Talk:Mary Lee Walsh - Revision history

Hurtful Truth Level: /* tsssf card */ new section

2022-07-11T11:15:30Z

tsssf card: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:15, 11 July 2022
Line 74:		Line 74:
	We ought to change the colour of Mary's email to Chris so it's easier to tell which is which. I mean we do it for every other exchanges.		We ought to change the colour of Mary's email to Chris so it's easier to tell which is which. I mean we do it for every other exchanges.
	[[User:BoradV\|BoradV]] ([[User talk:BoradV\|talk]]) 00:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)		[[User:BoradV\|BoradV]] ([[User talk:BoradV\|talk]]) 00:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

			== tsssf card ==

			There a place to put [[:File:Seductive mary lee walsh-min.jpg]], the [[TSSSF]] card Chris made? [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 11:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

BoradV at 00:39, 7 September 2017

2017-09-07T00:39:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 6 September 2017
Line 70:		Line 70:

	My english is like the one Chris uses : shitty as hell. So i believe i'm not worthy to edit that article.--[[User:Papytromblon\|Papytromblon]] 14:30, 11 March 2012 (PDT)		My english is like the one Chris uses : shitty as hell. So i believe i'm not worthy to edit that article.--[[User:Papytromblon\|Papytromblon]] 14:30, 11 March 2012 (PDT)

			== Colour change ==
			We ought to change the colour of Mary's email to Chris so it's easier to tell which is which. I mean we do it for every other exchanges.
			[[User:BoradV\|BoradV]] ([[User talk:BoradV\|talk]]) 00:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Papytromblon: /* An error in this article */

2012-03-11T21:30:01Z

An error in this article

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 11 March 2012
Line 67:		Line 67:
	*First of all SIGN YOUR POSTS ! (i already got a weeks ban for not doing that)		*First of all SIGN YOUR POSTS ! (i already got a weeks ban for not doing that)
	*Secondly, IMPROVE IT FAGGOT! if you are confident in your understanding, then fix it. maybe say "Chris would later explain in sub episode 3 that yada yada yada ..." -- [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 05:46, 6 March 2012 (PST)		*Secondly, IMPROVE IT FAGGOT! if you are confident in your understanding, then fix it. maybe say "Chris would later explain in sub episode 3 that yada yada yada ..." -- [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 05:46, 6 March 2012 (PST)


			My english is like the one Chris uses : shitty as hell. So i believe i'm not worthy to edit that article.--[[User:Papytromblon\|Papytromblon]] 14:30, 11 March 2012 (PDT)

Slimz: /* An error in this article */

2012-03-06T13:47:29Z

An error in this article

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:47, 6 March 2012
Line 65:		Line 65:
	I found a little mistake in that article. The line "Chris never explains the exact source of their hostility beyond stating that she once shattered his heart and she is frustrated by his dogged persistence in searching for love" is wrong : Chris explain with a little few words in the comic : in the sub episode 3 , Chris says that "She intruded (in the love quest) by destroying my advertisements [...] and threatened me to look bad"		I found a little mistake in that article. The line "Chris never explains the exact source of their hostility beyond stating that she once shattered his heart and she is frustrated by his dogged persistence in searching for love" is wrong : Chris explain with a little few words in the comic : in the sub episode 3 , Chris says that "She intruded (in the love quest) by destroying my advertisements [...] and threatened me to look bad"

	First of all SIGN YOUR POSTS ! (i already got a weeks ban for not doing that)		*First of all SIGN YOUR POSTS ! (i already got a weeks ban for not doing that)
	Secondly, IMPROVE IT FAGGOT! if you are confident in your understanding, then fix it. maybe say "Chris would later explain in sub episode 3 that yada yada yada ..."		*Secondly, IMPROVE IT FAGGOT! if you are confident in your understanding, then fix it. maybe say "Chris would later explain in sub episode 3 that yada yada yada ..." -- [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 05:46, 6 March 2012 (PST)
	-- [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 05:46, 6 March 2012 (PST)

