Talk:Rocky Shoemaker call - Revision history

Anonymax: Reverted edits by Anonybot (talk) to last revision by Sonijew is back

2012-04-24T19:35:24Z

Reverted edits by Anonybot (talk) to last revision by Sonijew is back

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 24 April 2012
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* ''CWC Wiki, where no shit is too minor''...except when there's more than a manchild involved. Seriously, if we're supposed to document everything that happens in Christian's life, why shouldn't we keep the call? We've already got plenty of calls like this, and it's been clearly stated that there can't be any legal trouble. Of course, Rocky's privacy will be a little diminished, but not more than it already has been thanks to the forums and PVCC. As you can see in the call, she's already getting calls from trolls who are just trying too hard. I think the call should stay, if we take it down, why wouldn't we do the same with all other calls, and Rocky-related content? Also, I don't get why people get so much troll's remorse because of Rocky. Does nobody remember that she's the one who told Chris that he doesn't need therapy? Way to go. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 03:21, 12 December 2011 (PST)		* ''CWC Wiki, where no shit is too minor''...except when there's more than a manchild involved. Seriously, if we're supposed to document everything that happens in Christian's life, why shouldn't we keep the call? We've already got plenty of calls like this, and it's been clearly stated that there can't be any legal trouble. Of course, Rocky's privacy will be a little diminished, but not more than it already has been thanks to the forums and PVCC. As you can see in the call, she's already getting calls from trolls who are just trying too hard. I think the call should stay, if we take it down, why wouldn't we do the same with all other calls, and Rocky-related content? Also, I don't get why people get so much troll's remorse because of Rocky. Does nobody remember that she's the one who told Chris that he doesn't need therapy? Way to go. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 03:21, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	:You're not the first to drag up our slogan in to discussions recently. But here's the thing - it's actually a very good thing that we have discussions about new material like this. It's part of what makes a wiki good - people having different views, ideas and opinions which help to shape the content of the wiki. I made my post about wanting to bring forward the deletion in order to hasten the arguments of others so we didn't ponder for too long on the issue of deletion - at that point it seems some very good arguments had been made for deletion and not many against, and that means if it warranted deletion, it warranted a far quicker close to the discussion.		:You're not the first to drag up our slogan in to discussions recently. But here's the thing - it's actually a very good thing that we have discussions about new material like this. It's part of what makes a wiki good - people having different views, ideas and opinions which help to shape the content of the wiki. I made my post about wanting to bring forward the deletion in order to hasten the arguments of others so we didn't ponder for too long on the issue of deletion - at that point it seems some very good arguments had been made for deletion and not many against, and that means if it warranted deletion, it warranted a far quicker close to the discussion.
	:Yes we have prank calls on the CWCki already, but that's more of a maintenance of status quo rather than a concerted effort to keep them here. Similar to the fail article, people can't make up their mind one way or another. I didn't want this article to be the same and the debate to stagnate. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:14, 12 December 2011 (PST)		:Yes we have prank calls on the CWCki already, but that's more of a maintenance of status quo rather than a concerted effort to keep them here. Similar to the [[fail]] article, people can't make up their mind one way or another. I didn't want this article to be the same and the debate to stagnate. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:14, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	::So, to make a brief resume: we got some new, important content about Christian in the form of a phone call like many others (other calls that the CWC Wiki still hosts or mirrors), but it'll be deleted because some people feel uneasy about having it here. I can't see the logic behind all this. I think that some people are just scared about this call bringing legal trouble to the CWC Wiki (it's still a perfectly legal and valid call), and fearing that Rocky's privacy will be violated (I still don't know how, since the call doesn't reveal any personal information about Rocky). By the way, I'd like to know which are those "very good arguments". Cheers. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 11:19, 12 December 2011 (PST)		::So, to make a brief resume: we got some new, important content about Christian in the form of a phone call like many others (other calls that the CWC Wiki still hosts or mirrors), but it'll be deleted because some people feel uneasy about having it here. I can't see the logic behind all this. I think that some people are just scared about this call bringing legal trouble to the CWC Wiki (it's still a perfectly legal and valid call), and fearing that Rocky's privacy will be violated (I still don't know how, since the call doesn't reveal any personal information about Rocky). By the way, I'd like to know which are those "very good arguments". Cheers. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 11:19, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	::Well it won't be deleted as we resolved not to delete it. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 13:07, 12 December 2011 (PST)		::Well it won't be deleted as we resolved not to delete it. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 13:07, 12 December 2011 (PST)

