Talk:Some Favored Comedians - Revision history

Thepicklesuitintheman: /* Yeah, I know, not a forum, but. */

2010-09-16T20:23:29Z

Yeah, I know, not a forum, but.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 16 September 2010
Line 68:		Line 68:
	*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	***This. People often mistake characters' statements ~~for~~ their authors' and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)		***This. People often mistake characters' statements as their authors' beliefs and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. (P.S. In regard to NAF, I see this this as a discussion over whether it should be in the article (I don't think it should) so you can't ban me.) --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)
	*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko		Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko

Thepicklesuitintheman: /* Yeah, I know, not a forum, but. */

2010-09-16T18:58:51Z

Yeah, I know, not a forum, but.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 16 September 2010
Line 68:		Line 68:
	*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
			***This. People often mistake characters' statements for their authors' and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)
	*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko		Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko

	:I'm not sure he said that about an autistic teenager meaning to refer directly to himself as he was at the time he was saying it. People often mistake characters' statements for their authors' and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)

	== Chris and Comedy ==		== Chris and Comedy ==

Thepicklesuitintheman: /* Yeah, I know, not a forum, but. */

2010-09-16T18:56:17Z

Yeah, I know, not a forum, but.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 16 September 2010
Line 70:		Line 70:
	*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko		Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko

			:I'm not sure he said that about an autistic teenager meaning to refer directly to himself as he was at the time he was saying it. People often mistake characters' statements for their authors' and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)

	== Chris and Comedy ==		== Chris and Comedy ==

Pfargtl9000: /* Jerry Seinfeld on Chris */ new section

2010-05-29T16:55:25Z

Jerry Seinfeld on Chris: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 29 May 2010
Line 85:		Line 85:

	I just realized the end of his Jerry Sienfeld thing (Which I am a less funny person for having transcribed) is just a repeat of his response to Vivian when she sent him the Toucher and Rich Segment. While I doubt this will become the next "Flies on a Garbage Dump" it always strikes me as interesting when Chris starts recycling a line.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 15:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		I just realized the end of his Jerry Sienfeld thing (Which I am a less funny person for having transcribed) is just a repeat of his response to Vivian when she sent him the Toucher and Rich Segment. While I doubt this will become the next "Flies on a Garbage Dump" it always strikes me as interesting when Chris starts recycling a line.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 15:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

			== Jerry Seinfeld on Chris ==

			[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI3M-Q-7ECg]

			This seems to be from the Attraction Sign days. [[User:Pfargtl9000\|Pfargtl9000 Spam and Eggs]] 16:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

DonnieDarko: /* Yeah, I know, not a forum, but. */

2010-05-26T15:44:09Z

Yeah, I know, not a forum, but.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 26 May 2010
Line 64:		Line 64:
	Has anyone noticed how he referred to himself in the third-person (through Seinfeld) as a teenager?		Has anyone noticed how he referred to himself in the third-person (through Seinfeld) as a teenager?
	Isn't that a bit odd? I know it's old news he's mentally stuck as a teenager, but still. He said it himself.		Isn't that a bit odd? I know it's old news he's mentally stuck as a teenager, but still. He said it himself.
	Edit: Ffff. Didn't re-read the article. For some reasn when I originally wanted to post this, the whole thing error'd on me.		Edit: Ffff. Didn't re-read the article. For some reasn when I originally wanted to post this, the whole thing error'd on me.
	So yeah, ignore my observation.		So yeah, ignore my observation. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)DonnieDarko
	*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

DonnieDarko: /* Yeah, I know, not a forum, but. */

2010-05-26T15:43:09Z

Yeah, I know, not a forum, but.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 26 May 2010
Line 69:		Line 69:
	**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
			Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko

	== Chris and Comedy ==		== Chris and Comedy ==

DStecks at 02:53, 24 May 2010

2010-05-24T02:53:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 23 May 2010
Line 79:		Line 79:
	::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
	:::::Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		:::::Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
			::::::I concur. Sounds like a plan, but what you're talking about would absolutely be a Chris and... page. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:53, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

	== Chris types a phrase, Latches onto it, Never lets go. ==		== Chris types a phrase, Latches onto it, Never lets go. ==

	I just realized the end of his Jerry Sienfeld thing (Which I am a less funny person for having transcribed) is just a repeat of his response to Vivian when she sent him the Toucher and Rich Segment. While I doubt this will become the next "Flies on a Garbage Dump" it always strikes me as interesting when Chris starts recycling a line.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 15:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		I just realized the end of his Jerry Sienfeld thing (Which I am a less funny person for having transcribed) is just a repeat of his response to Vivian when she sent him the Toucher and Rich Segment. While I doubt this will become the next "Flies on a Garbage Dump" it always strikes me as interesting when Chris starts recycling a line.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 15:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Beat: /* Chris types a phrase, Latches onto it, Never lets go. */ new section

2010-05-23T15:54:49Z

Chris types a phrase, Latches onto it, Never lets go.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 23 May 2010
Line 79:		Line 79:
	::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
	:::::Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		:::::Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

			== Chris types a phrase, Latches onto it, Never lets go. ==

			I just realized the end of his Jerry Sienfeld thing (Which I am a less funny person for having transcribed) is just a repeat of his response to Vivian when she sent him the Toucher and Rich Segment. While I doubt this will become the next "Flies on a Garbage Dump" it always strikes me as interesting when Chris starts recycling a line.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 15:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Edward at 15:07, 23 May 2010

2010-05-23T15:07:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 23 May 2010
Line 78:		Line 78:
	::::The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)		::::The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
	::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
			:::::Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* Chris and Comedy */

