Talk:Chris and... - Revision history

Hurtful Truth Level: /* Porn */

2024-06-30T06:15:13Z

Porn

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 30 June 2024
Line 56:		Line 56:

	: If you're asking about which header on the page, I would put it under Life. That's where his other forms of entertainment are (Internet, Television, Video Games). And Sex. If you mean the box at the bottom... either Body or Society. Neither is quite a perfect fit. [[User:JinkiesJanke\|JinkiesJanke]] ([[User talk:JinkiesJanke\|talk]]) 08:17, 29 June 2024 (EDT)		: If you're asking about which header on the page, I would put it under Life. That's where his other forms of entertainment are (Internet, Television, Video Games). And Sex. If you mean the box at the bottom... either Body or Society. Neither is quite a perfect fit. [[User:JinkiesJanke\|JinkiesJanke]] ([[User talk:JinkiesJanke\|talk]]) 08:17, 29 June 2024 (EDT)
			:: Sounds good. And yeah. Society could work. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 02:15, 30 June 2024 (EDT)

JinkiesJanke: /* Porn */

2024-06-29T12:17:55Z

Porn

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:17, 29 June 2024
Line 54:		Line 54:

	What's a good category to file [[Chris and pornography]] under? [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 22:16, 28 June 2024 (EDT)		What's a good category to file [[Chris and pornography]] under? [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 22:16, 28 June 2024 (EDT)

			: If you're asking about which header on the page, I would put it under Life. That's where his other forms of entertainment are (Internet, Television, Video Games). And Sex. If you mean the box at the bottom... either Body or Society. Neither is quite a perfect fit. [[User:JinkiesJanke\|JinkiesJanke]] ([[User talk:JinkiesJanke\|talk]]) 08:17, 29 June 2024 (EDT)

Hurtful Truth Level: /* Porn */ new section

2024-06-29T02:16:08Z

Porn: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 28 June 2024
Line 50:		Line 50:

	::Thanks, I actually got the idea from the Metro newspaper that comes out every weekday morning in London, and thought that ''Chris and...'' could be like that, for busy people and newcomers. --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 15:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)		::Thanks, I actually got the idea from the Metro newspaper that comes out every weekday morning in London, and thought that ''Chris and...'' could be like that, for busy people and newcomers. --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 15:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

			== Porn ==

			What's a good category to file [[Chris and pornography]] under? [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 22:16, 28 June 2024 (EDT)

Little Owl: /* A new idea */

2019-04-18T15:23:51Z

A new idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 18 April 2019
Line 48:		Line 48:

	:Sounds good. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 06:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)		:Sounds good. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 06:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

			::Thanks, I actually got the idea from the Metro newspaper that comes out every weekday morning in London, and thought that ''Chris and...'' could be like that, for busy people and newcomers. --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 15:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Hurtful Truth Level: /* A new idea */

2019-04-18T06:28:57Z

A new idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 18 April 2019
Line 46:		Line 46:

	Best regards, --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 11:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)		Best regards, --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 11:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

			:Sounds good. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 06:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Little Owl: /* A new idea */

2019-04-17T13:43:30Z

A new idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 17 April 2019
Line 39:		Line 39:
	== A new idea ==		== A new idea ==

	I think that the ''Chris and...'' article could be repositioned to summarise the situation, rather than just copying off the lead of the main article. For example, the ''Internet'' section could be decluttered to summarise Chris’ activities on the internet… you know, going straight to the point like ''The World'' section that I added this morning. Since I may be proposing a big revision to the format of existing sections, I thought I would ask rather than risking misunderstanding.		I think that the ''Chris and...'' article could be repositioned to summarise the situation, rather than just copying off the lead of the main article. For example, the ''Internet'' section could be decluttered to summarise Chris’ activities on the internet… you know, going straight to the point like ''The World'' section that I added this morning.

			Since I may be proposing a big revision to the format of existing sections, I thought I would ask rather than risking misunderstanding. I feel that such a change would make it easier for readers to see how they match up with Chris’ thoughts and actions.

