Talk:Mailbag 60 - Revision history

Revolver Octopus: /* Mailbags 59-61 Are Erased From Cwcipedia. */

2010-04-04T19:45:06Z

Mailbags 59-61 Are Erased From Cwcipedia.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 4 April 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
	*I think shes reffering to the old ones. When the Sysop condensed a few of the mailbags into one a chunk of the letters were deleted entirely. And not by Chris surprisingly. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		*I think shes reffering to the old ones. When the Sysop condensed a few of the mailbags into one a chunk of the letters were deleted entirely. And not by Chris surprisingly. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
			*When 110mb was down, the Mailbag pages still worked for some reason, but were empty. -- [[User:Revolver Octopus\|Revolver Octopus]] 19:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 19:25, 4 April 2010

2010-04-04T19:25:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 4 April 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:

	what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
			*I think shes reffering to the old ones. When the Sysop condensed a few of the mailbags into one a chunk of the letters were deleted entirely. And not by Chris surprisingly. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Clydec: /* Mailbags 59-61 Are Erased From Cwcipedia. */

2010-04-04T17:26:27Z

Mailbags 59-61 Are Erased From Cwcipedia.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 4 April 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl\|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl\|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
	*Nothing. He's never gonna answer deleted emails. We may as well forget it. Unless the Sysop decideds to bring them back, then theres no point in catalouging them. Just makea brief mention that there were originally more letters but that they were deleted. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 12:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		*Nothing. He's never gonna answer deleted emails. We may as well forget it. Unless the Sysop decideds to bring them back, then theres no point in catalouging them. Just makea brief mention that there were originally more letters but that they were deleted. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 12:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

			what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 12:51, 4 April 2010

2010-04-04T12:51:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 4 April 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl\|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl\|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
			*Nothing. He's never gonna answer deleted emails. We may as well forget it. Unless the Sysop decideds to bring them back, then theres no point in catalouging them. Just makea brief mention that there were originally more letters but that they were deleted. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 12:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

AsperGirl: /* Mailbags 59-61 Are Erased From Cwcipedia. */ new section

2010-04-04T09:28:57Z

Mailbags 59-61 Are Erased From Cwcipedia.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 4 April 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	That's the idea. --[[User:TubularMonkey\|TubularMonkey]] 06:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)		That's the idea. --[[User:TubularMonkey\|TubularMonkey]] 06:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

			== Mailbags 59-61 Are Erased From Cwcipedia. ==

			...

			What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl\|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

TubularMonkey: /* Bob */

2010-03-27T06:22:15Z

Bob

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:22, 27 March 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Finally a mail about Bob. Hopefully he won't be a faggot and actually answer it.[[User:Wise dude321\|Wise dude321]] 05:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)		Finally a mail about Bob. Hopefully he won't be a faggot and actually answer it.[[User:Wise dude321\|Wise dude321]] 05:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

			That's the idea. --[[User:TubularMonkey\|TubularMonkey]] 06:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Wise dude321: /* Bob */ new section

2010-03-27T05:17:53Z

Bob: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 27 March 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I don't think Sonichu should win, but that's just me hating Chris. My suggestions are always to have him hurt as much as possible. I don't think his hypocrisy needs any emphasizing after Sonichu 10's ending, either way. --[[User:OFSheep\|OFSheep]] 02:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)		:I don't think Sonichu should win, but that's just me hating Chris. My suggestions are always to have him hurt as much as possible. I don't think his hypocrisy needs any emphasizing after Sonichu 10's ending, either way. --[[User:OFSheep\|OFSheep]] 02:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
	Why is there nothing about Bob?--[[User:Doomknight\|Doomknight]] 08:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)		Why is there nothing about Bob?--[[User:Doomknight\|Doomknight]] 08:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

