Talk:Family Guy - Revision history

Hurtful Truth Level: Undo revision 251139 by TurkeyToaster (talk) no need to edit talk page comments

2020-08-25T19:31:54Z

Undo revision 251139 by TurkeyToaster (talk) no need to edit talk page comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 25 August 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody\|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009		I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody\|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009
	I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (coughsouthparkcough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover\|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (coughsouthparkcough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover\|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots at the show balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms the show gets in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about (originality, etc) and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. I think the article would be fairly bland if they weren't there. [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)

	== You forgot about this ==		== You forgot about this ==

TurkeyToaster: /* A Proposal */

2020-08-25T18:36:47Z

A Proposal

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 25 August 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody\|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009		I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody\|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009
	I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (coughsouthparkcough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover\|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (coughsouthparkcough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover\|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots ~~at the show~~ balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms ~~the show gets~~ in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about ~~(originality, etc)~~ and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. ~~I think the article would be fairly bland if they weren't there.~~ [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)

	== You forgot about this ==		== You forgot about this ==

Taco Wiz: /* Controversy */

2011-10-08T06:04:21Z

Controversy

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 8 October 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Just add all the times he referenced it in his comic and IRL.		Just add all the times he referenced it in his comic and IRL.

			I'd like to know when Chris claimed viewing Family Guy at a young age was beneficial. I wish to examine this source. --[[User:Taco Wiz\|Taco Wiz]] 23:04, 7 October 2011 (PDT)

	== A Proposal ==		== A Proposal ==

Anonymax: →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

2011-09-28T08:04:31Z

→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:04, 28 September 2011
Line 33:		Line 33:
	That wasn't the point I was trying to make , otherwise I would have piped that bit to autism. It's relevant to Chris because that episode debuted only a month or so after all those cosplay videos. It's another one of those amusing coincidences. It sure has a stronger connection than the comparison of Kimmi and Peter having sex with a cardboard cutout. --[[User:Xanabit\|Xanabit]] 23:38, 21 March 2011 (PDT)		That wasn't the point I was trying to make , otherwise I would have piped that bit to autism. It's relevant to Chris because that episode debuted only a month or so after all those cosplay videos. It's another one of those amusing coincidences. It sure has a stronger connection than the comparison of Kimmi and Peter having sex with a cardboard cutout. --[[User:Xanabit\|Xanabit]] 23:38, 21 March 2011 (PDT)
	*They make these episodes months in advance though. I think most of these amusing similarities are so vague it could apply to anything, that's the problem. It's like saying "OMG, there's a guy named Chris on Family Guy and he's fat like our Chris too!" I think when people read that, they assume that the creators of Family Guy follow Chris, which probably isn't the case and that's misleading to lead them on our part. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:54, 22 March 2011 (PDT)		*They make these episodes months in advance though. I think most of these amusing similarities are so vague it could apply to anything, that's the problem. It's like saying "OMG, there's a guy named Chris on Family Guy and he's fat like our Chris too!" I think when people read that, they assume that the creators of Family Guy follow Chris, which probably isn't the case and that's misleading to lead them on our part. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:54, 22 March 2011 (PDT)

			== Dead link ==

			During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

			* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDy-LEpQapQ
			** In [[Family Guy]] on 2011-09-20 22:38:31, 404 Not Found
			** In [[Family Guy]] on 2011-09-28 08:04:58, 404 Not Found

			--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 01:04, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Champthom: /* Blackface and Indian costumes */

2011-03-22T16:54:14Z

Blackface and Indian costumes

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 22 March 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:

	That wasn't the point I was trying to make , otherwise I would have piped that bit to autism. It's relevant to Chris because that episode debuted only a month or so after all those cosplay videos. It's another one of those amusing coincidences. It sure has a stronger connection than the comparison of Kimmi and Peter having sex with a cardboard cutout. --[[User:Xanabit\|Xanabit]] 23:38, 21 March 2011 (PDT)		That wasn't the point I was trying to make , otherwise I would have piped that bit to autism. It's relevant to Chris because that episode debuted only a month or so after all those cosplay videos. It's another one of those amusing coincidences. It sure has a stronger connection than the comparison of Kimmi and Peter having sex with a cardboard cutout. --[[User:Xanabit\|Xanabit]] 23:38, 21 March 2011 (PDT)
			*They make these episodes months in advance though. I think most of these amusing similarities are so vague it could apply to anything, that's the problem. It's like saying "OMG, there's a guy named Chris on Family Guy and he's fat like our Chris too!" I think when people read that, they assume that the creators of Family Guy follow Chris, which probably isn't the case and that's misleading to lead them on our part. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:54, 22 March 2011 (PDT)

