Talk:Asperchu is a Horrendous Joke - Revision history

Anonymax: →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

2011-09-28T09:44:08Z

→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 28 September 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:

	:The video is private. Doesn't matter. [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 23:06, 10 April 2011 (PDT)		:The video is private. Doesn't matter. [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 23:06, 10 April 2011 (PDT)

			== Dead link ==

			During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

			* http://hsienko.com/asperchu/index.php?title=Main_Page
			** In [[Asperchu]] on 2011-09-20 22:29:44, 404 Not Found
			** In [[Asperchu]] on 2011-09-28 07:53:27, 404 Not Found
			** In [[Asperchu]] on 2011-09-28 09:44:18, 404 Not Found

			--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 02:44, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Nullity at 06:06, 11 April 2011

2011-04-11T06:06:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 11 April 2011
Line 59:		Line 59:

	My bad, it was me. I didn't sign. Agh!-- [[User: darkhorse816\|darkhorse816]] 22:50, 31, January 2011 (CST)		My bad, it was me. I didn't sign. Agh!-- [[User: darkhorse816\|darkhorse816]] 22:50, 31, January 2011 (CST)

			:The video is private. Doesn't matter. [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 23:06, 10 April 2011 (PDT)

Darkhorse816: /* Mao's Response Video */

2011-02-01T04:51:50Z

Mao's Response Video

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 1 February 2011
Line 57:		Line 57:
	Is it possible to re-upload it? If not, we should get rid of the section with the rebuttal.		Is it possible to re-upload it? If not, we should get rid of the section with the rebuttal.
	:Person above didn't sign, but anways: rebuttal video needs re-linking.--[[User:Xavier orona\|Xavier orona]] 21:26, 8 January 2011 (PST)		:Person above didn't sign, but anways: rebuttal video needs re-linking.--[[User:Xavier orona\|Xavier orona]] 21:26, 8 January 2011 (PST)

			My bad, it was me. I didn't sign. Agh!-- [[User: darkhorse816\|darkhorse816]] 22:50, 31, January 2011 (CST)

Xavier orona: /* Mao's Response Video */

2011-01-09T05:26:33Z

Mao's Response Video

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 9 January 2011
Line 56:		Line 56:

	Is it possible to re-upload it? If not, we should get rid of the section with the rebuttal.		Is it possible to re-upload it? If not, we should get rid of the section with the rebuttal.
			:Person above didn't sign, but anways: rebuttal video needs re-linking.--[[User:Xavier orona\|Xavier orona]] 21:26, 8 January 2011 (PST)

Darkhorse816: /* Mao's Response Video */ new section

2010-12-10T06:27:38Z

Mao's Response Video: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 10 December 2010
Line 52:		Line 52:
	:::*Ah, good point; then it can wait for a response. --[[User:Dude\|Dude]] 06:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)		:::*Ah, good point; then it can wait for a response. --[[User:Dude\|Dude]] 06:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
	Unrelated to all that, is there a standard videobox template to use for relevant troll videos?--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)		Unrelated to all that, is there a standard videobox template to use for relevant troll videos?--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

			== Mao's Response Video ==

			Is it possible to re-upload it? If not, we should get rid of the section with the rebuttal.

MoarLurk at 17:46, 4 February 2010

2010-02-04T17:46:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 4 February 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:::*Yeah, I see what you guys mean. I just remembered it and guessed that was what Chris was refering to as "homosexual". It's not that he was right about about them being gay references, so, sorry 'bout that. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 09:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)		:::*Yeah, I see what you guys mean. I just remembered it and guessed that was what Chris was refering to as "homosexual". It's not that he was right about about them being gay references, so, sorry 'bout that. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 09:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

			I love how he claimed that the image of Jivin banging Heaven was a "homosexual reference". Also, even the word "fag" seems to disturb him.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
	== CWCville is real ==		== CWCville is real ==

DirtyCrappedBriefs: /* CWCville is real */

2010-01-18T19:19:29Z

CWCville is real

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 18 January 2010
Line 35:		Line 35:

	If Cwcville is real I can assure it's probably a smoldering crater, I mean what kind of living being would let Chris run a city?--[[User:Pikimon\|Pikimon]] 04:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)		If Cwcville is real I can assure it's probably a smoldering crater, I mean what kind of living being would let Chris run a city?--[[User:Pikimon\|Pikimon]] 04:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

			The 'real' CWCville is the LEGO shantytown that Chris has spent his entire life mashing together. Nobody else has picked up on that? It's his ultimate fetish. The amulets, the amyfist ring, those are secondary - his reaction when the amulet was stolen is proof of that. I'm not sure how this came to be, and I'm not sure what the specifics of this delusion are (does he consider the lego people to be real people, for instance) but I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that 'real CWCville' = the mass of mismatched, color-clashing LEGOs in his room. He thinks of it as a real city. --[[User:DirtyCrappedBriefs\|DirtyCrappedBriefs]] 19:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