			== Bob ==

			Finally a mail about Bob. Hopefully he won't be a faggot and actually answer it.[[User:Wise dude321\|Wise dude321]] 05:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Doomknight at 08:25, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T08:25:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:25, 9 March 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)		I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
	:I don't think Sonichu should win, but that's just me hating Chris. My suggestions are always to have him hurt as much as possible. I don't think his hypocrisy needs any emphasizing after Sonichu 10's ending, either way. --[[User:OFSheep\|OFSheep]] 02:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)		:I don't think Sonichu should win, but that's just me hating Chris. My suggestions are always to have him hurt as much as possible. I don't think his hypocrisy needs any emphasizing after Sonichu 10's ending, either way. --[[User:OFSheep\|OFSheep]] 02:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
			Why is there nothing about Bob?--[[User:Doomknight\|Doomknight]] 08:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

OFSheep at 02:19, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T02:19:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 8 March 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)		I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
			:I don't think Sonichu should win, but that's just me hating Chris. My suggestions are always to have him hurt as much as possible. I don't think his hypocrisy needs any emphasizing after Sonichu 10's ending, either way. --[[User:OFSheep\|OFSheep]] 02:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

MoarLurk at 23:03, 8 March 2010

2010-03-08T23:03:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 8 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::It might be a subtle reference to him losing so many fans after the latest issue. If so, I like it. --[[User:Iroquois\|Iroquois]] 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)		:::It might be a subtle reference to him losing so many fans after the latest issue. If so, I like it. --[[User:Iroquois\|Iroquois]] 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
	::::I wonder if he'll freak out when he realizes this. Of course, considering how astronomically dense he is, I doubt he will. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 22:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)		::::I wonder if he'll freak out when he realizes this. Of course, considering how astronomically dense he is, I doubt he will. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 22:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

			I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 4 April 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
	*I think shes reffering to the old ones. When the Sysop condensed a few of the mailbags into one a chunk of the letters were deleted entirely. And not by Chris surprisingly. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		*I think shes reffering to the old ones. When the Sysop condensed a few of the mailbags into one a chunk of the letters were deleted entirely. And not by Chris surprisingly. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 19:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
			*When 110mb was down, the Mailbag pages still worked for some reason, but were empty. -- [[User:Revolver Octopus\|Revolver Octopus]] 19:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 4 April 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl\|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl\|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
	*Nothing. He's never gonna answer deleted emails. We may as well forget it. Unless the Sysop decideds to bring them back, then theres no point in catalouging them. Just makea brief mention that there were originally more letters but that they were deleted. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 12:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		*Nothing. He's never gonna answer deleted emails. We may as well forget it. Unless the Sysop decideds to bring them back, then theres no point in catalouging them. Just makea brief mention that there were originally more letters but that they were deleted. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 12:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

			what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec\|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:25, 9 March 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)		I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
	:I don't think Sonichu should win, but that's just me hating Chris. My suggestions are always to have him hurt as much as possible. I don't think his hypocrisy needs any emphasizing after Sonichu 10's ending, either way. --[[User:OFSheep\|OFSheep]] 02:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)		:I don't think Sonichu should win, but that's just me hating Chris. My suggestions are always to have him hurt as much as possible. I don't think his hypocrisy needs any emphasizing after Sonichu 10's ending, either way. --[[User:OFSheep\|OFSheep]] 02:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
			Why is there nothing about Bob?--[[User:Doomknight\|Doomknight]] 08:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 8 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::It might be a subtle reference to him losing so many fans after the latest issue. If so, I like it. --[[User:Iroquois\|Iroquois]] 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)		:::It might be a subtle reference to him losing so many fans after the latest issue. If so, I like it. --[[User:Iroquois\|Iroquois]] 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
	::::I wonder if he'll freak out when he realizes this. Of course, considering how astronomically dense he is, I doubt he will. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 22:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)		::::I wonder if he'll freak out when he realizes this. Of course, considering how astronomically dense he is, I doubt he will. --[[User:BreadGod\|BreadGod]] 22:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

			I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)