Talk:CWCipedia - Revision history

Little Owl: /* File Not Found */

2019-05-24T16:23:25Z

File Not Found

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 24 May 2019
Line 140:		Line 140:
	==File Not Found==		==File Not Found==
	Where is the archived CWCipedia? All links are broken. Is it gone forever? What's up here? [[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/2/15		Where is the archived CWCipedia? All links are broken. Is it gone forever? What's up here? [[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/2/15

			==Broken CWCipedia==

			Hi guys, I think I may be able to explain why the CWCipedia is down. The server is using PHP 7.2.10, but I think the MediaWiki software that powers the archive have not been updated, according to [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tazthc8drqv4sexr this help thread]. I think that the CWCipedia will work again when the software is updated to something like MediaWiki 1.32. --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 16:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Asperhes at 21:59, 2 April 2015

2015-04-02T21:59:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 2 April 2015
Line 137:		Line 137:

	--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 01:01, 28 September 2011 (PDT)		--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 01:01, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

			==File Not Found==
			Where is the archived CWCipedia? All links are broken. Is it gone forever? What's up here? [[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/2/15

Anonymax: →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

2011-09-28T08:01:35Z

→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:01, 28 September 2011
Line 127:		Line 127:
	I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	:That's a good question. Truthfully, seeing as the CWCipedia is gone, there's no need to reduce to TMI - it's over, it's served its purpose and now we look at the archives and we chronicle how it got that way. As well, the TMI also serves as a deterrent against Chris: he hates having to read long things. When he does, he gets stressed and leaves.		:That's a good question. Truthfully, seeing as the CWCipedia is gone, there's no need to reduce to TMI - it's over, it's served its purpose and now we look at the archives and we chronicle how it got that way. As well, the TMI also serves as a deterrent against Chris: he hates having to read long things. When he does, he gets stressed and leaves.

			== Dead link ==

			During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

			* http://gayrights.change.org/
			** In [[CWCipedia]] on 2011-09-20 22:30:40, Error: ''
			** In [[CWCipedia]] on 2011-09-28 08:01:57, Error: ''

			--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 01:01, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Blazer: /* tmi? */

2010-09-30T01:50:05Z

tmi?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 29 September 2010
Line 126:		Line 126:

	I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
			:That's a good question. Truthfully, seeing as the CWCipedia is gone, there's no need to reduce to TMI - it's over, it's served its purpose and now we look at the archives and we chronicle how it got that way. As well, the TMI also serves as a deterrent against Chris: he hates having to read long things. When he does, he gets stressed and leaves.

Horsehorsehorse at 23:36, 29 September 2010

2010-09-29T23:36:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 29 September 2010
Line 122:		Line 122:

	The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on [[User:Cogsdev\|Cogs's]] server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)		The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on [[User:Cogsdev\|Cogs's]] server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)

	~~== tmi? ==~~

	I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

	== tmi? ==		== tmi? ==

	I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

Horsehorsehorse: /* tmi? */ new section

2010-09-29T23:35:41Z

tmi?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 29 September 2010
Line 122:		Line 122:

	The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on [[User:Cogsdev\|Cogs's]] server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)		The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on [[User:Cogsdev\|Cogs's]] server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)

			== tmi? ==

			I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

	== tmi? ==		== tmi? ==

	I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

Horsehorsehorse: /* tmi? */ new section

2010-09-29T23:35:31Z

tmi?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 29 September 2010
Line 122:		Line 122:

	The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on [[User:Cogsdev\|Cogs's]] server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)		The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on [[User:Cogsdev\|Cogs's]] server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)

			== tmi? ==

			I don't want to step on any toes due to my newfaggotry but one of the most recent edits (in the parenthetical bit in the first line) has me wondering if it really should be there. The CWCipedia drama has always left mrs horse & I puzzled until we saw that, after which we both fell over from the incredible impact of lulz. i know Chris reads the CWCiki, so I ask if this is too much info at this time. [[User:Horsehorsehorse\|Horsehorsehorse]] 16:35, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