Xanabit at 06:38, 22 March 2011

2011-03-22T06:38:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:38, 22 March 2011
Line 26:		Line 26:

	[[Chris Chan Update 24 September 2008]] --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 04:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)		[[Chris Chan Update 24 September 2008]] --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 04:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

			== Blackface and Indian costumes ==

			''Failing to realize the racism of black face isn't really a Chris specific thing, I'm sure there's plenty of other media that does this trope as well - Champthom''

			That wasn't the point I was trying to make , otherwise I would have piped that bit to autism. It's relevant to Chris because that episode debuted only a month or so after all those cosplay videos. It's another one of those amusing coincidences. It sure has a stronger connection than the comparison of Kimmi and Peter having sex with a cardboard cutout. --[[User:Xanabit\|Xanabit]] 23:38, 21 March 2011 (PDT)

Sonijew is back: /* You forgot about this */ new section

2010-04-14T04:36:54Z

You forgot about this: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 14 April 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots at the show balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots at the show balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms the show gets in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about (originality, etc) and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. I think the article would be fairly bland if they weren't there. [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms the show gets in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about (originality, etc) and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. I think the article would be fairly bland if they weren't there. [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)

			== You forgot about this ==

			[[Chris Chan Update 24 September 2008]] --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 04:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* To do */

2010-04-14T03:40:36Z

To do

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 13 April 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	*add stuff from his new video, like his plot idea and his drawings and shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:52, 10 December 2009 (CET)		*add stuff from his new video, like his plot idea and his drawings and shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:52, 10 December 2009 (CET)

			*We need to list all the times Chris has referenced Family Guy as well, directly and indirectly (like how he shouts "SHAZAAM" during phone sex with Julie).--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 03:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

	== Controversy ==		== Controversy ==

Clydec: 14 revisions

2010-01-03T08:42:48Z

14 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:42, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

VanKrause at 17:50, 11 December 2009

2009-12-11T17:50:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 11 December 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	***Oh god, it'd be longer than the list on the [[Excel Saga]] article. --[[User:Lime\|Lime]] ([[User_talk:Lime\|Scold?]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Lime\|Undo?]]) 03:56, 4 April 2009 (CEST)		***Oh god, it'd be longer than the list on the [[Excel Saga]] article. --[[User:Lime\|Lime]] ([[User_talk:Lime\|Scold?]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Lime\|Undo?]]) 03:56, 4 April 2009 (CEST)
	*his "skit" for Seth MacFarlane		*his "skit" for Seth MacFarlane
	** Don't forget "Sammy". --		** Don't forget "Sammy". -- [[User:Straha\|Straha]]

	*add stuff from his new video, like his plot idea and his drawings and shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:52, 10 December 2009 (CET)		*add stuff from his new video, like his plot idea and his drawings and shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:52, 10 December 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 25 August 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody\|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009		I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody\|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009
	I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (coughsouthparkcough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover\|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (coughsouthparkcough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover\|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots at the show balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms the show gets in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about (originality, etc) and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. I think the article would be fairly bland if they weren't there. [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)

	== You forgot about this ==		== You forgot about this ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 25 August 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody\|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009		I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody\|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009
	I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (coughsouthparkcough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover\|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (coughsouthparkcough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover\|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots ~~at the show~~ balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
	*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms ~~the show gets~~ in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about ~~(originality, etc)~~ and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. ~~I think the article would be fairly bland if they weren't there.~~ [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)		*:I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. [[User:Alteceastlansing\|Alteceastlansing]] 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)

	== You forgot about this ==		== You forgot about this ==