Anonybot: Robot: Unlinking "Fail"

2012-04-23T22:38:56Z

Robot: Unlinking "Fail"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 23 April 2012
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* ''CWC Wiki, where no shit is too minor''...except when there's more than a manchild involved. Seriously, if we're supposed to document everything that happens in Christian's life, why shouldn't we keep the call? We've already got plenty of calls like this, and it's been clearly stated that there can't be any legal trouble. Of course, Rocky's privacy will be a little diminished, but not more than it already has been thanks to the forums and PVCC. As you can see in the call, she's already getting calls from trolls who are just trying too hard. I think the call should stay, if we take it down, why wouldn't we do the same with all other calls, and Rocky-related content? Also, I don't get why people get so much troll's remorse because of Rocky. Does nobody remember that she's the one who told Chris that he doesn't need therapy? Way to go. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 03:21, 12 December 2011 (PST)		* ''CWC Wiki, where no shit is too minor''...except when there's more than a manchild involved. Seriously, if we're supposed to document everything that happens in Christian's life, why shouldn't we keep the call? We've already got plenty of calls like this, and it's been clearly stated that there can't be any legal trouble. Of course, Rocky's privacy will be a little diminished, but not more than it already has been thanks to the forums and PVCC. As you can see in the call, she's already getting calls from trolls who are just trying too hard. I think the call should stay, if we take it down, why wouldn't we do the same with all other calls, and Rocky-related content? Also, I don't get why people get so much troll's remorse because of Rocky. Does nobody remember that she's the one who told Chris that he doesn't need therapy? Way to go. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 03:21, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	:You're not the first to drag up our slogan in to discussions recently. But here's the thing - it's actually a very good thing that we have discussions about new material like this. It's part of what makes a wiki good - people having different views, ideas and opinions which help to shape the content of the wiki. I made my post about wanting to bring forward the deletion in order to hasten the arguments of others so we didn't ponder for too long on the issue of deletion - at that point it seems some very good arguments had been made for deletion and not many against, and that means if it warranted deletion, it warranted a far quicker close to the discussion.		:You're not the first to drag up our slogan in to discussions recently. But here's the thing - it's actually a very good thing that we have discussions about new material like this. It's part of what makes a wiki good - people having different views, ideas and opinions which help to shape the content of the wiki. I made my post about wanting to bring forward the deletion in order to hasten the arguments of others so we didn't ponder for too long on the issue of deletion - at that point it seems some very good arguments had been made for deletion and not many against, and that means if it warranted deletion, it warranted a far quicker close to the discussion.
	:Yes we have prank calls on the CWCki already, but that's more of a maintenance of status quo rather than a concerted effort to keep them here. Similar to the [[fail]] article, people can't make up their mind one way or another. I didn't want this article to be the same and the debate to stagnate. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:14, 12 December 2011 (PST)		:Yes we have prank calls on the CWCki already, but that's more of a maintenance of status quo rather than a concerted effort to keep them here. Similar to the fail article, people can't make up their mind one way or another. I didn't want this article to be the same and the debate to stagnate. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:14, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	::So, to make a brief resume: we got some new, important content about Christian in the form of a phone call like many others (other calls that the CWC Wiki still hosts or mirrors), but it'll be deleted because some people feel uneasy about having it here. I can't see the logic behind all this. I think that some people are just scared about this call bringing legal trouble to the CWC Wiki (it's still a perfectly legal and valid call), and fearing that Rocky's privacy will be violated (I still don't know how, since the call doesn't reveal any personal information about Rocky). By the way, I'd like to know which are those "very good arguments". Cheers. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 11:19, 12 December 2011 (PST)		::So, to make a brief resume: we got some new, important content about Christian in the form of a phone call like many others (other calls that the CWC Wiki still hosts or mirrors), but it'll be deleted because some people feel uneasy about having it here. I can't see the logic behind all this. I think that some people are just scared about this call bringing legal trouble to the CWC Wiki (it's still a perfectly legal and valid call), and fearing that Rocky's privacy will be violated (I still don't know how, since the call doesn't reveal any personal information about Rocky). By the way, I'd like to know which are those "very good arguments". Cheers. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 11:19, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	::Well it won't be deleted as we resolved not to delete it. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 13:07, 12 December 2011 (PST)		::Well it won't be deleted as we resolved not to delete it. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 13:07, 12 December 2011 (PST)

