Talk:The GAMe PLACe - Revision history

Champthom: God, I haven't edited in so long

2014-06-18T00:39:33Z

God, I haven't edited in so long

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 17 June 2014
Line 80:		Line 80:
	:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)		:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

	::::I prefer that information be vetted by someone in the know, like [[canine\|~~User:~~canine]] or myself. I'm not familiar with this e-mail. It's entirely possible it's real, I don't really see the huge benefit of making up something that's pretty trivial when it comes to Chris. My only issue is that there are people who enjoy making up fake Chris content to screw around with people, I know I've seen people claim they've made up stuff on the CWCki and that it's still there but wouldn't reveal what it was. It could very well be real, again I doubt someone would make something that insignificant up, but I personally prefer err on the side of reason. If you insist on having the e-mail, I would have a disclaimer saying that it's a supposed e-mail and that people can judge for themselves if it's authentic or not until we can actually can do so but personally I would prefer to not have it.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] ([[User talk:Champthom\|talk]]) 00:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)		::::I prefer that information be vetted by someone in the know, like [[User:canine\|canine]] or myself. I'm not familiar with this e-mail. It's entirely possible it's real, I don't really see the huge benefit of making up something that's pretty trivial when it comes to Chris. My only issue is that there are people who enjoy making up fake Chris content to screw around with people, I know I've seen people claim they've made up stuff on the CWCki and that it's still there but wouldn't reveal what it was. It could very well be real, again I doubt someone would make something that insignificant up, but I personally prefer err on the side of reason. If you insist on having the e-mail, I would have a disclaimer saying that it's a supposed e-mail and that people can judge for themselves if it's authentic or not until we can actually can do so but personally I would prefer to not have it.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] ([[User talk:Champthom\|talk]]) 00:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

	::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
	:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Champthom: /* 16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer */

2014-06-18T00:38:57Z

16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 17 June 2014
Line 79:		Line 79:

	:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)		:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

			::::I prefer that information be vetted by someone in the know, like [[canine\|User:canine]] or myself. I'm not familiar with this e-mail. It's entirely possible it's real, I don't really see the huge benefit of making up something that's pretty trivial when it comes to Chris. My only issue is that there are people who enjoy making up fake Chris content to screw around with people, I know I've seen people claim they've made up stuff on the CWCki and that it's still there but wouldn't reveal what it was. It could very well be real, again I doubt someone would make something that insignificant up, but I personally prefer err on the side of reason. If you insist on having the e-mail, I would have a disclaimer saying that it's a supposed e-mail and that people can judge for themselves if it's authentic or not until we can actually can do so but personally I would prefer to not have it.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] ([[User talk:Champthom\|talk]]) 00:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

	::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
	:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

NegaCWC: /* 16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer */

2014-06-17T20:10:17Z

16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 17 June 2014
Line 81:		Line 81:

	::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
			:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Alan Pardew: /* 16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer */

2014-06-17T14:54:39Z

16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:54, 17 June 2014
Line 79:		Line 79:

	:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)		:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

			::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

NegaCWC: /* 16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer */

2014-06-09T20:28:06Z

16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 9 June 2014
Line 77:		Line 77:

	::The pastebin was put up anonymously on 4 Feb 2012, so someone had to have known about the email on that day or earlier but apparently kept it very quiet. Are leaked emails typically verified? -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 20:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)		::The pastebin was put up anonymously on 4 Feb 2012, so someone had to have known about the email on that day or earlier but apparently kept it very quiet. Are leaked emails typically verified? -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 20:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

			:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

CWCTime: /* 16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer */ reply to NegaCWC

2014-06-09T20:15:42Z

16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer: reply to NegaCWC

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 9 June 2014
Line 75:		Line 75:

	:I'd like to know if there are any objections to having the CWCki regard this email as authentic. If not, it should be added to the list of Chris's emails and a brief mention of it should be made on this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 18:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)		:I'd like to know if there are any objections to having the CWCki regard this email as authentic. If not, it should be added to the list of Chris's emails and a brief mention of it should be made on this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 18:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

			::The pastebin was put up anonymously on 4 Feb 2012, so someone had to have known about the email on that day or earlier but apparently kept it very quiet. Are leaked emails typically verified? -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 20:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

NegaCWC: /* 16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer */

2014-06-09T18:30:18Z

16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 9 June 2014
Line 72:		Line 72:

