Talk:Mailbag 4 - Revision history

Digital at 03:55, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T03:55:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 8 March 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==		==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==
	That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)		That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)

			==David F. Smith==
			When I saw his name I thought someone was impersonating him (former writer for IGN, now writes for Nintendo Power and other gaming publications) but the website is correct, and I've seen enough of his posts elsewhere to know it sounds like it's actually him (along with 'DFS'). Plus he seems the type to join in the trolling and not care enough to use a different name. --[[User:Digital\|Digital]] 03:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Clydec: 13 revisions

2010-01-03T08:49:19Z

13 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:49, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

Champthom: /* Redacted */

2009-11-29T22:47:12Z

Redacted

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 29 November 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)		**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)
	***It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --[[User:GUInterface\|GUInterface]] 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET)		***It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --[[User:GUInterface\|GUInterface]] 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET)
			:::*To clarify what GUI said, it's the idea that if you're too close a friends with a woman, she'll view you as "just a friend" and therefore not be interested in a sexual relationship because she'll feel like she'd ruin an otherwise good friendship as a result. It's not so much a law but just a good idea - I mean, in some cases, you might be interested in someone and become their friend but you have such a good friendship that you don't want to fuck it up and then lose an otherwise good friend if things don't work out romantically and/or sexually between the two. In other words, Chris's concept of [[Sweetheart from the ground up]] falls apart because of this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 23:47, 29 November 2009 (CET)

	==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==		==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==
	That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)		That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 22:07, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T22:07:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 29 November 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)		*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)
	**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)		**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)
			***It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --[[User:GUInterface\|GUInterface]] 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET)

	==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==		==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==
	That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)		That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause: /* Redacted */

2009-11-29T17:43:00Z

Redacted

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 29 November 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)		Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)
	*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)		*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)
			**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)

	==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==		==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==
	That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)		That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause: I hope this isn't an awful idea.

2009-11-29T05:13:25Z

I hope this isn't an awful idea.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:13, 29 November 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)		Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)
	*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)		*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)

			==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==
			That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 02:51, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T02:51:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 28 November 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)		Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)
	*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"		*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 02:51, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T02:51:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 28 November 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)		Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)
			*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"

VanKrause: /* Redacted */

2009-11-29T02:01:17Z

Redacted

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 28 November 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Redacted==		==Redacted==

	Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)		Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)

VanKrause at 02:00, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T02:00:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 28 November 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Seconded. Proof that Chris is a homo.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 17:20, 28 November 2009 (CET)		Seconded. Proof that Chris is a homo.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 17:20, 28 November 2009 (CET)

			==Redacted==

			Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 29 November 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)		**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)
	***It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --[[User:GUInterface\|GUInterface]] 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET)		***It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --[[User:GUInterface\|GUInterface]] 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET)
			:::*To clarify what GUI said, it's the idea that if you're too close a friends with a woman, she'll view you as "just a friend" and therefore not be interested in a sexual relationship because she'll feel like she'd ruin an otherwise good friendship as a result. It's not so much a law but just a good idea - I mean, in some cases, you might be interested in someone and become their friend but you have such a good friendship that you don't want to fuck it up and then lose an otherwise good friend if things don't work out romantically and/or sexually between the two. In other words, Chris's concept of [[Sweetheart from the ground up]] falls apart because of this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 23:47, 29 November 2009 (CET)

	==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==		==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==
	That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)		That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 29 November 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)		*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)
	**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)		**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)
			***It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --[[User:GUInterface\|GUInterface]] 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET)

	==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==		==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==
	That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)		That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 29 November 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)		Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --[[User:Anaconda\|Anaconda]] 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)
	*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)		*"I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)
			**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)

	==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==		==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.==
	That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)		That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)