Sonijew is back: /* Proposed page 'infestation' */

2011-12-16T10:40:41Z

Proposed page 'infestation'

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 16 December 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)		Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)		*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [[Jackie E-mails 16]]		** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [[Jackie E-mails 16]][[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	[[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	There is [[house]]. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 02:40, 16 December 2011 (PST)		There is [[house]]. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 02:40, 16 December 2011 (PST)

Sonijew is back: /* Proposed page 'infestation' */

2011-12-16T10:40:27Z

Proposed page 'infestation'

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 16 December 2011
Line 63:		Line 63:
	** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [[Jackie E-mails 16]]		** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [[Jackie E-mails 16]]
	[[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)		[[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)
			There is [[house]]. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 02:40, 16 December 2011 (PST)

Slimz: /* Proposed page 'infestation' */

2011-12-14T17:56:08Z

Proposed page 'infestation'

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 14 December 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)		Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)		*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [Jackie E-mails 16]		** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [[Jackie E-mails 16]]
	[[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)		[[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)

Slimz: /* Proposed page 'infestation' */

2011-12-14T17:55:05Z

Proposed page 'infestation'

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 14 December 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)		Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)		*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)		** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [Jackie E-mails 16]
			[[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)

Slimz: /* Proposed page 'infestation' */

2011-12-14T17:49:54Z

Proposed page 'infestation'

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 14 December 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)		Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)		*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)
			** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)

Giantgroundsloth: /* Proposed page 'infestation' */

2011-12-14T17:37:32Z

Proposed page 'infestation'

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 14 December 2011
Line 60:		Line 60:
	==Proposed page 'infestation'==		==Proposed page 'infestation'==
	Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)		Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)
			*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)

Slimz at 17:32, 14 December 2011

2011-12-14T17:32:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 14 December 2011
Line 57:		Line 57:

	::::What an amazing and incredibly valuable fact for the CWCki. The call won't be split up, I guess that's the end of it. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 14:28, 13 December 2011 (PST)		::::What an amazing and incredibly valuable fact for the CWCki. The call won't be split up, I guess that's the end of it. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 14:28, 13 December 2011 (PST)

			==Proposed page 'infestation'==
			Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)

Xavier at 22:28, 13 December 2011

2011-12-13T22:28:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 13 December 2011
Line 55:		Line 55:

	:::I had no problem following the call while reading over my gf's shoulder as she read through too. And usually that's harder to do than reading at your own pace. Also it didn't take long at all. I'd say it doesn't need sections. [[User:BubonicTheHedgehog\|BubonicTheHedgehog]] 11:33, 13 December 2011 (PST)		:::I had no problem following the call while reading over my gf's shoulder as she read through too. And usually that's harder to do than reading at your own pace. Also it didn't take long at all. I'd say it doesn't need sections. [[User:BubonicTheHedgehog\|BubonicTheHedgehog]] 11:33, 13 December 2011 (PST)

