Talk:List of Sonichu characters - Revision history

OFSheep at 03:29, 18 August 2010

2010-08-18T03:29:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 17 August 2010
Line 60:		Line 60:

	* One idea that made me wish I drank, so I could pour the sad away of the possibility: Might have Bill the scientist been based on Bill Nye, the Science Guy? Thus, Chris has violated yet another beloved childhood icon. Worse yet, I've seen one or two drawings that sort of looked like The Muppets. Fuck you, Chris. Fuck you. --[[User:Xavier orona\|Xavier orona]] 20:10, 17 August 2010 (PDT)		* One idea that made me wish I drank, so I could pour the sad away of the possibility: Might have Bill the scientist been based on Bill Nye, the Science Guy? Thus, Chris has violated yet another beloved childhood icon. Worse yet, I've seen one or two drawings that sort of looked like The Muppets. Fuck you, Chris. Fuck you. --[[User:Xavier orona\|Xavier orona]] 20:10, 17 August 2010 (PDT)
			** There isn't any evidence for Bill besides the name. If Chris did take it there would be one or two of his character traits stolen wholesale. It may just be a name Chris picked at random. --[[User:OFSheep\|OFSheep]] 20:29, 17 August 2010 (PDT)

Xavier orona: /* Seriously now */

2010-08-18T03:10:07Z

Seriously now

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 17 August 2010
Line 58:		Line 58:

	[http://www.cogsdev.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Sonichu_characters&diff=97287&oldid=97184 Look what this guy is doing.] MP, are you a slow-in-the-mind or something? --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 08:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)		[http://www.cogsdev.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Sonichu_characters&diff=97287&oldid=97184 Look what this guy is doing.] MP, are you a slow-in-the-mind or something? --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 08:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

			* One idea that made me wish I drank, so I could pour the sad away of the possibility: Might have Bill the scientist been based on Bill Nye, the Science Guy? Thus, Chris has violated yet another beloved childhood icon. Worse yet, I've seen one or two drawings that sort of looked like The Muppets. Fuck you, Chris. Fuck you. --[[User:Xavier orona\|Xavier orona]] 20:10, 17 August 2010 (PDT)

Sonijew is back: /* Seriously now */

2010-06-20T08:49:25Z

Seriously now

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 20 June 2010
Line 56:		Line 56:

	:*Calm down fellas, both sides have valid points. First, yes, this article is pretty long even when we account for the breadth it's covering. Ideally, in a case like this, it does help to look to Wikipedia. While MachPunch linked to a good example, we could do something along the lines of "[[Wikipedia:List_of_Pokemon\|List of Pokemon]]" where instead of one long ass article with all 500 or so Pokemon in one article, or every Pokemon getting an article to themself, they gave certain Pokemon their own articles (like Pikachu) and minor Pokemon were described on the List. I think a good option here would be to split these characters by comics, where each character is briefly described and in what context, and people wanting a more background can look at the relevant articles - that's ideally how a wiki is suppose to work. Of course, this is one option as there's lots of things we can do with this.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)		:*Calm down fellas, both sides have valid points. First, yes, this article is pretty long even when we account for the breadth it's covering. Ideally, in a case like this, it does help to look to Wikipedia. While MachPunch linked to a good example, we could do something along the lines of "[[Wikipedia:List_of_Pokemon\|List of Pokemon]]" where instead of one long ass article with all 500 or so Pokemon in one article, or every Pokemon getting an article to themself, they gave certain Pokemon their own articles (like Pikachu) and minor Pokemon were described on the List. I think a good option here would be to split these characters by comics, where each character is briefly described and in what context, and people wanting a more background can look at the relevant articles - that's ideally how a wiki is suppose to work. Of course, this is one option as there's lots of things we can do with this.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

			[http://www.cogsdev.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Sonichu_characters&diff=97287&oldid=97184 Look what this guy is doing.] MP, are you a slow-in-the-mind or something? --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 08:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* Seriously now */

2010-06-20T05:41:27Z

Seriously now

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 20 June 2010
Line 54:		Line 54:

	:I already said i've given up. Do whatever you want. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 23:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)		:I already said i've given up. Do whatever you want. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 23:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

			:*Calm down fellas, both sides have valid points. First, yes, this article is pretty long even when we account for the breadth it's covering. Ideally, in a case like this, it does help to look to Wikipedia. While MachPunch linked to a good example, we could do something along the lines of "[[Wikipedia:List_of_Pokemon\|List of Pokemon]]" where instead of one long ass article with all 500 or so Pokemon in one article, or every Pokemon getting an article to themself, they gave certain Pokemon their own articles (like Pikachu) and minor Pokemon were described on the List. I think a good option here would be to split these characters by comics, where each character is briefly described and in what context, and people wanting a more background can look at the relevant articles - that's ideally how a wiki is suppose to work. Of course, this is one option as there's lots of things we can do with this.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Edward: /* Seriously now */

