Talk:Ian Brandon Anderson - Revision history

Old meme: /* lol */

2011-08-08T14:18:30Z

lol

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:18, 8 August 2011
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Yeah...This article is shit. It's unfunny, it's confusing to new readers, it serves no purpose, it doesn't properly cover relevant information, there's no real information in this article that isn't already in Liquid Chris, it encourages stupid Ian jokes, and it breaks CWCki policy in several ways, off the top of my head I'm thinking [[CWCki:NPOV]] and [[CWCki:NOTED]]. So i've rewrote it so it's informative and it serves an actual purpose. If people don't like how insulting it is to newfags, you can tone it down. That's why you have an edit button too. But you can't revert a legitimate article back into a shitty one unless you have a legitimate reason for it, otherwise what you're doing is vandalism. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 06:59, 8 August 2011 (PDT)		Yeah...This article is shit. It's unfunny, it's confusing to new readers, it serves no purpose, it doesn't properly cover relevant information, there's no real information in this article that isn't already in Liquid Chris, it encourages stupid Ian jokes, and it breaks CWCki policy in several ways, off the top of my head I'm thinking [[CWCki:NPOV]] and [[CWCki:NOTED]]. So i've rewrote it so it's informative and it serves an actual purpose. If people don't like how insulting it is to newfags, you can tone it down. That's why you have an edit button too. But you can't revert a legitimate article back into a shitty one unless you have a legitimate reason for it, otherwise what you're doing is vandalism. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 06:59, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
	*Ah ha, but the NOTED policy would suggest that article's aren't suppose to be funny to begin with so that shouldn't be an issue. However, I am divided on this. On the one hand, you have made the article informative to those new to Chris and provide background to those wondering "Who the hell is Ian Brandon Anderson and what does he have to do with Chris?" On the other hand, it sorta violates the CWCki's norm of being in universe. In universe, we treat Chris as Ian mostly because Chris reads the CWCki and if he ever bothered to read it, I'm sure it would piss him off but that would violate our policy of using the CWCki to troll Chris. I'm inclined to believe that clarity precedes humor and as such, I will leave it as it is. Of course, that's also because I'm too [[stress\|stressed]] to go to the trouble of undoing all the work you just put in so in any case, nice work. If anyone else wants to, I guess they can though Old Meme has made a good argument.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:09, 8 August 2011 (PDT)		*Ah ha, but the NOTED policy would suggest that article's aren't suppose to be funny to begin with so that shouldn't be an issue. However, I am divided on this. On the one hand, you have made the article informative to those new to Chris and provide background to those wondering "Who the hell is Ian Brandon Anderson and what does he have to do with Chris?" On the other hand, it sorta violates the CWCki's norm of being in universe. In universe, we treat Chris as Ian mostly because Chris reads the CWCki and if he ever bothered to read it, I'm sure it would piss him off but that would violate our policy of using the CWCki to troll Chris. I'm inclined to believe that clarity precedes humor and as such, I will leave it as it is. Of course, that's also because I'm too [[stress\|stressed]] to go to the trouble of undoing all the work you just put in so in any case, nice work. If anyone else wants to, I guess they can though Old Meme has made a good argument.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:09, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
			**Thankee kindly Champ. As I already stated above, if anyone has a problem with the agressive tone the article takes, you're free to edit out blatant insults if you so choose. I have no problem with trying improve the article or edit it further, I just believe that undoing everything to revert it to Ian jokes and animated gifs is a step backwards. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 07:18, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Champthom: /* The patient has survived */

2011-08-08T14:10:59Z

The patient has survived

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:10, 8 August 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)
	*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)
			:*I had to read it twice to get it but it's good, well played, sir. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:10, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

	Fucking Christ. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 06:59, 7 August 2011 (PDT)		Fucking Christ. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 06:59, 7 August 2011 (PDT)

