Talk:Mailbag 52 - Revision history

Liquid!: /* Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. */

2010-02-16T18:03:27Z

Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 16 February 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
	*****Then we'll have to keep pestering Chris until he finally starts to give genuine responses again. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		*****Then we'll have to keep pestering Chris until he finally starts to give genuine responses again. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
			*****The beauty of Chris's SysOp being a combination of two trolls is that they can tell him what they want and set action in motion ('legal' action, perhaps) through other trolls to threaten the CWCipedia and force compliance if he disobeys. We'll get him writing proper responses soon, I'm sure of it. Even if he relapses, the powers that be can push him back. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 18:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

BreadGod: /* Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. */

2010-02-16T15:21:16Z

Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 16 February 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
			*****Then we'll have to keep pestering Chris until he finally starts to give genuine responses again. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Torvalr: /* Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. */

2010-02-16T12:50:17Z

Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 16 February 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 18:42, 15 February 2010

2010-02-15T18:42:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 15 February 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::Considering the fact that Chris has no empathy or remorse, he'll probably tell Mike Jackson's widow to get over it. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 16:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)		:::Considering the fact that Chris has no empathy or remorse, he'll probably tell Mike Jackson's widow to get over it. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 16:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Probably not that bluntly though. I think it'll be something along the lines of 'I'm sos sorry I feel for you. I know its difficult but you have to move past this tragic event and get on with your life.' All bets are off as to whether or not he will tell her to find a new husband and father for her children though. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 02:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		:::*Probably not that bluntly though. I think it'll be something along the lines of 'I'm sos sorry I feel for you. I know its difficult but you have to move past this tragic event and get on with your life.' All bets are off as to whether or not he will tell her to find a new husband and father for her children though. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 02:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::**Boy was I ever wrong. Chris is a bigger prick than I thought.--[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

	== Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. ==		== Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. ==
Line 19:		Line 20:
	**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

MoarLurk at 17:55, 15 February 2010

2010-02-15T17:55:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 15 February 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

BreadGod: /* Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. */

2010-02-15T15:24:39Z

Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:24, 15 February 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:
	**He... he used that as his response to Mike Jackson's Death. Fucking shit.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**He... he used that as his response to Mike Jackson's Death. Fucking shit.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 14:56, 15 February 2010

2010-02-15T14:56:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 15 February 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* You make it sound likehe didn't half ass them before.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 05:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		* You make it sound likehe didn't half ass them before.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 05:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	**He... he used that as his response to Mike Jackson's Death. Fucking shit.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**He... he used that as his response to Mike Jackson's Death. Fucking shit.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56.		*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 14:56, 15 February 2010

2010-02-15T14:56:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 15 February 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* You make it sound likehe didn't half ass them before.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 05:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		* You make it sound likehe didn't half ass them before.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 05:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	**He... he used that as his response to Mike Jackson's Death. Fucking shit.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**He... he used that as his response to Mike Jackson's Death. Fucking shit.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56.

Beat: /* Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. */

2010-02-15T05:47:34Z

Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:47, 15 February 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Oh great, now Chris is going to half-ass his responses? At this point, I would rather let him reject my letter outright. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 04:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		Oh great, now Chris is going to half-ass his responses? At this point, I would rather let him reject my letter outright. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 04:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	* You make it sound likehe didn't half ass them before.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 05:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		* You make it sound likehe didn't half ass them before.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 05:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			**He... he used that as his response to Mike Jackson's Death. Fucking shit.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Sonichuistehcool at 05:18, 15 February 2010

2010-02-15T05:18:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 15 February 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Oh great, now Chris is going to half-ass his responses? At this point, I would rather let him reject my letter outright. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 04:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		Oh great, now Chris is going to half-ass his responses? At this point, I would rather let him reject my letter outright. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 04:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			* You make it sound likehe didn't half ass them before.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool\|Sonichuistehcool]] 05:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 16 February 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
	*****Then we'll have to keep pestering Chris until he finally starts to give genuine responses again. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		*****Then we'll have to keep pestering Chris until he finally starts to give genuine responses again. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
			*****The beauty of Chris's SysOp being a combination of two trolls is that they can tell him what they want and set action in motion ('legal' action, perhaps) through other trolls to threaten the CWCipedia and force compliance if he disobeys. We'll get him writing proper responses soon, I'm sure of it. Even if he relapses, the powers that be can push him back. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 18:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 16 February 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
			*****Then we'll have to keep pestering Chris until he finally starts to give genuine responses again. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 16 February 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			****The sad thing is that we can dedicate an entire mailbag to this, yet Chris's responses will most likely be that copypasta "Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts." Hell, I doubt we'll see any decent responses from Chris in the Mailbag anymore. --[[User:Torvalr\|Torvalr]] 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 15 February 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::Considering the fact that Chris has no empathy or remorse, he'll probably tell Mike Jackson's widow to get over it. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 16:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)		:::Considering the fact that Chris has no empathy or remorse, he'll probably tell Mike Jackson's widow to get over it. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 16:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Probably not that bluntly though. I think it'll be something along the lines of 'I'm sos sorry I feel for you. I know its difficult but you have to move past this tragic event and get on with your life.' All bets are off as to whether or not he will tell her to find a new husband and father for her children though. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 02:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		:::*Probably not that bluntly though. I think it'll be something along the lines of 'I'm sos sorry I feel for you. I know its difficult but you have to move past this tragic event and get on with your life.' All bets are off as to whether or not he will tell her to find a new husband and father for her children though. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 02:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::**Boy was I ever wrong. Chris is a bigger prick than I thought.--[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

	== Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. ==		== Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts. ==
Line 19:		Line 20:
	**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			****I support this. We'll have another operation mailbag in the style of the Asperchu mailbag. Everyone will write in either calling him out for the Mike Jackson emial or telling him that giving the stock reply still makes him look like a prick. And we'll force him into an individual reply to each of them. I'll go see if I can convince someone important to let us go ahead with it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 18:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 15 February 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		*** For fucks sake. Before he was insensitive about death and just told people to move on. Now hes rejected a letter informing him that he caused a death. Ryan Cash warranted a youtube video. Now Mike Jackson's death gets a rejection in the mailbag. Thats no longer insensitive. Thats just Chris being an outright asshole. We have to call him out on that for Mailbag 56. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
	**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)		**** That sounds like an awesome idea. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
			**** Only if we dedicate the entire mailbag to it. And Sysop bans him from deleting it because they're facing their third lawsuit in three months if Chris doesn't fully reply to each email.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)