Talk:Pokémon - Revision history

Hurtful Truth Level: /* Pokemon GO? */

2019-04-25T20:32:52Z

Pokemon GO?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 25 April 2019
Line 36:		Line 36:

	I think it's time to either add a Pokemon Go section here or as its own article considering how it's been an obsession of Chris' for the past few months. [[User:Duff101\|Duff101]] ([[User talk:Duff101\|talk]]) 20:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)		I think it's time to either add a Pokemon Go section here or as its own article considering how it's been an obsession of Chris' for the past few months. [[User:Duff101\|Duff101]] ([[User talk:Duff101\|talk]]) 20:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

			:Might be enough for an article. There's [https://sonichu.com/cwcki/July_2016_Facebook_posts#Too_Stressed_to_Play_Pokemon_Go his stance on the game from years before], him buying and wearing the six Pokeball Pluses, and the various Pokemon Go pics he's tweeted with his house in the background. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 20:32, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Duff101 at 20:20, 25 April 2019

2019-04-25T20:20:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 25 April 2019
Line 32:		Line 32:
	Would it be better if we could link the Pokémon names to something more relevant, like their Bulbapedia articles? Since most of the Wikipedia pages provide very little information, not even having images of them for example.		Would it be better if we could link the Pokémon names to something more relevant, like their Bulbapedia articles? Since most of the Wikipedia pages provide very little information, not even having images of them for example.
	::Good idea, also please sign your post by entering "~" 4 times. -[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 02:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)		::Good idea, also please sign your post by entering "~" 4 times. -[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 02:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

			==Pokemon GO?==

			I think it's time to either add a Pokemon Go section here or as its own article considering how it's been an obsession of Chris' for the past few months. [[User:Duff101\|Duff101]] ([[User talk:Duff101\|talk]]) 20:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Larry the Larryhog at 02:32, 14 June 2018

2018-06-14T02:32:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 13 June 2018
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Would it be better if we could link the Pokémon names to something more relevant, like their Bulbapedia articles? Since most of the Wikipedia pages provide very little information, not even having images of them for example.		Would it be better if we could link the Pokémon names to something more relevant, like their Bulbapedia articles? Since most of the Wikipedia pages provide very little information, not even having images of them for example.
			::Good idea, also please sign your post by entering "~" 4 times. -[[User:Larry the Larryhog\|Larry the Larryhog]] ([[User talk:Larry the Larryhog\|talk]]) 02:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

La Primavera: /* Better links */ new section

2018-06-14T01:03:49Z

Better links: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 13 June 2018
Line 27:		Line 27:
	: I was looking into a table of some kind, just to keep things uniform...but the example I made was still messy as fuck due to the fact that some of these pokemon have more use and abuse than others and in such, have more information. Unless we due two tables...one with the more used and abuse and one with the less...I can't imagine how to make this less of an eyesore, unless there's a format I'm missing. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 08:32, 24 January 2012 (PST)		: I was looking into a table of some kind, just to keep things uniform...but the example I made was still messy as fuck due to the fact that some of these pokemon have more use and abuse than others and in such, have more information. Unless we due two tables...one with the more used and abuse and one with the less...I can't imagine how to make this less of an eyesore, unless there's a format I'm missing. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 08:32, 24 January 2012 (PST)
	::Seeing that I'm the one who caused this mess I thought I should also be the one to fix it... I divided the Pokémons in this article into two section, those who actually appear in the comic (or are at least mentioned briefly in it) and those who do not appear in the comics but are mentioned by Chris to have taken a part in its plot. Rather than having a subsection for each negligible Pokémon, those who do not appear in the comics are only briefly listed. I hope the page looks more pleasing to the eye now. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 11:53, 24 January 2012 (PST)		::Seeing that I'm the one who caused this mess I thought I should also be the one to fix it... I divided the Pokémons in this article into two section, those who actually appear in the comic (or are at least mentioned briefly in it) and those who do not appear in the comics but are mentioned by Chris to have taken a part in its plot. Rather than having a subsection for each negligible Pokémon, those who do not appear in the comics are only briefly listed. I hope the page looks more pleasing to the eye now. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 11:53, 24 January 2012 (PST)

			== Better links ==

			Would it be better if we could link the Pokémon names to something more relevant, like their Bulbapedia articles? Since most of the Wikipedia pages provide very little information, not even having images of them for example.