2010-06-19T23:53:51Z

Seriously now

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 19 June 2010
Line 52:		Line 52:

	:I don't even get what you're saying about the Manajerks. They have to stay here because they're too important to put on the Manajerks page? The Manajerks page doesn't give enough info on them, but that would change if we...move the stuff that's here over there, duh. That way the same content would be on a shorter, more focused article, where people might actually, y'know, read it. That's the whole fucking point to wikis, so that you don't have to put everything on one page like Chris would. --[[User:MachPunch\|MachPunch]] 18:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)		:I don't even get what you're saying about the Manajerks. They have to stay here because they're too important to put on the Manajerks page? The Manajerks page doesn't give enough info on them, but that would change if we...move the stuff that's here over there, duh. That way the same content would be on a shorter, more focused article, where people might actually, y'know, read it. That's the whole fucking point to wikis, so that you don't have to put everything on one page like Chris would. --[[User:MachPunch\|MachPunch]] 18:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

			:I already said i've given up. Do whatever you want. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 23:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

MachPunch: /* Seriously now */

2010-06-19T18:58:12Z

Seriously now

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 19 June 2010
Line 48:		Line 48:

	Actually, on second thought: Fuck it. I'm just leaving this article as it is. I'm not going to argue anymore. Do whatever the fuck you want. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 13:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)		Actually, on second thought: Fuck it. I'm just leaving this article as it is. I'm not going to argue anymore. Do whatever the fuck you want. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 13:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

			:All of these characters need an explanation, but why do all of those explanations have to be here? There's too many of them to do that. (This page is already too long and it doesn't even have summaries for all the characters; if we flesh out the stuff for Asperchu clones and put the Pokemon back in it'll be gigantic.) I understand that this page is trying to have a format similar to [[wikipedia:List of Sonic the Hedgehog video game characters\|similar articles]] on Wikipedia, and I guess that's how Wikipedia does it, so maybe that's more professional. But I guarantee you that if each Sonic game introduced fifteen new characters, somebody over there would be like "fuck, this page is too long, move some of this shit someplace else and link to it." There are times when this wiki can only be as professional as the man-child it's about.

			:I don't even get what you're saying about the Manajerks. They have to stay here because they're too important to put on the Manajerks page? The Manajerks page doesn't give enough info on them, but that would change if we...move the stuff that's here over there, duh. That way the same content would be on a shorter, more focused article, where people might actually, y'know, read it. That's the whole fucking point to wikis, so that you don't have to put everything on one page like Chris would. --[[User:MachPunch\|MachPunch]] 18:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Edward: /* Seriously now */

2010-06-19T13:07:33Z

Seriously now

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 19 June 2010
Line 46:		Line 46:

	I am not going to do fucking bullet points. I'm trying to be profesional here. Oversized or not, these characters need an explaination of who they are. Their names are not an adequat description, unless they have a name like 'Boulder Dropping Whale'. I'd like an explaination for who the fuck these people are without having to link to other articles. I'm already not happy about removing the Pokemon from the page, but i'm not reverting it since you obviously feel we'd benefit from that. You are not removing the Manajerks though. They are major characters and they don't have nearly enough description in the Manajerks article. They are staying. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 13:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)		I am not going to do fucking bullet points. I'm trying to be profesional here. Oversized or not, these characters need an explaination of who they are. Their names are not an adequat description, unless they have a name like 'Boulder Dropping Whale'. I'd like an explaination for who the fuck these people are without having to link to other articles. I'm already not happy about removing the Pokemon from the page, but i'm not reverting it since you obviously feel we'd benefit from that. You are not removing the Manajerks though. They are major characters and they don't have nearly enough description in the Manajerks article. They are staying. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 13:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

			Actually, on second thought: Fuck it. I'm just leaving this article as it is. I'm not going to argue anymore. Do whatever the fuck you want. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 13:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Edward: /* Seriously now */

2010-06-19T13:04:49Z

Seriously now

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 19 June 2010
Line 44:		Line 44:

