Talk:Chris and oratory - Revision history

Byzantine: /* Twitter campaigns? */

2020-08-22T10:23:52Z

Twitter campaigns?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:23, 22 August 2020
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Considering this page is about oral speeches and general oratory pieces, I don't think that Twitter campaigns can really have a place here, sure, the videos themselves would be good examples to put in that section, but the twitter campaign is a very non-oral form of protest. I think they should be moved to their own page or possibly Chris and writing. What do other people think? [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 13:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)		Considering this page is about oral speeches and general oratory pieces, I don't think that Twitter campaigns can really have a place here, sure, the videos themselves would be good examples to put in that section, but the twitter campaign is a very non-oral form of protest. I think they should be moved to their own page or possibly Chris and writing. What do other people think? [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 13:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
	:Seems like a good idea. If they are moved to Chris and writing they can be used as an example of Chris's attempts at persuasive writing.--[[User:Superspongebobbros\|Superspongebobbros]] ([[User talk:Superspongebobbros\|talk]]) 19:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)		:Seems like a good idea. If they are moved to Chris and writing they can be used as an example of Chris's attempts at persuasive writing.--[[User:Superspongebobbros\|Superspongebobbros]] ([[User talk:Superspongebobbros\|talk]]) 19:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
			::Hmm, having read the "In the comic" section, which is definitely not Chris speaking, but is technically still a speech, I can kinda see why the person who put Twitter campaigns here did, it is still a display of Chris's rhetoric, even if it's not using tone or body language. [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 10:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Superspongebobbros: /* Twitter campaigns? */

2020-08-21T19:43:05Z

Twitter campaigns?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 21 August 2020
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Considering this page is about oral speeches and general oratory pieces, I don't think that Twitter campaigns can really have a place here, sure, the videos themselves would be good examples to put in that section, but the twitter campaign is a very non-oral form of protest. I think they should be moved to their own page or possibly Chris and writing. What do other people think? [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 13:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)		Considering this page is about oral speeches and general oratory pieces, I don't think that Twitter campaigns can really have a place here, sure, the videos themselves would be good examples to put in that section, but the twitter campaign is a very non-oral form of protest. I think they should be moved to their own page or possibly Chris and writing. What do other people think? [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 13:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
			:Seems like a good idea. If they are moved to Chris and writing they can be used as an example of Chris's attempts at persuasive writing.--[[User:Superspongebobbros\|Superspongebobbros]] ([[User talk:Superspongebobbros\|talk]]) 19:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Byzantine: /* Twitter campaigns? */ new section

2020-08-21T13:19:53Z

Twitter campaigns?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:19, 21 August 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:

	::What about "Chris and Oratory"? it fits in better with the standards of the "Chris and..." series (E.G. "Chris and Cinematography", "... and Writing"), as oratory refers to the art/practice of public speaking, while the principal meaning of oration is a formal speech. "Chris and Oration" is kinda like calling "Chris and Writing", "Chris and Sentence".[[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 17:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)		::What about "Chris and Oratory"? it fits in better with the standards of the "Chris and..." series (E.G. "Chris and Cinematography", "... and Writing"), as oratory refers to the art/practice of public speaking, while the principal meaning of oration is a formal speech. "Chris and Oration" is kinda like calling "Chris and Writing", "Chris and Sentence".[[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 17:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

			== Twitter campaigns? ==

			Considering this page is about oral speeches and general oratory pieces, I don't think that Twitter campaigns can really have a place here, sure, the videos themselves would be good examples to put in that section, but the twitter campaign is a very non-oral form of protest. I think they should be moved to their own page or possibly Chris and writing. What do other people think? [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 13:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

PsychoNerd054: PsychoNerd054 moved page Talk:Chris and oration to Talk:Chris and oratory: As per talk page

2020-07-09T17:48:59Z

PsychoNerd054 moved page Talk:Chris and oration to Talk:Chris and oratory: As per talk page

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:48, 9 July 2020
(No difference)

Saint-just at 17:31, 9 July 2020

2020-07-09T17:31:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 9 July 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:I like Chris and oration more than these alternatives. - [[User:Klop\|klop]] ([[User talk:Klop\|talk]]) 15:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)		:I like Chris and oration more than these alternatives. - [[User:Klop\|klop]] ([[User talk:Klop\|talk]]) 15:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

	::What about "Chris and Oratory"? it fits in better with the standards of the "Chris and..." series (E.G. "Chris and Cinematography", "... and Writing"), as oratory refers to the art/practice of public speaking, while the ~~principle~~ meaning of oration is a formal speech. "Chris and Oration" is kinda like calling "Chris and Writing", "Chris and Sentence".[[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 17:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)		::What about "Chris and Oratory"? it fits in better with the standards of the "Chris and..." series (E.G. "Chris and Cinematography", "... and Writing"), as oratory refers to the art/practice of public speaking, while the principal meaning of oration is a formal speech. "Chris and Oration" is kinda like calling "Chris and Writing", "Chris and Sentence".[[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 17:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Saint-just: /* Title */