			::::What an amazing and incredibly valuable fact for the CWCki. The call won't be split up, I guess that's the end of it. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 14:28, 13 December 2011 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 24 April 2012
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* ''CWC Wiki, where no shit is too minor''...except when there's more than a manchild involved. Seriously, if we're supposed to document everything that happens in Christian's life, why shouldn't we keep the call? We've already got plenty of calls like this, and it's been clearly stated that there can't be any legal trouble. Of course, Rocky's privacy will be a little diminished, but not more than it already has been thanks to the forums and PVCC. As you can see in the call, she's already getting calls from trolls who are just trying too hard. I think the call should stay, if we take it down, why wouldn't we do the same with all other calls, and Rocky-related content? Also, I don't get why people get so much troll's remorse because of Rocky. Does nobody remember that she's the one who told Chris that he doesn't need therapy? Way to go. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 03:21, 12 December 2011 (PST)		* ''CWC Wiki, where no shit is too minor''...except when there's more than a manchild involved. Seriously, if we're supposed to document everything that happens in Christian's life, why shouldn't we keep the call? We've already got plenty of calls like this, and it's been clearly stated that there can't be any legal trouble. Of course, Rocky's privacy will be a little diminished, but not more than it already has been thanks to the forums and PVCC. As you can see in the call, she's already getting calls from trolls who are just trying too hard. I think the call should stay, if we take it down, why wouldn't we do the same with all other calls, and Rocky-related content? Also, I don't get why people get so much troll's remorse because of Rocky. Does nobody remember that she's the one who told Chris that he doesn't need therapy? Way to go. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 03:21, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	:You're not the first to drag up our slogan in to discussions recently. But here's the thing - it's actually a very good thing that we have discussions about new material like this. It's part of what makes a wiki good - people having different views, ideas and opinions which help to shape the content of the wiki. I made my post about wanting to bring forward the deletion in order to hasten the arguments of others so we didn't ponder for too long on the issue of deletion - at that point it seems some very good arguments had been made for deletion and not many against, and that means if it warranted deletion, it warranted a far quicker close to the discussion.		:You're not the first to drag up our slogan in to discussions recently. But here's the thing - it's actually a very good thing that we have discussions about new material like this. It's part of what makes a wiki good - people having different views, ideas and opinions which help to shape the content of the wiki. I made my post about wanting to bring forward the deletion in order to hasten the arguments of others so we didn't ponder for too long on the issue of deletion - at that point it seems some very good arguments had been made for deletion and not many against, and that means if it warranted deletion, it warranted a far quicker close to the discussion.
	:Yes we have prank calls on the CWCki already, but that's more of a maintenance of status quo rather than a concerted effort to keep them here. Similar to the fail article, people can't make up their mind one way or another. I didn't want this article to be the same and the debate to stagnate. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:14, 12 December 2011 (PST)		:Yes we have prank calls on the CWCki already, but that's more of a maintenance of status quo rather than a concerted effort to keep them here. Similar to the [[fail]] article, people can't make up their mind one way or another. I didn't want this article to be the same and the debate to stagnate. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:14, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	::So, to make a brief resume: we got some new, important content about Christian in the form of a phone call like many others (other calls that the CWC Wiki still hosts or mirrors), but it'll be deleted because some people feel uneasy about having it here. I can't see the logic behind all this. I think that some people are just scared about this call bringing legal trouble to the CWC Wiki (it's still a perfectly legal and valid call), and fearing that Rocky's privacy will be violated (I still don't know how, since the call doesn't reveal any personal information about Rocky). By the way, I'd like to know which are those "very good arguments". Cheers. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 11:19, 12 December 2011 (PST)		::So, to make a brief resume: we got some new, important content about Christian in the form of a phone call like many others (other calls that the CWC Wiki still hosts or mirrors), but it'll be deleted because some people feel uneasy about having it here. I can't see the logic behind all this. I think that some people are just scared about this call bringing legal trouble to the CWC Wiki (it's still a perfectly legal and valid call), and fearing that Rocky's privacy will be violated (I still don't know how, since the call doesn't reveal any personal information about Rocky). By the way, I'd like to know which are those "very good arguments". Cheers. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 11:19, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	::Well it won't be deleted as we resolved not to delete it. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 13:07, 12 December 2011 (PST)		::Well it won't be deleted as we resolved not to delete it. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 13:07, 12 December 2011 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 23 April 2012
