Talk:Jackie E-mails 23 - Revision history

Blue Bully at 20:44, 16 December 2020

2020-12-16T20:44:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 16 December 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)		:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)
	So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)		So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)
			Never mind I checked, it's not. [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)

Blue Bully at 20:42, 16 December 2020

2020-12-16T20:42:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 16 December 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)		How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)
	:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)		:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)
	So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)		So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)

Blue Bully at 20:42, 16 December 2020

2020-12-16T20:42:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 16 December 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)		How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)
	:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)		:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)
			So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)

Freecell at 18:43, 2 January 2011

2011-01-02T18:43:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 2 January 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)		How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)
			:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)

Draygoon at 12:14, 2 January 2011

2011-01-02T12:14:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 2 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I made a minor edit just to fix the benefits & blah blah blah. If no one likes it you guys can change it to whatever u guys like. [[User:ShinGokuIAM\|ShinGokuIAM]] 10:40, 6 December 2010 (PST)		I made a minor edit just to fix the benefits & blah blah blah. If no one likes it you guys can change it to whatever u guys like. [[User:ShinGokuIAM\|ShinGokuIAM]] 10:40, 6 December 2010 (PST)

			How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)

ShinGokuIAM at 18:40, 6 December 2010

2010-12-06T18:40:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 6 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--[[User:Xavier orona\|Xavier orona]] 02:01, 3 December 2010 (PST)		Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--[[User:Xavier orona\|Xavier orona]] 02:01, 3 December 2010 (PST)

			I made a minor edit just to fix the benefits & blah blah blah. If no one likes it you guys can change it to whatever u guys like. [[User:ShinGokuIAM\|ShinGokuIAM]] 10:40, 6 December 2010 (PST)

Xavier orona: Created page with "Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--~~~~"

2010-12-03T10:01:51Z

Created page with "Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--~~~~"

New page

Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--[[User:Xavier orona|Xavier orona]] 02:01, 3 December 2010 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 16 December 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)		:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)
	So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)		So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)
			Never mind I checked, it's not. [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 16 December 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)		How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)
	:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)		:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)
	So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)		So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 16 December 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)		How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon\|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)
	:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)		:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism\|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)
			So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully\|Blue Bully 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)