NegaCWC: /* This page is messy as fuck */

2012-01-24T19:53:17Z

This page is messy as fuck

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 24 January 2012
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Look at that formatting goddamn. It's good that it's more informative now, but damn if this thing isn't an eyesore. Can we clean this up a bit? --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 08:05, 24 January 2012 (PST)		Look at that formatting goddamn. It's good that it's more informative now, but damn if this thing isn't an eyesore. Can we clean this up a bit? --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 08:05, 24 January 2012 (PST)
	: I was looking into a table of some kind, just to keep things uniform...but the example I made was still messy as fuck due to the fact that some of these pokemon have more use and abuse than others and in such, have more information. Unless we due two tables...one with the more used and abuse and one with the less...I can't imagine how to make this less of an eyesore, unless there's a format I'm missing. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 08:32, 24 January 2012 (PST)		: I was looking into a table of some kind, just to keep things uniform...but the example I made was still messy as fuck due to the fact that some of these pokemon have more use and abuse than others and in such, have more information. Unless we due two tables...one with the more used and abuse and one with the less...I can't imagine how to make this less of an eyesore, unless there's a format I'm missing. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 08:32, 24 January 2012 (PST)
			::Seeing that I'm the one who caused this mess I thought I should also be the one to fix it... I divided the Pokémons in this article into two section, those who actually appear in the comic (or are at least mentioned briefly in it) and those who do not appear in the comics but are mentioned by Chris to have taken a part in its plot. Rather than having a subsection for each negligible Pokémon, those who do not appear in the comics are only briefly listed. I hope the page looks more pleasing to the eye now. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 11:53, 24 January 2012 (PST)

4Macie: /* This page is messy as fuck */

2012-01-24T16:32:32Z

This page is messy as fuck

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 24 January 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:
	== This page is messy as fuck ==		== This page is messy as fuck ==
	Look at that formatting goddamn. It's good that it's more informative now, but damn if this thing isn't an eyesore. Can we clean this up a bit? --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 08:05, 24 January 2012 (PST)		Look at that formatting goddamn. It's good that it's more informative now, but damn if this thing isn't an eyesore. Can we clean this up a bit? --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 08:05, 24 January 2012 (PST)
			: I was looking into a table of some kind, just to keep things uniform...but the example I made was still messy as fuck due to the fact that some of these pokemon have more use and abuse than others and in such, have more information. Unless we due two tables...one with the more used and abuse and one with the less...I can't imagine how to make this less of an eyesore, unless there's a format I'm missing. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 08:32, 24 January 2012 (PST)

Old meme at 16:05, 24 January 2012

2012-01-24T16:05:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 24 January 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Would it help to link it to this section? Also does anyone know how to link directly to the CWCipedia? [[User:Darkspecteranon\|Darkspecteranon]] 00:26, 19 November 2011 (PST)		Would it help to link it to this section? Also does anyone know how to link directly to the CWCipedia? [[User:Darkspecteranon\|Darkspecteranon]] 00:26, 19 November 2011 (PST)

			== This page is messy as fuck ==
			Look at that formatting goddamn. It's good that it's more informative now, but damn if this thing isn't an eyesore. Can we clean this up a bit? --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 08:05, 24 January 2012 (PST)

Darkspecteranon: /* Dasiy/David Dragonite */

2011-11-19T08:26:53Z

Dasiy/David Dragonite

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 19 November 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

	== ~~Dasiy~~/David Dragonite ==		== Daisy/David Dragonite ==
	The test Mentions that the cwcikipedia mentions the different name, and I found the reference:		The test Mentions that the cwcikipedia mentions the different name, and I found the reference:

	http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Sonichu#First_Encounter_with_Naitsirhc		http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Sonichu#First_Encounter_with_Naitsirhc

	Would it help to link it to this section? Also does anyone know how to link directly to the CWCipedia?[[User:Darkspecteranon\|Darkspecteranon]] 00:26, 19 November 2011 (PST)		Would it help to link it to this section? Also does anyone know how to link directly to the CWCipedia? [[User:Darkspecteranon\|Darkspecteranon]] 00:26, 19 November 2011 (PST)