	Someone on the forums [http://cwckiforums.com/threads/sonichu-drawing-for-sale.3785/page-126#post-245253 turned up] a 16 Jan 2004 [http://pastebin.com/bGBtD7yz email] of a proposed Pokémon TCG flyer from Chris, sent from Bob's IAMMRC@aol.com address to a John Crowl (or Crowll, not sure). I'm not sure if it is important enough to add to this article, but I extracted the attached file, uploaded a PNG of it, and [http://www.sonichu.com/cwcki/User:CWCTime/16Jan2004Email archived the email on my user page] for posterity. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 15:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)		Someone on the forums [http://cwckiforums.com/threads/sonichu-drawing-for-sale.3785/page-126#post-245253 turned up] a 16 Jan 2004 [http://pastebin.com/bGBtD7yz email] of a proposed Pokémon TCG flyer from Chris, sent from Bob's IAMMRC@aol.com address to a John Crowl (or Crowll, not sure). I'm not sure if it is important enough to add to this article, but I extracted the attached file, uploaded a PNG of it, and [http://www.sonichu.com/cwcki/User:CWCTime/16Jan2004Email archived the email on my user page] for posterity. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 15:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
			:No shit is too minor. Presuming that this email is authentic, it's content should be copied to [[Chris emails 2004-2006]]. While the authenticity of several Chris related pastebins have come under suspicion on this wiki, I don't see a reason to be suspicious of this one. As far as I gather, the email address that Chris uses in this paste bin hasn't been known to the CWC community until Chris posted it on Facebook a couple of days ago, so a forger shouldn't have known it. Likewise, the email in question is fairly innocuous; I find it hard to think of a reason for forging something like this.

			:I'd like to know if there are any objections to having the CWCki regard this email as authentic. If not, it should be added to the list of Chris's emails and a brief mention of it should be made on this article. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 18:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

CWCTime: /* 16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer */ new section

2014-06-09T15:56:59Z

16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 9 June 2014
Line 68:		Line 68:

	Pretty unlikely. The name change came when Mike bought the place from the pedofork guy. And I suppose the new name shows that it doesn't just sell video games. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 09:02, 7 January 2014 (PST)		Pretty unlikely. The name change came when Mike bought the place from the pedofork guy. And I suppose the new name shows that it doesn't just sell video games. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 09:02, 7 January 2014 (PST)

			== 16 Jan 2004 Pokémon TCG flyer ==

			Someone on the forums [http://cwckiforums.com/threads/sonichu-drawing-for-sale.3785/page-126#post-245253 turned up] a 16 Jan 2004 [http://pastebin.com/bGBtD7yz email] of a proposed Pokémon TCG flyer from Chris, sent from Bob's IAMMRC@aol.com address to a John Crowl (or Crowll, not sure). I'm not sure if it is important enough to add to this article, but I extracted the attached file, uploaded a PNG of it, and [http://www.sonichu.com/cwcki/User:CWCTime/16Jan2004Email archived the email on my user page] for posterity. -[[User:CWCTime\|CWCTime]] ([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 15:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Eamoo: /* Name Change */

2014-01-07T17:02:31Z

Name Change

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 7 January 2014
Line 66:		Line 66:
	Any indication that this is because of its online association with Chris as The GAMe PLACe, which would be lulzy as hell?		Any indication that this is because of its online association with Chris as The GAMe PLACe, which would be lulzy as hell?
	--[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 20:43, 6 January 2014 (PST)		--[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 20:43, 6 January 2014 (PST)

			Pretty unlikely. The name change came when Mike bought the place from the pedofork guy. And I suppose the new name shows that it doesn't just sell video games. [[User:Eamoo\|Eamoo]] 09:02, 7 January 2014 (PST)

