Talk:Respectable Frames - Revision history

PsychoNerd054: PsychoNerd054 moved page Talk:Pedo-Glasses to Talk:Respectable Frames: Per talk page

2026-01-03T03:13:59Z

PsychoNerd054 moved page Talk:Pedo-Glasses to Talk:Respectable Frames: Per talk page

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:13, 2 January 2026
(No difference)

Ayumu Kasuga: /* Rename? */

2026-01-03T02:12:07Z

Rename?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 2 January 2026
Line 55:		Line 55:
	[[User:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|Elbow-Greased Strongman]] ([[User talk:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|talk]]) 12:24, 2 January 2026 (EST)		[[User:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|Elbow-Greased Strongman]] ([[User talk:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|talk]]) 12:24, 2 January 2026 (EST)
	:Pedo is derogatory? [[User:Master\|Master]] ([[User talk:Master\|talk]]) 13:07, 2 January 2026 (EST)		:Pedo is derogatory? [[User:Master\|Master]] ([[User talk:Master\|talk]]) 13:07, 2 January 2026 (EST)

			I agree that the current name is excessive. I would either rename it to "Respectable Frames" like you suggested, or instead, I suggest renaming it to just "Glasses" and broaden the scope since Chris often wears a variety of glasses nowadays. [[User:Ayumu Kasuga\|Ayumu Kasuga]] ([[User talk:Ayumu Kasuga\|talk]]) 21:12, 2 January 2026 (EST)

Master: /* Rename? */

2026-01-02T18:07:26Z

Rename?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 2 January 2026
Line 54:		Line 54:
	I had to suggest one, it would be "Respectable Frames", as that is what Chris called them in [[Mailbag 20]].		I had to suggest one, it would be "Respectable Frames", as that is what Chris called them in [[Mailbag 20]].
	[[User:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|Elbow-Greased Strongman]] ([[User talk:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|talk]]) 12:24, 2 January 2026 (EST)		[[User:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|Elbow-Greased Strongman]] ([[User talk:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|talk]]) 12:24, 2 January 2026 (EST)
			:Pedo is derogatory? [[User:Master\|Master]] ([[User talk:Master\|talk]]) 13:07, 2 January 2026 (EST)

Elbow-Greased Strongman: /* Rename? */ new section

2026-01-02T17:24:14Z

Rename?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:24, 2 January 2026
Line 47:		Line 47:
	Are there any plans to write about the new set of glasses that were first seen in the Tomgirl pictures? --[[User:IwegalBadnik\|IwegalBadnik]] 14:01, 12 August 2011 (PDT)		Are there any plans to write about the new set of glasses that were first seen in the Tomgirl pictures? --[[User:IwegalBadnik\|IwegalBadnik]] 14:01, 12 August 2011 (PDT)
	*Are they new? I haven't really noticed. If they are indeed new then I'd include them in this article, be sure to have a pic. You sure they're new though, not just the old ones, fixed? --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 13 August 2011 (PDT)		*Are they new? I haven't really noticed. If they are indeed new then I'd include them in this article, be sure to have a pic. You sure they're new though, not just the old ones, fixed? --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 13 August 2011 (PDT)

			== Rename? ==

			I've noticed a small trend here as of late to change pages with (needlessly) derogatory names (which I feel the current name falls under) to more neutral ones.

