Talk:Mimms and Lucas Q&A - Revision history

4Macie: /* Story/Incident */ new section

2011-07-30T20:28:21Z

Story/Incident: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 30 July 2011
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris? And its tres annoying how these teo seem to answer a question without actuslly answering the damn question.		Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris? And its tres annoying how these teo seem to answer a question without actuslly answering the damn question.
	*1) sign your posts (it's four ~s in a row), 2) this isn't the place to discuss the content of the Q&A, 3) be damn grateful they even answered them. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 04:38, 28 June 2011 (PDT)		*1) sign your posts (it's four ~s in a row), 2) this isn't the place to discuss the content of the Q&A, 3) be damn grateful they even answered them. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 04:38, 28 June 2011 (PDT)

			== Story/Incident ==

			Quick question. The "Brawl release tourney" story is mentioned and that we should all know what happened there... Is there anything to link to this incident, or any side-notes that can be made to that answer for those new to the Christian Weston Chandler life story? --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 13:28, 30 July 2011 (PDT)

Champthom: /* Holy shit... */

2011-06-28T11:38:49Z

Holy shit...

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:38, 28 June 2011
Line 23:		Line 23:
	==Holy shit...==		==Holy shit...==
	Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris? And its tres annoying how these teo seem to answer a question without actuslly answering the damn question.		Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris? And its tres annoying how these teo seem to answer a question without actuslly answering the damn question.
			*1) sign your posts (it's four ~s in a row), 2) this isn't the place to discuss the content of the Q&A, 3) be damn grateful they even answered them. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 04:38, 28 June 2011 (PDT)

Jack Kelso at 09:12, 28 June 2011

2011-06-28T09:12:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:12, 28 June 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==Holy shit...==		==Holy shit...==
	Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris?		Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris? And its tres annoying how these teo seem to answer a question without actuslly answering the damn question.

Jack Kelso at 09:11, 28 June 2011

2011-06-28T09:11:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 28 June 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:*Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		:*Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
	::* Okay, I rearranged them to fit stuff together by subject and added more headings. Some of the big lists of questions I broke up to move different ones around to the right subject heading, hope that was okay. Obviously if folks think there should be more subject headings or if stuff should be moved around or the formatting needs changing, fine by me. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 03:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)		::* Okay, I rearranged them to fit stuff together by subject and added more headings. Some of the big lists of questions I broke up to move different ones around to the right subject heading, hope that was okay. Obviously if folks think there should be more subject headings or if stuff should be moved around or the formatting needs changing, fine by me. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 03:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

			==Holy shit...==
			Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris?

Dkaien: /* To do */

2010-04-14T03:20:29Z

To do

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 13 April 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
	:*Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		:*Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
			::* Okay, I rearranged them to fit stuff together by subject and added more headings. Some of the big lists of questions I broke up to move different ones around to the right subject heading, hope that was okay. Obviously if folks think there should be more subject headings or if stuff should be moved around or the formatting needs changing, fine by me. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 03:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* To do */

2010-04-06T07:38:46Z

To do

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 6 April 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
	*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
			:*Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Dkaien at 05:42, 6 April 2010

2010-04-06T05:42:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:42, 6 April 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
	*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Dkaien: /* To do */

2010-04-06T05:41:40Z

To do

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 6 April 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
			*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* To do */ new section

2010-04-06T05:22:12Z

To do: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:22, 6 April 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	This may explain why Chris assumed he knew who Surfshack Tito was.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 21:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)		This may explain why Chris assumed he knew who Surfshack Tito was.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 21:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
	*Shitcunt. I was just coming here to point that out. But yeah, that may explain some things. -[[User:Borednewb\|Borednewb]] 01:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)		*Shitcunt. I was just coming here to point that out. But yeah, that may explain some things. -[[User:Borednewb\|Borednewb]] 01:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

			== To do ==

			Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Borednewb at 01:29, 3 April 2010

2010-04-03T01:29:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 2 April 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	This may explain why Chris assumed he knew who Surfshack Tito was.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 21:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)		This may explain why Chris assumed he knew who Surfshack Tito was.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 21:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
			*Shitcunt. I was just coming here to point that out. But yeah, that may explain some things. -[[User:Borednewb\|Borednewb]] 01:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 13 April 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
	:*Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		:*Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
			::* Okay, I rearranged them to fit stuff together by subject and added more headings. Some of the big lists of questions I broke up to move different ones around to the right subject heading, hope that was okay. Obviously if folks think there should be more subject headings or if stuff should be moved around or the formatting needs changing, fine by me. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 03:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 6 April 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
	*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)		*In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
			:*Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)