Talk:Mailbag 56 - Revision history

Liquid! at 13:18, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T13:18:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 20 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>		:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>
	:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets the Marie Jackson letter long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets the Marie Jackson letter long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
			:: It shows that he doesn't really read the letters, though - The woman directly references Chris's personal involvement and what drove Mike to his suicide earlier that same morning. He couldn't possibly have read and reread that email and still think he was talking about the pop star - He wasn't married, he didn't commit suicide, he died six months ago and when was he ever called 'Mike' in the first place? Chris is just a lazy son of a bitch. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 13:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Beat at 12:32, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T12:32:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 20 February 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
	:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>		:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>
	:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets ~~this e-mail~~ long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets the Marie Jackson letter long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Beat at 12:32, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T12:32:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 20 February 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
	:Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>
			:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets this e-mail long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Beat at 05:15, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T05:15:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 20 February 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
			:Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Xentrilus at 05:06, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T05:06:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 20 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Oh boy, Chris half-assed the response, I can't wait for Mike's reply.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 04:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		Oh boy, Chris half-assed the response, I can't wait for Mike's reply.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 04:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

			Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

MoarLurk at 04:18, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T04:18:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 20 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:<s>There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday.</s> Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		:<s>There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday.</s> Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
	:: I wouldn't expect a response to MB56 for at least a couple of weeks. [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 13:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		:: I wouldn't expect a response to MB56 for at least a couple of weeks. [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 13:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

			Oh boy, Chris half-assed the response, I can't wait for Mike's reply.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 04:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Liquid! at 13:09, 16 February 2010

2010-02-16T13:09:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 16 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
	:<s>There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday.</s> Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		:<s>There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday.</s> Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
			:: I wouldn't expect a response to MB56 for at least a couple of weeks. [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 13:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Xentrilus at 11:58, 16 February 2010

2010-02-16T11:58:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:58, 16 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
			:<s>There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday.</s> Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Beat: Created page with 'OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--~~~~'

2010-02-16T05:23:59Z

Created page with 'OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--~~~~'

New page

OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 05:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 20 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>		:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>
	:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets the Marie Jackson letter long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets the Marie Jackson letter long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
			:: It shows that he doesn't really read the letters, though - The woman directly references Chris's personal involvement and what drove Mike to his suicide earlier that same morning. He couldn't possibly have read and reread that email and still think he was talking about the pop star - He wasn't married, he didn't commit suicide, he died six months ago and when was he ever called 'Mike' in the first place? Chris is just a lazy son of a bitch. - [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 13:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 20 February 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
	:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>		:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>
	:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets ~~this e-mail~~ long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets the Marie Jackson letter long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 20 February 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
	:Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		:<s>Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</s>
			:I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets this e-mail long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 20 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:<s>There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday.</s> Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		:<s>There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday.</s> Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. [[User:Xentrilus\|Xentrilus]] 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
	:: I wouldn't expect a response to MB56 for at least a couple of weeks. [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 13:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		:: I wouldn't expect a response to MB56 for at least a couple of weeks. [[User:Liquid!\|Liquid!]] 13:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

			Oh boy, Chris half-assed the response, I can't wait for Mike's reply.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 04:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)