			I had to suggest one, it would be "Respectable Frames", as that is what Chris called them in [[Mailbag 20]].
			[[User:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|Elbow-Greased Strongman]] ([[User talk:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|talk]]) 12:24, 2 January 2026 (EST)

Holdek at 18:39, 8 August 2014

2014-08-08T18:39:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 8 August 2014
Line 21:		Line 21:
	[[Image:TheLovelyChrisChan.jpg]]		[[Image:TheLovelyChrisChan.jpg]]
	::No it isn't. That guy was divorced, so not a virgin with rage. It took a lot of time and effort to build the underground dungeon - Crhis would be too lazy. Also, that guy was able to convince the jerkops that he was a normal person - Chris would just have shouted about trolls and tried to run away. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 18:01, 21 October 2010 (PDT)		::No it isn't. That guy was divorced, so not a virgin with rage. It took a lot of time and effort to build the underground dungeon - Crhis would be too lazy. Also, that guy was able to convince the jerkops that he was a normal person - Chris would just have shouted about trolls and tried to run away. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 18:01, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

	~~:'''[REDACTED]'''~~

	~~::The fuck am I reading? Also CWCki is not a forum. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 22:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)~~

	==Moving "Dramatic Glasses Removal"==		==Moving "Dramatic Glasses Removal"==

Holdek: Getting rid of this

2014-08-08T09:03:59Z

Getting rid of this

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 8 August 2014
Line 22:		Line 22:
	::No it isn't. That guy was divorced, so not a virgin with rage. It took a lot of time and effort to build the underground dungeon - Crhis would be too lazy. Also, that guy was able to convince the jerkops that he was a normal person - Chris would just have shouted about trolls and tried to run away. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 18:01, 21 October 2010 (PDT)		::No it isn't. That guy was divorced, so not a virgin with rage. It took a lot of time and effort to build the underground dungeon - Crhis would be too lazy. Also, that guy was able to convince the jerkops that he was a normal person - Chris would just have shouted about trolls and tried to run away. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 18:01, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

	:~~First of all: those are not pedophiles but rather child molesters. Is like comparing a women rapist to an heterosexual.~~		:'''[REDACTED]'''
	:Second: I really hope you understand that that is an stereotype. There is absolutely no "stereotypical" pedophile just like there is no "stereotypical" gay. I digress, but most people with this sexual orientation find out when they are very young, usually 13, 14, 15 yo, and they are most of them, are completely normal and healthy persons, who have the same morals, looks and intelligence as everyone else.
	~~:Of course,~~ '''~~stereotypes serve to make sense of things people dont understand and/or are scared of.~~''' No one chooses to be a pedophile and someone who discovers that has this orientation can be as good, as intelligent and as good-looking as anyone else. His only difference is his/her sexual orientation that nature/god (whatever you believe in) gave him/her. But being a pedophile (unlike autism) doesnt interfere and is certainly not incompatible with having the same moral, ethical, social and emotional skills as anyone else. I hope you understand. [[User:Philips\|Philips]] 20:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)
	::The fuck am I reading? Also CWCki is not a forum. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 22:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)		::The fuck am I reading? Also CWCki is not a forum. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 22:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)

T K 19: /* Actual pedos wearing actual pedo-glasses */

2012-02-02T06:27:01Z

Actual pedos wearing actual pedo-glasses

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 2 February 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Here's a couple of links to professional nonces proudly sporting their sexy specs; [http://www.herbanmedia.com/ambglb/myspace/myspace-pics-t/715patty_ann_kenley.jpg Patty Ann Kenley] and [http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/ffximage/2008/07/02/250ferguson,0.jpg Dennis Ferguson]. Could and should these be incorporated into the article, or has the point about Chris' unfortunate taste in eye-wear well enough made? [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 06:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)		Here's a couple of links to professional nonces proudly sporting their sexy specs; [http://www.herbanmedia.com/ambglb/myspace/myspace-pics-t/715patty_ann_kenley.jpg Patty Ann Kenley] and [http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/ffximage/2008/07/02/250ferguson,0.jpg Dennis Ferguson]. Could and should these be incorporated into the article, or has the point about Chris' unfortunate taste in eye-wear well enough made? [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 06:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

