Talk:CWCki Club - Revision history

Little Owl: /* Malware Issues */

2019-08-02T18:27:12Z

Malware Issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 2 August 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:

	*As mentioned in the edit notes, Glaive (The site's admin) stated, "I left a variable name in there that wasnt even in use so it was flagging on that even though the script wasn't even there to use it". He then provided a link to urlscan.io: https://urlscan.io/result/df892dbd-4962-4c76-8c57-d24ce1bab3c7#summary showing there is no miner or any other scripts. For the record the miner never was malicious and ran entirely in the browser; I can't claim I know exacly how any of this stuff works but you can read about it in the initial thread: http://cwcki.club/index.php?threads/testing-in-browser-cyptocurrency-miner-here-to-cover-costs.1673/ . Glaive has removed the miner as it's more trouble then it's worth for visitors who's antivirus goes off when they visit the site. I you have any further questions about the miner or the site I'd be glad to answer them to the best of my ability but Glaive is the ultimate auditory on such matters. --[[User:Finnegan\|Finnegan]] ([[User talk:Finnegan\|talk]]) 18:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)		*As mentioned in the edit notes, Glaive (The site's admin) stated, "I left a variable name in there that wasnt even in use so it was flagging on that even though the script wasn't even there to use it". He then provided a link to urlscan.io: https://urlscan.io/result/df892dbd-4962-4c76-8c57-d24ce1bab3c7#summary showing there is no miner or any other scripts. For the record the miner never was malicious and ran entirely in the browser; I can't claim I know exacly how any of this stuff works but you can read about it in the initial thread: http://cwcki.club/index.php?threads/testing-in-browser-cyptocurrency-miner-here-to-cover-costs.1673/ . Glaive has removed the miner as it's more trouble then it's worth for visitors who's antivirus goes off when they visit the site. I you have any further questions about the miner or the site I'd be glad to answer them to the best of my ability but Glaive is the ultimate auditory on such matters. --[[User:Finnegan\|Finnegan]] ([[User talk:Finnegan\|talk]]) 18:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

			* Web-based cryptominers already have a bad reputation due to misuse by the malware authors, that Firefox now [https://blog.mozilla.org/firefox/block-cryptominers-with-firefox/ has an option] for users to block it completely. As a result, any kind of cryptominer is going to raise alarm bells. --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 18:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Finnegan at 18:07, 2 August 2019

2019-08-02T18:07:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 2 August 2019
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Apparently the Cwcki Club has malwares that mines CPU for cryptocurrency. What should we do? I am considering adding a warning.-[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 04:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)		Apparently the Cwcki Club has malwares that mines CPU for cryptocurrency. What should we do? I am considering adding a warning.-[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 04:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

	*As mentioned in the edit notes, Glaive (The site's admin) stated, "I left a variable name in there that wasnt even in use so it was flagging on that even though the script wasn't even there to use it". He then provided a link to urlscan.io: https://urlscan.io/result/df892dbd-4962-4c76-8c57-d24ce1bab3c7#summary showing there is no miner or any other scripts. For the record the miner never was malicious and ran entirely in the browser; I can't claim I know exacly how any of this stuff works but you can read about it in the initial thread: http://cwcki.club/index.php?threads/testing-in-browser-cyptocurrency-miner-here-to-cover-costs.1673/ . Glaive has removed the miner as it's more trouble then it's worth for visitors who's antivirus goes off when they visit the site. I you have any further questions about the miner or the site I'd be glad to answer them to the best of my ability but Glaive is the ultimate auditory on such matters.		*As mentioned in the edit notes, Glaive (The site's admin) stated, "I left a variable name in there that wasnt even in use so it was flagging on that even though the script wasn't even there to use it". He then provided a link to urlscan.io: https://urlscan.io/result/df892dbd-4962-4c76-8c57-d24ce1bab3c7#summary showing there is no miner or any other scripts. For the record the miner never was malicious and ran entirely in the browser; I can't claim I know exacly how any of this stuff works but you can read about it in the initial thread: http://cwcki.club/index.php?threads/testing-in-browser-cyptocurrency-miner-here-to-cover-costs.1673/ . Glaive has removed the miner as it's more trouble then it's worth for visitors who's antivirus goes off when they visit the site. I you have any further questions about the miner or the site I'd be glad to answer them to the best of my ability but Glaive is the ultimate auditory on such matters. --[[User:Finnegan\|Finnegan]] ([[User talk:Finnegan\|talk]]) 18:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Finnegan: /* Malware Issues */