			''Message was edited to add a wee bit more detail.''

	Best regards, --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 11:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)		Best regards, --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 11:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Little Owl: /* A new idea */ new section

2019-04-17T11:30:33Z

A new idea: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:30, 17 April 2019
Line 36:		Line 36:

	'Contests' is not a skill and i dont think it even needs a Chris And article		'Contests' is not a skill and i dont think it even needs a Chris And article

			== A new idea ==

			I think that the ''Chris and...'' article could be repositioned to summarise the situation, rather than just copying off the lead of the main article. For example, the ''Internet'' section could be decluttered to summarise Chris’ activities on the internet… you know, going straight to the point like ''The World'' section that I added this morning. Since I may be proposing a big revision to the format of existing sections, I thought I would ask rather than risking misunderstanding.

			Best regards, --[[User:Little Owl\|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl\|talk]]) 11:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Slimz: /* Not a 'chris and' */ new section

2012-04-10T12:08:51Z

Not a 'chris and': new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 10 April 2012
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:I'm still mulling the idea. The main thing which sticks out in my mind is - while having ''Chris and...'' prefixed on to each article name at present might seem odd and out of place, some ''Chris and...'' topics would look odd if their title was simply the name given after the ''Chris and...'' prefix. Part of why we have the ''Chris and...'' naming system is because the articles refer to Chris's relations, knowledge or opinions about a topic.		:I'm still mulling the idea. The main thing which sticks out in my mind is - while having ''Chris and...'' prefixed on to each article name at present might seem odd and out of place, some ''Chris and...'' topics would look odd if their title was simply the name given after the ''Chris and...'' prefix. Part of why we have the ''Chris and...'' naming system is because the articles refer to Chris's relations, knowledge or opinions about a topic.
	:The solution may simply be to rename some articles - but I feel that if we were to drop the ''Chris and...'' prefix, most if not all articles would need some form of re-write to make them make more sense as a standalone article about that topic. It would be about shaping the articles up to be more of an overview about the subject, which then leads on to how it relates to Chris etc. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:18, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		:The solution may simply be to rename some articles - but I feel that if we were to drop the ''Chris and...'' prefix, most if not all articles would need some form of re-write to make them make more sense as a standalone article about that topic. It would be about shaping the articles up to be more of an overview about the subject, which then leads on to how it relates to Chris etc. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:18, 14 October 2011 (PDT)

			== Not a 'chris and' ==

			'Contests' is not a skill and i dont think it even needs a Chris And article

Barry: /* A proposal */

2011-10-15T19:42:40Z

A proposal

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 15 October 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:Again it sounds great, it's just that one part that bugs me. [[User:Barry\|Barry]] 08:17, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		:Again it sounds great, it's just that one part that bugs me. [[User:Barry\|Barry]] 08:17, 14 October 2011 (PDT)
	::*Good question. Something like "Topics about Chris" works, we could still very leave the template as "Chris and...", just dropping the "Chris and..." part from the article name.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:07, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		::*Good question. Something like "Topics about Chris" works, we could still very leave the template as "Chris and...", just dropping the "Chris and..." part from the article name.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:07, 14 October 2011 (PDT)
			:::Good idea. :) [[User:Barry\|Barry]] 12:42, 15 October 2011 (PDT)
	:I'm still mulling the idea. The main thing which sticks out in my mind is - while having ''Chris and...'' prefixed on to each article name at present might seem odd and out of place, some ''Chris and...'' topics would look odd if their title was simply the name given after the ''Chris and...'' prefix. Part of why we have the ''Chris and...'' naming system is because the articles refer to Chris's relations, knowledge or opinions about a topic.		:I'm still mulling the idea. The main thing which sticks out in my mind is - while having ''Chris and...'' prefixed on to each article name at present might seem odd and out of place, some ''Chris and...'' topics would look odd if their title was simply the name given after the ''Chris and...'' prefix. Part of why we have the ''Chris and...'' naming system is because the articles refer to Chris's relations, knowledge or opinions about a topic.
	:The solution may simply be to rename some articles - but I feel that if we were to drop the ''Chris and...'' prefix, most if not all articles would need some form of re-write to make them make more sense as a standalone article about that topic. It would be about shaping the articles up to be more of an overview about the subject, which then leads on to how it relates to Chris etc. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:18, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		:The solution may simply be to rename some articles - but I feel that if we were to drop the ''Chris and...'' prefix, most if not all articles would need some form of re-write to make them make more sense as a standalone article about that topic. It would be about shaping the articles up to be more of an overview about the subject, which then leads on to how it relates to Chris etc. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:18, 14 October 2011 (PDT)