	~~:First of all: those are not pedophiles but rather child molesters. Is like comparing a women rapist to an heterosexual.~~
	:Second: I really hope you understand that that is an stereotype. There is absolutely no "stereotypical" pedophile just like there is no "stereotypical" gay. I digress, but most people with this sexual orientation find out when they are very young, usually 13, 14, 15 yo, and they are most of them, are completely normal and healthy persons, who have the same morals, looks and intelligence as everyone else.
	:Of course, '''stereotypes serve to make sense of things people dont understand and/or are scared of.''' No one chooses to be a pedophile and someone who discovers that has this orientation can be as good, as intelligent and as good-looking as anyone else. His only difference is his/her sexual orientation that nature/god (whatever you believe in) gave him/her. But being a pedophile (unlike autism) doesnt interfere and is certainly not incompatible with having the same moral, ethical, social and emotional skills as anyone else. I hope you understand. [[User:Philips\|Philips]] 20:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)

	:* There's also the child rapist/murderer from The Lovely Bones (named after Chris' [[Lovely Weather\|future wife]], of course). Image below. The resemblance between this man and Chris is just uncanny IMHO. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 08:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)		:* There's also the child rapist/murderer from The Lovely Bones (named after Chris' [[Lovely Weather\|future wife]], of course). Image below. The resemblance between this man and Chris is just uncanny IMHO. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 08:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Line 25:		Line 21:
	[[Image:TheLovelyChrisChan.jpg]]		[[Image:TheLovelyChrisChan.jpg]]
	::No it isn't. That guy was divorced, so not a virgin with rage. It took a lot of time and effort to build the underground dungeon - Crhis would be too lazy. Also, that guy was able to convince the jerkops that he was a normal person - Chris would just have shouted about trolls and tried to run away. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 18:01, 21 October 2010 (PDT)		::No it isn't. That guy was divorced, so not a virgin with rage. It took a lot of time and effort to build the underground dungeon - Crhis would be too lazy. Also, that guy was able to convince the jerkops that he was a normal person - Chris would just have shouted about trolls and tried to run away. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 18:01, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

			:First of all: those are not pedophiles but rather child molesters. Is like comparing a women rapist to an heterosexual.
			:Second: I really hope you understand that that is an stereotype. There is absolutely no "stereotypical" pedophile just like there is no "stereotypical" gay. I digress, but most people with this sexual orientation find out when they are very young, usually 13, 14, 15 yo, and they are most of them, are completely normal and healthy persons, who have the same morals, looks and intelligence as everyone else.
			:Of course, '''stereotypes serve to make sense of things people dont understand and/or are scared of.''' No one chooses to be a pedophile and someone who discovers that has this orientation can be as good, as intelligent and as good-looking as anyone else. His only difference is his/her sexual orientation that nature/god (whatever you believe in) gave him/her. But being a pedophile (unlike autism) doesnt interfere and is certainly not incompatible with having the same moral, ethical, social and emotional skills as anyone else. I hope you understand. [[User:Philips\|Philips]] 20:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)
			::The fuck am I reading? Also CWCki is not a forum. --[[User:T K 19\|T K 19]] 22:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)

	==Moving "Dramatic Glasses Removal"==		==Moving "Dramatic Glasses Removal"==

Philips at 04:27, 2 February 2012

2012-02-02T04:27:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 2 February 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Here's a couple of links to professional nonces proudly sporting their sexy specs; [http://www.herbanmedia.com/ambglb/myspace/myspace-pics-t/715patty_ann_kenley.jpg Patty Ann Kenley] and [http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/ffximage/2008/07/02/250ferguson,0.jpg Dennis Ferguson]. Could and should these be incorporated into the article, or has the point about Chris' unfortunate taste in eye-wear well enough made? [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 06:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)		Here's a couple of links to professional nonces proudly sporting their sexy specs; [http://www.herbanmedia.com/ambglb/myspace/myspace-pics-t/715patty_ann_kenley.jpg Patty Ann Kenley] and [http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/ffximage/2008/07/02/250ferguson,0.jpg Dennis Ferguson]. Could and should these be incorporated into the article, or has the point about Chris' unfortunate taste in eye-wear well enough made? [[User:Blusko\|Blusko]] 06:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