SeventhBase: /* How did it all begin? */ new section

2010-09-02T21:15:12Z

How did it all begin?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 2 September 2010
Line 118:		Line 118:
	***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
	****Can some lawfag translate for me? I know he didn't give a "note or memorandum of the transfer... in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed" because it wasn't signed and isn't in writing, only typing which doesn't count in court of law. Furthermore, as it isn't being lawfully seized, it isn't an "operation of law". Did he then give an "instrument of conveyance" by stating he was abandoning the site? If not, than we fail the first hurdle in saying that the copyright isn't his because the transfer of copyright isn't legally valid by this law. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 21:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		****Can some lawfag translate for me? I know he didn't give a "note or memorandum of the transfer... in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed" because it wasn't signed and isn't in writing, only typing which doesn't count in court of law. Furthermore, as it isn't being lawfully seized, it isn't an "operation of law". Did he then give an "instrument of conveyance" by stating he was abandoning the site? If not, than we fail the first hurdle in saying that the copyright isn't his because the transfer of copyright isn't legally valid by this law. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 21:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

			== How did it all begin? ==

			The "early days" history is fairly ambiguous. All we know was that it was hosted on [[User:Cogsdev\|Cogs's]] server. We don't know why Chris requested it, or why Cogs offered the space... --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 14:15, 2 September 2010 (PDT)

Thelieisacake at 21:39, 26 June 2010

2010-06-26T21:39:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 26 June 2010
Line 117:		Line 117:
	**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --[[User:Grey\|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --[[User:Grey\|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
	***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
			****Can some lawfag translate for me? I know he didn't give a "note or memorandum of the transfer... in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed" because it wasn't signed and isn't in writing, only typing which doesn't count in court of law. Furthermore, as it isn't being lawfully seized, it isn't an "operation of law". Did he then give an "instrument of conveyance" by stating he was abandoning the site? If not, than we fail the first hurdle in saying that the copyright isn't his because the transfer of copyright isn't legally valid by this law. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 21:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Clydec: /* CWCipedia Suspended? */

2010-06-26T21:17:41Z

CWCipedia Suspended?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 26 June 2010
Line 116:		Line 116:
	*Or maybe Vivian realised that her attempt at a troll scheme was a failure and just decided to shut down the site, for great justice. Incidentally, I want to know what the legal status of Sonichu is if it was work for hire to the CWCipedia and and CWCipedia is now dead. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		*Or maybe Vivian realised that her attempt at a troll scheme was a failure and just decided to shut down the site, for great justice. Incidentally, I want to know what the legal status of Sonichu is if it was work for hire to the CWCipedia and and CWCipedia is now dead. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
	**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --[[User:Grey\|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --[[User:Grey\|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
			***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 26 June 2010
Line 117:		Line 117:
	**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --[[User:Grey\|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --[[User:Grey\|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
	***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
			****Can some lawfag translate for me? I know he didn't give a "note or memorandum of the transfer... in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed" because it wasn't signed and isn't in writing, only typing which doesn't count in court of law. Furthermore, as it isn't being lawfully seized, it isn't an "operation of law". Did he then give an "instrument of conveyance" by stating he was abandoning the site? If not, than we fail the first hurdle in saying that the copyright isn't his because the transfer of copyright isn't legally valid by this law. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 21:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 26 June 2010
Line 116:		Line 116:
	*Or maybe Vivian realised that her attempt at a troll scheme was a failure and just decided to shut down the site, for great justice. Incidentally, I want to know what the legal status of Sonichu is if it was work for hire to the CWCipedia and and CWCipedia is now dead. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		*Or maybe Vivian realised that her attempt at a troll scheme was a failure and just decided to shut down the site, for great justice. Incidentally, I want to know what the legal status of Sonichu is if it was work for hire to the CWCipedia and and CWCipedia is now dead. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
	**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --[[User:Grey\|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)		**It's still, if it really is considered work-for-hire, copyrighted to the owners of the CWCipedia, I believe -- whomever they may be. If Chris agreed to assign his copyright rights to the owners of the CWCipedia, then that means they are under copyright protection for up to 35 years. The owners of the CWCipedia are the ones who may choose to negotiate the termination of the copyright. It's all [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap2.html#204 here] in black and white. I might be misreading it, but there is a certificate of transfer (in the form of the WFH form signed by both parties), and that serves as the major evidence that the transfer took place. --[[User:Grey\|Grey]] 8:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
			***Due to complaints about the old vandalized cwcipedia apparently, it was still up. [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 21:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)