Talk:Gun Comic - Revision history

Hurtful Truth Level: Hurtful Truth Level moved page Talk:Sonichu Special 4 to Talk:Gun Comic

2023-12-17T12:01:40Z

Hurtful Truth Level moved page Talk:Sonichu Special 4 to Talk:Gun Comic

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:01, 17 December 2023
(No difference)

Anonymax: →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

2011-10-31T02:30:38Z

→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 30 October 2011
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

			== Dead link ==

			During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

			* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V1gEjtmm9M
			** In [[Liquid Chris]] on 2011-09-20 22:39:10, 404 Not Found
			** In [[Liquid Chris]] on 2011-09-28 08:16:30, 404 Not Found
			** In [[Liquid Chris]] on 2011-10-31 02:08:13, 404 Not Found

			--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 19:30, 30 October 2011 (PDT)

Clydec: 26 revisions

2010-01-03T08:49:45Z

26 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:49, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

VanKrause at 14:11, 9 November 2009

2009-11-09T14:11:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 9 November 2009
Line 36:		Line 36:
	"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)		"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)
	:*It's hard to say at this point. We've had convincing mimicks of CDubyaC before, and I don't see why he doesn't just post from his Clyde blackmail account. That said, he's had loads of sock puppets in the past. [[User:Klingerbgoode\|Klingerbgoode]] 12:51, 9 November 2009 (CET)		:*It's hard to say at this point. We've had convincing mimicks of CDubyaC before, and I don't see why he doesn't just post from his Clyde blackmail account. That said, he's had loads of sock puppets in the past. [[User:Klingerbgoode\|Klingerbgoode]] 12:51, 9 November 2009 (CET)
			::*As much as Chris is likely to make a sock puppet, we also have to take into account not only white-knighting, but reverse trolling. Especially considering we're watching Liquid, who is an excellent mimic, it's not like it would be so unbelievable that there could be more people would could do such things. Especially on YouTube comments of less than 400 characters, copying the ranting about honesty that Chris has been spewing for years isn't all that hard. --[[User:LizardPie\|LizardPie]] 15:11, 9 November 2009 (CET)

	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause: /* (Sockpuppet) Chris on the comic and video? */

2009-11-09T11:51:59Z

(Sockpuppet) Chris on the comic and video?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:51, 9 November 2009
Line 35:		Line 35:

	"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)		"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)
			:*It's hard to say at this point. We've had convincing mimicks of CDubyaC before, and I don't see why he doesn't just post from his Clyde blackmail account. That said, he's had loads of sock puppets in the past. [[User:Klingerbgoode\|Klingerbgoode]] 12:51, 9 November 2009 (CET)

	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 10:38, 9 November 2009

2009-11-09T10:38:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:38, 9 November 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	I wonder if it's illegal it is in Virginia to send drawings mimicking bodily harm to someone. Anyone with a clue? This might put Solid into trouble --Griffintown,		I wonder if it's illegal it is in Virginia to send drawings mimicking bodily harm to someone. Anyone with a clue? This might put Solid into trouble --Griffintown,
	:Even if it isn't, we could still just tell Chris we're reporting him for making a death threat. It shouldn't take much to put the fear of god into him --[[User:That Man\|That Man]] 04:57, 9 November 2009 (CET)		:Even if it isn't, we could still just tell Chris we're reporting him for making a death threat. It shouldn't take much to put the fear of god into him --[[User:That Man\|That Man]] 04:57, 9 November 2009 (CET)

			==(Sockpuppet) Chris on the comic and video?==

			"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)

	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 03:57, 9 November 2009

2009-11-09T03:57:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 8 November 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::Kacey's dad is Guile, her sister(mom? idk) looks like <s>Anzu/Tea from Yu-Gi-Oh!</s> Candice from Pokemon and he shoots Liquid with his SUCTION DART GUN. WTF, Chris? --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:04, 8 November 2009 (CET)		::Kacey's dad is Guile, her sister(mom? idk) looks like <s>Anzu/Tea from Yu-Gi-Oh!</s> Candice from Pokemon and he shoots Liquid with his SUCTION DART GUN. WTF, Chris? --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:04, 8 November 2009 (CET)
			:::Glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks the dad looks like Guile --[[User:That Man\|That Man]] 04:57, 9 November 2009 (CET)

	Added examination of Chris's plan. If anybody thinks I'm just stating the obvious, feel free to clean it up or clear it out. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 17:56, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Added examination of Chris's plan. If anybody thinks I'm just stating the obvious, feel free to clean it up or clear it out. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 17:56, 8 November 2009 (CET)
Line 29:		Line 30:

	I wonder if it's illegal it is in Virginia to send drawings mimicking bodily harm to someone. Anyone with a clue? This might put Solid into trouble --Griffintown,		I wonder if it's illegal it is in Virginia to send drawings mimicking bodily harm to someone. Anyone with a clue? This might put Solid into trouble --Griffintown,
			:Even if it isn't, we could still just tell Chris we're reporting him for making a death threat. It shouldn't take much to put the fear of god into him --[[User:That Man\|That Man]] 04:57, 9 November 2009 (CET)
	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 03:25, 9 November 2009

2009-11-09T03:25:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 8 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I believe the stated upload date had the incorrect month, but if I'm wrong please change it back. Also, is Kacey's dad suppose to be... Guile? [[User:Zayce\|Zayce]] 17:19, 8 November 2009 (CET)		I believe the stated upload date had the incorrect month, but if I'm wrong please change it back. Also, is Kacey's dad suppose to be... Guile? [[User:Zayce\|Zayce]] 17:19, 8 November 2009 (CET)