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* ''CWC Wiki, where no shit is too minor''...except when there's more than a manchild involved. Seriously, if we're supposed to document everything that happens in Christian's life, why shouldn't we keep the call? We've already got plenty of calls like this, and it's been clearly stated that there can't be any legal trouble. Of course, Rocky's privacy will be a little diminished, but not more than it already has been thanks to the forums and PVCC. As you can see in the call, she's already getting calls from trolls who are just trying too hard. I think the call should stay, if we take it down, why wouldn't we do the same with all other calls, and Rocky-related content? Also, I don't get why people get so much troll's remorse because of Rocky. Does nobody remember that she's the one who told Chris that he doesn't need therapy? Way to go. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 03:21, 12 December 2011 (PST)		* ''CWC Wiki, where no shit is too minor''...except when there's more than a manchild involved. Seriously, if we're supposed to document everything that happens in Christian's life, why shouldn't we keep the call? We've already got plenty of calls like this, and it's been clearly stated that there can't be any legal trouble. Of course, Rocky's privacy will be a little diminished, but not more than it already has been thanks to the forums and PVCC. As you can see in the call, she's already getting calls from trolls who are just trying too hard. I think the call should stay, if we take it down, why wouldn't we do the same with all other calls, and Rocky-related content? Also, I don't get why people get so much troll's remorse because of Rocky. Does nobody remember that she's the one who told Chris that he doesn't need therapy? Way to go. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 03:21, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	:You're not the first to drag up our slogan in to discussions recently. But here's the thing - it's actually a very good thing that we have discussions about new material like this. It's part of what makes a wiki good - people having different views, ideas and opinions which help to shape the content of the wiki. I made my post about wanting to bring forward the deletion in order to hasten the arguments of others so we didn't ponder for too long on the issue of deletion - at that point it seems some very good arguments had been made for deletion and not many against, and that means if it warranted deletion, it warranted a far quicker close to the discussion.		:You're not the first to drag up our slogan in to discussions recently. But here's the thing - it's actually a very good thing that we have discussions about new material like this. It's part of what makes a wiki good - people having different views, ideas and opinions which help to shape the content of the wiki. I made my post about wanting to bring forward the deletion in order to hasten the arguments of others so we didn't ponder for too long on the issue of deletion - at that point it seems some very good arguments had been made for deletion and not many against, and that means if it warranted deletion, it warranted a far quicker close to the discussion.
	:Yes we have prank calls on the CWCki already, but that's more of a maintenance of status quo rather than a concerted effort to keep them here. Similar to the [[fail]] article, people can't make up their mind one way or another. I didn't want this article to be the same and the debate to stagnate. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:14, 12 December 2011 (PST)		:Yes we have prank calls on the CWCki already, but that's more of a maintenance of status quo rather than a concerted effort to keep them here. Similar to the fail article, people can't make up their mind one way or another. I didn't want this article to be the same and the debate to stagnate. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:14, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	::So, to make a brief resume: we got some new, important content about Christian in the form of a phone call like many others (other calls that the CWC Wiki still hosts or mirrors), but it'll be deleted because some people feel uneasy about having it here. I can't see the logic behind all this. I think that some people are just scared about this call bringing legal trouble to the CWC Wiki (it's still a perfectly legal and valid call), and fearing that Rocky's privacy will be violated (I still don't know how, since the call doesn't reveal any personal information about Rocky). By the way, I'd like to know which are those "very good arguments". Cheers. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 11:19, 12 December 2011 (PST)		::So, to make a brief resume: we got some new, important content about Christian in the form of a phone call like many others (other calls that the CWC Wiki still hosts or mirrors), but it'll be deleted because some people feel uneasy about having it here. I can't see the logic behind all this. I think that some people are just scared about this call bringing legal trouble to the CWC Wiki (it's still a perfectly legal and valid call), and fearing that Rocky's privacy will be violated (I still don't know how, since the call doesn't reveal any personal information about Rocky). By the way, I'd like to know which are those "very good arguments". Cheers. --[[User:Xavier\|Xavier]] 11:19, 12 December 2011 (PST)
	::Well it won't be deleted as we resolved not to delete it. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 13:07, 12 December 2011 (PST)		::Well it won't be deleted as we resolved not to delete it. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 13:07, 12 December 2011 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 16 December 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)		Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)		*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [[Jackie E-mails 16]]		** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [[Jackie E-mails 16]][[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	[[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	There is [[house]]. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 02:40, 16 December 2011 (PST)		There is [[house]]. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 02:40, 16 December 2011 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 14 December 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)		Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)		*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)		** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki .. EDIT also [Jackie E-mails 16]
			[[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 14 December 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)		Seems that an infestation is an important fact that may (if more details arise) warrant its own page. WOuld love to get some information on who is doing the fumigation and mayby cantact them afterwards to see if any more info could be had [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:32, 14 December 2011 (PST)
	*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)		*there isn't really enough information for a whole page, I doubt, and the only other time I think that the subject of insects in Chris's house was addressed is [[Kacey Call 15]]. Not much to write about... [[User:Giantgroundsloth\|Giantgroundsloth]] 09:37, 14 December 2011 (PST)
			** agreed, maybe a stub. I would be prety sure that its bedbugs considering lumberjack was covered with bites. We could extrapolate enough information to create a stub i think. Im going to search the wiki for any other mentions. Maybe not enough now i think there will eventually be enough to warant it. I just really think that words like "bugs" and "infestation" should at least have a home on the wiki [[User:Slimz\|.-~ Slimz ~-.]] 09:49, 14 December 2011 (PST)