Champthom: /* lol */

2011-08-08T14:09:26Z

lol

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:09, 8 August 2011
Line 24:		Line 24:
	==lol==		==lol==
	Yeah...This article is shit. It's unfunny, it's confusing to new readers, it serves no purpose, it doesn't properly cover relevant information, there's no real information in this article that isn't already in Liquid Chris, it encourages stupid Ian jokes, and it breaks CWCki policy in several ways, off the top of my head I'm thinking [[CWCki:NPOV]] and [[CWCki:NOTED]]. So i've rewrote it so it's informative and it serves an actual purpose. If people don't like how insulting it is to newfags, you can tone it down. That's why you have an edit button too. But you can't revert a legitimate article back into a shitty one unless you have a legitimate reason for it, otherwise what you're doing is vandalism. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 06:59, 8 August 2011 (PDT)		Yeah...This article is shit. It's unfunny, it's confusing to new readers, it serves no purpose, it doesn't properly cover relevant information, there's no real information in this article that isn't already in Liquid Chris, it encourages stupid Ian jokes, and it breaks CWCki policy in several ways, off the top of my head I'm thinking [[CWCki:NPOV]] and [[CWCki:NOTED]]. So i've rewrote it so it's informative and it serves an actual purpose. If people don't like how insulting it is to newfags, you can tone it down. That's why you have an edit button too. But you can't revert a legitimate article back into a shitty one unless you have a legitimate reason for it, otherwise what you're doing is vandalism. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 06:59, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
			*Ah ha, but the NOTED policy would suggest that article's aren't suppose to be funny to begin with so that shouldn't be an issue. However, I am divided on this. On the one hand, you have made the article informative to those new to Chris and provide background to those wondering "Who the hell is Ian Brandon Anderson and what does he have to do with Chris?" On the other hand, it sorta violates the CWCki's norm of being in universe. In universe, we treat Chris as Ian mostly because Chris reads the CWCki and if he ever bothered to read it, I'm sure it would piss him off but that would violate our policy of using the CWCki to troll Chris. I'm inclined to believe that clarity precedes humor and as such, I will leave it as it is. Of course, that's also because I'm too [[stress\|stressed]] to go to the trouble of undoing all the work you just put in so in any case, nice work. If anyone else wants to, I guess they can though Old Meme has made a good argument.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:09, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Old meme at 13:59, 8 August 2011

2011-08-08T13:59:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 8 August 2011
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Fucking Christ. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 06:59, 7 August 2011 (PDT)		Fucking Christ. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 06:59, 7 August 2011 (PDT)

			==lol==
			Yeah...This article is shit. It's unfunny, it's confusing to new readers, it serves no purpose, it doesn't properly cover relevant information, there's no real information in this article that isn't already in Liquid Chris, it encourages stupid Ian jokes, and it breaks CWCki policy in several ways, off the top of my head I'm thinking [[CWCki:NPOV]] and [[CWCki:NOTED]]. So i've rewrote it so it's informative and it serves an actual purpose. If people don't like how insulting it is to newfags, you can tone it down. That's why you have an edit button too. But you can't revert a legitimate article back into a shitty one unless you have a legitimate reason for it, otherwise what you're doing is vandalism. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 06:59, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Sonijew is back: /* The patient has survived */

2011-08-07T13:59:36Z

The patient has survived

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 7 August 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)
	*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)

			Fucking Christ. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 06:59, 7 August 2011 (PDT)

Old meme: /* The patient has survived */

2011-07-29T12:05:34Z

The patient has survived

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:05, 29 July 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	==The patient has survived==		==The patient has survived==
	And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)
			*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)

Old meme at 12:04, 29 July 2011

2011-07-29T12:04:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 29 July 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT)		:Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

			==The patient has survived==
			And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)

Nullity: Would you believe my tilde key is broken?

2011-07-24T21:40:35Z

Would you believe my tilde key is broken?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 24 July 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Supporting this. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT)		::Supporting this. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

	* I'm with Dude on this. I'll see what I can do over the weekend.		* I'm with Dude on this. I'll see what I can do over the weekend. [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 14:40, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

	:Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT)		:Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

Nullity: For ze motherland

2011-07-24T21:39:07Z

For ze motherland

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 24 July 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::Supporting this. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT)		::Supporting this. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

			* I'm with Dude on this. I'll see what I can do over the weekend.

	:Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT)		:Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

Giantgroundsloth at 21:12, 24 July 2011

2011-07-24T21:12:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 24 July 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::Supporting this. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT)		::Supporting this. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

			:Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:18, 8 August 2011
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Yeah...This article is shit. It's unfunny, it's confusing to new readers, it serves no purpose, it doesn't properly cover relevant information, there's no real information in this article that isn't already in Liquid Chris, it encourages stupid Ian jokes, and it breaks CWCki policy in several ways, off the top of my head I'm thinking [[CWCki:NPOV]] and [[CWCki:NOTED]]. So i've rewrote it so it's informative and it serves an actual purpose. If people don't like how insulting it is to newfags, you can tone it down. That's why you have an edit button too. But you can't revert a legitimate article back into a shitty one unless you have a legitimate reason for it, otherwise what you're doing is vandalism. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 06:59, 8 August 2011 (PDT)		Yeah...This article is shit. It's unfunny, it's confusing to new readers, it serves no purpose, it doesn't properly cover relevant information, there's no real information in this article that isn't already in Liquid Chris, it encourages stupid Ian jokes, and it breaks CWCki policy in several ways, off the top of my head I'm thinking [[CWCki:NPOV]] and [[CWCki:NOTED]]. So i've rewrote it so it's informative and it serves an actual purpose. If people don't like how insulting it is to newfags, you can tone it down. That's why you have an edit button too. But you can't revert a legitimate article back into a shitty one unless you have a legitimate reason for it, otherwise what you're doing is vandalism. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 06:59, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
	*Ah ha, but the NOTED policy would suggest that article's aren't suppose to be funny to begin with so that shouldn't be an issue. However, I am divided on this. On the one hand, you have made the article informative to those new to Chris and provide background to those wondering "Who the hell is Ian Brandon Anderson and what does he have to do with Chris?" On the other hand, it sorta violates the CWCki's norm of being in universe. In universe, we treat Chris as Ian mostly because Chris reads the CWCki and if he ever bothered to read it, I'm sure it would piss him off but that would violate our policy of using the CWCki to troll Chris. I'm inclined to believe that clarity precedes humor and as such, I will leave it as it is. Of course, that's also because I'm too [[stress\|stressed]] to go to the trouble of undoing all the work you just put in so in any case, nice work. If anyone else wants to, I guess they can though Old Meme has made a good argument.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:09, 8 August 2011 (PDT)		*Ah ha, but the NOTED policy would suggest that article's aren't suppose to be funny to begin with so that shouldn't be an issue. However, I am divided on this. On the one hand, you have made the article informative to those new to Chris and provide background to those wondering "Who the hell is Ian Brandon Anderson and what does he have to do with Chris?" On the other hand, it sorta violates the CWCki's norm of being in universe. In universe, we treat Chris as Ian mostly because Chris reads the CWCki and if he ever bothered to read it, I'm sure it would piss him off but that would violate our policy of using the CWCki to troll Chris. I'm inclined to believe that clarity precedes humor and as such, I will leave it as it is. Of course, that's also because I'm too [[stress\|stressed]] to go to the trouble of undoing all the work you just put in so in any case, nice work. If anyone else wants to, I guess they can though Old Meme has made a good argument.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:09, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
			**Thankee kindly Champ. As I already stated above, if anyone has a problem with the agressive tone the article takes, you're free to edit out blatant insults if you so choose. I have no problem with trying improve the article or edit it further, I just believe that undoing everything to revert it to Ian jokes and animated gifs is a step backwards. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 07:18, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:10, 8 August 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)
	*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)
			:*I had to read it twice to get it but it's good, well played, sir. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:10, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

	Fucking Christ. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 06:59, 7 August 2011 (PDT)		Fucking Christ. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 06:59, 7 August 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 7 August 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		And the operation was a complete sucess! I'm happy to report that I removed the big nasty tumour that was Ian jokes from this article and turned it into an actual CWCki article. No more will it be laughed at by the other articles for it's defiency of information and poor humour. It was difficult though. Ian Brandon Anderson is a pretty...''old meme''...sunglasses YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:04, 29 July 2011 (PDT)
	*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)		*That joke was terrible. I'm sorry. --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 05:05, 29 July 2011 (PDT)

			Fucking Christ. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 06:59, 7 August 2011 (PDT)