Talk:Mumble 3 - Revision history

Demendred: /* Wish to help */

2011-06-19T03:34:45Z

Wish to help

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 18 June 2011
Line 100:		Line 100:

	I wish to help add anything missed and see if I can make out anything that is indistinct, unclear, and whatever else.[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)		I wish to help add anything missed and see if I can make out anything that is indistinct, unclear, and whatever else.[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)

			Sorry, hit save twice, didnt mean to make two topics[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)

	== Wish to help ==		== Wish to help ==

	I wish to help add anything missed and see if I can make out anything that is indistinct, unclear, and whatever else.[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)		I wish to help add anything missed and see if I can make out anything that is indistinct, unclear, and whatever else.[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)

Demendred: /* Wish to help */ new section

2011-06-19T03:34:06Z

Wish to help: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 18 June 2011
Line 96:		Line 96:
	== No Download ==		== No Download ==
	Why does the file on mediafire not work? If somebody has the file of this conversation please upload it to mediafire and link it to here.--[[User:Hans Gruber\|Hans Gruber]] 19:21, 5 September 2010 (PDT)		Why does the file on mediafire not work? If somebody has the file of this conversation please upload it to mediafire and link it to here.--[[User:Hans Gruber\|Hans Gruber]] 19:21, 5 September 2010 (PDT)

			== Wish to help ==

			I wish to help add anything missed and see if I can make out anything that is indistinct, unclear, and whatever else.[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)

	== Wish to help ==		== Wish to help ==

	I wish to help add anything missed and see if I can make out anything that is indistinct, unclear, and whatever else.[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)		I wish to help add anything missed and see if I can make out anything that is indistinct, unclear, and whatever else.[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)

Demendred: /* Wish to help */ new section

2011-06-19T03:34:00Z

Wish to help: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 18 June 2011
Line 96:		Line 96:
	== No Download ==		== No Download ==
	Why does the file on mediafire not work? If somebody has the file of this conversation please upload it to mediafire and link it to here.--[[User:Hans Gruber\|Hans Gruber]] 19:21, 5 September 2010 (PDT)		Why does the file on mediafire not work? If somebody has the file of this conversation please upload it to mediafire and link it to here.--[[User:Hans Gruber\|Hans Gruber]] 19:21, 5 September 2010 (PDT)

			== Wish to help ==

			I wish to help add anything missed and see if I can make out anything that is indistinct, unclear, and whatever else.[[User:Demendred\|Demendred]] 20:34, 18 June 2011 (PDT)

Hans Gruber at 02:21, 6 September 2010

2010-09-06T02:21:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 5 September 2010
Line 92:		Line 92:
	I did a search on the CWCki for 'Uhgh'. I noticed that the only times it's written- the beginning of the [[Alec_Benson_Leary_Phone_Call_8\|ABL call 8]] and in Mumble 3- are when I've transcribed it. Is this some kind of... noise only I can hear? Like a dog whistle that only effects TRUE and ORIGINAL Sonichu/Rosechu hybrids? [[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 09:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		I did a search on the CWCki for 'Uhgh'. I noticed that the only times it's written- the beginning of the [[Alec_Benson_Leary_Phone_Call_8\|ABL call 8]] and in Mumble 3- are when I've transcribed it. Is this some kind of... noise only I can hear? Like a dog whistle that only effects TRUE and ORIGINAL Sonichu/Rosechu hybrids? [[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 09:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
	:It's probably just a Difference between individual transcribers. What you write down as "ugh" I'm probably writing down as "umm".--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 18:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		:It's probably just a Difference between individual transcribers. What you write down as "ugh" I'm probably writing down as "umm".--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 18:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


			== No Download ==
			Why does the file on mediafire not work? If somebody has the file of this conversation please upload it to mediafire and link it to here.--[[User:Hans Gruber\|Hans Gruber]] 19:21, 5 September 2010 (PDT)