2020-07-09T17:29:07Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 9 July 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:I like Chris and oration more than these alternatives. - [[User:Klop\|klop]] ([[User talk:Klop\|talk]]) 15:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)		:I like Chris and oration more than these alternatives. - [[User:Klop\|klop]] ([[User talk:Klop\|talk]]) 15:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

			::What about "Chris and Oratory"? it fits in better with the standards of the "Chris and..." series (E.G. "Chris and Cinematography", "... and Writing"), as oratory refers to the art/practice of public speaking, while the principle meaning of oration is a formal speech. "Chris and Oration" is kinda like calling "Chris and Writing", "Chris and Sentence".[[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 17:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Klop: /* Title */

2020-07-09T15:37:24Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 9 July 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::Good idea, could use "Chris and rhetoric", but rhetoric is just a discipline under discourse (However think rhetoric is a more recognisable term for spoken language). [[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 13:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)		::Good idea, could use "Chris and rhetoric", but rhetoric is just a discipline under discourse (However think rhetoric is a more recognisable term for spoken language). [[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 13:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

			:I like Chris and oration more than these alternatives. - [[User:Klop\|klop]] ([[User talk:Klop\|talk]]) 15:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Saint-just at 14:48, 9 July 2020

2020-07-09T14:48:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 9 July 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Maybe “Chris and discourse” could work. [[User:PsychoNerd054\|PsychoNerd054]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054\|talk]]) 01:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)		:Maybe “Chris and discourse” could work. [[User:PsychoNerd054\|PsychoNerd054]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054\|talk]]) 01:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

	::Good idea, could use "Chris and rhetoric", but rhetoric is just a discipline under discourse. [[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 13:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)		::Good idea, could use "Chris and rhetoric", but rhetoric is just a discipline under discourse (However think rhetoric is a more recognisable term for spoken language). [[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 13:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Saint-just: /* Title */

2020-07-09T13:52:44Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 9 July 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Title==		==Title==

	Something seems wrong about the title. I know oration is a succinct way of saying public communication skills, but "Chris and Oration" just doesn't sound right to me. Can anyone come up with a better title?[[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 21:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)		Something seems wrong about the title. I know oration is a succinct way of saying public communication skills, but "Chris and Oration" just doesn't sound right to me. Can anyone come up with a better title? [[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 21:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

	:Maybe “Chris and discourse” could work. [[User:PsychoNerd054\|PsychoNerd054]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054\|talk]]) 01:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)		:Maybe “Chris and discourse” could work. [[User:PsychoNerd054\|PsychoNerd054]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054\|talk]]) 01:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

			::Good idea, could use "Chris and rhetoric", but rhetoric is just a discipline under discourse. [[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 13:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

PsychoNerd054: /* Title */

2020-07-09T01:40:27Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 8 July 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Something seems wrong about the title. I know oration is a succinct way of saying public communication skills, but "Chris and Oration" just doesn't sound right to me. Can anyone come up with a better title?[[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 21:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)		Something seems wrong about the title. I know oration is a succinct way of saying public communication skills, but "Chris and Oration" just doesn't sound right to me. Can anyone come up with a better title?[[User:Saint-just\|Saint-just]] ([[User talk:Saint-just\|talk]]) 21:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

			:Maybe “Chris and discourse” could work. [[User:PsychoNerd054\|PsychoNerd054]] ([[User talk:PsychoNerd054\|talk]]) 01:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:23, 22 August 2020
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Considering this page is about oral speeches and general oratory pieces, I don't think that Twitter campaigns can really have a place here, sure, the videos themselves would be good examples to put in that section, but the twitter campaign is a very non-oral form of protest. I think they should be moved to their own page or possibly Chris and writing. What do other people think? [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 13:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)		Considering this page is about oral speeches and general oratory pieces, I don't think that Twitter campaigns can really have a place here, sure, the videos themselves would be good examples to put in that section, but the twitter campaign is a very non-oral form of protest. I think they should be moved to their own page or possibly Chris and writing. What do other people think? [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 13:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
	:Seems like a good idea. If they are moved to Chris and writing they can be used as an example of Chris's attempts at persuasive writing.--[[User:Superspongebobbros\|Superspongebobbros]] ([[User talk:Superspongebobbros\|talk]]) 19:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)		:Seems like a good idea. If they are moved to Chris and writing they can be used as an example of Chris's attempts at persuasive writing.--[[User:Superspongebobbros\|Superspongebobbros]] ([[User talk:Superspongebobbros\|talk]]) 19:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
			::Hmm, having read the "In the comic" section, which is definitely not Chris speaking, but is technically still a speech, I can kinda see why the person who put Twitter campaigns here did, it is still a display of Chris's rhetoric, even if it's not using tone or body language. [[User:Byzantine\|Byzantine]] ([[User talk:Byzantine\|talk]]) 10:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)