			** I think it might just be because the whole thing is based on his LittleBigPlanet level, where he used the Street Fighter DLC for the game to create Kacey's Dad, using the Guile sackboy. [[User:Bladedone\|Bladedone]] 04:25, 9 November 2009 (CET)

	It certainly seems to be. Yet another thing he's ripping off? --[[User:Hayate666\|Hayate666]] 17:27, 8 November 2009 (CET)		It certainly seems to be. Yet another thing he's ripping off? --[[User:Hayate666\|Hayate666]] 17:27, 8 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 00:10, 9 November 2009

2009-11-09T00:10:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 8 November 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:
	*Couldn't we just ask Liquid for them? --[[User:Sonicow\|Sonicow]] 19:26, 8 November 2009 (CET)		*Couldn't we just ask Liquid for them? --[[User:Sonicow\|Sonicow]] 19:26, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:*Well, why don't you? :3 --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:32, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:*Well, why don't you? :3 --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:32, 8 November 2009 (CET)

			I wonder if it's illegal it is in Virginia to send drawings mimicking bodily harm to someone. Anyone with a clue? This might put Solid into trouble --Griffintown,

	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause: /* To do */

2009-11-08T19:49:07Z

To do

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 8 November 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
			:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 9 November 2009
Line 36:		Line 36:
	"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)		"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)
	:*It's hard to say at this point. We've had convincing mimicks of CDubyaC before, and I don't see why he doesn't just post from his Clyde blackmail account. That said, he's had loads of sock puppets in the past. [[User:Klingerbgoode\|Klingerbgoode]] 12:51, 9 November 2009 (CET)		:*It's hard to say at this point. We've had convincing mimicks of CDubyaC before, and I don't see why he doesn't just post from his Clyde blackmail account. That said, he's had loads of sock puppets in the past. [[User:Klingerbgoode\|Klingerbgoode]] 12:51, 9 November 2009 (CET)
			::*As much as Chris is likely to make a sock puppet, we also have to take into account not only white-knighting, but reverse trolling. Especially considering we're watching Liquid, who is an excellent mimic, it's not like it would be so unbelievable that there could be more people would could do such things. Especially on YouTube comments of less than 400 characters, copying the ranting about honesty that Chris has been spewing for years isn't all that hard. --[[User:LizardPie\|LizardPie]] 15:11, 9 November 2009 (CET)

	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:51, 9 November 2009
Line 35:		Line 35:

	"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)		"YOU ARE A LIE AND A FAKE! I pray that god will show Kacey this! You are not CWC you are a troll and an imposter. The real Chris will win. And another thing, in the comic the troll is not killed he is only hurt as a lesson! SO IT IS NOT MURDER!" [http://www.youtube.com/user/uhcinosnahc link]. There's apparently a CWC sockpuppet adding positive comments to his CWC's videos for some reason. The account name is uhcinosnahc. The speech patterns in the quote, the use of sockpuppets towards some futile end, and having his own name in the sockpuppet account is all consistent with shit that CWC does. Anyone else think this is legit? --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 11:38, 9 November 2009 (CET)
			:*It's hard to say at this point. We've had convincing mimicks of CDubyaC before, and I don't see why he doesn't just post from his Clyde blackmail account. That said, he's had loads of sock puppets in the past. [[User:Klingerbgoode\|Klingerbgoode]] 12:51, 9 November 2009 (CET)

	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 8 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I believe the stated upload date had the incorrect month, but if I'm wrong please change it back. Also, is Kacey's dad suppose to be... Guile? [[User:Zayce\|Zayce]] 17:19, 8 November 2009 (CET)		I believe the stated upload date had the incorrect month, but if I'm wrong please change it back. Also, is Kacey's dad suppose to be... Guile? [[User:Zayce\|Zayce]] 17:19, 8 November 2009 (CET)

			** I think it might just be because the whole thing is based on his LittleBigPlanet level, where he used the Street Fighter DLC for the game to create Kacey's Dad, using the Guile sackboy. [[User:Bladedone\|Bladedone]] 04:25, 9 November 2009 (CET)

	It certainly seems to be. Yet another thing he's ripping off? --[[User:Hayate666\|Hayate666]] 17:27, 8 November 2009 (CET)		It certainly seems to be. Yet another thing he's ripping off? --[[User:Hayate666\|Hayate666]] 17:27, 8 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 8 November 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:
	*Couldn't we just ask Liquid for them? --[[User:Sonicow\|Sonicow]] 19:26, 8 November 2009 (CET)		*Couldn't we just ask Liquid for them? --[[User:Sonicow\|Sonicow]] 19:26, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:*Well, why don't you? :3 --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:32, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:*Well, why don't you? :3 --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:32, 8 November 2009 (CET)

			I wonder if it's illegal it is in Virginia to send drawings mimicking bodily harm to someone. Anyone with a clue? This might put Solid into trouble --Griffintown,

	==To do==		==To do==
	Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)		Right now, the "Plot to Assassinate Chris" sucks balls (no offense to who wrote it). Really should be "plot summary" and a bit more in the style of the other plot summaries where what happens in this comic is described, not so much a commentary on Chris's plan. I realize that pages aren't available (yet) but c'mon, you can still see the text very well, probably moreso than one of the [[Audiobooks]]. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 19:25, 8 November 2009 (CET)
	:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)		:No offense taken. Now that there's a proper summary, do you think it should go entirely? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 20:49, 8 November 2009 (CET)