Ronichu: /* A HUGE mistake and other comments. */

2010-04-18T12:43:27Z

A HUGE mistake and other comments.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:43, 18 April 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	:I just checked my copy of the file. That's a man voice. I hearby dub him "Dude".		:I just checked my copy of the file. That's a man voice. I hearby dub him "Dude".
	:Also, timestamps are a bitch because now we have to listen to that giant goddamn thing all over again to find out what times people said those things. Also, VLC (my media player of choice) always tells me the file's a half-hour longer than it really is. Throws the whole thing off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		:Also, timestamps are a bitch because now we have to listen to that giant goddamn thing all over again to find out what times people said those things. Also, VLC (my media player of choice) always tells me the file's a half-hour longer than it really is. Throws the whole thing off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

	::*I will fix these issues when I get home from work. I just assumed Cogs was being played by a dude in this instance, like how many people have been Clyde Cash. My player reports the right time so I'll timestamp this one too, then Mumble 6. Apologies for the fail. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)		::*I will fix these issues when I get home from work. I just assumed Cogs was being played by a dude in this instance, like how many people have been Clyde Cash. My player reports the right time so I'll timestamp this one too, then Mumble 6. Apologies for the fail. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
			::*FIXED. GodJesus fucking dammit, I had to re-listen to the fucking cyber scene again FUCK. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 12:43, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

	==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==		==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==

Ronichu: /* A HUGE mistake and other comments. */

2010-04-18T02:39:32Z

A HUGE mistake and other comments.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 17 April 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	:I just checked my copy of the file. That's a man voice. I hearby dub him "Dude".		:I just checked my copy of the file. That's a man voice. I hearby dub him "Dude".
	:Also, timestamps are a bitch because now we have to listen to that giant goddamn thing all over again to find out what times people said those things. Also, VLC (my media player of choice) always tells me the file's a half-hour longer than it really is. Throws the whole thing off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		:Also, timestamps are a bitch because now we have to listen to that giant goddamn thing all over again to find out what times people said those things. Also, VLC (my media player of choice) always tells me the file's a half-hour longer than it really is. Throws the whole thing off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

			::*I will fix these issues when I get home from work. I just assumed Cogs was being played by a dude in this instance, like how many people have been Clyde Cash. My player reports the right time so I'll timestamp this one too, then Mumble 6. Apologies for the fail. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 02:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

	==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==		==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==

YawningSquirtleRedux: /* Done. */

2010-04-17T22:26:26Z

Done.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 17 April 2010
Line 80:		Line 80:
	THIS BITCH BE TRANSCRIBED. Total time spent transcribing this thing is 10 hours, 10 minutes over two days. A little over the eight hours promised, but hey; under promise, over deliver. I wanted to finish this shit and I did. I bid you strange, gentle folk farewell, and it's back to Mumble 6 for now. Which sucks because instead of Julie and Chris talking with long pauses while Chris' slow-arse mind thinks of simple answers to reasonable questions, it's six trolls all yelling over the top of each other. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 10:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		THIS BITCH BE TRANSCRIBED. Total time spent transcribing this thing is 10 hours, 10 minutes over two days. A little over the eight hours promised, but hey; under promise, over deliver. I wanted to finish this shit and I did. I bid you strange, gentle folk farewell, and it's back to Mumble 6 for now. Which sucks because instead of Julie and Chris talking with long pauses while Chris' slow-arse mind thinks of simple answers to reasonable questions, it's six trolls all yelling over the top of each other. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 10:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
	:I never thought this day would come. It's so beautiful.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 18:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		:I never thought this day would come. It's so beautiful.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 18:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
			:* :) :) :) :) --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux\|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 22:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

