Talk:The Journey to the Merge - Revision history

SpookyBones: n.b.

2021-10-27T02:24:04Z

n.b.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 26 October 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[User:Anaxis]] created this page with the following introduction:		[[User:Anaxis]] created this page with the following introduction:
	: On 23 January 2021, a set of screenshots were publicly released by Watchmen member Lainchu ...		: On 23 January 2021, a set of screenshots were publicly released by Watchmen member Lainchu ...
	As we know from this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis1.png]]</ref>, this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis2.png]]</ref>, and this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis3.png]]</ref>, among others, Anaxis ''was'' Lainchu at that time. Had she kept it to "conversations with Lainchu/the Lainchu RP account" or something like that, it might be a little less egregious, but here she's claiming that Lainchu was (a) an actual person and (b) not her. Now, not wanting to get your name involved with Chris content is totally understandable ... which is why she's using the name Anaxis and not her government.		As we know from this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis1.png]]</ref>, this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis2.png]]</ref>, and this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis3.png]]</ref>, among others, Anaxis ''was'' Lainchu at that time. Had she* kept it to "conversations with Lainchu/the Lainchu RP account" or something like that, it might be a little less egregious, but here she's claiming that Lainchu was (a) an actual person and (b) not her. Now, not wanting to get your name involved with Chris content is totally understandable ... which is why she's using the name Anaxis and not her government.

			:(*I've actually heard it both ways, that Anaxis was a guy or a girl, but I think the latter, dunno.)

	She's bullshitting around hard here, and combined with the efforts of [[User:Hurful Truth Level]] ([[User_talk:Anaxis#CWCki Jerkop\|who granted her jannie privileges]] on the Wiki in April 2021) to redact her identity from the [[Watchmen]] page, there's a very clear effort to scrub her involvement with that group and with fucking around with Chris in general. It is all suspect as hell. The various highly selective "Watchmen leaks" from their Discord were also a pet project of hers (although one imagines they could not have been done without the approval of, at the very least, Naught, at least given that Anaxis stayed around.) Anaxis left the Watchmen and went with Sean's splinter group (the Knights of CWC) from which she leaks nothing (or even acknowldge their existence) and then goes dark around the time of the merge.		She's bullshitting around hard here, and combined with the efforts of [[User:Hurful Truth Level]] ([[User_talk:Anaxis#CWCki Jerkop\|who granted her jannie privileges]] on the Wiki in April 2021) to redact her identity from the [[Watchmen]] page, there's a very clear effort to scrub her involvement with that group and with fucking around with Chris in general. It is all suspect as hell. The various highly selective "Watchmen leaks" from their Discord were also a pet project of hers (although one imagines they could not have been done without the approval of, at the very least, Naught, at least given that Anaxis stayed around.) Anaxis left the Watchmen and went with Sean's splinter group (the Knights of CWC) from which she leaks nothing (or even acknowldge their existence) and then goes dark around the time of the merge.

SpookyBones at 01:03, 27 October 2021

2021-10-27T01:03:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 26 October 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:
	: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
	:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.		:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.
	:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too even though [[User:Anaxis]] was not yet staff at the time.		:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently) because these groups by their nature skulk around in the shadows. They hardly publish membership lists. It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too even though [[User:Anaxis]] was not yet staff at the time.

	:: Especially since this is not a Wiki open to random people from the general public there's an implied level of trust with people who are granted an account. It's been broken repeatedly and so far without consequences.		:: Especially since this is not a Wiki open to random people from the general public there's an implied level of trust with people who are granted an account. It's been broken repeatedly and so far without consequences.

	:: I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		:: I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

SpookyBones at 01:02, 27 October 2021

2021-10-27T01:02:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 26 October 2021
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too even though [[User:Anaxis]] was not yet staff at the time.		:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too even though [[User:Anaxis]] was not yet staff at the time.

	Especially since this is not a Wiki open to random people from the general public there's an implied level of trust with people who are granted an account. It's been broken repeatedly and so far without consequences.		:: Especially since this is not a Wiki open to random people from the general public there's an implied level of trust with people who are granted an account. It's been broken repeatedly and so far without consequences.

	I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		:: I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

SpookyBones at 01:02, 27 October 2021

2021-10-27T01:02:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 26 October 2021
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.		:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.
	:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too even though [[User:Anaxis]] was not yet staff at the time.		:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too even though [[User:Anaxis]] was not yet staff at the time.

			Especially since this is not a Wiki open to random people from the general public there's an implied level of trust with people who are granted an account. It's been broken repeatedly and so far without consequences.

	I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

SpookyBones at 01:01, 27 October 2021

2021-10-27T01:01:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 26 October 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:
	: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
	:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.		:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.
	:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too. I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too even though [[User:Anaxis]] was not yet staff at the time.

			I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

SpookyBones at 01:00, 27 October 2021

2021-10-27T01:00:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 26 October 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:
	: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
	:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.		:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.
	:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. Sockpuppeting to do so is on another level especially if you are [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|staff]] but what happened in this case is a big problem too. I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

