Talk:Abusive babysitter - Revision history

Chandler at 03:55, 16 June 2014

2014-06-16T03:55:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 15 June 2014
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:I'd say no, because the page isn't really about her, but Chris's distorted perception of what happened. (Who remembers anything from when they were 1 1/2 anyway?) Her name is just a part of the story, not the story itself. Perhaps a redirect? [[User:Smokedaddy\|Smokedaddy]] 13:44, 6 May 2011 (PDT)		:I'd say no, because the page isn't really about her, but Chris's distorted perception of what happened. (Who remembers anything from when they were 1 1/2 anyway?) Her name is just a part of the story, not the story itself. Perhaps a redirect? [[User:Smokedaddy\|Smokedaddy]] 13:44, 6 May 2011 (PDT)

	~~== What The Fuck Is Going On?! ==~~

	An abusive babysitter surnamed Roach, and my surname is Roach. Not to mention he shares my mother's maiden name of Chandler. This is all too fucking weird. I hope to god I'm not related in any way to Chris.
	~~:*Talk pages are [[CWCki:NOTAFORUM\|not a forum]]. Please follow the previous link to see appropriate places where to post your story. --[[User:Galford\|Galford]] 03:06, 28 February 2012 (PST)~~

Galford: /* What The Fuck Is Going On?! */

2012-02-28T11:06:44Z

What The Fuck Is Going On?!

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 28 February 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:

	An abusive babysitter surnamed Roach, and my surname is Roach. Not to mention he shares my mother's maiden name of Chandler. This is all too fucking weird. I hope to god I'm not related in any way to Chris.		An abusive babysitter surnamed Roach, and my surname is Roach. Not to mention he shares my mother's maiden name of Chandler. This is all too fucking weird. I hope to god I'm not related in any way to Chris.
			:*Talk pages are [[CWCki:NOTAFORUM\|not a forum]]. Please follow the previous link to see appropriate places where to post your story. --[[User:Galford\|Galford]] 03:06, 28 February 2012 (PST)

Chandler: /* What The Fuck Is Going On?! */ new section

2012-02-28T10:19:03Z

What The Fuck Is Going On?!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:19, 28 February 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:I'd say no, because the page isn't really about her, but Chris's distorted perception of what happened. (Who remembers anything from when they were 1 1/2 anyway?) Her name is just a part of the story, not the story itself. Perhaps a redirect? [[User:Smokedaddy\|Smokedaddy]] 13:44, 6 May 2011 (PDT)		:I'd say no, because the page isn't really about her, but Chris's distorted perception of what happened. (Who remembers anything from when they were 1 1/2 anyway?) Her name is just a part of the story, not the story itself. Perhaps a redirect? [[User:Smokedaddy\|Smokedaddy]] 13:44, 6 May 2011 (PDT)

			== What The Fuck Is Going On?! ==

			An abusive babysitter surnamed Roach, and my surname is Roach. Not to mention he shares my mother's maiden name of Chandler. This is all too fucking weird. I hope to god I'm not related in any way to Chris.

Smokedaddy: ruminations on renaming the article

2011-05-06T20:44:55Z

ruminations on renaming the article

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 6 May 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Possible rename? ==		== Possible rename? ==
	Would it be more appropriate to rename this page "Roach" or something similar? It seems odd to me to refer to her as the Abusive babysitter when we know at least part of her actual name. --[[User:Obligatory\|Obligatory]] 11:04, 6 May 2011 (PDT)		Would it be more appropriate to rename this page "Roach" or something similar? It seems odd to me to refer to her as the Abusive babysitter when we know at least part of her actual name. --[[User:Obligatory\|Obligatory]] 11:04, 6 May 2011 (PDT)

			:I'd say no, because the page isn't really about her, but Chris's distorted perception of what happened. (Who remembers anything from when they were 1 1/2 anyway?) Her name is just a part of the story, not the story itself. Perhaps a redirect? [[User:Smokedaddy\|Smokedaddy]] 13:44, 6 May 2011 (PDT)

Obligatory at 18:04, 6 May 2011

2011-05-06T18:04:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 6 May 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.		::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.
	:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)		:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

			== Possible rename? ==
			Would it be more appropriate to rename this page "Roach" or something similar? It seems odd to me to refer to her as the Abusive babysitter when we know at least part of her actual name. --[[User:Obligatory\|Obligatory]] 11:04, 6 May 2011 (PDT)

Hans Gruber at 19:08, 6 September 2010

2010-09-06T19:08:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 6 September 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.		::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.
	:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)		:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


	~~== Note ==~~
	~~After Chris discovers we know he's JenkinsJinkies add that the babysitter's name is "Roache".~~
	~~Evidence- http://trollingtrain.10.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=17&start=30~~
	~~And no, Chris is never going to check the discussion page of "Abusive babysitter" so saying he's JenkinsJenkies here is no big deal.--[[User:Hans Gruber\|Hans Gruber]] 12:06, 6 September 2010 (PDT)~~

Hans Gruber at 19:06, 6 September 2010

2010-09-06T19:06:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 6 September 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.		::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.
	:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)		:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


			== Note ==
			After Chris discovers we know he's JenkinsJinkies add that the babysitter's name is "Roache".
			Evidence- http://trollingtrain.10.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=17&start=30
			And no, Chris is never going to check the discussion page of "Abusive babysitter" so saying he's JenkinsJenkies here is no big deal.--[[User:Hans Gruber\|Hans Gruber]] 12:06, 6 September 2010 (PDT)

Champthom: /* De-stubification */

2010-03-28T17:18:26Z

De-stubification

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 28 March 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::Okay, I tried my best (with the few sources there are). Basically I just elaborated on select parts. Unless the big guy reveals anything more about his babysitter, this article will forever remain a stub. --[[User:Blunderscore\|Blunderscore]] 17:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)		::Okay, I tried my best (with the few sources there are). Basically I just elaborated on select parts. Unless the big guy reveals anything more about his babysitter, this article will forever remain a stub. --[[User:Blunderscore\|Blunderscore]] 17:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

			::*Well it's a small article, which isn't necessarily bad. I think we should try to remind ourselves that just because it's small doesn't mean it doesn't warrant an article. Stubs should more or less be articles that are only a sentence long and there to get the ball holding.
			:::Hasn't Chris mentioned the babysitter more than once? We need to list every instance Chris has mentioned her in any media that's available.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 17:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Blunderscore: /* De-stubification */

2010-03-26T17:24:15Z

De-stubification

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:24, 26 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Good luck. I'll take a bash at it as well, once you're through --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux\|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 17:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)		:Good luck. I'll take a bash at it as well, once you're through --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux\|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 17:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

			::Okay, I tried my best (with the few sources there are). Basically I just elaborated on select parts. Unless the big guy reveals anything more about his babysitter, this article will forever remain a stub. --[[User:Blunderscore\|Blunderscore]] 17:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

YawningSquirtleRedux: /* De-stubification */

2010-03-26T17:15:27Z

De-stubification

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:15, 26 March 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I might try and edit this into a full article. Wish me luck, gentlemen. --[[User:Blunderscore\|Blunderscore]] 17:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)		I might try and edit this into a full article. Wish me luck, gentlemen. --[[User:Blunderscore\|Blunderscore]] 17:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

			:Good luck. I'll take a bash at it as well, once you're through --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux\|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 17:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)