Thepicklesuitintheman at 04:43, 7 January 2014

2014-01-07T04:43:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 7 January 2014
Line 60:		Line 60:
	Looking at the February Facebook leaks, it would appear that Chris has taken a 10% off coupon for the game place, added messages to it encouraging people to avoid the store, made several copies and is distributing them at his usual hangouts...Should something about this be added to the article? There's a post by chris about it as well as an image of the edited flyer here: http://sonichu.com/w/images/3/34/Chfb3.png For that matter, should the game place be informed? (I'm not sure if we really want chris to get put in jail here since it'd stop the comedic output)		Looking at the February Facebook leaks, it would appear that Chris has taken a 10% off coupon for the game place, added messages to it encouraging people to avoid the store, made several copies and is distributing them at his usual hangouts...Should something about this be added to the article? There's a post by chris about it as well as an image of the edited flyer here: http://sonichu.com/w/images/3/34/Chfb3.png For that matter, should the game place be informed? (I'm not sure if we really want chris to get put in jail here since it'd stop the comedic output)
	Pretty insane that he's still doing shit like this when he has an outstanding court case for his actions against them.--[[User:IThrewTheFrisbee\|IThrewTheFrisbee]] 17:20, 29 February 2012 (PST)		Pretty insane that he's still doing shit like this when he has an outstanding court case for his actions against them.--[[User:IThrewTheFrisbee\|IThrewTheFrisbee]] 17:20, 29 February 2012 (PST)

			==Name Change==
			The article says that the store's "currently named Cville's Hobbies, Games, and Toys."

			Any indication that this is because of its online association with Chris as The GAMe PLACe, which would be lulzy as hell?
			--[[User:Thepicklesuitintheman\|Thepicklesuitintheman]] 20:43, 6 January 2014 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 17 June 2014
Line 80:		Line 80:
	:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)		:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

	::::I prefer that information be vetted by someone in the know, like [[canine\|~~User:~~canine]] or myself. I'm not familiar with this e-mail. It's entirely possible it's real, I don't really see the huge benefit of making up something that's pretty trivial when it comes to Chris. My only issue is that there are people who enjoy making up fake Chris content to screw around with people, I know I've seen people claim they've made up stuff on the CWCki and that it's still there but wouldn't reveal what it was. It could very well be real, again I doubt someone would make something that insignificant up, but I personally prefer err on the side of reason. If you insist on having the e-mail, I would have a disclaimer saying that it's a supposed e-mail and that people can judge for themselves if it's authentic or not until we can actually can do so but personally I would prefer to not have it.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] ([[User talk:Champthom\|talk]]) 00:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)		::::I prefer that information be vetted by someone in the know, like [[User:canine\|canine]] or myself. I'm not familiar with this e-mail. It's entirely possible it's real, I don't really see the huge benefit of making up something that's pretty trivial when it comes to Chris. My only issue is that there are people who enjoy making up fake Chris content to screw around with people, I know I've seen people claim they've made up stuff on the CWCki and that it's still there but wouldn't reveal what it was. It could very well be real, again I doubt someone would make something that insignificant up, but I personally prefer err on the side of reason. If you insist on having the e-mail, I would have a disclaimer saying that it's a supposed e-mail and that people can judge for themselves if it's authentic or not until we can actually can do so but personally I would prefer to not have it.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] ([[User talk:Champthom\|talk]]) 00:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

	::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
	:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 17 June 2014
Line 79:		Line 79:

	:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)		:::There's isn't any official CWCki policy regarding how to verify the authencity of a leaked email. As I see it, the rule of thumb here is that if the leaked email was revealed to the public by a person which the CWCki regards as reliable (i.e Champthom, Alec or Marvin) than it's considered legit. While the email wasn't leaked by someone that is considered to be a reputable source, as I said before it's hard for me to see it as a forgery. Therefore, I think it should be treated as genuine on the CWCki, but I'd like to see if there are any objections before taking further steps. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

			::::I prefer that information be vetted by someone in the know, like [[canine\|User:canine]] or myself. I'm not familiar with this e-mail. It's entirely possible it's real, I don't really see the huge benefit of making up something that's pretty trivial when it comes to Chris. My only issue is that there are people who enjoy making up fake Chris content to screw around with people, I know I've seen people claim they've made up stuff on the CWCki and that it's still there but wouldn't reveal what it was. It could very well be real, again I doubt someone would make something that insignificant up, but I personally prefer err on the side of reason. If you insist on having the e-mail, I would have a disclaimer saying that it's a supposed e-mail and that people can judge for themselves if it's authentic or not until we can actually can do so but personally I would prefer to not have it.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] ([[User talk:Champthom\|talk]]) 00:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

	::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		::::Not objecting to it and I find it genuine, but can't find the posts. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
	:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)		:::::If you're referring to the CWCki forums posts and the pastbin, the links are in the first edit of this comment thread. If you're want see confirmation from Chris that this is indeed an email address of his, see [https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=666975556730260&set=a.278642068896946.64983.100002534669114&type=1 here]. - [[User:NegaCWC\|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC\|talk]]) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)