Slimz: /* An error in this article */

2012-03-06T13:46:53Z

An error in this article

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 6 March 2012
Line 67:		Line 67:
	First of all SIGN YOUR POSTS ! (i already got a weeks ban for not doing that)		First of all SIGN YOUR POSTS ! (i already got a weeks ban for not doing that)
	Secondly, IMPROVE IT FAGGOT! if you are confident in your understanding, then fix it. maybe say "Chris would later explain in sub episode 3 that yada yada yada ..."		Secondly, IMPROVE IT FAGGOT! if you are confident in your understanding, then fix it. maybe say "Chris would later explain in sub episode 3 that yada yada yada ..."
	--[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 05:46, 6 March 2012 (PST)		-- [[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 05:46, 6 March 2012 (PST)

Slimz at 13:46, 6 March 2012

2012-03-06T13:46:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 6 March 2012
Line 64:		Line 64:

	I found a little mistake in that article. The line "Chris never explains the exact source of their hostility beyond stating that she once shattered his heart and she is frustrated by his dogged persistence in searching for love" is wrong : Chris explain with a little few words in the comic : in the sub episode 3 , Chris says that "She intruded (in the love quest) by destroying my advertisements [...] and threatened me to look bad"		I found a little mistake in that article. The line "Chris never explains the exact source of their hostility beyond stating that she once shattered his heart and she is frustrated by his dogged persistence in searching for love" is wrong : Chris explain with a little few words in the comic : in the sub episode 3 , Chris says that "She intruded (in the love quest) by destroying my advertisements [...] and threatened me to look bad"

			First of all SIGN YOUR POSTS ! (i already got a weeks ban for not doing that)
			Secondly, IMPROVE IT FAGGOT! if you are confident in your understanding, then fix it. maybe say "Chris would later explain in sub episode 3 that yada yada yada ..."
			--[[User:Slimz\|slimz - ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐]] 05:46, 6 March 2012 (PST)

Papytromblon: /* An error in this article */ new section

2012-03-05T23:53:09Z

An error in this article: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 5 March 2012
Line 58:		Line 58:

	--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 01:17, 28 September 2011 (PDT)		--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 01:17, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

			== An error in this article ==

			Hello friends of Sonichu.

			I found a little mistake in that article. The line "Chris never explains the exact source of their hostility beyond stating that she once shattered his heart and she is frustrated by his dogged persistence in searching for love" is wrong : Chris explain with a little few words in the comic : in the sub episode 3 , Chris says that "She intruded (in the love quest) by destroying my advertisements [...] and threatened me to look bad"

Anonymax: →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

2011-09-28T08:17:41Z

→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 ** In [[Mary Lee Walsh]] on 2011-09-20 22:39:19, 404 Not Found
 ** In [[Mary Lee Walsh]] on 2011-09-28 08:17:39, 404 Not Found
 --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 01:17, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Anonymax: →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

2011-09-28T08:17:21Z

→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 28 September 2011
Line 38:		Line 38:
	So I guess this is just a cautionary measure against doing his thing, right?--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)		So I guess this is just a cautionary measure against doing his thing, right?--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
	:Looks like it. I can't really disagree with it. It is the best way to draw the line in the sand. Chris, vandals, Whiteknights and Christorians with a case of virulent Moralfaggotry wouldn't be able to mess with the CWCki. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 18:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)		:Looks like it. I can't really disagree with it. It is the best way to draw the line in the sand. Chris, vandals, Whiteknights and Christorians with a case of virulent Moralfaggotry wouldn't be able to mess with the CWCki. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 18:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

			== Dead link ==

			During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

			* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLCsZpcTSg0
			** In [[Mary Lee Walsh]] on 2011-09-20 22:39:19, 404 Not Found
			** In [[Mary Lee Walsh]] on 2011-09-28 08:17:39, 404 Not Found

			--[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 01:17, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Griffintown at 18:11, 15 March 2010

2010-03-15T18:11:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 15 March 2010
Line 37:		Line 37:

	So I guess this is just a cautionary measure against doing his thing, right?--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)		So I guess this is just a cautionary measure against doing his thing, right?--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
			:Looks like it. I can't really disagree with it. It is the best way to draw the line in the sand. Chris, vandals, Whiteknights and Christorians with a case of virulent Moralfaggotry wouldn't be able to mess with the CWCki. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 18:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)