Talk:Chris-chan (forum) - Revision history

Alan Pardew: Redirected page to Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica

2014-05-13T04:50:53Z

Redirected page to Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica

Alan Pardew: /* Merge with Encyclopedia Dramatica */

2014-05-13T04:46:44Z

Merge with Encyclopedia Dramatica

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 13 May 2014
Line 1,111:		Line 1,111:
	The subject of this article seems really insignificant; if Chris hadn't talked about this forum in [[Chris dispels videogame rumors\|a video]] it wouldn't even warrant a mention on our website. I think that except for the first and third paragraph all of this article has no value to the CWCki's goal of documenting Chris. I suggest we include a brief mention of the forum in the article on ED and do away with rest of this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 07:22, 28 June 2012 (PDT)		The subject of this article seems really insignificant; if Chris hadn't talked about this forum in [[Chris dispels videogame rumors\|a video]] it wouldn't even warrant a mention on our website. I think that except for the first and third paragraph all of this article has no value to the CWCki's goal of documenting Chris. I suggest we include a brief mention of the forum in the article on ED and do away with rest of this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 07:22, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
	: Two-year late reply, but I have to heavily agree here. I think this article is needlessly inflammatory and insulting. While it might have been a festering cesspool of spergery, it doesn't warrant such a blindly slating article (or even an article at all) by any stretch. A section on the ED article would probably be far, far better than the article as it stands. Barely anything pipes to it anyway. --[[User:DX10\|DX10]] ([[User talk:DX10\|talk]]) 04:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)		: Two-year late reply, but I have to heavily agree here. I think this article is needlessly inflammatory and insulting. While it might have been a festering cesspool of spergery, it doesn't warrant such a blindly slating article (or even an article at all) by any stretch. A section on the ED article would probably be far, far better than the article as it stands. Barely anything pipes to it anyway. --[[User:DX10\|DX10]] ([[User talk:DX10\|talk]]) 04:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

			* Sorry for the late reply, but I agree. Merging now and the talk page for the forum is inserted too for archival purposes. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 04:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

DX10: /* Merge with Encyclopedia Dramatica */

2014-05-08T04:35:39Z

Merge with Encyclopedia Dramatica

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:35, 8 May 2014
Line 1,110:		Line 1,110:

	The subject of this article seems really insignificant; if Chris hadn't talked about this forum in [[Chris dispels videogame rumors\|a video]] it wouldn't even warrant a mention on our website. I think that except for the first and third paragraph all of this article has no value to the CWCki's goal of documenting Chris. I suggest we include a brief mention of the forum in the article on ED and do away with rest of this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 07:22, 28 June 2012 (PDT)		The subject of this article seems really insignificant; if Chris hadn't talked about this forum in [[Chris dispels videogame rumors\|a video]] it wouldn't even warrant a mention on our website. I think that except for the first and third paragraph all of this article has no value to the CWCki's goal of documenting Chris. I suggest we include a brief mention of the forum in the article on ED and do away with rest of this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 07:22, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
			: Two-year late reply, but I have to heavily agree here. I think this article is needlessly inflammatory and insulting. While it might have been a festering cesspool of spergery, it doesn't warrant such a blindly slating article (or even an article at all) by any stretch. A section on the ED article would probably be far, far better than the article as it stands. Barely anything pipes to it anyway. --[[User:DX10\|DX10]] ([[User talk:DX10\|talk]]) 04:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

NegaCWC: /* Merge with Encyclopedia Dramatica */ new section

2012-06-28T14:22:16Z

Merge with Encyclopedia Dramatica: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 28 June 2012
Line 1,106:		Line 1,106:
	The recent posters seem to be knowledgeable. However, the place has gotten slow. Maybe the lamers left. --[[User:16BitAlex\|16BitAlex]] 11:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		The recent posters seem to be knowledgeable. However, the place has gotten slow. Maybe the lamers left. --[[User:16BitAlex\|16BitAlex]] 11:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
	*I'm sure it's just the right level for you. Go, frolic. Seriously, get the fuck out. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 15:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		*I'm sure it's just the right level for you. Go, frolic. Seriously, get the fuck out. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 15:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

			== Merge with Encyclopedia Dramatica ==

			The subject of this article seems really insignificant; if Chris hadn't talked about this forum in [[Chris dispels videogame rumors\|a video]] it wouldn't even warrant a mention on our website. I think that except for the first and third paragraph all of this article has no value to the CWCki's goal of documenting Chris. I suggest we include a brief mention of the forum in the article on ED and do away with rest of this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 07:22, 28 June 2012 (PDT)

Thelieisacake at 15:36, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T15:36:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 30 June 2010
Line 1,105:		Line 1,105:

	The recent posters seem to be knowledgeable. However, the place has gotten slow. Maybe the lamers left. --[[User:16BitAlex\|16BitAlex]] 11:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		The recent posters seem to be knowledgeable. However, the place has gotten slow. Maybe the lamers left. --[[User:16BitAlex\|16BitAlex]] 11:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
			*I'm sure it's just the right level for you. Go, frolic. Seriously, get the fuck out. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 15:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

16BitAlex: /* It isn't the cesspool you depict it as */ new section

2010-06-30T11:59:52Z

It isn't the cesspool you depict it as: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:59, 30 June 2010
Line 1,101:		Line 1,101:
	Sep 04 21:52:41 <GodBear01\|TextOnly> HAPPY		Sep 04 21:52:41 <GodBear01\|TextOnly> HAPPY
	</pre>		</pre>

			== It isn't the cesspool you depict it as ==

			The recent posters seem to be knowledgeable. However, the place has gotten slow. Maybe the lamers left. --[[User:16BitAlex\|16BitAlex]] 11:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Clydec: 7 revisions

2010-01-03T08:58:45Z

7 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:58, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

VanKrause at 04:14, 23 December 2009

2009-12-23T04:14:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 23 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Addition to the trolling community?==
			That statement just doesn't seem right to me--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 05:14, 23 December 2009 (CET)

	==To do==		==To do==
	Add a "Typical threads" like from the [[Krapple]] article. I couldn't think of anything funny. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:39, 20 September 2009 (CEST)		Add a "Typical threads" like from the [[Krapple]] article. I couldn't think of anything funny. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:39, 20 September 2009 (CEST)

VanKrause at 07:59, 26 November 2009

2009-11-26T07:59:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 26 November 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*Done. They all link to the origninal topics, too. Tell me what you think. --[[User:Anon1Guardian\|Anon1Guardian]] 21:28, 25 November 2009 (CET)[[Image:anonlaugh.png\|50px]]		*Done. They all link to the origninal topics, too. Tell me what you think. --[[User:Anon1Guardian\|Anon1Guardian]] 21:28, 25 November 2009 (CET)[[Image:anonlaugh.png\|50px]]
	:*It's even better that you added to actual links. Nice work, I like it a lot. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:56, 25 November 2009 (CET)		:*It's even better that you added to actual links. Nice work, I like it a lot. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:56, 25 November 2009 (CET)
			::*Yeah. I would have added them to the [[Krapple]] article, but all the old ones are gone. :( --[[User:Anon1Guardian\|Anon1Guardian]] 08:59, 26 November 2009 (CET)[[Image:Anonlaugh.png\|50px]]

	== Chatlog ==		== Chatlog ==

Champthom: /* To do */

2009-11-25T21:56:33Z

To do

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 25 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Add a "Typical threads" like from the [[Krapple]] article. I couldn't think of anything funny. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:39, 20 September 2009 (CEST)		Add a "Typical threads" like from the [[Krapple]] article. I couldn't think of anything funny. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 06:39, 20 September 2009 (CEST)
	*Done. They all link to the origninal topics, too. Tell me what you think. --[[User:Anon1Guardian\|Anon1Guardian]] 21:28, 25 November 2009 (CET)[[Image:anonlaugh.png\|50px]]		*Done. They all link to the origninal topics, too. Tell me what you think. --[[User:Anon1Guardian\|Anon1Guardian]] 21:28, 25 November 2009 (CET)[[Image:anonlaugh.png\|50px]]
			:*It's even better that you added to actual links. Nice work, I like it a lot. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:56, 25 November 2009 (CET)

	== Chatlog ==		== Chatlog ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 13 May 2014
Line 1,111:		Line 1,111:
	The subject of this article seems really insignificant; if Chris hadn't talked about this forum in [[Chris dispels videogame rumors\|a video]] it wouldn't even warrant a mention on our website. I think that except for the first and third paragraph all of this article has no value to the CWCki's goal of documenting Chris. I suggest we include a brief mention of the forum in the article on ED and do away with rest of this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 07:22, 28 June 2012 (PDT)		The subject of this article seems really insignificant; if Chris hadn't talked about this forum in [[Chris dispels videogame rumors\|a video]] it wouldn't even warrant a mention on our website. I think that except for the first and third paragraph all of this article has no value to the CWCki's goal of documenting Chris. I suggest we include a brief mention of the forum in the article on ED and do away with rest of this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 07:22, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
	: Two-year late reply, but I have to heavily agree here. I think this article is needlessly inflammatory and insulting. While it might have been a festering cesspool of spergery, it doesn't warrant such a blindly slating article (or even an article at all) by any stretch. A section on the ED article would probably be far, far better than the article as it stands. Barely anything pipes to it anyway. --[[User:DX10\|DX10]] ([[User talk:DX10\|talk]]) 04:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)		: Two-year late reply, but I have to heavily agree here. I think this article is needlessly inflammatory and insulting. While it might have been a festering cesspool of spergery, it doesn't warrant such a blindly slating article (or even an article at all) by any stretch. A section on the ED article would probably be far, far better than the article as it stands. Barely anything pipes to it anyway. --[[User:DX10\|DX10]] ([[User talk:DX10\|talk]]) 04:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

			* Sorry for the late reply, but I agree. Merging now and the talk page for the forum is inserted too for archival purposes. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 04:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC)