Talk:Chris and gender - Revision history

Lunaloser64: /* Androgyny */

2026-04-22T22:20:14Z

Androgyny

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 22 April 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:
	He does have manboobs, which may be considered a feminine trait, I guess?		He does have manboobs, which may be considered a feminine trait, I guess?
	-[[User:Camille\|Camille]] 18:42, 5 November 2017 (PST)		-[[User:Camille\|Camille]] 18:42, 5 November 2017 (PST)

			i think we should? i mean even if shes not succeeding her attempts at being andro should still be documented in her "and Gender" article as it is really integeral (in my opinion) to the over arching idea of gender - [[User:Lunaloser64\|Lunaloser64]] 17:19, 22 April 2026

Camille: /* Androgyny */

2017-11-06T02:36:10Z

Androgyny

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 5 November 2017
Line 21:		Line 21:

	:I think this kind of section should be tongue and cheek. [[2016#January\|I really don't see any femininity in Chris]]. The dated meaning of androgyny is "having the physical characteristics of both sexes." The more modern definition is "being partly male and partly female in appearance." Chris certainly has a desire to appear more feminine, but he's completely failing at it. I don't see actual femininity, I just see autism.--[[User:Galilean\|Galilean]] ([[User talk:Galilean\|talk]]) 12:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)		:I think this kind of section should be tongue and cheek. [[2016#January\|I really don't see any femininity in Chris]]. The dated meaning of androgyny is "having the physical characteristics of both sexes." The more modern definition is "being partly male and partly female in appearance." Chris certainly has a desire to appear more feminine, but he's completely failing at it. I don't see actual femininity, I just see autism.--[[User:Galilean\|Galilean]] ([[User talk:Galilean\|talk]]) 12:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

			He does have manboobs, which may be considered a feminine trait, I guess?
			-[[User:Camille\|Camille]] 18:42, 5 November 2017 (PST)

Galilean at 13:04, 1 August 2017

2017-08-01T13:04:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 1 August 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Does anyone think there should be a section about Androgyny in this article? Because Chris has shown both masculine and feminine traits all throughout his life, even as a tomgirl.		Does anyone think there should be a section about Androgyny in this article? Because Chris has shown both masculine and feminine traits all throughout his life, even as a tomgirl.

	:I think this kind of section should be tongue and cheek. [~~https://sonichu.com/w/images/9/99/0116.png~~\| I really don't see any femininity in Chris]. The dated meaning of androgyny is "having the physical characteristics of both sexes." The more modern definition is "being partly male and partly female in appearance." Chris certainly has a desire to appear more feminine, but he's completely failing at ~~this~~. I don't see actual femininity, I just see autism.--[[User:Galilean\|Galilean]] ([[User talk:Galilean\|talk]]) 12:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)		:I think this kind of section should be tongue and cheek. [[2016#January\|I really don't see any femininity in Chris]]. The dated meaning of androgyny is "having the physical characteristics of both sexes." The more modern definition is "being partly male and partly female in appearance." Chris certainly has a desire to appear more feminine, but he's completely failing at it. I don't see actual femininity, I just see autism.--[[User:Galilean\|Galilean]] ([[User talk:Galilean\|talk]]) 12:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Galilean at 12:56, 1 August 2017

2017-08-01T12:56:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 1 August 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Does anyone think there should be a section about Androgyny in this article? Because Chris has shown both masculine and feminine traits all throughout his life, even as a tomgirl.		Does anyone think there should be a section about Androgyny in this article? Because Chris has shown both masculine and feminine traits all throughout his life, even as a tomgirl.

			:I think this kind of section should be tongue and cheek. [https://sonichu.com/w/images/9/99/0116.png\| I really don't see any femininity in Chris]. The dated meaning of androgyny is "having the physical characteristics of both sexes." The more modern definition is "being partly male and partly female in appearance." Chris certainly has a desire to appear more feminine, but he's completely failing at this. I don't see actual femininity, I just see autism.--[[User:Galilean\|Galilean]] ([[User talk:Galilean\|talk]]) 12:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

PsychoNerd054: /* Androgyny */ new section

2017-08-01T04:30:08Z

Androgyny: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 1 August 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:I don't think it's an unnecessary page, but it's probably going to reiterate a lot in the JERKS and Women's Right's pages, so a three-way merge may be necessary. If the merge occurs, it's best that the page has this title, his attitudes towards gender are definitely "Chris and" page material, especially with the recent intersex fiasco. The "gender" in the page title needs to be "Gender" though. I've written for this page and will pipe to it where appropriate.[[User:Res\|Res]] ([[User talk:Res\|talk]]) 16:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)		:I don't think it's an unnecessary page, but it's probably going to reiterate a lot in the JERKS and Women's Right's pages, so a three-way merge may be necessary. If the merge occurs, it's best that the page has this title, his attitudes towards gender are definitely "Chris and" page material, especially with the recent intersex fiasco. The "gender" in the page title needs to be "Gender" though. I've written for this page and will pipe to it where appropriate.[[User:Res\|Res]] ([[User talk:Res\|talk]]) 16:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

			== Androgyny ==

			Does anyone think there should be a section about Androgyny in this article? Because Chris has shown both masculine and feminine traits all throughout his life, even as a tomgirl.

Res at 16:54, 16 January 2016

2016-01-16T16:54:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 16 January 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Okay iv'e gone into the rules and they say that you do not need direct admin approval. I would like for other people to give me feedback on the page NOTE: Im just getting started on this. If many people feel like this page is irrevelant then i will get in touch with an admin to delete it [[skurvypete]] 4/5/15		Okay iv'e gone into the rules and they say that you do not need direct admin approval. I would like for other people to give me feedback on the page NOTE: Im just getting started on this. If many people feel like this page is irrevelant then i will get in touch with an admin to delete it [[skurvypete]] 4/5/15

			:I don't think it's an unnecessary page, but it's probably going to reiterate a lot in the JERKS and Women's Right's pages, so a three-way merge may be necessary. If the merge occurs, it's best that the page has this title, his attitudes towards gender are definitely "Chris and" page material, especially with the recent intersex fiasco. The "gender" in the page title needs to be "Gender" though. I've written for this page and will pipe to it where appropriate.[[User:Res\|Res]] ([[User talk:Res\|talk]]) 16:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Skurvypete: /* Is this necessary? */

2015-04-07T02:31:11Z

Is this necessary?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 6 April 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Finally, the "Chris and..." pages are high-profile, and I believe require (or should require) admin approval. Why not create this as an experimental page for now on your userpage, and see what the mods think of it?[[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/5/15		Finally, the "Chris and..." pages are high-profile, and I believe require (or should require) admin approval. Why not create this as an experimental page for now on your userpage, and see what the mods think of it?[[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/5/15

	:I understand and appreciate your critical analysis. I saw this article as requested and tried to put as much in as I can at this time. As you can see this article is far from finished and greatly appreciate contributions to the article. I will try to moderate the page as much as possible. If it does devolve to what you fear then I will gladly wipe it from existence.Also if the admins find it in any way unneeded or innapropiate I will delete it. [[User:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]],4/5/15		:I understand and appreciate your critical analysis. I saw this article as requested and tried to put as much in as I can at this time. As you can see '''this article is far from finished and greatly appreciate contributions to the article'''. I will try to moderate the page as much as possible. If it does devolve to what you fear then I will gladly wipe it from existence.Also if the admins find it in any way unneeded or innapropiate I will delete it. [[User:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]],4/5/15

	::Well actually you can't delete it. Only the admins can do that. I would check with them about how to proceed, especially since you don't waste your time working on a page that an admin unilaterally deletes (which they have been known to do). There hasn't been a new "Chris and..." page added in over two years, and that time it definitely required admin approval. [[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/5/15.		::Well actually you can't delete it. Only the admins can do that. I would check with them about how to proceed, especially since you don't waste your time working on a page that an admin unilaterally deletes (which they have been known to do). There hasn't been a new "Chris and..." page added in over two years, and that time it definitely required admin approval. [[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/5/15.