Darkspecteranon at 08:26, 19 November 2011

2011-11-19T08:26:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 19 November 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	I've noticed that the outgoing links to the wikipedia articles have no pictures or anything interesting. By constract, there is at least one Pokemon wiki out there that not only includes pictures but more information than one could possibly ask for. Now, I haven't played or cared about Pokemon since early High School but if I were to click on one of those links out of curiosity, I would at least like to see a picture so I knew exactly what I'm supposed to see (instead of a short, one-paragraph summary on Wikipedia that has no visual aids or more information if I was bored and wanted to read something for the heck of it). Would anyone mind if I changed the links from Wikipedia entries to entries from the Bulbapedia, which has an exhaustive 17,589 articles? I realize this is a lot of work, which is why I'm volunteering my time to this task if it pleases the higher-ups on the CWCiki. I just thought I'll ask since it makes sense to me that, if you're going to post an out-going link, it should be as informative as possible and have visual guides if available. Wikipedia is great if there are no better options but there are in this case.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 03:46, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		I've noticed that the outgoing links to the wikipedia articles have no pictures or anything interesting. By constract, there is at least one Pokemon wiki out there that not only includes pictures but more information than one could possibly ask for. Now, I haven't played or cared about Pokemon since early High School but if I were to click on one of those links out of curiosity, I would at least like to see a picture so I knew exactly what I'm supposed to see (instead of a short, one-paragraph summary on Wikipedia that has no visual aids or more information if I was bored and wanted to read something for the heck of it). Would anyone mind if I changed the links from Wikipedia entries to entries from the Bulbapedia, which has an exhaustive 17,589 articles? I realize this is a lot of work, which is why I'm volunteering my time to this task if it pleases the higher-ups on the CWCiki. I just thought I'll ask since it makes sense to me that, if you're going to post an out-going link, it should be as informative as possible and have visual guides if available. Wikipedia is great if there are no better options but there are in this case.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 03:46, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	*I've been on Bulbapedia quite a lot in my time, and I don't really see how those links are really any better than the ones that exist. They give more information, that's true, but the point of the article isn't to link to the base stats or egg moves of various pokemon, but rather to give a general idea to those who forgot/never had their childhood, and the Wikipedia articles do that well enough. If we were trying to educate people on EVERYTHING, I would wholeheartedly agree with you, but this is really about how the various pokemon pertain to Chris, rather than the pokemon themselves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 08:17, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		*I've been on Bulbapedia quite a lot in my time, and I don't really see how those links are really any better than the ones that exist. They give more information, that's true, but the point of the article isn't to link to the base stats or egg moves of various pokemon, but rather to give a general idea to those who forgot/never had their childhood, and the Wikipedia articles do that well enough. If we were trying to educate people on EVERYTHING, I would wholeheartedly agree with you, but this is really about how the various pokemon pertain to Chris, rather than the pokemon themselves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 08:17, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

	**Well, I'll repeat myself again; the Wikipedia entries doesn't have any pictures. I click on the link and get a boring text. If I take the time to go to the Bulapedia, I can actually see what said Pokemon looks like. Maybe I'm missing something (and if I am, feel free to explain it to me) but I think people would have a better idea about how various Pokemon relates to Christian if we can actually see said Pokemon; that's why I suggested replacing the text-only Wikipedia link with the more informative and imaged-filled Bulapedia links.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 14:37, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		**Well, I'll repeat myself again; the Wikipedia entries doesn't have any pictures. I click on the link and get a boring text. If I take the time to go to the Bulapedia, I can actually see what said Pokemon looks like. Maybe I'm missing something (and if I am, feel free to explain it to me) but I think people would have a better idea about how various Pokemon relates to Christian if we can actually see said Pokemon; that's why I suggested replacing the text-only Wikipedia link with the more informative and imaged-filled Bulapedia links.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 14:37, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	***Then, we should add sprite images of the pokemon appearing in the comics, but only those who are more remarcable and are actual pokemon. No sonichus's fan sprites.--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 14:41, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		***Then, we should add sprite images of the pokemon appearing in the comics, but only those who are more remarcable and are actual pokemon. No sonichus's fan sprites.--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 14:41, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

			== Dasiy/David Dragonite ==
			The test Mentions that the cwcikipedia mentions the different name, and I found the reference:

			http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Sonichu#First_Encounter_with_Naitsirhc

			Would it help to link it to this section? Also does anyone know how to link directly to the CWCipedia?[[User:Darkspecteranon\|Darkspecteranon]] 00:26, 19 November 2011 (PST)

Freecell: I had to type my own sig because of bad keyboard, but put the wrong timezone thing.

