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 20 October 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:

	~~== stuffed bra ==~~
	~~Do you guys think Jackie is the one that requested him to stuff his sports bra for this video? --[[User:Shotaru\|Shotaru]] 14:31, 20 October 2010 (PDT)~~

Shotaru: Created page with " == stuffed bra == Do you guys think Jackie is the one that requested him to stuff his sports bra for this video? --~~~~"

2010-10-20T21:31:36Z

Created page with " == stuffed bra == Do you guys think Jackie is the one that requested him to stuff his sports bra for this video? --~~~~"

New page

== stuffed bra ==
Do you guys think Jackie is the one that requested him to stuff his sports bra for this video? --[[User:Shotaru|Shotaru]] 14:31, 20 October 2010 (PDT)