Talk:Wallflower E-mails 1 - Revision history

Hurtful Truth Level: /* Rename */

2021-10-02T16:35:56Z

Rename

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:35, 2 October 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:

	There's already articles named "Wallflower E-mails 2" and "Wallflower E-mails 3." This page makes it seem like it's covering all of those emails by not being numbered. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 16:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)		There's already articles named "Wallflower E-mails 2" and "Wallflower E-mails 3." This page makes it seem like it's covering all of those emails by not being numbered. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 16:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
			:Good point, renamed the page. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level\|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level\|talk]]) 16:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Hurtful Truth Level: Hurtful Truth Level moved page Talk:Wallflower E-mails to Talk:Wallflower E-mails 1

2021-10-02T16:35:10Z

Hurtful Truth Level moved page Talk:Wallflower E-mails to Talk:Wallflower E-mails 1

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:35, 2 October 2021
(No difference)

4CentUser: /* Rename */ new section

2021-10-02T16:09:30Z

Rename: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 2 October 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:

	My opinion is to use 'redacted'. Although censored is technically correct, it has a negative conotation in today's society, implying "removal of alternate opinion". In fact, I'd recommend using 'redacted' but piping to the Wallflower Policy. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 05:48, 10 April 2011 (PDT)		My opinion is to use 'redacted'. Although censored is technically correct, it has a negative conotation in today's society, implying "removal of alternate opinion". In fact, I'd recommend using 'redacted' but piping to the Wallflower Policy. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 05:48, 10 April 2011 (PDT)

			== Rename ==

			There's already articles named "Wallflower E-mails 2" and "Wallflower E-mails 3." This page makes it seem like it's covering all of those emails by not being numbered. --[[User:4CentUser\|4CentUser]] ([[User talk:4CentUser\|talk]]) 16:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

4CentUser at 16:08, 2 October 2021

2021-10-02T16:08:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 2 October 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

			==Censoring==
	You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT)		You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT)

	My opinion is to use 'redacted'. Although censored is technically correct, it has a negative conotation in today's society, implying "removal of alternate opinion". In fact, I'd recommend using 'redacted' but piping to the Wallflower Policy. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 05:48, 10 April 2011 (PDT)		My opinion is to use 'redacted'. Although censored is technically correct, it has a negative conotation in today's society, implying "removal of alternate opinion". In fact, I'd recommend using 'redacted' but piping to the Wallflower Policy. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 05:48, 10 April 2011 (PDT)

Ronichu: My thoughts.

2011-04-10T12:48:23Z

My thoughts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 10 April 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:

	You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT)		You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT)

			My opinion is to use 'redacted'. Although censored is technically correct, it has a negative conotation in today's society, implying "removal of alternate opinion". In fact, I'd recommend using 'redacted' but piping to the Wallflower Policy. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 05:48, 10 April 2011 (PDT)

Champthom at 23:00, 9 April 2011

2011-04-09T23:00:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 9 April 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

			You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT)

Caboose -1: Dates have been put in

2010-09-26T04:53:29Z

Dates have been put in

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 26 September 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)
	~~== Yo ==~~

	~~Do we have any dates on these? [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 07:38, 25 September 2010 (PDT)~~

Caboose -1 at 19:44, 25 September 2010

2010-09-25T19:44:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 25 September 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	If chris doesn't believe I fucked The Wallflower now, idk what will. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 00:55, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		If chris doesn't believe I fucked The Wallflower now, idk what will. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 00:55, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

	:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the ~~highest~~ coconut will ~~to fall to the ground eventually~~.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)
	== Yo ==		== Yo ==

	Do we have any dates on these? [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 07:38, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		Do we have any dates on these? [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 07:38, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

Caboose -1 at 19:43, 25 September 2010

2010-09-25T19:43:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 25 September 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	If chris doesn't believe I fucked The Wallflower now, idk what will. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 00:55, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		If chris doesn't believe I fucked The Wallflower now, idk what will. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 00:55, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

			:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the highest coconut will to fall to the ground eventually.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)
	== Yo ==		== Yo ==

	Do we have any dates on these? [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 07:38, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		Do we have any dates on these? [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 07:38, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

RachmaninovDESU: /* Yo */ new section

2010-09-25T14:38:05Z

Yo: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 25 September 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	If chris doesn't believe I fucked The Wallflower now, idk what will. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 00:55, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		If chris doesn't believe I fucked The Wallflower now, idk what will. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 00:55, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

			== Yo ==

			Do we have any dates on these? [[User:RachmaninovDESU\|RachmaninovDESU]] 07:38, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 2 October 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)		:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1\|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)

			==Censoring==
	You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT)		You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT)

	My opinion is to use 'redacted'. Although censored is technically correct, it has a negative conotation in today's society, implying "removal of alternate opinion". In fact, I'd recommend using 'redacted' but piping to the Wallflower Policy. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 05:48, 10 April 2011 (PDT)		My opinion is to use 'redacted'. Although censored is technically correct, it has a negative conotation in today's society, implying "removal of alternate opinion". In fact, I'd recommend using 'redacted' but piping to the Wallflower Policy. --[[User:Ronichu\|Ronichu]] 05:48, 10 April 2011 (PDT)