Talk:CWC is Sad - Revision history

Galford: /* Contradictory date of video */ new section

2012-01-08T16:40:11Z

Contradictory date of video: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 8 January 2012
Line 41:		Line 41:
	I really don't believe he refers to Kacey as 'Katey' at the end of the video. It sounds like a quick cut due to the malfunctioning PSEye causes it to drop the 'c' and a small distortion sounds like a 't'. Anyone have any thoughts? [[User:hersuri]] 17:15, 9 December 2009		I really don't believe he refers to Kacey as 'Katey' at the end of the video. It sounds like a quick cut due to the malfunctioning PSEye causes it to drop the 'c' and a small distortion sounds like a 't'. Anyone have any thoughts? [[User:hersuri]] 17:15, 9 December 2009
	*I just listened to it again. It really sounds like he's saying Katey. Kinda weird that he would screw up her name at a time like this, but whatever.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:29, 29 December 2009 (CET)		*I just listened to it again. It really sounds like he's saying Katey. Kinda weird that he would screw up her name at a time like this, but whatever.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:29, 29 December 2009 (CET)

			== Contradictory date of video ==

			In the description of this video it's stated that it was released on 10 November 2009. However in the description of his [[Red_Letter_CWC_Certified_Day\|next video]] it's stated that this one was released 11 November 2009. The later seems to be accurate considering the name of the video (11112009) and that this page was also created on the 11th. --[[User:Galford\|Galford]] 08:40, 8 January 2012 (PST)

Clydec: 22 revisions

2010-01-03T08:48:31Z

22 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:48, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

VanKrause: /* "Katey" */

2009-12-29T20:29:52Z

"Katey"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 29 December 2009
Line 40:		Line 40:

	I really don't believe he refers to Kacey as 'Katey' at the end of the video. It sounds like a quick cut due to the malfunctioning PSEye causes it to drop the 'c' and a small distortion sounds like a 't'. Anyone have any thoughts? [[User:hersuri]] 17:15, 9 December 2009		I really don't believe he refers to Kacey as 'Katey' at the end of the video. It sounds like a quick cut due to the malfunctioning PSEye causes it to drop the 'c' and a small distortion sounds like a 't'. Anyone have any thoughts? [[User:hersuri]] 17:15, 9 December 2009
			*I just listened to it again. It really sounds like he's saying Katey. Kinda weird that he would screw up her name at a time like this, but whatever.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:29, 29 December 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 06:17, 9 December 2009

2009-12-09T06:17:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 9 December 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:
	== "Katey" ==		== "Katey" ==

	I really don't believe he refers to Kacey as 'Katey' at the end of the video. It sounds like a quick cut due to the malfunctioning PSEye causes it to drop the 'c' and a small distortion sounds like a 't'. Anyone have any thoughts?		I really don't believe he refers to Kacey as 'Katey' at the end of the video. It sounds like a quick cut due to the malfunctioning PSEye causes it to drop the 'c' and a small distortion sounds like a 't'. Anyone have any thoughts? [[User:hersuri]] 17:15, 9 December 2009

VanKrause at 06:15, 9 December 2009

2009-12-09T06:15:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 9 December 2009
Line 36:		Line 36:

	Im suprised I was the first person to make a page on this vid, when I watched it it had over 300 views [[User:CJB8895]] 21:20, 1 December 2009		Im suprised I was the first person to make a page on this vid, when I watched it it had over 300 views [[User:CJB8895]] 21:20, 1 December 2009

			== "Katey" ==

			I really don't believe he refers to Kacey as 'Katey' at the end of the video. It sounds like a quick cut due to the malfunctioning PSEye causes it to drop the 'c' and a small distortion sounds like a 't'. Anyone have any thoughts?

VanKrause at 05:21, 2 December 2009

2009-12-02T05:21:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 2 December 2009
Line 35:		Line 35:
	== Dang ==		== Dang ==

	Im suprised I was the first person to make a page on this vid, when I watched it it had over 300 views		Im suprised I was the first person to make a page on this vid, when I watched it it had over 300 views [[User:CJB8895]] 21:20, 1 December 2009

VanKrause: New section: Dang

2009-12-02T05:20:09Z

New section: Dang

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 2 December 2009
Line 32:		Line 32:
	*That's actually a good idea, maybe "Not TRUE and HONEST videos" could be the category name but that's a very good idea to point out which videos when he's not wearing his medallion or ring. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:50, 11 November 2009 (CET)		*That's actually a good idea, maybe "Not TRUE and HONEST videos" could be the category name but that's a very good idea to point out which videos when he's not wearing his medallion or ring. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:50, 11 November 2009 (CET)
	:* Yeah, goes for some of the Ivy videos and such as well. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 23:12, 11 November 2009 (CET)		:* Yeah, goes for some of the Ivy videos and such as well. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 23:12, 11 November 2009 (CET)

