Talk:Sydney Kirsch - Revision history

Anonymax: moved Talk:Sydney Contacts to Talk:Sydney Kirsch

2010-11-18T22:15:42Z

moved Talk:Sydney Contacts to Talk:Sydney Kirsch

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:15, 18 November 2010
(No difference)

Bealtespip122: /* Relevance? */

2010-09-04T03:34:33Z

Relevance?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 3 September 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
			:* To be honest, I feel like this really didn't add anything as far as information goes although I feel this could just be mentioned somewhere else at best rather than giving it it's own page.[[User:Bealtespip122\|Bealtespip122]] 20:34, 3 September 2010 (PDT)

	== Rename to Sydney Kirsch ==		== Rename to Sydney Kirsch ==

Ronichu: /* Voice? */

2010-05-16T08:20:21Z

Voice?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:20, 16 May 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:

	I'm tempted to add some notes on the fact that "Sydney" is quite obviously a man speaking in a falsetto, but I'm not sure if it would just clutter the page, or even where to really bring it up. I think that might also be why Chris is a bit suspicious about the whole thing: though with his [[Julie\|track record]] who can say... [[User:Inkmonkey\|Inkmonkey]] 23:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)		I'm tempted to add some notes on the fact that "Sydney" is quite obviously a man speaking in a falsetto, but I'm not sure if it would just clutter the page, or even where to really bring it up. I think that might also be why Chris is a bit suspicious about the whole thing: though with his [[Julie\|track record]] who can say... [[User:Inkmonkey\|Inkmonkey]] 23:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

			:*Ronichu is the hybrid Sonichu/Rosechu. That's why his/her voice is so deep. SYDNEY IS ALL WOMAN! --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 08:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Inkmonkey at 23:50, 15 May 2010

2010-05-15T23:50:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 15 May 2010
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Category Trolls. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 12:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)		Category Trolls. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 12:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

			== Voice? ==

			I'm tempted to add some notes on the fact that "Sydney" is quite obviously a man speaking in a falsetto, but I'm not sure if it would just clutter the page, or even where to really bring it up. I think that might also be why Chris is a bit suspicious about the whole thing: though with his [[Julie\|track record]] who can say... [[User:Inkmonkey\|Inkmonkey]] 23:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Frozenblwf: /* Article Name? */

2010-05-15T12:21:58Z

Article Name?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 15 May 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::*I completely agree and said as much. It's not a saga. It's a little more detailed than a prank call, given the leadup, but... Hmm. I'm still inclined to go with it's current name, although it still doesn't seem right to me. Beat is perfect, maybe he can provide a name. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 22:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)		::*I completely agree and said as much. It's not a saga. It's a little more detailed than a prank call, given the leadup, but... Hmm. I'm still inclined to go with it's current name, although it still doesn't seem right to me. Beat is perfect, maybe he can provide a name. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 22:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

	I agree, Sydney Kirsch is fine. On a side note, Chris mentions he has access to pvcc?		I agree, Sydney Kirsch is fine. On a side note, Chris mentions he has access to pvcc? [[User:Frozenblwf\|Frozenblwf]] 22:50, 13 May 2010
	*Well, it could be that or EDF, or somewhere else, but Chris didn't specify which forum he got the info from. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 05:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		*Well, it could be that or EDF, or somewhere else, but Chris didn't specify which forum he got the info from. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 05:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
	*One, sign your fucking posts. Two, he has no access to PVCC. He reads EDF and checks the front page of the CWCki every now and then. That's it. Three, reverse my username.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		*One, sign your fucking posts. Two, he has no access to PVCC. He reads EDF and checks the front page of the CWCki every now and then. That's it. Three, reverse my username.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Sonijew is back: /* Rename to Sydney Kirsch */ new section

2010-05-15T12:19:16Z

Rename to Sydney Kirsch: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 15 May 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

			== Rename to Sydney Kirsch ==

			Category Trolls. --[[User:Sonijew is back\|Sonijew is back]] 12:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: /* Relevance? */