			:First of all: those are not pedophiles but rather child molesters. Is like comparing a women rapist to an heterosexual.
			:Second: I really hope you understand that that is an stereotype. There is absolutely no "stereotypical" pedophile just like there is no "stereotypical" gay. I digress, but most people with this sexual orientation find out when they are very young, usually 13, 14, 15 yo, and they are most of them, are completely normal and healthy persons, who have the same morals, looks and intelligence as everyone else.
			:Of course, '''stereotypes serve to make sense of things people dont understand and/or are scared of.''' No one chooses to be a pedophile and someone who discovers that has this orientation can be as good, as intelligent and as good-looking as anyone else. His only difference is his/her sexual orientation that nature/god (whatever you believe in) gave him/her. But being a pedophile (unlike autism) doesnt interfere and is certainly not incompatible with having the same moral, ethical, social and emotional skills as anyone else. I hope you understand. [[User:Philips\|Philips]] 20:27, 1 February 2012 (PST)

	:* There's also the child rapist/murderer from The Lovely Bones (named after Chris' [[Lovely Weather\|future wife]], of course). Image below. The resemblance between this man and Chris is just uncanny IMHO. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 08:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)		:* There's also the child rapist/murderer from The Lovely Bones (named after Chris' [[Lovely Weather\|future wife]], of course). Image below. The resemblance between this man and Chris is just uncanny IMHO. -[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 08:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* Pedo-Glasses II */

2011-08-13T12:22:05Z

Pedo-Glasses II

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:22, 13 August 2011
Line 46:		Line 46:

	Are there any plans to write about the new set of glasses that were first seen in the Tomgirl pictures? --[[User:IwegalBadnik\|IwegalBadnik]] 14:01, 12 August 2011 (PDT)		Are there any plans to write about the new set of glasses that were first seen in the Tomgirl pictures? --[[User:IwegalBadnik\|IwegalBadnik]] 14:01, 12 August 2011 (PDT)
			*Are they new? I haven't really noticed. If they are indeed new then I'd include them in this article, be sure to have a pic. You sure they're new though, not just the old ones, fixed? --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:22, 13 August 2011 (PDT)

IwegalBadnik: /* Pedo-Glasses II */ new section

2011-08-12T21:01:04Z

Pedo-Glasses II: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 12 August 2011
Line 42:		Line 42:

	On it, boss ;) [[User:Whispsonichu\|Whispsonichu]] 04:28, 5 November 2010 (PDT)		On it, boss ;) [[User:Whispsonichu\|Whispsonichu]] 04:28, 5 November 2010 (PDT)

			== Pedo-Glasses II ==

			Are there any plans to write about the new set of glasses that were first seen in the Tomgirl pictures? --[[User:IwegalBadnik\|IwegalBadnik]] 14:01, 12 August 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 2 January 2026
Line 55:		Line 55:
	[[User:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|Elbow-Greased Strongman]] ([[User talk:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|talk]]) 12:24, 2 January 2026 (EST)		[[User:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|Elbow-Greased Strongman]] ([[User talk:Elbow-Greased Strongman\|talk]]) 12:24, 2 January 2026 (EST)
	:Pedo is derogatory? [[User:Master\|Master]] ([[User talk:Master\|talk]]) 13:07, 2 January 2026 (EST)		:Pedo is derogatory? [[User:Master\|Master]] ([[User talk:Master\|talk]]) 13:07, 2 January 2026 (EST)

			I agree that the current name is excessive. I would either rename it to "Respectable Frames" like you suggested, or instead, I suggest renaming it to just "Glasses" and broaden the scope since Chris often wears a variety of glasses nowadays. [[User:Ayumu Kasuga\|Ayumu Kasuga]] ([[User talk:Ayumu Kasuga\|talk]]) 21:12, 2 January 2026 (EST)