Talk:June 2014 leaks - Revision history

Alan Pardew: Redirected page to Talk:Manchester High Leaks

2014-07-06T01:49:28Z

Redirected page to Talk:Manchester High Leaks

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 5 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Should cursive transcriptions be added? If so, where? ==~~		#REDIRECT [[Talk:Manchester_High_Leaks]]

	Some users on the forums have complained about not being able to (easily) read Chris's cursive handwriting. I transcribed the Amendment timeline [[User:CWCTime/27 Amendment Timeline\|here]] but I didn't insert it in this page because I thought it might make the page way too long/cluttered. I'm not sure that a separate article for each document is necessary (unless analyzing each document is not too spergy for the CWCki). Would a collapsible box on this page be a good way to add the transcriptions? A CWCki Forums user has [http://cwckiforums.com/threads/chriss-writing-leak-20jun14.3963/#post-258353 transcribed] one of the more recent leaks. There may be other transcriptions on the forums (I haven't completely caught up yet). --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 13:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

	:I think that in many countries cursive writing is not taught at all. I'm an Israeli and I haven't been taught how to read it, and I know of no other compatriot of mine who have been. For that reason, I think that transcriptions are definitely needed, and yeah I think that collapsible boxes for the transcriptions would be good. As for analyzing the Chris's homework... I think that this is something the CWCki should do to. We already note instances in which Chris shows a [[Chris and sex#Knowledge of sex and gender\|lack of knowledge]] [[Chris and the Law#~~Understanding\|regarding subjects]]~~ [[~~Chris and money#Chris's Beliefs\|that an adult at his age should be knowledgeable about]]; analyzing the mistakes he made in his homework would be appropriate. - [[User~~:~~NegaCWC\|NegaCWC~~]] ~~([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 14:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)~~

	::Alright, I started adding brief descriptions and collapsible transcriptions. They could use some help from someone better at formatting than me... I couldn't figure out how to use different font colors in the transcriptions, for example. When I tried using formatting like <nowiki><font color="00ff00"></nowiki>, it kept breaking entire quoteboxes. --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 04:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)


	~~--Speaking of handwriting, I would like to politely point out that Chris didn't write "Dong MacArthur." He wrote Doug; it's just hard to read. --asperhes.~~
	~~:Freud was right. [[User:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|Chrissy Wankston Fagler]] ([[User talk:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|talk]]) 11:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)~~

	:Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt (certainly he meant "Doug" in any case), but if you look at the Us in "Arthur" and the Ns in "Pyongyang" it really ''looks'' like a U. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 11:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

	~~==Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects==~~
	~~1. Page is currently titled "June 2014 leaks". It's going to be July soon and I've still got stuff to leak. I request that the page's name be changed to "Manchester High Leaks" or something similar.~~
	2. This page is getting a bit big. I think we should have brief, overall summaries on this main page, and have a separate page for each individual school subject once we get enough content. Thoughts? Comments? [[User:Skyraider91\|Skyraider91]] ([[User talk:Skyraider91\|talk]]) 02:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

	:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
	~~::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)~~
	~~:::I say Manchester High Homework. I think I'll rename the title now. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)~~
	~~EDIT: Chose "Manchester High Leaks". Let me know if you dislike the name. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)~~

Alan Pardew: /* Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects */

2014-07-05T15:13:11Z

Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 5 July 2014
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)		::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
	:::I say Manchester High Homework. I think I'll rename the title now. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)		:::I say Manchester High Homework. I think I'll rename the title now. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
			EDIT: Chose "Manchester High Leaks". Let me know if you dislike the name. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Alan Pardew: /* Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects */

2014-07-05T15:07:14Z

Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 5 July 2014
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)		:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
	::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)		::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
			:::I say Manchester High Homework. I think I'll rename the title now. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

NegaCWC: /* Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects */

2014-07-01T22:25:39Z

Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 1 July 2014
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)		:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
			::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

CWCTime: reply to Skyraider91 (added new topic)

2014-07-01T18:25:45Z

reply to Skyraider91 (added new topic)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 1 July 2014
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt (certainly he meant "Doug" in any case), but if you look at the Us in "Arthur" and the Ns in "Pyongyang" it really ''looks'' like a U. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 11:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)		:Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt (certainly he meant "Doug" in any case), but if you look at the Us in "Arthur" and the Ns in "Pyongyang" it really ''looks'' like a U. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 11:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

