ChanOfTartary: Created page with "I have noticed that Chris often responds to weens and white knights, and though these dialogues may be important, they do not make their way into the social media posts archiv..."

2019-10-17T23:18:08Z

Created page with "I have noticed that Chris often responds to weens and white knights, and though these dialogues may be important, they do not make their way into the social media posts archiv..."

New page

I have noticed that Chris often responds to weens and white knights, and though these dialogues may be important, they do not make their way into the social media posts archives, which we seem to reserve for Chris's unsolicited statements. Seeing Sockness's post yesterday being included make me think we should reconsider this. Would it be better to include them with other social media post, or would their volume justify separate monthly ''social media replies'' pages, past months being created retroactively through research? It would be more coherent and consistent than the current CWCki practise of providing pictures of Chris's replies and using them in articles or as references. [[User:ChanOfTartary|ChanOfTartary]] ([[User talk:ChanOfTartary|talk]]) 23:18, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Talk:October 2019 social media posts - Revision history

ChanOfTartary: Created page with "I have noticed that Chris often responds to weens and white knights, and though these dialogues may be important, they do not make their way into the social media posts archiv..."