2010-09-30T09:33:41Z

I had to type my own sig because of bad keyboard, but put the wrong timezone thing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 30 September 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	**Well, I'll repeat myself again; the Wikipedia entries doesn't have any pictures. I click on the link and get a boring text. If I take the time to go to the Bulapedia, I can actually see what said Pokemon looks like. Maybe I'm missing something (and if I am, feel free to explain it to me) but I think people would have a better idea about how various Pokemon relates to Christian if we can actually see said Pokemon; that's why I suggested replacing the text-only Wikipedia link with the more informative and imaged-filled Bulapedia links.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 14:37, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		**Well, I'll repeat myself again; the Wikipedia entries doesn't have any pictures. I click on the link and get a boring text. If I take the time to go to the Bulapedia, I can actually see what said Pokemon looks like. Maybe I'm missing something (and if I am, feel free to explain it to me) but I think people would have a better idea about how various Pokemon relates to Christian if we can actually see said Pokemon; that's why I suggested replacing the text-only Wikipedia link with the more informative and imaged-filled Bulapedia links.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 14:37, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	***Then, we should add sprite images of the pokemon appearing in the comics, but only those who are more remarcable and are actual pokemon. No sonichus's fan sprites.--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 14:41, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		***Then, we should add sprite images of the pokemon appearing in the comics, but only those who are more remarcable and are actual pokemon. No sonichus's fan sprites.--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 14:41, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (~~GMT~~)		***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 24 January 2012
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Look at that formatting goddamn. It's good that it's more informative now, but damn if this thing isn't an eyesore. Can we clean this up a bit? --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 08:05, 24 January 2012 (PST)		Look at that formatting goddamn. It's good that it's more informative now, but damn if this thing isn't an eyesore. Can we clean this up a bit? --[[User:Old meme\|Old meme]] 08:05, 24 January 2012 (PST)
	: I was looking into a table of some kind, just to keep things uniform...but the example I made was still messy as fuck due to the fact that some of these pokemon have more use and abuse than others and in such, have more information. Unless we due two tables...one with the more used and abuse and one with the less...I can't imagine how to make this less of an eyesore, unless there's a format I'm missing. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 08:32, 24 January 2012 (PST)		: I was looking into a table of some kind, just to keep things uniform...but the example I made was still messy as fuck due to the fact that some of these pokemon have more use and abuse than others and in such, have more information. Unless we due two tables...one with the more used and abuse and one with the less...I can't imagine how to make this less of an eyesore, unless there's a format I'm missing. --[[User:4Macie\|4Macie]] 08:32, 24 January 2012 (PST)
			::Seeing that I'm the one who caused this mess I thought I should also be the one to fix it... I divided the Pokémons in this article into two section, those who actually appear in the comic (or are at least mentioned briefly in it) and those who do not appear in the comics but are mentioned by Chris to have taken a part in its plot. Rather than having a subsection for each negligible Pokémon, those who do not appear in the comics are only briefly listed. I hope the page looks more pleasing to the eye now. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] 11:53, 24 January 2012 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 19 November 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	I've noticed that the outgoing links to the wikipedia articles have no pictures or anything interesting. By constract, there is at least one Pokemon wiki out there that not only includes pictures but more information than one could possibly ask for. Now, I haven't played or cared about Pokemon since early High School but if I were to click on one of those links out of curiosity, I would at least like to see a picture so I knew exactly what I'm supposed to see (instead of a short, one-paragraph summary on Wikipedia that has no visual aids or more information if I was bored and wanted to read something for the heck of it). Would anyone mind if I changed the links from Wikipedia entries to entries from the Bulbapedia, which has an exhaustive 17,589 articles? I realize this is a lot of work, which is why I'm volunteering my time to this task if it pleases the higher-ups on the CWCiki. I just thought I'll ask since it makes sense to me that, if you're going to post an out-going link, it should be as informative as possible and have visual guides if available. Wikipedia is great if there are no better options but there are in this case.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 03:46, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		I've noticed that the outgoing links to the wikipedia articles have no pictures or anything interesting. By constract, there is at least one Pokemon wiki out there that not only includes pictures but more information than one could possibly ask for. Now, I haven't played or cared about Pokemon since early High School but if I were to click on one of those links out of curiosity, I would at least like to see a picture so I knew exactly what I'm supposed to see (instead of a short, one-paragraph summary on Wikipedia that has no visual aids or more information if I was bored and wanted to read something for the heck of it). Would anyone mind if I changed the links from Wikipedia entries to entries from the Bulbapedia, which has an exhaustive 17,589 articles? I realize this is a lot of work, which is why I'm volunteering my time to this task if it pleases the higher-ups on the CWCiki. I just thought I'll ask since it makes sense to me that, if you're going to post an out-going link, it should be as informative as possible and have visual guides if available. Wikipedia is great if there are no better options but there are in this case.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 03:46, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	*I've been on Bulbapedia quite a lot in my time, and I don't really see how those links are really any better than the ones that exist. They give more information, that's true, but the point of the article isn't to link to the base stats or egg moves of various pokemon, but rather to give a general idea to those who forgot/never had their childhood, and the Wikipedia articles do that well enough. If we were trying to educate people on EVERYTHING, I would wholeheartedly agree with you, but this is really about how the various pokemon pertain to Chris, rather than the pokemon themselves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 08:17, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		*I've been on Bulbapedia quite a lot in my time, and I don't really see how those links are really any better than the ones that exist. They give more information, that's true, but the point of the article isn't to link to the base stats or egg moves of various pokemon, but rather to give a general idea to those who forgot/never had their childhood, and the Wikipedia articles do that well enough. If we were trying to educate people on EVERYTHING, I would wholeheartedly agree with you, but this is really about how the various pokemon pertain to Chris, rather than the pokemon themselves. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 08:17, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