			==Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects==
	1. Page is currently titled "June 2014 leaks". It's going to be July soon and I've still got stuff to leak. I request that the page's name be changed to "Manchester High Leaks" or something similar.		1. Page is currently titled "June 2014 leaks". It's going to be July soon and I've still got stuff to leak. I request that the page's name be changed to "Manchester High Leaks" or something similar.
	2. This page is getting a bit big. I think we should have brief, overall summaries on this main page, and have a separate page for each individual school subject once we get enough content. Thoughts? Comments? [[User:Skyraider91\|Skyraider91]] ([[User talk:Skyraider91\|talk]]) 02:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)		2. This page is getting a bit big. I think we should have brief, overall summaries on this main page, and have a separate page for each individual school subject once we get enough content. Thoughts? Comments? [[User:Skyraider91\|Skyraider91]] ([[User talk:Skyraider91\|talk]]) 02:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

			:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Skyraider91 at 02:38, 1 July 2014

2014-07-01T02:38:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 30 June 2014
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt (certainly he meant "Doug" in any case), but if you look at the Us in "Arthur" and the Ns in "Pyongyang" it really ''looks'' like a U. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 11:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)		:Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt (certainly he meant "Doug" in any case), but if you look at the Us in "Arthur" and the Ns in "Pyongyang" it really ''looks'' like a U. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 11:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

			1. Page is currently titled "June 2014 leaks". It's going to be July soon and I've still got stuff to leak. I request that the page's name be changed to "Manchester High Leaks" or something similar.
			2. This page is getting a bit big. I think we should have brief, overall summaries on this main page, and have a separate page for each individual school subject once we get enough content. Thoughts? Comments? [[User:Skyraider91\|Skyraider91]] ([[User talk:Skyraider91\|talk]]) 02:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

CWCTime: reply to asperhes

2014-06-23T11:23:46Z

reply to asperhes

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 23 June 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:
	--Speaking of handwriting, I would like to politely point out that Chris didn't write "Dong MacArthur." He wrote Doug; it's just hard to read. --asperhes.		--Speaking of handwriting, I would like to politely point out that Chris didn't write "Dong MacArthur." He wrote Doug; it's just hard to read. --asperhes.
	:Freud was right. [[User:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|Chrissy Wankston Fagler]] ([[User talk:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|talk]]) 11:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)		:Freud was right. [[User:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|Chrissy Wankston Fagler]] ([[User talk:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|talk]]) 11:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

			:Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt (certainly he meant "Doug" in any case), but if you look at the Us in "Arthur" and the Ns in "Pyongyang" it really ''looks'' like a U. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 11:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Chrissy Wankston Fagler at 11:22, 23 June 2014

2014-06-23T11:22:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 23 June 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	--Speaking of handwriting, I would like to politely point out that Chris didn't write "Dong MacArthur." He wrote Doug; it's just hard to read. --asperhes.		--Speaking of handwriting, I would like to politely point out that Chris didn't write "Dong MacArthur." He wrote Doug; it's just hard to read. --asperhes.
			:Freud was right. [[User:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|Chrissy Wankston Fagler]] ([[User talk:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|talk]]) 11:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Asperhes: /* Should cursive transcriptions be added? If so, where? */

2014-06-23T03:32:33Z

Should cursive transcriptions be added? If so, where?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 22 June 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Alright, I started adding brief descriptions and collapsible transcriptions. They could use some help from someone better at formatting than me... I couldn't figure out how to use different font colors in the transcriptions, for example. When I tried using formatting like <nowiki><font color="00ff00"></nowiki>, it kept breaking entire quoteboxes. --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 04:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)		::Alright, I started adding brief descriptions and collapsible transcriptions. They could use some help from someone better at formatting than me... I couldn't figure out how to use different font colors in the transcriptions, for example. When I tried using formatting like <nowiki><font color="00ff00"></nowiki>, it kept breaking entire quoteboxes. --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 04:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)


			--Speaking of handwriting, I would like to politely point out that Chris didn't write "Dong MacArthur." He wrote Doug; it's just hard to read. --asperhes.

CWCTime: /* Should cursive transcriptions be added? If so, where? */

2014-06-22T04:43:21Z

Should cursive transcriptions be added? If so, where?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 22 June 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:I think that in many countries cursive writing is not taught at all. I'm an Israeli and I haven't been taught how to read it, and I know of no other compatriot of mine who have been. For that reason, I think that transcriptions are definitely needed, and yeah I think that collapsible boxes for the transcriptions would be good. As for analyzing the Chris's homework... I think that this is something the CWCki should do to. We already note instances in which Chris shows a [[Chris and sex#Knowledge of sex and gender\|lack of knowledge]] [[Chris and the Law#Understanding\|regarding subjects]] [[Chris and money#Chris's Beliefs\|that an adult at his age should be knowledgeable about]]; analyzing the mistakes he made in his homework would be appropriate. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 14:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)		:I think that in many countries cursive writing is not taught at all. I'm an Israeli and I haven't been taught how to read it, and I know of no other compatriot of mine who have been. For that reason, I think that transcriptions are definitely needed, and yeah I think that collapsible boxes for the transcriptions would be good. As for analyzing the Chris's homework... I think that this is something the CWCki should do to. We already note instances in which Chris shows a [[Chris and sex#Knowledge of sex and gender\|lack of knowledge]] [[Chris and the Law#Understanding\|regarding subjects]] [[Chris and money#Chris's Beliefs\|that an adult at his age should be knowledgeable about]]; analyzing the mistakes he made in his homework would be appropriate. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 14:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