	:This article is always going to be long because there are dozens of characters in the comic and this list is supposed to include them all. But there's nothing that says it has to be so detailed about every damn character. Not that the summaries are bad but they don't ''all'' need to be ''here''. I think the best thing to do is reduce it to a series of bullet lists, one for each issue, with the characters' names and ''maybe'' fifty words of description. Each character's name can link out to his own article; if the character doesn't have a dedicated article, we'll make sure he has a section on an article. The Pokemon can all be on the Pokemon page. The lesser Manajerks can all be on the Manajerks page. I don't know what to do with all of them yet, but I don't think any of them should be right here. --[[User:MachPunch\|MachPunch]] 05:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)		:This article is always going to be long because there are dozens of characters in the comic and this list is supposed to include them all. But there's nothing that says it has to be so detailed about every damn character. Not that the summaries are bad but they don't ''all'' need to be ''here''. I think the best thing to do is reduce it to a series of bullet lists, one for each issue, with the characters' names and ''maybe'' fifty words of description. Each character's name can link out to his own article; if the character doesn't have a dedicated article, we'll make sure he has a section on an article. The Pokemon can all be on the Pokemon page. The lesser Manajerks can all be on the Manajerks page. I don't know what to do with all of them yet, but I don't think any of them should be right here. --[[User:MachPunch\|MachPunch]] 05:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

			I am not going to do fucking bullet points. I'm trying to be profesional here. Oversized or not, these characters need an explaination of who they are. Their names are not an adequat description, unless they have a name like 'Boulder Dropping Whale'. I'd like an explaination for who the fuck these people are without having to link to other articles. I'm already not happy about removing the Pokemon from the page, but i'm not reverting it since you obviously feel we'd benefit from that. You are not removing the Manajerks though. They are major characters and they don't have nearly enough description in the Manajerks article. They are staying. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 13:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

MachPunch: /* Seriously now */

2010-06-19T05:21:27Z

Seriously now

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 19 June 2010
Line 40:		Line 40:
	== Seriously now ==		== Seriously now ==
	I am trying to rewrite this page right now. That is no easy task when you consider how many fucktons of characters there are that need a more detailed explaination. If you want to keep Pokemon in the Pokemon article, then fine. I don't want whatever that was in it's place though. A blank subsection with a link to another subsection elsewhere? It looks messy, and really what's the point? So either nothing goes there or it goes as before. And seriously, can people please not move around or remove character sections? Every time they do, I have to realign the pictures so that they go left and right in a pattern again. It is fucking awkward. STRESS SIGH --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 01:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)		I am trying to rewrite this page right now. That is no easy task when you consider how many fucktons of characters there are that need a more detailed explaination. If you want to keep Pokemon in the Pokemon article, then fine. I don't want whatever that was in it's place though. A blank subsection with a link to another subsection elsewhere? It looks messy, and really what's the point? So either nothing goes there or it goes as before. And seriously, can people please not move around or remove character sections? Every time they do, I have to realign the pictures so that they go left and right in a pattern again. It is fucking awkward. STRESS SIGH --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 01:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

			:OK, the problem with this article is that it's too long. It's too long because it not only lists every single character but also tries to provide a paragraph or two about most of them. That's not necessary--we don't need a 1000 words about Black Sonichu AND a picture here, in an already-crowded page, when there's already perfectly good article for Black Sonichu ''which this article links to''. (I removed an "incomplete" banner from the Crystal section, which already has a brief paragraph and a link to the Crystal article. How is that incomplete? What more could possibly said about Crystal that isn't already on her own page?)

			:This article is always going to be long because there are dozens of characters in the comic and this list is supposed to include them all. But there's nothing that says it has to be so detailed about every damn character. Not that the summaries are bad but they don't ''all'' need to be ''here''. I think the best thing to do is reduce it to a series of bullet lists, one for each issue, with the characters' names and ''maybe'' fifty words of description. Each character's name can link out to his own article; if the character doesn't have a dedicated article, we'll make sure he has a section on an article. The Pokemon can all be on the Pokemon page. The lesser Manajerks can all be on the Manajerks page. I don't know what to do with all of them yet, but I don't think any of them should be right here. --[[User:MachPunch\|MachPunch]] 05:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 01:16, 19 June 2010

2010-06-19T01:16:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 18 June 2010
Line 37:		Line 37:

	She looks to me like a black version of Bebe from South Park. If Chris did trace Florance, he was probably using a picture of Bebe.-[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 11:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)		She looks to me like a black version of Bebe from South Park. If Chris did trace Florance, he was probably using a picture of Bebe.-[[User:Trombonista\|trombonista]] 11:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

			== Seriously now ==
			I am trying to rewrite this page right now. That is no easy task when you consider how many fucktons of characters there are that need a more detailed explaination. If you want to keep Pokemon in the Pokemon article, then fine. I don't want whatever that was in it's place though. A blank subsection with a link to another subsection elsewhere? It looks messy, and really what's the point? So either nothing goes there or it goes as before. And seriously, can people please not move around or remove character sections? Every time they do, I have to realign the pictures so that they go left and right in a pattern again. It is fucking awkward. STRESS SIGH --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 01:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)