	**Well, I'll repeat myself again; the Wikipedia entries doesn't have any pictures. I click on the link and get a boring text. If I take the time to go to the Bulapedia, I can actually see what said Pokemon looks like. Maybe I'm missing something (and if I am, feel free to explain it to me) but I think people would have a better idea about how various Pokemon relates to Christian if we can actually see said Pokemon; that's why I suggested replacing the text-only Wikipedia link with the more informative and imaged-filled Bulapedia links.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 14:37, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		**Well, I'll repeat myself again; the Wikipedia entries doesn't have any pictures. I click on the link and get a boring text. If I take the time to go to the Bulapedia, I can actually see what said Pokemon looks like. Maybe I'm missing something (and if I am, feel free to explain it to me) but I think people would have a better idea about how various Pokemon relates to Christian if we can actually see said Pokemon; that's why I suggested replacing the text-only Wikipedia link with the more informative and imaged-filled Bulapedia links.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 14:37, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	***Then, we should add sprite images of the pokemon appearing in the comics, but only those who are more remarcable and are actual pokemon. No sonichus's fan sprites.--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 14:41, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		***Then, we should add sprite images of the pokemon appearing in the comics, but only those who are more remarcable and are actual pokemon. No sonichus's fan sprites.--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 14:41, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (PDT)

			== Dasiy/David Dragonite ==
			The test Mentions that the cwcikipedia mentions the different name, and I found the reference:

			http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Sonichu#First_Encounter_with_Naitsirhc

			Would it help to link it to this section? Also does anyone know how to link directly to the CWCipedia?[[User:Darkspecteranon\|Darkspecteranon]] 00:26, 19 November 2011 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 30 September 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	**Well, I'll repeat myself again; the Wikipedia entries doesn't have any pictures. I click on the link and get a boring text. If I take the time to go to the Bulapedia, I can actually see what said Pokemon looks like. Maybe I'm missing something (and if I am, feel free to explain it to me) but I think people would have a better idea about how various Pokemon relates to Christian if we can actually see said Pokemon; that's why I suggested replacing the text-only Wikipedia link with the more informative and imaged-filled Bulapedia links.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 14:37, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		**Well, I'll repeat myself again; the Wikipedia entries doesn't have any pictures. I click on the link and get a boring text. If I take the time to go to the Bulapedia, I can actually see what said Pokemon looks like. Maybe I'm missing something (and if I am, feel free to explain it to me) but I think people would have a better idea about how various Pokemon relates to Christian if we can actually see said Pokemon; that's why I suggested replacing the text-only Wikipedia link with the more informative and imaged-filled Bulapedia links.--[[User:Bailoroc\|Bailoroc]] 14:37, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	***Then, we should add sprite images of the pokemon appearing in the comics, but only those who are more remarcable and are actual pokemon. No sonichus's fan sprites.--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 14:41, 29 September 2010 (PDT)		***Then, we should add sprite images of the pokemon appearing in the comics, but only those who are more remarcable and are actual pokemon. No sonichus's fan sprites.--[[User:Basgon\|Basgon]] 14:41, 29 September 2010 (PDT)
	***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (~~GMT~~)		***If you really think images are so important, add a couple to the article. We don't need to have excessively obfuscating links just because they include some pictures. --[[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 10:32, 29 September 2010 (PDT)