			::Alright, I started adding brief descriptions and collapsible transcriptions. They could use some help from someone better at formatting than me... I couldn't figure out how to use different font colors in the transcriptions, for example. When I tried using formatting like <nowiki><font color="00ff00"></nowiki>, it kept breaking entire quoteboxes. --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 04:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 5 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Should cursive transcriptions be added? If so, where? ==~~		#REDIRECT [[Talk:Manchester_High_Leaks]]

	Some users on the forums have complained about not being able to (easily) read Chris's cursive handwriting. I transcribed the Amendment timeline [[User:CWCTime/27 Amendment Timeline\|here]] but I didn't insert it in this page because I thought it might make the page way too long/cluttered. I'm not sure that a separate article for each document is necessary (unless analyzing each document is not too spergy for the CWCki). Would a collapsible box on this page be a good way to add the transcriptions? A CWCki Forums user has [http://cwckiforums.com/threads/chriss-writing-leak-20jun14.3963/#post-258353 transcribed] one of the more recent leaks. There may be other transcriptions on the forums (I haven't completely caught up yet). --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 13:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

	:I think that in many countries cursive writing is not taught at all. I'm an Israeli and I haven't been taught how to read it, and I know of no other compatriot of mine who have been. For that reason, I think that transcriptions are definitely needed, and yeah I think that collapsible boxes for the transcriptions would be good. As for analyzing the Chris's homework... I think that this is something the CWCki should do to. We already note instances in which Chris shows a [[Chris and sex#Knowledge of sex and gender\|lack of knowledge]] [[Chris and the Law#~~Understanding\|regarding subjects]]~~ [[~~Chris and money#Chris's Beliefs\|that an adult at his age should be knowledgeable about]]; analyzing the mistakes he made in his homework would be appropriate. - [[User~~:~~NegaCWC\|NegaCWC~~]] ~~([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 14:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)~~

	::Alright, I started adding brief descriptions and collapsible transcriptions. They could use some help from someone better at formatting than me... I couldn't figure out how to use different font colors in the transcriptions, for example. When I tried using formatting like <nowiki><font color="00ff00"></nowiki>, it kept breaking entire quoteboxes. --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 04:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)


	~~--Speaking of handwriting, I would like to politely point out that Chris didn't write "Dong MacArthur." He wrote Doug; it's just hard to read. --asperhes.~~
	~~:Freud was right. [[User:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|Chrissy Wankston Fagler]] ([[User talk:Chrissy Wankston Fagler\|talk]]) 11:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)~~

	:Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt (certainly he meant "Doug" in any case), but if you look at the Us in "Arthur" and the Ns in "Pyongyang" it really ''looks'' like a U. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 11:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

	~~==Proposal: Rename the article and split it off by subjects==~~
	~~1. Page is currently titled "June 2014 leaks". It's going to be July soon and I've still got stuff to leak. I request that the page's name be changed to "Manchester High Leaks" or something similar.~~
	2. This page is getting a bit big. I think we should have brief, overall summaries on this main page, and have a separate page for each individual school subject once we get enough content. Thoughts? Comments? [[User:Skyraider91\|Skyraider91]] ([[User talk:Skyraider91\|talk]]) 02:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

	:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
	~~::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)~~
	~~:::I say Manchester High Homework. I think I'll rename the title now. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)~~
	~~EDIT: Chose "Manchester High Leaks". Let me know if you dislike the name. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 5 July 2014
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)		::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
	:::I say Manchester High Homework. I think I'll rename the title now. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)		:::I say Manchester High Homework. I think I'll rename the title now. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
			EDIT: Chose "Manchester High Leaks". Let me know if you dislike the name. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 5 July 2014
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)		:I agree with you on both points (I added a topic header for your comment, by the way, hope that's okay). At the start of the leaks I had no idea on the timeframe/how much content you were going to leak, so I didn't consider the name or size, but now clearly both need to be addressed and I think you have good approaches to them. As for the name itself, on the forums they have been dubbed "Burned Docs", which is catchy but not very informative IMO. I would suggest mentioning "homework" somewhere in the title as well, but I dunno... does "Manchester High Homework Leaks" seem too unwieldy? --[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 18:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
	::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)		::Why not just "Manchester High Homework"? - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
			:::I say Manchester High Homework. I think I'll rename the title now. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 15:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)