SpookyBones: /* Deceptive attribution */

2021-10-27T00:59:44Z

Deceptive attribution

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 26 October 2021
Line 17:		Line 17:
	: I don't really know enough about the situation to say much more, so I'll leave that to other editors. More action definitely needs to happen, though.		: I don't really know enough about the situation to say much more, so I'll leave that to other editors. More action definitely needs to happen, though.
	: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)		: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
			:: I'm pretty much the opposite as far as the first part goes, I know pretty much nothing about Wikis (thanks for pointing out the image links, should work now) but am very comfortable on the Farms and places like that. It's a different mindset for sure but in a perfect world we'd complement each other, after all, "CWCki forums" and all that.
			:: You're definitely on the right track as far as restricting people from editing articles on subjects that concern them. The unfortunate thing about this is that I guess that would have to be a self-report thing unless people are outright exposed (as has been happening recently.) It would be a good start, though. An absolute minimum. And as far as the rest goes, concealing involvement should be grounds for a ban, no questions asked. There were far too many weird Discord gayops and general fuckery in the leadup to the Merge, including, I'm sure, a lot of stuff that we don't even know about. The fact that people are not only withholding this information but then going around and editing CWCki articles on the subject is, to say the least, problematic. Just the act of editing an article, IMO, if we're "assuming good faith" (heh) implies ''not actively concealing information on the subject''. I would love to hear the input of others. [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 00:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

4CentUser: fixed dead links

2021-10-27T00:52:03Z

fixed dead links

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 26 October 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[User:Anaxis]] created this page with the following introduction:		[[User:Anaxis]] created this page with the following introduction:
	: On 23 January 2021, a set of screenshots were publicly released by Watchmen member Lainchu ...		: On 23 January 2021, a set of screenshots were publicly released by Watchmen member Lainchu ...
	As we know from this<ref>[[Lainchu_Anaxis1.png]]</ref>, this<ref>[[Lainchu_Anaxis2.png]]</ref>, and this<ref>[[Lainchu_Anaxis3.png]]</ref>, among others, Anaxis ''was'' Lainchu at that time. Had she kept it to "conversations with Lainchu/the Lainchu RP account" or something like that, it might be a little less egregious, but here she's claiming that Lainchu was (a) an actual person and (b) not her. Now, not wanting to get your name involved with Chris content is totally understandable ... which is why she's using the name Anaxis and not her government.		As we know from this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis1.png]]</ref>, this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis2.png]]</ref>, and this<ref>[[:File:Lainchu_Anaxis3.png]]</ref>, among others, Anaxis ''was'' Lainchu at that time. Had she kept it to "conversations with Lainchu/the Lainchu RP account" or something like that, it might be a little less egregious, but here she's claiming that Lainchu was (a) an actual person and (b) not her. Now, not wanting to get your name involved with Chris content is totally understandable ... which is why she's using the name Anaxis and not her government.

	She's bullshitting around hard here, and combined with the efforts of [[User:Hurful Truth Level]] ([[User_talk:Anaxis#CWCki Jerkop\|who granted her jannie privileges]] on the Wiki in April 2021) to redact her identity from the [[Watchmen]] page, there's a very clear effort to scrub her involvement with that group and with fucking around with Chris in general. It is all suspect as hell. The various highly selective "Watchmen leaks" from their Discord were also a pet project of hers (although one imagines they could not have been done without the approval of, at the very least, Naught, at least given that Anaxis stayed around.) Anaxis left the Watchmen and went with Sean's splinter group (the Knights of CWC) from which she leaks nothing (or even acknowldge their existence) and then goes dark around the time of the merge.		She's bullshitting around hard here, and combined with the efforts of [[User:Hurful Truth Level]] ([[User_talk:Anaxis#CWCki Jerkop\|who granted her jannie privileges]] on the Wiki in April 2021) to redact her identity from the [[Watchmen]] page, there's a very clear effort to scrub her involvement with that group and with fucking around with Chris in general. It is all suspect as hell. The various highly selective "Watchmen leaks" from their Discord were also a pet project of hers (although one imagines they could not have been done without the approval of, at the very least, Naught, at least given that Anaxis stayed around.) Anaxis left the Watchmen and went with Sean's splinter group (the Knights of CWC) from which she leaks nothing (or even acknowldge their existence) and then goes dark around the time of the merge.

4CentUser: /* Deceptive attribution */

2021-10-27T00:25:03Z

Deceptive attribution

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 26 October 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	For the record I have tried over time and repeatedly to get in touch with Anaxis and she ignored and eventually outright refused to speak with me.		For the record I have tried over time and repeatedly to get in touch with Anaxis and she ignored and eventually outright refused to speak with me.
	[[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 23:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)		[[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 23:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
			<references/>
			: Yikes. This looks pretty bad.
			: As someone who doesn't browse the Farms much and mainly just {{w\|Wikipedia:WikiGnome\|WikiGnomes}} here, I propose that as a starting measure, editors who have personal connections or a conflict of interest regarding a topic be categorically ''barred'' from editing articles on that topic, similar to how {{w\|Wikipedia:Banning policy#Topic ban\|Wikipedia deals with this kind of thing}}. I don't see any reason why people suspected of being ''in'' the Watchmen are allowed to edit the Watchmen page.
			: I don't really know enough about the situation to say much more, so I'll leave that to other editors. More action definitely needs to happen, though.
			: By the way, [[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]]: the links you're using as sources are dead links. I think you might have forgotten to put "File:" before the names of the images you're linking. You might want to fix that. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 00:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

SpookyBones: /* Deceptive attribution */

2021-10-27T00:12:07Z

Deceptive attribution

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 26 October 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Highly relevant discussion is [[Talk:Watchmen#Should_Klop_and_Anaxis_be_put_under_the_known_members_list\|here]] on the Watchmen talk page.		Highly relevant discussion is [[Talk:Watchmen#Should_Klop_and_Anaxis_be_put_under_the_known_members_list\|here]] on the Watchmen talk page.

	For the record I have tried over time and repeatedly to get in touch with Anaxis and she refused to speak with me.		For the record I have tried over time and repeatedly to get in touch with Anaxis and she ignored and eventually outright refused to speak with me.
	[[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 23:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)		[[User:SpookyBones\|SpookyBones]] ([[User talk:SpookyBones\|talk]]) 23:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)