2019-08-02T18:07:36Z

Malware Issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 2 August 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Malware Issues==		==Malware Issues==
	Apparently the Cwcki Club has malwares that mines CPU for cryptocurrency. What should we do? I am considering adding a warning.-[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 04:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)		Apparently the Cwcki Club has malwares that mines CPU for cryptocurrency. What should we do? I am considering adding a warning.-[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 04:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

			*As mentioned in the edit notes, Glaive (The site's admin) stated, "I left a variable name in there that wasnt even in use so it was flagging on that even though the script wasn't even there to use it". He then provided a link to urlscan.io: https://urlscan.io/result/df892dbd-4962-4c76-8c57-d24ce1bab3c7#summary showing there is no miner or any other scripts. For the record the miner never was malicious and ran entirely in the browser; I can't claim I know exacly how any of this stuff works but you can read about it in the initial thread: http://cwcki.club/index.php?threads/testing-in-browser-cyptocurrency-miner-here-to-cover-costs.1673/ . Glaive has removed the miner as it's more trouble then it's worth for visitors who's antivirus goes off when they visit the site. I you have any further questions about the miner or the site I'd be glad to answer them to the best of my ability but Glaive is the ultimate auditory on such matters.

Larry the Larryhog at 04:48, 21 February 2019

2019-02-21T04:48:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:48, 21 February 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:

	**Looks like this page was originally just a redirect to [[CWCki Forums]]. That part could be added back in. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 00:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)		**Looks like this page was originally just a redirect to [[CWCki Forums]]. That part could be added back in. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 00:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

			==Malware Issues==
			Apparently the Cwcki Club has malwares that mines CPU for cryptocurrency. What should we do? I am considering adding a warning.-[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 04:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Hurtful Truth Level at 00:36, 22 January 2017

2017-01-22T00:36:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 21 January 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:

	-[[User:Windows OS\|Windows OS]] ([[User talk:Windows OS\|talk]]) 00:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)		-[[User:Windows OS\|Windows OS]] ([[User talk:Windows OS\|talk]]) 00:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

			**Looks like this page was originally just a redirect to [[CWCki Forums]]. That part could be added back in. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 00:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Windows OS at 00:17, 22 January 2017

2017-01-22T00:17:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 21 January 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Navy\|Navy]] ([[User talk:Navy\|talk]]) 23:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)		[[User:Navy\|Navy]] ([[User talk:Navy\|talk]]) 23:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

			Ehh. I already made a section on the [[CWCki Forums]] page about the CWCki Club. Plus, on their statement about the death of the Kiwi Farms, they did said that even though that they are about "so-bad-its-good shows and media", they are advertising their section on Chris. Plus, their about us does say "We're off our meds and on the online as the primary forum-based community dedicated exclusively to the one and only Christian Weston Chandler. Known as the creator of Sonichu the electric hedgehog Pokemon." So, yeah. The CWCki Club should be mentioned over here (especially now that the Farms are gone), but I'm not so sure if it should have its own page or the section on the CWCki Forums page is good enough.

			-[[User:Windows OS\|Windows OS]] ([[User talk:Windows OS\|talk]]) 00:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Navy: Serious Question regarding CWCki Club

2017-01-21T23:52:38Z

Serious Question regarding CWCki Club

New page

Is there a reason to start making and fleshing out this page? I mean, there is still a sections on CWCki Club, and it does HAVE the term "CWCki" in it, but does that mean that there should be a page up here?

[[User:Navy|Navy]] ([[User talk:Navy|talk]]) 23:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)