Talk:Scale of Respect - Revision history

Clydec: 13 revisions

2010-01-03T08:45:20Z

13 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:45, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

Champthom at 12:15, 7 December 2009

2009-12-07T12:15:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 7 December 2009
Line 88:		Line 88:
	*Also, yeah, this is what I had in mind in terms of a scale, so thanks Cogs for making this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:45, 7 December 2009 (CET)		*Also, yeah, this is what I had in mind in terms of a scale, so thanks Cogs for making this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:45, 7 December 2009 (CET)
	*i just copied the text from above so i could see what it would look like filled up. it'd be great if we could find a way to get chris to write out his scale of respect for us --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:50, 7 December 2009 (CET)		*i just copied the text from above so i could see what it would look like filled up. it'd be great if we could find a way to get chris to write out his scale of respect for us --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:50, 7 December 2009 (CET)
			:*Possible Mailbag question, perhaps? Wouldn't even have to phrase it as the "Scale of Respect" - maybe just say it's a game and the sender could ask for Chris's opinion, by having them label from 0 to 10 the people they respect. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:15, 7 December 2009 (CET)

	==Congratulations to CrassCrab==		==Congratulations to CrassCrab==
	His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)		His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)

Cogsdev at 08:50, 7 December 2009

2009-12-07T08:50:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 7 December 2009
Line 87:		Line 87:
	:*Fantastic colors, non factual text. My complaint with Rachmann's edit from months ago was that people might think that Chris elaborated his scale of respect somewhere when it's not the case. Either that or we can keep it like this and phrase it in such a way like "This is what Chris actually believes" or some shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:44, 7 December 2009 (CET)		:*Fantastic colors, non factual text. My complaint with Rachmann's edit from months ago was that people might think that Chris elaborated his scale of respect somewhere when it's not the case. Either that or we can keep it like this and phrase it in such a way like "This is what Chris actually believes" or some shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:44, 7 December 2009 (CET)
	*Also, yeah, this is what I had in mind in terms of a scale, so thanks Cogs for making this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:45, 7 December 2009 (CET)		*Also, yeah, this is what I had in mind in terms of a scale, so thanks Cogs for making this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:45, 7 December 2009 (CET)
			*i just copied the text from above so i could see what it would look like filled up. it'd be great if we could find a way to get chris to write out his scale of respect for us --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:50, 7 December 2009 (CET)
	==Congratulations to CrassCrab==		==Congratulations to CrassCrab==
	His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)		His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)

Champthom at 08:45, 7 December 2009

2009-12-07T08:45:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:45, 7 December 2009
Line 86:		Line 86:
	*also just noticed that chris's scale of respect actually has ''eleven'' points. fuck. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:42, 7 December 2009 (CET)		*also just noticed that chris's scale of respect actually has ''eleven'' points. fuck. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:42, 7 December 2009 (CET)
	:*Fantastic colors, non factual text. My complaint with Rachmann's edit from months ago was that people might think that Chris elaborated his scale of respect somewhere when it's not the case. Either that or we can keep it like this and phrase it in such a way like "This is what Chris actually believes" or some shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:44, 7 December 2009 (CET)		:*Fantastic colors, non factual text. My complaint with Rachmann's edit from months ago was that people might think that Chris elaborated his scale of respect somewhere when it's not the case. Either that or we can keep it like this and phrase it in such a way like "This is what Chris actually believes" or some shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:44, 7 December 2009 (CET)
			*Also, yeah, this is what I had in mind in terms of a scale, so thanks Cogs for making this. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:45, 7 December 2009 (CET)
	==Congratulations to CrassCrab==		==Congratulations to CrassCrab==
	His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)		His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)