			== Dang ==

			Im suprised I was the first person to make a page on this vid, when I watched it it had over 300 views

VanKrause: /* New category */

2009-11-11T22:12:02Z

New category

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 11 November 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	[[User:Sygerrik\|Sygerrik]] 19:09, 11 November 2009 (CET)		[[User:Sygerrik\|Sygerrik]] 19:09, 11 November 2009 (CET)
	*That's actually a good idea, maybe "Not TRUE and HONEST videos" could be the category name but that's a very good idea to point out which videos when he's not wearing his medallion or ring. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:50, 11 November 2009 (CET)		*That's actually a good idea, maybe "Not TRUE and HONEST videos" could be the category name but that's a very good idea to point out which videos when he's not wearing his medallion or ring. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:50, 11 November 2009 (CET)
			:* Yeah, goes for some of the Ivy videos and such as well. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 23:12, 11 November 2009 (CET)

Champthom at 21:52, 11 November 2009

2009-11-11T21:52:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 11 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{protip\|Please keep discussion on the talk page strictly to improving the article. Those who wish to discuss video contents are encouraged to go to [[Sonichu (IRC)\|#sonichu]], [[Krapple\|/cwc/]], [[PVCC (message board)\|PVCC]], or (God forbid) [[Chris-chan (forum)\|the ED Chris-chan forum]]}}

	The current title kinda sucks. --[[User:Sonijew\|Sonijew]] 09:36, 11 November 2009 (CET)		The current title kinda sucks. --[[User:Sonijew\|Sonijew]] 09:36, 11 November 2009 (CET)
	*The current title kinda rocks. It's like, [[CWC is Angry]] but with sadness. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 12:01, 11 November 2009 (CET)		*The current title kinda rocks. It's like, [[CWC is Angry]] but with sadness. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 12:01, 11 November 2009 (CET)

Champthom: /* New category */

2009-11-11T21:50:55Z

New category

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 11 November 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	So, I wonder if we should create a new category for "videos of questionable provenance," including these two, the one where he "came out" and others. At least we could tag 'em. This is just a thought.		So, I wonder if we should create a new category for "videos of questionable provenance," including these two, the one where he "came out" and others. At least we could tag 'em. This is just a thought.
	[[User:Sygerrik\|Sygerrik]] 19:09, 11 November 2009 (CET)		[[User:Sygerrik\|Sygerrik]] 19:09, 11 November 2009 (CET)
			*That's actually a good idea, maybe "Not TRUE and HONEST videos" could be the category name but that's a very good idea to point out which videos when he's not wearing his medallion or ring. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:50, 11 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 11 November 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	[[User:Sygerrik\|Sygerrik]] 19:09, 11 November 2009 (CET)		[[User:Sygerrik\|Sygerrik]] 19:09, 11 November 2009 (CET)
	*That's actually a good idea, maybe "Not TRUE and HONEST videos" could be the category name but that's a very good idea to point out which videos when he's not wearing his medallion or ring. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:50, 11 November 2009 (CET)		*That's actually a good idea, maybe "Not TRUE and HONEST videos" could be the category name but that's a very good idea to point out which videos when he's not wearing his medallion or ring. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:50, 11 November 2009 (CET)
			:* Yeah, goes for some of the Ivy videos and such as well. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 23:12, 11 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 11 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{protip\|Please keep discussion on the talk page strictly to improving the article. Those who wish to discuss video contents are encouraged to go to [[Sonichu (IRC)\|#sonichu]], [[Krapple\|/cwc/]], [[PVCC (message board)\|PVCC]], or (God forbid) [[Chris-chan (forum)\|the ED Chris-chan forum]]}}

	The current title kinda sucks. --[[User:Sonijew\|Sonijew]] 09:36, 11 November 2009 (CET)		The current title kinda sucks. --[[User:Sonijew\|Sonijew]] 09:36, 11 November 2009 (CET)
	*The current title kinda rocks. It's like, [[CWC is Angry]] but with sadness. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 12:01, 11 November 2009 (CET)		*The current title kinda rocks. It's like, [[CWC is Angry]] but with sadness. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 12:01, 11 November 2009 (CET)