2010-05-23T13:23:27Z

Chris and Comedy

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 23 May 2010
Line 77:		Line 77:
	:::The "Chris and..." Pages are some of my favorites, so I'm all for creating a "Chris and Comedy/Humor/Whatever" page, assuming there's sufficient material/analysis to justify it. [[User:RobGoblin\|RobGoblin]] 03:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)		:::The "Chris and..." Pages are some of my favorites, so I'm all for creating a "Chris and Comedy/Humor/Whatever" page, assuming there's sufficient material/analysis to justify it. [[User:RobGoblin\|RobGoblin]] 03:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
	::::The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)		::::The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
			::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 16 September 2010
Line 68:		Line 68:
	*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	***This. People often mistake characters' statements ~~for~~ their authors' and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)		***This. People often mistake characters' statements as their authors' beliefs and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. (P.S. In regard to NAF, I see this this as a discussion over whether it should be in the article (I don't think it should) so you can't ban me.) --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)
	*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko		Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 16 September 2010
Line 68:		Line 68:
	*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*Sign your post please. Also, it may be that he was speculating that he'd be confused ''for'' a teenager--he seems convinced that he hasn't changed at all physically since high school.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		**My impression was that he was just talking about some random autistic teenager. Granted, the only person Chris cares about is Chris, so you had better belive that this random teenager would basically be Chris in every way shape and form.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 07:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
			***This. People often mistake characters' statements for their authors' and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)
	*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)		*As I have read earlier, I think he's using the third person because he want to talk about himself while somebody (Rocky) forbids him to do so. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 12:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko		Derp, my bad. [[User:DonnieDarko\|DonnieDarko]] 15:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Donnie Darko

	:I'm not sure he said that about an autistic teenager meaning to refer directly to himself as he was at the time he was saying it. People often mistake characters' statements for their authors' and Chris is notoriously bad at storytelling. For him to think himself a teenager would be a direct disconnect from strict material reality. By all means, correct me if I'm wrong 'cause that would really change my mind on a lot of things about him, but I don't think he's ever demonstrated a definite, y'know... I mean, he's dyscalculiac and shit and he's obviously stupid and he has no idea how people react to him, but the pattern's never been that he's that... like... fucked up. He makes totally untenable claims in overwhelming states of emotion like that Michael Snyder and the Greene County school board are trying to keep him from making any friends and he's just plain ''wrong'' a lot, but to me he seems generally "all there" the way he'd have not to be to think that. --[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 11:56, 16 September 2010 (PDT)

	== Chris and Comedy ==		== Chris and Comedy ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 23 May 2010
Line 79:		Line 79:
	::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
	:::::Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		:::::Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
			::::::I concur. Sounds like a plan, but what you're talking about would absolutely be a Chris and... page. --[[User:DStecks\|DStecks]] 02:53, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

	== Chris types a phrase, Latches onto it, Never lets go. ==		== Chris types a phrase, Latches onto it, Never lets go. ==

	I just realized the end of his Jerry Sienfeld thing (Which I am a less funny person for having transcribed) is just a repeat of his response to Vivian when she sent him the Toucher and Rich Segment. While I doubt this will become the next "Flies on a Garbage Dump" it always strikes me as interesting when Chris starts recycling a line.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 15:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		I just realized the end of his Jerry Sienfeld thing (Which I am a less funny person for having transcribed) is just a repeat of his response to Vivian when she sent him the Toucher and Rich Segment. While I doubt this will become the next "Flies on a Garbage Dump" it always strikes me as interesting when Chris starts recycling a line.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 15:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 23 May 2010
Line 78:		Line 78:
	::::The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)		::::The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
	::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)		::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
			:::::Thats why I suggested a 'Humour' page rather than a 'Chris and Humour' page. I feel that we should make a page just about 'Humour'. One word. Just like 'Parody' or 'Homos'. The Humour page would then talk about Christian's relationship to humour, both random and this sort of shit. Most of the stuff from the current RAH page would go there. Then RAH is turned into a redirect to a small section in Minor CWCisms about the term 'Random Acess Humour' itself, and what exactly it means. Thoughts? --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 15:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 23 May 2010
Line 77:		Line 77:
	:::The "Chris and..." Pages are some of my favorites, so I'm all for creating a "Chris and Comedy/Humor/Whatever" page, assuming there's sufficient material/analysis to justify it. [[User:RobGoblin\|RobGoblin]] 03:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)		:::The "Chris and..." Pages are some of my favorites, so I'm all for creating a "Chris and Comedy/Humor/Whatever" page, assuming there's sufficient material/analysis to justify it. [[User:RobGoblin\|RobGoblin]] 03:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
	::::The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)		::::The Chris And... pages are the ones that should be held to the highest standards, so if you're going to do Chris and Comedy, I suggest you spend some time drafting it first.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 16:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
			::::*As Beat said, the Random-Access Humor is for all extensive purposes "Chris and humor." The thing with "Chris and..." page is that this can be done with any page on the CWCki. The Sonichu comic could easily become "Chris and his comic." [[Bob Chandler]] could easily become "Chris and his father." I think I might have made the first "Chris and..." pages mostly in the same vein of Wikipedia pages where topics that were too long or too distracting to be discussed on a main page would get their own page for a more in depth look (for instance, the Wikipedia page on "Abraham Lincoln's sexuality" would by too long and too distracting in tone and content for the main article on Abraham Lincoln). However I'm not a fan of them because mostly they've become essays which are fun to read but mostly speculative and mostly a way for people to justify their e-psychiatry or whatever personal views of Chris. So yeah, you could easily do "Chris and humor" in Random-Access Humor. I don't think there's really enough incidents of non-random access humor that would warrant its own page. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 13:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)