Skurvypete: /* Is this necessary? */

2015-04-06T04:27:29Z

Is this necessary?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 6 April 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I'm rather new to the cwcki so thank you for notifying me of this. Do you know where I can discuss with the admins (I don't know any) about the page? [[user:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]]4/5/15		I'm rather new to the cwcki so thank you for notifying me of this. Do you know where I can discuss with the admins (I don't know any) about the page? [[user:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]]4/5/15

	Okay iv'e gone into the rules and they say that you do not need direct admin approval. I would like for other people to give me feedback on the page NOTE: Im just getting started on this. If many people feel like this page ~~irrevvelant~~ then i will get in touch with an admin to delete it [[skurvypete]] 4/5/15		Okay iv'e gone into the rules and they say that you do not need direct admin approval. I would like for other people to give me feedback on the page NOTE: Im just getting started on this. If many people feel like this page is irrevelant then i will get in touch with an admin to delete it [[skurvypete]] 4/5/15

Skurvypete: /* Is this necessary? */

2015-04-06T04:27:09Z

Is this necessary?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 6 April 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I'm rather new to the cwcki so thank you for notifying me of this. Do you know where I can discuss with the admins (I don't know any) about the page? [[user:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]]4/5/15		I'm rather new to the cwcki so thank you for notifying me of this. Do you know where I can discuss with the admins (I don't know any) about the page? [[user:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]]4/5/15

	Okay iv'e gone into the rules and they say that you do not need direct admin approval. I would like for other people to give me feedback on the page NOTE:im just getting started ~~onthis~~. If many people feel like this page irrevvelant then i will get in touch with an admin to delete it [[skurvypete]] 4/5/15		Okay iv'e gone into the rules and they say that you do not need direct admin approval. I would like for other people to give me feedback on the page NOTE: Im just getting started on this. If many people feel like this page irrevvelant then i will get in touch with an admin to delete it [[skurvypete]] 4/5/15

Skurvypete: /* Is this necessary? */

2015-04-06T04:26:38Z

Is this necessary?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 6 April 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I'm rather new to the cwcki so thank you for notifying me of this. Do you know where I can discuss with the admins (I don't know any) about the page? [[user:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]]4/5/15		I'm rather new to the cwcki so thank you for notifying me of this. Do you know where I can discuss with the admins (I don't know any) about the page? [[user:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]]4/5/15

			Okay iv'e gone into the rules and they say that you do not need direct admin approval. I would like for other people to give me feedback on the page NOTE:im just getting started onthis. If many people feel like this page irrevvelant then i will get in touch with an admin to delete it [[skurvypete]] 4/5/15

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 6 April 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Finally, the "Chris and..." pages are high-profile, and I believe require (or should require) admin approval. Why not create this as an experimental page for now on your userpage, and see what the mods think of it?[[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/5/15		Finally, the "Chris and..." pages are high-profile, and I believe require (or should require) admin approval. Why not create this as an experimental page for now on your userpage, and see what the mods think of it?[[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/5/15

	:I understand and appreciate your critical analysis. I saw this article as requested and tried to put as much in as I can at this time. As you can see this article is far from finished and greatly appreciate contributions to the article. I will try to moderate the page as much as possible. If it does devolve to what you fear then I will gladly wipe it from existence.Also if the admins find it in any way unneeded or innapropiate I will delete it. [[User:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]],4/5/15		:I understand and appreciate your critical analysis. I saw this article as requested and tried to put as much in as I can at this time. As you can see '''this article is far from finished and greatly appreciate contributions to the article'''. I will try to moderate the page as much as possible. If it does devolve to what you fear then I will gladly wipe it from existence.Also if the admins find it in any way unneeded or innapropiate I will delete it. [[User:skurvypete\|Skurvypete]],4/5/15

	::Well actually you can't delete it. Only the admins can do that. I would check with them about how to proceed, especially since you don't waste your time working on a page that an admin unilaterally deletes (which they have been known to do). There hasn't been a new "Chris and..." page added in over two years, and that time it definitely required admin approval. [[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/5/15.		::Well actually you can't delete it. Only the admins can do that. I would check with them about how to proceed, especially since you don't waste your time working on a page that an admin unilaterally deletes (which they have been known to do). There hasn't been a new "Chris and..." page added in over two years, and that time it definitely required admin approval. [[User:Asperhes\|asperhes]], 4/5/15.