2010-05-14T21:38:00Z

Relevance?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 14 May 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
	:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
			:*I agree that the relevancy of Sydney mostly lies in Chris recognizing publicly a sweetheart troll, and whatever you wish to make out of his comment of him reading troll forums. Also the "Don't hold my cleavage against me" is pretty amusing. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 21:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

	:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Ronichu: /* Relevance? */

2010-05-14T15:53:43Z

Relevance?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 14 May 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
	:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
			:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Schismtracer at 15:31, 14 May 2010

2010-05-14T15:31:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 14 May 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	==Relevance?==		==Relevance?==
	I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
			:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

WarOfTheBees at 14:58, 14 May 2010

2010-05-14T14:58:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:58, 14 May 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::*Sure, if you feel she's worthy of a brief mention. Just mention that Clyde threatened her into doing it and that Chris found her out by reading the troll forums. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 14:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		::*Sure, if you feel she's worthy of a brief mention. Just mention that Clyde threatened her into doing it and that Chris found her out by reading the troll forums. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 14:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
	:::*Done. [[User:Koba\|Koba]] 14:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:::*Done. [[User:Koba\|Koba]] 14:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

			==Relevance?==
			I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 15 May 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::*I completely agree and said as much. It's not a saga. It's a little more detailed than a prank call, given the leadup, but... Hmm. I'm still inclined to go with it's current name, although it still doesn't seem right to me. Beat is perfect, maybe he can provide a name. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 22:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)		::*I completely agree and said as much. It's not a saga. It's a little more detailed than a prank call, given the leadup, but... Hmm. I'm still inclined to go with it's current name, although it still doesn't seem right to me. Beat is perfect, maybe he can provide a name. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 22:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

	I agree, Sydney Kirsch is fine. On a side note, Chris mentions he has access to pvcc?		I agree, Sydney Kirsch is fine. On a side note, Chris mentions he has access to pvcc? [[User:Frozenblwf\|Frozenblwf]] 22:50, 13 May 2010
	*Well, it could be that or EDF, or somewhere else, but Chris didn't specify which forum he got the info from. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 05:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		*Well, it could be that or EDF, or somewhere else, but Chris didn't specify which forum he got the info from. [[User:Fefnir\|Fefnir]] 05:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
	*One, sign your fucking posts. Two, he has no access to PVCC. He reads EDF and checks the front page of the CWCki every now and then. That's it. Three, reverse my username.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		*One, sign your fucking posts. Two, he has no access to PVCC. He reads EDF and checks the front page of the CWCki every now and then. That's it. Three, reverse my username.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 06:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 14 May 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
	:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
			:*I agree that the relevancy of Sydney mostly lies in Chris recognizing publicly a sweetheart troll, and whatever you wish to make out of his comment of him reading troll forums. Also the "Don't hold my cleavage against me" is pretty amusing. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 21:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

	:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 14 May 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		I know, "No shit is too minor", but this really doesn't add anything to the CWC canon. Should we make a page for every failed troll? The only thing I can see that is interesting is that it shows Chris adapting to the trolls. That probably warrants a footnote on the troll page, at best, not a whole article. --[[User:WarOfTheBees\|WarOfTheBees]] 14:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
	:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:You know how scientific claims require evidence, especially when they contradict a previously established fact? Well, Chris recognizing and adapting to reality is a big fucking paradigm shift given his previous behavior, '''especially''' regarding sex offers. [[User:Schismtracer\|Schismtracer]] 15:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
			:* Sydney here- I do agree to a limited extent. Note the very long time between when Sydney was busted, vs when the information was leaked to the CWCki. There were many reasons for this, but amongst them was "Is it worth it?". I was the first to admit that CWCki is for documenting Chris, not trolling attempts, and I've never tried to bigname myself. I DO, however, think that this represents a big shift in Chris's thinking and should be documented- see any pages on Sandy Sasayaki around here? Or Simon Sasayaki? It's not like every troll persona I make gets a page, even if I spoke to Chris directly, or even gets mentioned anywhere. But Sydney is different. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 15:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)