Talk:Sonichu 8 - Revision history

Dkaien: /* "Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? */

2010-08-23T17:27:05Z

"Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 23 August 2010
Line 36:		Line 36:

	I can't remember which Mailbag it was, but I seem to recall Chris mentioning that it was okay for Sonichu to let his kids watch Family Guy because he "put it into context" for them. I think the South Park article needs a section on the number of times Chris misunderstood the show.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 23 August 2010 (PDT)		I can't remember which Mailbag it was, but I seem to recall Chris mentioning that it was okay for Sonichu to let his kids watch Family Guy because he "put it into context" for them. I think the South Park article needs a section on the number of times Chris misunderstood the show.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 23 August 2010 (PDT)
			:[[Mailbag 21]]. He doesn't actually quote the "context" line, though, I dunno that you could draw too specific a connection there. [[User:Dkaien\|Dkaien]] 10:27, 23 August 2010 (PDT)

MoarLurk at 15:16, 23 August 2010

2010-08-23T15:16:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 23 August 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:
	This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)		This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)
	:Fixed your comment. As for "no 69ing"... "Come on, defy your gravity!" --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 20:04, 21 August 2010 (PDT)		:Fixed your comment. As for "no 69ing"... "Come on, defy your gravity!" --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 20:04, 21 August 2010 (PDT)

			I can't remember which Mailbag it was, but I seem to recall Chris mentioning that it was okay for Sonichu to let his kids watch Family Guy because he "put it into context" for them. I think the South Park article needs a section on the number of times Chris misunderstood the show.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 23 August 2010 (PDT)

SeventhBase: /* "Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? */

2010-08-22T03:04:47Z

"Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 21 August 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:
	== "Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? ==		== "Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? ==

	It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.		It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.
	This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)		This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)
			:Fixed your comment. As for "no 69ing"... "Come on, defy your gravity!" --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 20:04, 21 August 2010 (PDT)

Lenion: /* "Disclaimer"= Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? */

2010-08-22T02:52:18Z

"Disclaimer"= Yet Another Damn South Park Reference?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 21 August 2010
Line 33:		Line 33:
	It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.		It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.
	This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)		This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)

	~~== "Disclaimer"= Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? ==~~

	It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.
	~~This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:52, 21 August 2010 (PDT)~~

Lenion: /* "Disclaimer"= Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? */ new section

2010-08-22T02:52:07Z

"Disclaimer"= Yet Another Damn South Park Reference?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 21 August 2010
Line 33:		Line 33:
	It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.		It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.
	This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)		This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)

			== "Disclaimer"= Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? ==

			It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.
			This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:52, 21 August 2010 (PDT)

Lenion: /* "Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? */ new section

2010-08-22T02:51:53Z

"Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 21 August 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:

	I just realized now that Chris probably changed the camera name to "Quadak" as a portmanteau of "Quahog" and "Kodak" so it's still pronounced KO-dak. Or possibly he actually thinks Kodak is spelled that way. Either way it's retarded. [[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 17:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		I just realized now that Chris probably changed the camera name to "Quadak" as a portmanteau of "Quahog" and "Kodak" so it's still pronounced KO-dak. Or possibly he actually thinks Kodak is spelled that way. Either way it's retarded. [[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 17:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

			== "Disclaimer": Yet Another Damn South Park Reference? ==

			It just occured to me that the disclaimer in the beginning smacks of a South Park episode, "The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers". The basic premise of the episode is that the parents believe the kids have seen a particularly gruesome porno, rather than the ''Lord of the Rings'' movie they had rented. Turns out only Butters watched it (lol). Towards the end, however, the parents catch up with Cartman and the gang and proceed to "put things into context," talking about sexual intercourse and skimming through its various incarnations. The humor, seemingly lost on Chris, is that they didn't need to tell a bunch of 8-year olds about 69ing and double penetration.
			This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)

Mellowyellowsalvation at 17:51, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T17:51:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 30 June 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:

	I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)		I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

			== Family Guy Reference(Sorta) ==

			I just realized now that Chris probably changed the camera name to "Quadak" as a portmanteau of "Quahog" and "Kodak" so it's still pronounced KO-dak. Or possibly he actually thinks Kodak is spelled that way. Either way it's retarded. [[User:Mellowyellowsalvation\|Mellowyellowsalvation]] 17:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Wwwwolf: Double post, sorry

2010-04-15T14:48:52Z

Double post, sorry

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 15 April 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	*I'm assuming Chris is referring to the Joseph MultiColor Coat story, where he forgives his brothers for selling him into slavery. [[User:Meh\|Meh]] 11:09, 1 December 2009 (CET)		*I'm assuming Chris is referring to the Joseph MultiColor Coat story, where he forgives his brothers for selling him into slavery. [[User:Meh\|Meh]] 11:09, 1 December 2009 (CET)
	:*Oh, that Joseph. Seriously, I was in Catholic school for elementary school and I sure as hell don't remember that shit. I do remember Moses wandering around the desert and the whole bit at the beginning of Matthew where it's like "Ezekiel begat Jacob and Jacob begat..." Didn't recall Joseph forgiving his brothers but from what I recall, Joseph si a pretty cool guy who loved God and didn't afraid of anything. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 11:20, 1 December 2009 (CET)		:*Oh, that Joseph. Seriously, I was in Catholic school for elementary school and I sure as hell don't remember that shit. I do remember Moses wandering around the desert and the whole bit at the beginning of Matthew where it's like "Ezekiel begat Jacob and Jacob begat..." Didn't recall Joseph forgiving his brothers but from what I recall, Joseph si a pretty cool guy who loved God and didn't afraid of anything. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 11:20, 1 December 2009 (CET)