	== lol ==		== lol ==

Beat: /* A HUGE mistake and other comments. */

2010-04-17T21:23:19Z

A HUGE mistake and other comments.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 17 April 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	However, I will say that the subdividing thing is a good idea, we need to make this a standard practice so we can cite specific subsections. The titles are a bit subjective, so I think that doing the time stamp might be the best way to do it is to subdivide in certain time frames, like 5-10 minutes or whatever, stuff like that. Obviously keep the same divisions, but just rename the subsections by time frames. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		However, I will say that the subdividing thing is a good idea, we need to make this a standard practice so we can cite specific subsections. The titles are a bit subjective, so I think that doing the time stamp might be the best way to do it is to subdivide in certain time frames, like 5-10 minutes or whatever, stuff like that. Obviously keep the same divisions, but just rename the subsections by time frames. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
	:I just checked my copy of the file. That's a man voice. I hearby dub him "Dude".		:I just checked my copy of the file. That's a man voice. I hearby dub him "Dude".
	:Also, timestamps are a bitch because now we have to listen to that giant goddamn thing all over again to find out what times people said those things.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		:Also, timestamps are a bitch because now we have to listen to that giant goddamn thing all over again to find out what times people said those things. Also, VLC (my media player of choice) always tells me the file's a half-hour longer than it really is. Throws the whole thing off.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

	==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==		==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==

Beat: /* A HUGE mistake and other comments. */

2010-04-17T21:22:11Z

A HUGE mistake and other comments.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 17 April 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	However, I will say that the subdividing thing is a good idea, we need to make this a standard practice so we can cite specific subsections. The titles are a bit subjective, so I think that doing the time stamp might be the best way to do it is to subdivide in certain time frames, like 5-10 minutes or whatever, stuff like that. Obviously keep the same divisions, but just rename the subsections by time frames. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		However, I will say that the subdividing thing is a good idea, we need to make this a standard practice so we can cite specific subsections. The titles are a bit subjective, so I think that doing the time stamp might be the best way to do it is to subdivide in certain time frames, like 5-10 minutes or whatever, stuff like that. Obviously keep the same divisions, but just rename the subsections by time frames. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
			:I just checked my copy of the file. That's a man voice. I hearby dub him "Dude".
			:Also, timestamps are a bitch because now we have to listen to that giant goddamn thing all over again to find out what times people said those things.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

	==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==		==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==

Champthom: /* To do */

2010-04-17T20:27:42Z

To do

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 17 April 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:

	*We need a synopsis that summarizes. Yes, that sounds silly but we need something like we have for the IRC chats - we need more or less a short paragraph or two that provides a narrative of the chat and anything major that went down (like Sarah May threatening to kill herself in that one Mumble). The things people choose to highlight should be up to the reader. But yeah, it's silly to have two sections and it's even sillier to have a "summary" that is pretty damn long. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)		*We need a synopsis that summarizes. Yes, that sounds silly but we need something like we have for the IRC chats - we need more or less a short paragraph or two that provides a narrative of the chat and anything major that went down (like Sarah May threatening to kill herself in that one Mumble). The things people choose to highlight should be up to the reader. But yeah, it's silly to have two sections and it's even sillier to have a "summary" that is pretty damn long. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

			==A HUGE mistake and other comments.==
			Cogsdev talking? ROFLMAO. Seriously, Cogsdev never talks, that's the thing about Cogs is that no one knows about what she sounds like. That's why in that one segment where Chris talks to Cogs, he'll pause because she always types on the left. Just call it "chick," we vaguely remember who these people are and I think the chick people think is "Cogs" no one remembers anyway.

			Personally, I'd go through the audio and double check but I'm in some of these chats and frankly, I hate the sound of my voice.

			However, I will say that the subdividing thing is a good idea, we need to make this a standard practice so we can cite specific subsections. The titles are a bit subjective, so I think that doing the time stamp might be the best way to do it is to subdivide in certain time frames, like 5-10 minutes or whatever, stuff like that. Obviously keep the same divisions, but just rename the subsections by time frames. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

	==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==		==MARCH MUMBLE MADNESS==