Anonymax: /* A proposal */

2011-10-14T22:18:54Z

A proposal

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 14 October 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:Again it sounds great, it's just that one part that bugs me. [[User:Barry\|Barry]] 08:17, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		:Again it sounds great, it's just that one part that bugs me. [[User:Barry\|Barry]] 08:17, 14 October 2011 (PDT)
	::*Good question. Something like "Topics about Chris" works, we could still very leave the template as "Chris and...", just dropping the "Chris and..." part from the article name.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:07, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		::*Good question. Something like "Topics about Chris" works, we could still very leave the template as "Chris and...", just dropping the "Chris and..." part from the article name.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:07, 14 October 2011 (PDT)
			:I'm still mulling the idea. The main thing which sticks out in my mind is - while having ''Chris and...'' prefixed on to each article name at present might seem odd and out of place, some ''Chris and...'' topics would look odd if their title was simply the name given after the ''Chris and...'' prefix. Part of why we have the ''Chris and...'' naming system is because the articles refer to Chris's relations, knowledge or opinions about a topic.
			:The solution may simply be to rename some articles - but I feel that if we were to drop the ''Chris and...'' prefix, most if not all articles would need some form of re-write to make them make more sense as a standalone article about that topic. It would be about shaping the articles up to be more of an overview about the subject, which then leads on to how it relates to Chris etc. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:18, 14 October 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 15 October 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:Again it sounds great, it's just that one part that bugs me. [[User:Barry\|Barry]] 08:17, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		:Again it sounds great, it's just that one part that bugs me. [[User:Barry\|Barry]] 08:17, 14 October 2011 (PDT)
	::*Good question. Something like "Topics about Chris" works, we could still very leave the template as "Chris and...", just dropping the "Chris and..." part from the article name.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:07, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		::*Good question. Something like "Topics about Chris" works, we could still very leave the template as "Chris and...", just dropping the "Chris and..." part from the article name.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:07, 14 October 2011 (PDT)
			:::Good idea. :) [[User:Barry\|Barry]] 12:42, 15 October 2011 (PDT)
	:I'm still mulling the idea. The main thing which sticks out in my mind is - while having ''Chris and...'' prefixed on to each article name at present might seem odd and out of place, some ''Chris and...'' topics would look odd if their title was simply the name given after the ''Chris and...'' prefix. Part of why we have the ''Chris and...'' naming system is because the articles refer to Chris's relations, knowledge or opinions about a topic.		:I'm still mulling the idea. The main thing which sticks out in my mind is - while having ''Chris and...'' prefixed on to each article name at present might seem odd and out of place, some ''Chris and...'' topics would look odd if their title was simply the name given after the ''Chris and...'' prefix. Part of why we have the ''Chris and...'' naming system is because the articles refer to Chris's relations, knowledge or opinions about a topic.
	:The solution may simply be to rename some articles - but I feel that if we were to drop the ''Chris and...'' prefix, most if not all articles would need some form of re-write to make them make more sense as a standalone article about that topic. It would be about shaping the articles up to be more of an overview about the subject, which then leads on to how it relates to Chris etc. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:18, 14 October 2011 (PDT)		:The solution may simply be to rename some articles - but I feel that if we were to drop the ''Chris and...'' prefix, most if not all articles would need some form of re-write to make them make more sense as a standalone article about that topic. It would be about shaping the articles up to be more of an overview about the subject, which then leads on to how it relates to Chris etc. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:18, 14 October 2011 (PDT)