	~~== ED references ==~~

	I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

	== ED references ==		== ED references ==

	I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)		I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Wwwwolf: /* ED references */ new section

2010-04-15T14:48:29Z

ED references: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 15 April 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	*I'm assuming Chris is referring to the Joseph MultiColor Coat story, where he forgives his brothers for selling him into slavery. [[User:Meh\|Meh]] 11:09, 1 December 2009 (CET)		*I'm assuming Chris is referring to the Joseph MultiColor Coat story, where he forgives his brothers for selling him into slavery. [[User:Meh\|Meh]] 11:09, 1 December 2009 (CET)
	:*Oh, that Joseph. Seriously, I was in Catholic school for elementary school and I sure as hell don't remember that shit. I do remember Moses wandering around the desert and the whole bit at the beginning of Matthew where it's like "Ezekiel begat Jacob and Jacob begat..." Didn't recall Joseph forgiving his brothers but from what I recall, Joseph si a pretty cool guy who loved God and didn't afraid of anything. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 11:20, 1 December 2009 (CET)		:*Oh, that Joseph. Seriously, I was in Catholic school for elementary school and I sure as hell don't remember that shit. I do remember Moses wandering around the desert and the whole bit at the beginning of Matthew where it's like "Ezekiel begat Jacob and Jacob begat..." Didn't recall Joseph forgiving his brothers but from what I recall, Joseph si a pretty cool guy who loved God and didn't afraid of anything. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 11:20, 1 December 2009 (CET)

			== ED references ==

			I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

	== ED references ==		== ED references ==

	I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)		I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Wwwwolf: /* ED references */ new section

2010-04-15T14:48:23Z

ED references: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 15 April 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	*I'm assuming Chris is referring to the Joseph MultiColor Coat story, where he forgives his brothers for selling him into slavery. [[User:Meh\|Meh]] 11:09, 1 December 2009 (CET)		*I'm assuming Chris is referring to the Joseph MultiColor Coat story, where he forgives his brothers for selling him into slavery. [[User:Meh\|Meh]] 11:09, 1 December 2009 (CET)
	:*Oh, that Joseph. Seriously, I was in Catholic school for elementary school and I sure as hell don't remember that shit. I do remember Moses wandering around the desert and the whole bit at the beginning of Matthew where it's like "Ezekiel begat Jacob and Jacob begat..." Didn't recall Joseph forgiving his brothers but from what I recall, Joseph si a pretty cool guy who loved God and didn't afraid of anything. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 11:20, 1 December 2009 (CET)		:*Oh, that Joseph. Seriously, I was in Catholic school for elementary school and I sure as hell don't remember that shit. I do remember Moses wandering around the desert and the whole bit at the beginning of Matthew where it's like "Ezekiel begat Jacob and Jacob begat..." Didn't recall Joseph forgiving his brothers but from what I recall, Joseph si a pretty cool guy who loved God and didn't afraid of anything. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 11:20, 1 December 2009 (CET)

			== ED references ==

			I thought about this a while ago, but forgot: should this page link to the ED stuff that Chris references, and have links to the pictures Chris nicked? It's pretty clear that Chris read a whole bunch of ED pages unrelated to him to scour for the pictures that appear in the elevator - not just general articles on, um, general depravity, but also articles on [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Branca Branca], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sonicrocksmysocks SRMS], [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger Snogger] and like... though I have no idea why he read those articles, aside of the fact that they were among the previous contenders for the throne of hilarity before Chris came along. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 23 August 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:
	This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)		This would certainly explain why "The Love Hogs" were talking about 69ing when the following sex scene has no 69ing whatsoever, or so I'm told. [[User:Lenion\|Lenion]] 19:51, 21 August 2010 (PDT)
	:Fixed your comment. As for "no 69ing"... "Come on, defy your gravity!" --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 20:04, 21 August 2010 (PDT)		:Fixed your comment. As for "no 69ing"... "Come on, defy your gravity!" --[[User:SeventhBase\|Seventh]][[User Talk:SeventhBase\|Base]] 20:04, 21 August 2010 (PDT)

			I can't remember which Mailbag it was, but I seem to recall Chris mentioning that it was okay for Sonichu to let his kids watch Family Guy because he "put it into context" for them. I think the South Park article needs a section on the number of times Chris misunderstood the show.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 23 August 2010 (PDT)