Talk:Alec Benson Leary calls - Revision history

Liquid!: /* Purpose of this page */

2010-02-12T14:39:47Z

Purpose of this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 12 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	::::Have a ~~look~~ [[Mumble\|~~now~~]] and tell me what you think so far. I'm writing up new summaries for Mumble 10 and 11, so those will be up later today or early tomorrow. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 14:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)		::::Have a [[Mumble\|look]] and tell me what you think so far. I'm writing up new summaries for Mumble 10 and 11, so those will be up later today or early tomorrow. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 14:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

	==hey get the dates==		==hey get the dates==

Liquid!: /* Purpose of this page */

2010-02-12T14:13:26Z

Purpose of this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 12 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	~~****~~ Have a look [[Mumble\|now]] and tell me what you think so far. I'm writing up new summaries for Mumble 10 and 11, so those will be up later today or early tomorrow. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 14:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)		::::Have a look [[Mumble\|now]] and tell me what you think so far. I'm writing up new summaries for Mumble 10 and 11, so those will be up later today or early tomorrow. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 14:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

	==hey get the dates==		==hey get the dates==

Liquid!: /* Purpose of this page */

2010-02-12T14:12:59Z

Purpose of this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 12 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	~~::::~~ Have a look [[Mumble\|now]] and tell me what you think so far. I'm writing up new summaries for Mumble 10 and 11, so those will be up later today or early tomorrow.		**** Have a look [[Mumble\|now]] and tell me what you think so far. I'm writing up new summaries for Mumble 10 and 11, so those will be up later today or early tomorrow. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 14:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

	==hey get the dates==		==hey get the dates==

Liquid!: /* Purpose of this page */

2010-02-12T14:12:07Z

Purpose of this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 12 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::: Have a look [[Mumble\|now]] and tell me what you think so far. I'm writing up new summaries for Mumble 10 and 11, so those will be up later today or early tomorrow.

	==hey get the dates==		==hey get the dates==

Clydec: /* hey get the dates */

2010-02-10T22:41:51Z

hey get the dates

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 10 February 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	==hey get the dates==		==hey get the dates==
			January 22, 2010
	~~call two took place 1-~~28-2010 ~~and call seven took place 2-8-~~2010~~. i'll get the other dates later i guess~~ [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		January 28, 2010
			January 30, 2010
			February 01, 2010
			February 02, 2010
			February 04, 2010
			February 08, 2010
			[[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 22:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

	== Green for Alec/Text colors ==		== Green for Alec/Text colors ==

Scarf: /* Green for Alec/Text colors */

2010-02-10T20:20:13Z

Green for Alec/Text colors

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 10 February 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Also, remember to wikify transcripts. I don't give a fuck if it's hard to tell a link is wikified for Chris's blue font, this is a god damn wiki and pages should be wikified with links to explain the content of the transcript. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		Also, remember to wikify transcripts. I don't give a fuck if it's hard to tell a link is wikified for Chris's blue font, this is a god damn wiki and pages should be wikified with links to explain the content of the transcript. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

			<font color="green">Would this color be better? I could go through and fix it.</font> --[[User:Scarf\|Scarf]] 20:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* Purpose of this page */

2010-02-10T20:16:42Z

Purpose of this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 10 February 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Yeah, that sounds fair. But in theory, this page might not develop because people are too lazy to do anything with it. Just saying. Also, now that I think about it, the Julie PSN chats and the Mumble chats could have an index page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		*Yeah, that sounds fair. But in theory, this page might not develop because people are too lazy to do anything with it. Just saying. Also, now that I think about it, the Julie PSN chats and the Mumble chats could have an index page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::*Yeah, I was sorta thinking something along those lines. I was thinking of a separate page for the Mumble chats, but then I'm like "Do we really need a separate page to explain what Mumble is, and another page for the Mumble chats?" Might as well repurpose the Mumble page into an index for the Mumble chats, since when most people refer to "Mumble" it's in respect to the Mumble chats. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

	==hey get the dates==		==hey get the dates==

Liquid!: /* Purpose of this page */

2010-02-10T20:11:03Z

Purpose of this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 10 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	So ideally, each call is gonna have a brief narrative of what is being discussed - previous calls are referenced, IIRC, so another reason why we need a page. If people want to check out the calls, they can do so by looking at each call's page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		So ideally, each call is gonna have a brief narrative of what is being discussed - previous calls are referenced, IIRC, so another reason why we need a page. If people want to check out the calls, they can do so by looking at each call's page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	* Not to stick my nose into this, but I can see the validity of both perspectives. I think we should keep the separate page for now and see how it evolves. If it remains as an index with no real detail, I think it should just be merged with [[Asperchu]], and we could refer to the subsection. If it develops an identity of its own, it should stay separate. I can't think of any other series of calls/audios that has its own index page; perhaps the way this page develops could be a precedent for how we deal with the others.		* Not to stick my nose into this, but I can see the validity of both perspectives. I think we should keep the separate page for now and see how it evolves. If it remains as an index with no real detail, I think it should just be merged with [[Asperchu]], and we could refer to the subsection. If it develops an identity of its own, it should stay separate. I can't think of any other series of calls/audios that has its own index page; perhaps the way this page develops could be a precedent for how we deal with the others.
			tl;dr: Let's wait and see how it goes. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 15:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	*Yeah, that sounds fair. But in theory, this page might not develop because people are too lazy to do anything with it. Just saying. Also, now that I think about it, the Julie PSN chats and the Mumble chats could have an index page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		*Yeah, that sounds fair. But in theory, this page might not develop because people are too lazy to do anything with it. Just saying. Also, now that I think about it, the Julie PSN chats and the Mumble chats could have an index page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
	~~tl;dr: Let~~'s wait and see how it goes. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 15:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		** Yeah, I see your point. I guess a large part of why I'm saying 'wait and see' as opposed to doing is because I don't really know what such an index should look like and the level of detail it should have. I feel kind of invested in the Mumble chats, so I'll fiddle with the [[Mumble\|main page]] later and create small sections for each chat (similar to how this one looks atm) with a brief paragraph to summarise each one and see how it goes down. Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 20:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

	==hey get the dates==		==hey get the dates==

Champthom: /* Green for Alec */

2010-02-10T18:23:27Z

Green for Alec

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, 10 February 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	call two took place 1-28-2010 and call seven took place 2-8-2010. i'll get the other dates later i guess [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		call two took place 1-28-2010 and call seven took place 2-8-2010. i'll get the other dates later i guess [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

	== Green for Alec ==		== Green for Alec/Text colors ==

	No offense people, but do you actually, you know, try reading that green font? It's shit, it hurts my eyes, baby Jesus tried to read it and he cried. Yes, it's fun to color code but I'd rather have everything be in "dull" black and readable than some "fun" color and unreadable.		No offense people, but do you actually, you know, try reading that green font? It's shit, it hurts my eyes, baby Jesus tried to read it and he cried. Yes, it's fun to color code but I'd rather have everything be in "dull" black and readable than some "fun" color and unreadable.

	Also, remember to wikify transcripts. I don't give a fuck if it's hard to tell a link is wikified for Chris's blue font, this is a god damn wiki and pages should be wikified with links to explain the content of the transcript. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		Also, remember to wikify transcripts. I don't give a fuck if it's hard to tell a link is wikified for Chris's blue font, this is a god damn wiki and pages should be wikified with links to explain the content of the transcript. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* Green for Alec */ new section

2010-02-10T18:23:12Z

Green for Alec: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, 10 February 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	call two took place 1-28-2010 and call seven took place 2-8-2010. i'll get the other dates later i guess [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		call two took place 1-28-2010 and call seven took place 2-8-2010. i'll get the other dates later i guess [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

			== Green for Alec ==

			No offense people, but do you actually, you know, try reading that green font? It's shit, it hurts my eyes, baby Jesus tried to read it and he cried. Yes, it's fun to color code but I'd rather have everything be in "dull" black and readable than some "fun" color and unreadable.

			Also, remember to wikify transcripts. I don't give a fuck if it's hard to tell a link is wikified for Chris's blue font, this is a god damn wiki and pages should be wikified with links to explain the content of the transcript. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)