Talk:The Eye of Judgment - Revision history

Blazer: /* Recurring themes! */

2010-07-05T02:30:29Z

Recurring themes!

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 4 July 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game. Especially unjustified when most creatures in any of the games he plays are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings. Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? Even the Pokemon CCG doesn't make a mechanical distinction for male or female beasties. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)		As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game. Especially unjustified when most creatures in any of the games he plays are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings. Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? Even the Pokemon CCG doesn't make a mechanical distinction for male or female beasties. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)
	: Yup, definitely a recurring theme. [[:Image:138-CurseYeHaMeHa.jpg\|Yu-Gi-Oh, too]]. Most TCGs I've seen don't have this sort of card effects, well, you'd have to assume such information would be ''present in all of the cards too''. Otherwise, you get 10-year-olds arguing "That character is a woman!" "No it's not! It's a kawaii bishie!" "Is not!" "Is too!" and then you need to summon tournament judges, then the police and then the fire brigade. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 12:18, 29 September 2009 (CEST)		: Yup, definitely a recurring theme. [[:Image:138-CurseYeHaMeHa.jpg\|Yu-Gi-Oh, too]]. Most TCGs I've seen don't have this sort of card effects, well, you'd have to assume such information would be ''present in all of the cards too''. Otherwise, you get 10-year-olds arguing "That character is a woman!" "No it's not! It's a kawaii bishie!" "Is not!" "Is too!" and then you need to summon tournament judges, then the police and then the fire brigade. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 12:18, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

			==Interesting Find==

			I know we haven't heard much about Chris and this game since the days of Ivy, but apparently Sony has stopped support for this game and will shut off all its online servers come September 30th. Have to wonder how Chris'll take it.--[[User:Blazer\|Blazer]] 02:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Clydec: 10 revisions

2010-01-03T09:00:32Z

10 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:00, 3 January 2010
(No difference)

VanKrause: /* Recurring themes! */

2009-09-29T10:18:26Z

Recurring themes!

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:18, 29 September 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Recurring themes!==		==Recurring themes!==
	As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game. Especially unjustified when most creatures in any of the games he plays are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings. Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? Even the Pokemon CCG doesn't make a mechanical distinction for male or female beasties. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)		As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game. Especially unjustified when most creatures in any of the games he plays are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings. Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? Even the Pokemon CCG doesn't make a mechanical distinction for male or female beasties. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)
			: Yup, definitely a recurring theme. [[:Image:138-CurseYeHaMeHa.jpg\|Yu-Gi-Oh, too]]. Most TCGs I've seen don't have this sort of card effects, well, you'd have to assume such information would be ''present in all of the cards too''. Otherwise, you get 10-year-olds arguing "That character is a woman!" "No it's not! It's a kawaii bishie!" "Is not!" "Is too!" and then you need to summon tournament judges, then the police and then the fire brigade. --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 12:18, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

VanKrause: /* Recurring themes! */

2009-09-29T08:19:23Z

Recurring themes!

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:19, 29 September 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==Recurring themes!==		==Recurring themes!==
	As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game. Especially when ~~your enemies~~ are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings. Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)		As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game. Especially unjustified when most creatures in any of the games he plays are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings. Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? Even the Pokemon CCG doesn't make a mechanical distinction for male or female beasties. [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

VanKrause at 08:14, 29 September 2009

2009-09-29T08:14:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 29 September 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	...''Magic: the Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers'' is available on Hex-Box, and unlike most Wizards of the Coast money-fleecing schemes, features no additional purchases. Get one today! (Not a paid advertisement) --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 09:20, 29 September 2009 (CEST)		...''Magic: the Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers'' is available on Hex-Box, and unlike most Wizards of the Coast money-fleecing schemes, features no additional purchases. Get one today! (Not a paid advertisement) --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 09:20, 29 September 2009 (CEST)
	:I've got mine! [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:11, 29 September 2009 (CEST)		:I've got mine! [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:11, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

			==Recurring themes!==
			As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game. Especially when your enemies are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings. Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

VanKrause: /* In unrelated news... */

2009-09-29T08:11:06Z

In unrelated news...

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:11, 29 September 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:

	...''Magic: the Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers'' is available on Hex-Box, and unlike most Wizards of the Coast money-fleecing schemes, features no additional purchases. Get one today! (Not a paid advertisement) --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 09:20, 29 September 2009 (CEST)		...''Magic: the Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers'' is available on Hex-Box, and unlike most Wizards of the Coast money-fleecing schemes, features no additional purchases. Get one today! (Not a paid advertisement) --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 09:20, 29 September 2009 (CEST)
			:I've got mine! [[User:Ensign disposable\|Ensign disposable]] 10:11, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

VanKrause: New section: In unrelated news...

2009-09-29T07:20:09Z

New section: In unrelated news...

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:20, 29 September 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::* I've always preferred to spell it ''judgment'', seinor. [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)		::* I've always preferred to spell it ''judgment'', seinor. [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)
	:::* Moving it. [[User:Fat Nigger\|Fat Nigger]] 11:39, 24 May 2009 (CEST)		:::* Moving it. [[User:Fat Nigger\|Fat Nigger]] 11:39, 24 May 2009 (CEST)

			== In unrelated news... ==

			...''Magic: the Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers'' is available on Hex-Box, and unlike most Wizards of the Coast money-fleecing schemes, features no additional purchases. Get one today! (Not a paid advertisement) --''[[User:Wwwwolf\|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf\|wake me when you need me]])</span> 09:20, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

VanKrause: Talk:The Eye of Judgement moved to Talk:The Eye of Judgment: spelling error

2009-05-24T09:46:42Z

Talk:The Eye of Judgement moved to Talk:The Eye of Judgment: spelling error

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:46, 24 May 2009
(No difference)

VanKrause at 09:39, 24 May 2009

2009-05-24T09:39:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:39, 24 May 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:* Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)		:* Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)
	::* I've always preferred to spell it ''judgment'', seinor. [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)		::* I've always preferred to spell it ''judgment'', seinor. [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)
			:::* Moving it. [[User:Fat Nigger\|Fat Nigger]] 11:39, 24 May 2009 (CEST)

VanKrause: /* Correction to Title */

2009-05-24T07:52:04Z

Correction to Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:52, 24 May 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It's actually titled "The Eye of Judgment", not "The Eye of Judgement". (I actually prefer the latter spelling, but alas, it's incorrect here.) [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 06:12, 23 May 2009 (CEST)		It's actually titled "The Eye of Judgment", not "The Eye of Judgement". (I actually prefer the latter spelling, but alas, it's incorrect here.) [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 06:12, 23 May 2009 (CEST)
	:* Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)		:* Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)
			::* I've always preferred to spell it ''judgment'', seinor. [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:39, 24 May 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:* Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)		:* Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)
	::* I've always preferred to spell it ''judgment'', seinor. [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)		::* I've always preferred to spell it ''judgment'', seinor. [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)
			:::* Moving it. [[User:Fat Nigger\|Fat Nigger]] 11:39, 24 May 2009 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:52, 24 May 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It's actually titled "The Eye of Judgment", not "The Eye of Judgement". (I actually prefer the latter spelling, but alas, it's incorrect here.) [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 06:12, 23 May 2009 (CEST)		It's actually titled "The Eye of Judgment", not "The Eye of Judgement". (I actually prefer the latter spelling, but alas, it's incorrect here.) [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 06:12, 23 May 2009 (CEST)
	:* Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)		:* Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)
			::* I've always preferred to spell it ''judgment'', seinor. [[User:Axe\|Axe]] 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)