Champthom at 08:44, 7 December 2009

2009-12-07T08:44:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 7 December 2009
Line 85:		Line 85:
	had some fun with formatting, as you can see. the text colours, as well as the top and bottom boxes, could do with a little work. [http://websitetips.com/colortools/colorblender/ this] will probably help if you want to change the colours. i'm not entirely satisfied with the borders either. try removing the wikitable bit and hitting preview. WILD. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:40, 7 December 2009 (CET)		had some fun with formatting, as you can see. the text colours, as well as the top and bottom boxes, could do with a little work. [http://websitetips.com/colortools/colorblender/ this] will probably help if you want to change the colours. i'm not entirely satisfied with the borders either. try removing the wikitable bit and hitting preview. WILD. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:40, 7 December 2009 (CET)
	*also just noticed that chris's scale of respect actually has ''eleven'' points. fuck. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:42, 7 December 2009 (CET)		*also just noticed that chris's scale of respect actually has ''eleven'' points. fuck. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:42, 7 December 2009 (CET)
			:*Fantastic colors, non factual text. My complaint with Rachmann's edit from months ago was that people might think that Chris elaborated his scale of respect somewhere when it's not the case. Either that or we can keep it like this and phrase it in such a way like "This is what Chris actually believes" or some shit. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 09:44, 7 December 2009 (CET)
	==Congratulations to CrassCrab==		==Congratulations to CrassCrab==
	His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)		His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)

Cogsdev at 08:42, 7 December 2009

2009-12-07T08:42:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:42, 7 December 2009
Line 84:		Line 84:
	\|}		\|}
	had some fun with formatting, as you can see. the text colours, as well as the top and bottom boxes, could do with a little work. [http://websitetips.com/colortools/colorblender/ this] will probably help if you want to change the colours. i'm not entirely satisfied with the borders either. try removing the wikitable bit and hitting preview. WILD. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:40, 7 December 2009 (CET)		had some fun with formatting, as you can see. the text colours, as well as the top and bottom boxes, could do with a little work. [http://websitetips.com/colortools/colorblender/ this] will probably help if you want to change the colours. i'm not entirely satisfied with the borders either. try removing the wikitable bit and hitting preview. WILD. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:40, 7 December 2009 (CET)
			*also just noticed that chris's scale of respect actually has ''eleven'' points. fuck. --[[User:Cogsdev\|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:42, 7 December 2009 (CET)
	==Congratulations to CrassCrab==		==Congratulations to CrassCrab==
	His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)		His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)

Cogsdev at 08:40, 7 December 2009

2009-12-07T08:40:18Z

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 *Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
 ==Congratulations to CrassCrab==
 His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)

Champthom at 07:54, 7 December 2009

2009-12-07T07:54:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:54, 7 December 2009
Line 53:		Line 53:
	With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST)		With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
	*Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST)		*Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST)

			==Congratulations to CrassCrab==
			His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)

Champthom at 20:43, 24 June 2009

2009-06-24T20:43:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 24 June 2009
Line 52:		Line 52:

	With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST)		With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
			*Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST)

Champthom at 18:45, 24 June 2009

2009-06-24T18:45:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 24 June 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* I did a small table, showing what the Scale of Respect theoretically could look like. Everyone, please edit it if you think certain things are wrong. Also add people who I may have forgotten. In the end someone could whip out a decent looking graph in MS paint or whatever. It will be cool. [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 20:24, 24 June 2009 (CEST)		* I did a small table, showing what the Scale of Respect theoretically could look like. Everyone, please edit it if you think certain things are wrong. Also add people who I may have forgotten. In the end someone could whip out a decent looking graph in MS paint or whatever. It will be cool. [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 20:24, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
	::* Fuck you, Champthom, with your funny but not factual. ^^ But srsly, if you wanted a picture, how would that suddenly be "factual"? Or were you just referring to a funny illustrative picture...		::* Fuck you, Champthom, with your funny but not factual. ^^ But srsly, if you wanted a picture, how would that suddenly be "factual"? Or were you just referring to a funny illustrative picture...

	{\| class="wikitable sortable"		{\| class="wikitable sortable"
	\|-		\|-
Line 43:		Line 44:

	Check it out now. [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 20:27, 24 June 2009 (CEST)		Check it out now. [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 20:27, 24 June 2009 (CEST)

			:::*I was thinking just a 1 to 10 point bar, like:

			1 ───────────────────────────────── 10 (Respect)<br>
			No
			Respect

			With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST)