Talk:DPF phonecall - Revision history

Pfargtl9000: /* Do we really need this? */ new section

2010-11-06T00:34:04Z

Do we really need this?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 5 November 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXwJEMeDbGg		http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXwJEMeDbGg

			== Do we really need this? ==

			The only thing that happens is Chris describing how to say "Love Sonichu y Hate Asperchu" backwards and Chris imitating Kermit, Bill Cosby, and Cleveland Brown. Do we really need to keep this? It's as useless as the Sydney Contacts. [[User:Pfargtl9000\|Pfargtl9000 Spam & Eggs]] 17:34, 5 November 2010 (PDT)

BigDan at 22:08, 2 August 2010

2010-08-02T22:08:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 2 August 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Imma break open a fresh pack of cigarettes and hop to transcribing part 2, for great justice --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		Imma break open a fresh pack of cigarettes and hop to transcribing part 2, for great justice --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
	Done the first part, will do more when I get back from driver's ed --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		Done the first part, will do more when I get back from driver's ed --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

			Transcribing for part 2 is complete. Gonna move on to Mumbles after listening to that Bob vid the DPF people put up. --[[User:BigDan\|BigDan]] 10:07, 2 August 2010

	== derp derp ==		== derp derp ==

Jester at 02:36, 1 August 2010

2010-08-01T02:36:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 31 July 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Imma break open a fresh pack of cigarettes and hop to transcribing part 2, for great justice --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		Imma break open a fresh pack of cigarettes and hop to transcribing part 2, for great justice --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
	Done the first part, will do more when I get back from driver's ed --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		Done the first part, will do more when I get back from driver's ed --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

			== derp derp ==

			We faggots spoke to Bob too.

			You may or may-not want to do something with this.

			http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXwJEMeDbGg

Banzai881: /* Transcribing dis bitch */

2010-06-30T05:44:52Z

Transcribing dis bitch

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 30 June 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Transcribing dis bitch==		==Transcribing dis bitch==
	Imma break open a fresh pack of cigarettes and hop to transcribing part 2, for great justice --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		Imma break open a fresh pack of cigarettes and hop to transcribing part 2, for great justice --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
			Done the first part, will do more when I get back from driver's ed --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Banzai881 at 05:08, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T05:08:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 30 June 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	i'm still learning about the templates and cwcki editing, but after a quick reading of how to do it i improved it and left a note that it needs transcribing		i'm still learning about the templates and cwcki editing, but after a quick reading of how to do it i improved it and left a note that it needs transcribing
	--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
			==Transcribing dis bitch==
			Imma break open a fresh pack of cigarettes and hop to transcribing part 2, for great justice --[[User:Banzai881\|Banzai881]] 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Champthom at 00:46, 28 January 2010

2010-01-28T00:46:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 27 January 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	*Maybe we should make a single page for "fan chats" with Chris where all these types of calls go? It's not really notable enough to get its own page. --[[User:Delabonte\|Delabonte]] 01:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)		*Maybe we should make a single page for "fan chats" with Chris where all these types of calls go? It's not really notable enough to get its own page. --[[User:Delabonte\|Delabonte]] 01:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
			:*I'm inclined to agree with Delabonte, HOWEVER I believe this would set a bad precedence. Ideally, CWCki promotes openness in trolling - this is why we require publicly available sources of information before things get cited.
			::Unlike Wikipedia, independent research should be encouraged such that if people can get Chris to clarify points about his work in such a way that it contributes to the CWCki or clarifies a previous misunderstanding, then we should accept that as evidence provided there's an accurate way to determine the legitimacy.
			::So where does this come in? Some faggots, while they are faggots, manage to get in touch with Chris and they make their conversation with him publicly available. They went outside conventional means of contacting Chris and these aren't the usual people who put out material (i.e. "Miscreants", "Secret Circle", what have you) guys but nonetheless, they had a conversation with Chris that provides a few tidbits of insight into Chris that were not publicly available. Yes, they're really annoying because they're trying really hard to earn Chris's trust and possibly attention whores but nonetheless, they could have easily kept this to themselves as many people are apt to do, that is to troll Chris and never share the results (early trolls had this problem, which is why we have no confirmed records of Jessica Ruddi and why some trolls hate "Ginger" - not because she's a troll who's working outside the system, but a troll who isn't making her results publicly available). We do have a page for that one interview people did with Chris, and they were sorta faggots, might as well let these faggots have a page here since their attention whoring is still outweighed by the insight provided. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 00:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

	== sorry about the stub==		== sorry about the stub==
	i'm still learning about the templates and cwcki editing, but after a quick reading of how to do it i improved it and left a note that it needs transcribing		i'm still learning about the templates and cwcki editing, but after a quick reading of how to do it i improved it and left a note that it needs transcribing
	--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Delabonte at 01:31, 27 January 2010

2010-01-27T01:31:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 26 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==lolwut?==		==lolwut?==
	So, someone went to the trouble of making a (shitty) stub (no offense) for this call. As I discuss [[CWCki:Community_Portal#DPF_call.3F\|here]], there is some issues with this call. I'd rather not outright delete it but would anyone care to weigh in on how to treat this call? --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 21:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		So, someone went to the trouble of making a (shitty) stub (no offense) for this call. As I discuss [[CWCki:Community_Portal#DPF_call.3F\|here]], there is some issues with this call. I'd rather not outright delete it but would anyone care to weigh in on how to treat this call? --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 21:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

			*Maybe we should make a single page for "fan chats" with Chris where all these types of calls go? It's not really notable enough to get its own page. --[[User:Delabonte\|Delabonte]] 01:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

	== sorry about the stub==		== sorry about the stub==
	i'm still learning about the templates and cwcki editing, but after a quick reading of how to do it i improved it and left a note that it needs transcribing		i'm still learning about the templates and cwcki editing, but after a quick reading of how to do it i improved it and left a note that it needs transcribing
	--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Basgon: /* lolwut? */

2010-01-26T23:32:25Z

lolwut?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 26 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==lolwut?==		==lolwut?==
	So, someone went to the trouble of making a (shitty) stub (no offense) for this call. As I discuss [[CWCki:Community_Portal#DPF_call.3F\|here]], there is some issues with this call. I'd rather not outright delete it but would anyone care to weigh in on how to treat this call? --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 21:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		So, someone went to the trouble of making a (shitty) stub (no offense) for this call. As I discuss [[CWCki:Community_Portal#DPF_call.3F\|here]], there is some issues with this call. I'd rather not outright delete it but would anyone care to weigh in on how to treat this call? --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 21:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

			== sorry about the stub==
			i'm still learning about the templates and cwcki editing, but after a quick reading of how to do it i improved it and left a note that it needs transcribing
			--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: Created page with '==lolwut?== So, someone went to the trouble of making a (shitty) stub (no offense) for this call. As I discuss here, there is some issues w…'

2010-01-26T21:43:12Z

Created page with '==lolwut?== So, someone went to the trouble of making a (shitty) stub (no offense) for this call. As I discuss here, there is some issues w…'

New page

==lolwut?==
So, someone went to the trouble of making a (shitty) stub (no offense) for this call. As I discuss [[CWCki:Community_Portal#DPF_call.3F|here]], there is some issues with this call. I'd rather not outright delete it but would anyone care to weigh in on how to treat this call? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 21:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)