	== You rage you ruse ==		== You rage you ruse ==

Fefnir: /* The homosexual references. */

2010-01-18T10:04:47Z

The homosexual references.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:04, 18 January 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:*Actually, he is wrong. They're male models or something, right? Does that mean they're gay? In Chris's view, a male model in a suggestive pose would constitute "homosexual reference," but he's an idiot. Considering that they're photoshopped into posters for Twilight: New Moon, they're meant for females to gawk at. Chris is, yet again displaying his overactive homophobia.--[[User:Jewlay\|Jewlay]] 20:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)		:*Actually, he is wrong. They're male models or something, right? Does that mean they're gay? In Chris's view, a male model in a suggestive pose would constitute "homosexual reference," but he's an idiot. Considering that they're photoshopped into posters for Twilight: New Moon, they're meant for females to gawk at. Chris is, yet again displaying his overactive homophobia.--[[User:Jewlay\|Jewlay]] 20:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
	::*I transcribed that part, and yeah, I couldn't see any half-naked dudes with Chris's crappy video quality (that and the fact he's fucking filming his TV). My bad dudes. Still, to automatically assume as buff guy is a "homosexual reference" is a bit much.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)		::*I transcribed that part, and yeah, I couldn't see any half-naked dudes with Chris's crappy video quality (that and the fact he's fucking filming his TV). My bad dudes. Still, to automatically assume as buff guy is a "homosexual reference" is a bit much.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Yeah, I see what you guys mean. I just remembered it and guessed that was what Chris was refering to as "homosexual". ~~Sorry~~ 'bout that. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 09:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)		:::*Yeah, I see what you guys mean. I just remembered it and guessed that was what Chris was refering to as "homosexual". It's not that he was right about about them being gay references, so, sorry 'bout that. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 09:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

	== CWCville is real ==		== CWCville is real ==

Fefnir: /* The homosexual references. */

2010-01-18T09:59:47Z

The homosexual references.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:59, 18 January 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:*Actually, he is wrong. They're male models or something, right? Does that mean they're gay? In Chris's view, a male model in a suggestive pose would constitute "homosexual reference," but he's an idiot. Considering that they're photoshopped into posters for Twilight: New Moon, they're meant for females to gawk at. Chris is, yet again displaying his overactive homophobia.--[[User:Jewlay\|Jewlay]] 20:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)		:*Actually, he is wrong. They're male models or something, right? Does that mean they're gay? In Chris's view, a male model in a suggestive pose would constitute "homosexual reference," but he's an idiot. Considering that they're photoshopped into posters for Twilight: New Moon, they're meant for females to gawk at. Chris is, yet again displaying his overactive homophobia.--[[User:Jewlay\|Jewlay]] 20:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
	::*I transcribed that part, and yeah, I couldn't see any half-naked dudes with Chris's crappy video quality (that and the fact he's fucking filming his TV). My bad dudes. Still, to automatically assume as buff guy is a "homosexual reference" is a bit much.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)		::*I transcribed that part, and yeah, I couldn't see any half-naked dudes with Chris's crappy video quality (that and the fact he's fucking filming his TV). My bad dudes. Still, to automatically assume as buff guy is a "homosexual reference" is a bit much.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Yeah, I see what you guys mean. I just remembered it and guessed that was what Chris was refering to as "homosexual". [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 09:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)		:::*Yeah, I see what you guys mean. I just remembered it and guessed that was what Chris was refering to as "homosexual". Sorry 'bout that. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 09:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

	== CWCville is real ==		== CWCville is real ==

Fefnir: /* The homosexual references. */

2010-01-18T09:56:20Z

The homosexual references.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 18 January 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:*Actually, he is wrong. They're male models or something, right? Does that mean they're gay? In Chris's view, a male model in a suggestive pose would constitute "homosexual reference," but he's an idiot. Considering that they're photoshopped into posters for Twilight: New Moon, they're meant for females to gawk at. Chris is, yet again displaying his overactive homophobia.--[[User:Jewlay\|Jewlay]] 20:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)		:*Actually, he is wrong. They're male models or something, right? Does that mean they're gay? In Chris's view, a male model in a suggestive pose would constitute "homosexual reference," but he's an idiot. Considering that they're photoshopped into posters for Twilight: New Moon, they're meant for females to gawk at. Chris is, yet again displaying his overactive homophobia.--[[User:Jewlay\|Jewlay]] 20:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
	::*I transcribed that part, and yeah, I couldn't see any half-naked dudes with Chris's crappy video quality (that and the fact he's fucking filming his TV). My bad dudes. Still, to automatically assume as buff guy is a "homosexual reference" is a bit much.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)		::*I transcribed that part, and yeah, I couldn't see any half-naked dudes with Chris's crappy video quality (that and the fact he's fucking filming his TV). My bad dudes. Still, to automatically assume as buff guy is a "homosexual reference" is a bit much.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
			:::*Yeah, I see what you guys mean. I just remembered it and guessed that was what Chris was refering to as "homosexual". [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 09:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

	== CWCville is real ==		== CWCville is real ==