Talk:Response to ADF - Revision history

DicksOak: /* Free Bird */ new section

2011-08-30T21:02:19Z

Free Bird: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 30 August 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read [http://kingjbible.com/romans/1.htm Romans 1:26-27] "''For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.''" Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - [[User:InvalidLogin\|InvalidLogin]] 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT)		* Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read [http://kingjbible.com/romans/1.htm Romans 1:26-27] "''For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.''" Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - [[User:InvalidLogin\|InvalidLogin]] 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT)
	::*cool - [[I Love Little Girls]] 22:49, 29 August 2011 (PDT)		::*cool - [[I Love Little Girls]] 22:49, 29 August 2011 (PDT)

			== Free Bird ==

			Don't know if it's worth mentioning, but there are other Skynyrd songs on other Guitar Hero games.

			As Chris just downloads ALL the shit though, he's probably never played them, and only the popular "Free Bird." (When we all know Tuesday's Gone is a better song.)

Groggers at 08:28, 30 August 2011

2011-08-30T08:28:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 30 August 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have to get ready for work but this needs to be more wikified, plus the intro paragraph seems to be kinda clunky, any chance it could be split up into a few separate paragraphs?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:01, 29 August 2011 (PDT)		I have to get ready for work but this needs to be more wikified, plus the intro paragraph seems to be kinda clunky, any chance it could be split up into a few separate paragraphs?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:01, 29 August 2011 (PDT)
			: I'll trim it a little bit, it does seem pretty clunky. --[[User:Groggers\|Groggers]] 01:28, 30 August 2011 (PDT)

	== "That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned" ==		== "That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned" ==

I Love Little Girls: /* "That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned" */

2011-08-30T05:49:30Z

"That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 30 August 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:

	* Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read [http://kingjbible.com/romans/1.htm Romans 1:26-27] "''For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.''" Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - [[User:InvalidLogin\|InvalidLogin]] 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT)		* Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read [http://kingjbible.com/romans/1.htm Romans 1:26-27] "''For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.''" Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - [[User:InvalidLogin\|InvalidLogin]] 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT)
	::*cool -[[I Love Little Girls]] 22:49, 29 August 2011 (PDT)		::*cool - [[I Love Little Girls]] 22:49, 29 August 2011 (PDT)

I Love Little Girls: /* "That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned" */

2011-08-30T05:49:21Z

"That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 30 August 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:

	* Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read [http://kingjbible.com/romans/1.htm Romans 1:26-27] "''For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.''" Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - [[User:InvalidLogin\|InvalidLogin]] 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT)		* Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read [http://kingjbible.com/romans/1.htm Romans 1:26-27] "''For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.''" Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - [[User:InvalidLogin\|InvalidLogin]] 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT)
			::*cool -[[I Love Little Girls]] 22:49, 29 August 2011 (PDT)

InvalidLogin: ed" */

2011-08-30T04:12:03Z

ed" */

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 30 August 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Actually, Leviticus only condemns male homosexuality. Lesbians are... conspicuously never mentioned, to my knowledge. Maybe so the Old Testament wouldn't give women ideas. :p - [[User:LucidFox\|LucidFox]] 20:48, 29 August 2011 (PDT)		Actually, Leviticus only condemns male homosexuality. Lesbians are... conspicuously never mentioned, to my knowledge. Maybe so the Old Testament wouldn't give women ideas. :p - [[User:LucidFox\|LucidFox]] 20:48, 29 August 2011 (PDT)

			* Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read [http://kingjbible.com/romans/1.htm Romans 1:26-27] "''For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.''" Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - [[User:InvalidLogin\|InvalidLogin]] 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT)

LucidFox: /* "That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned" */ new section

2011-08-30T03:48:58Z

"That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned": new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 29 August 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have to get ready for work but this needs to be more wikified, plus the intro paragraph seems to be kinda clunky, any chance it could be split up into a few separate paragraphs?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:01, 29 August 2011 (PDT)		I have to get ready for work but this needs to be more wikified, plus the intro paragraph seems to be kinda clunky, any chance it could be split up into a few separate paragraphs?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 18:01, 29 August 2011 (PDT)

			== "That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned" ==

			Actually, Leviticus only condemns male homosexuality. Lesbians are... conspicuously never mentioned, to my knowledge. Maybe so the Old Testament wouldn't give women ideas. :p - [[User:LucidFox\|LucidFox]] 20:48, 29 August 2011 (PDT)

Champthom: Created page with "I have to get ready for work but this needs to be more wikified, plus the intro paragraph seems to be kinda clunky, any chance it could be split up into a few separate paragraphs..."

2011-08-30T01:01:05Z

Created page with "I have to get ready for work but this needs to be more wikified, plus the intro paragraph seems to be kinda clunky, any chance it could be split up into a few separate paragraphs..."

New page

I have to get ready for work but this needs to be more wikified, plus the intro paragraph seems to be kinda clunky, any chance it could be split up into a few separate paragraphs?--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 18:01, 29 August 2011 (PDT)