Talk:Laughs Under Lucricities - Revision history

DStecks at 17:47, 18 March 2010

2010-03-18T17:47:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 18 March 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious etc). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious etc). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
			* English has way too many words that start with "Lu". Still no excuse for improper word choice, though. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 17:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Blusko: /* TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid" */

2010-03-12T22:06:05Z

TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 12 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious etc). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Blusko at 22:05, 12 March 2010

2010-03-12T22:05:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 12 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
			* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Squirrelbait: /* TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid" */ suggesting ludicrous as a root word

2010-03-12T20:39:07Z

TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid": suggesting ludicrous as a root word

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 12 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)		* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
			* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Blusko at 12:04, 12 March 2010

2010-03-12T12:04:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 12 March 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon\|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)		:* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon\|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
	* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)		* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
			* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

DStecks at 02:59, 3 March 2010

2010-03-03T02:59:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 2 March 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)		Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
	:* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon\|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)		:* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon\|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
			* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Phlegethon: /* TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid" */

2010-01-31T17:17:45Z

TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 31 January 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)		Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
			:* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon\|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Llort: Created page with '==TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid"== Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any …'

2010-01-31T15:57:08Z

Created page with '==TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid"== Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any …'

New page

==TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid"==

Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. [[User:Llort|Llort]] 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 18 March 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious etc). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious etc). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
			* English has way too many words that start with "Lu". Still no excuse for improper word choice, though. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 17:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 12 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious etc). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 12 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
			* I think what's happening here is a kind of garbled phonesthesia, that is, Chris is getting bogged down trying to pluck a single word from a selection that have common phonetic features and similar connonations (lurid, lewd, ludicrous, atrocious). Words that sound similar but carrying totally divergent meanings (lucrative, possibly lucid) are getting thrown into the mix. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 12 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)		* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
	* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)		* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
			* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait\|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 12 March 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon\|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)		:* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon\|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
	* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)		* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
			* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds\|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)